Cocktails

Under Pandemic Lockdowns, Bartending Is Illegal. Is This the New Prohibition?

What happens to bars in a world where bars as we've always known them are forbidden?

|

For bar culture, this is the darkest time since Prohibition. 

Consuming alcohol is still legal, but bars and bartending as we have long known them are not. Pubs everywhere have either shut down entirely or found themselves limited to takeout and delivery service. The pandemic lockdowns have destroyed our ability to imbibe with friends and strangers, to enjoy the silent comforts of a cheap beer or a well-made cocktail, or to have conversations mediated by oak bartops and the taste of whiskey rather than the dim-blue glow of a screen. They have destroyed an industry—and a community. 

For the bar business, the situation is dire. "Difficulty is definitely the right word for it," says Derek Brown, co-owner of the Columbia Room, one of the premier cocktail bars in Washington, D.C. For many bar staff, he says, the mindset has always been simple: When times are tight, you can always work more shifts. "You hustle a little harder, you work a little longer," he says. "But there is no hustling harder right now. There is only go home." 

Or take-home.

Across the country, bars affected by shutdown orders have begun experimenting with drinks meant to be consumed from the comfort of your kitchen table. Although pre-mixed cocktails have existed in some form for generations, and to-go drinks have been allowed in other countries for years, this is a new frontier for most American cocktail bars, in part because to-go orders weren't legal in most cities until just weeks ago. 

Just as Prohibition left its mark on American drinking culture a century ago—memory-holing classic drinks for generations and ushering in the era of the speakeasy—so too will today's restrictions on bars. This is the New Prohibition. 

Yet the hustle hasn't completely stopped. The loosening of legal restrictions, and the necessity of generating revenue in the worst economy for bars in a century, is already spawning innovations. 

The Columbia Room, for example, is offering takeout and delivery versions of the elaborate pre-made drinks that once helped it win recognition as the best cocktail bar in the country.  The current menu includes the Rugbrød Old Fashioned, a variation on the pre-Prohibition classic that mixes rye with aquavit, honey, salt, and bitters, and the Watermelon Americano, with Campari, blanc vermouth, and watermelon soda. 

But the bar now sells make-at-home cocktail kits as well, consisting of bottled ingredients chosen and made by Columbia Room staff. The daiquiri kit, for example, includes a full bottle of Two James Dr. Bird Jamaican Rum, and 10-ounce bottles of house-made rich simple syrup and clarified lime juice. 

The value proposition is in the selection and the presentation. Sure, you can always make a simple daiquiri at home if you've got rum, lime juice, and sugar. But would you think to make it with that particular rum? Do you even know how to clarify lime juice

The Columbia Room is far from the only bar to rapidly transform its offerings for a world of drinking at home. In New York, Dutch Kills, a much-lauded cocktail joint in Long Island City, has opened a to-go window and is delivering ready-to-drink, fully garnished cocktails, as well as bags of the large-format clear ice preferred by cocktail bars. 

Copycat Co. in Northeast D.C. is offering to-go and delivery cocktails in pitchers, as well as bottles of house-made syrups and measured pours of obscure liquors: You may never find a use for an entire bottle of Giffard's Banane du Bresil banana liqueur, but you can try mixing it into a drink or four at home with a four-ounce pour for just $6. McClellan's Retreat, a petite craft cocktail bar located near Reason's office in D.C. is selling choose-your-own-spirit Old Fashioneds and 58-day barreled-aged Manhattans, among other tipples, for people to pick up. In addition to luxury barware, New York's Death & Co. is now offering a variety of "experience packages." For $2,500, the bar will name a cocktail after you. 

These are just a few of the innovations the lockdown have spawned. As recently as two months ago, products like this simply didn't exist in most U.S. cities. Partly, this was because of legal restrictions on serving alcohol for off-site consumption—restrictions which turned out to be surprisingly easy to lift. "We were granted the ability by a very simple process—to sell cocktails, wine, and beer, for pickup and delivery," says Brown. All it took was an online form.

And some restrictions still apply. Alcohol served to-go in D.C. must be accompanied by food. That's a difficult proposition for bars with tiny food-prep spaces—but not an impossible one. McClellan's Retreat requires customers to purchase a bag of popcorn with each cocktail order. "Obey the letter of the law, if not the intent for which it was written," says McClellan's Retreat bar manager Brian Nixon. 

But there's another reason these options didn't exist before: Most bar owners wanted to own bars, not boozy pickup windows. What bartenders like about their jobs is bartending. 

"It's not that they don't want to be here, it's that they just can't be. And that's really hard for people in our business," says Nixon. 

With the current rules in place, Brown says, "Bartenders can't be bartenders, really. They can't do what they do. Bartenders don't just mix drinks." With the spaces closed, he says, "You're taking away the ritual, the environment, the interaction." You're left with a drink—a good one, hopefully—but it's just a drink. You're missing out on something essential about the experience. 

Still, a good drink shouldn't be dismissed. Which is why some bars have added teaching elements to their offerings. 

The Columbia Room's daiquiri kit, for example, isn't just a package of ingredients; it's a way of showing customers what goes into an especially well-made version of the drink. McClellan's Retreat has started publishing instructional videos on Instagram demonstrating how to make classic cocktails, with the option to "tip" the bartender.  

The New Prohibition, in other words, is already transforming how we drink, what we drink, and where we drink it. "I definitely see business models changing," says Nixon. 

"For the foreseeable future," he says, "there are going to be major changes in bar culture, solely based on the way people are going to be allowed to interact, or feel comfortable interacting with others in confined spaces." As drinking moves into the home, he suspects that more people will be "educated on what it takes to make a balanced cocktail." 

Batched cocktails, to-go orders, delivery service, craft ingredients—these are valuable innovations, but they won't save the bar industry as we've known it. At best, they will allow for a kind of economic hibernation. "This is not going to save anybody's business," Brown says. "What it's going to do is help them live a little longer." The Columbia Room normally employs 19 people, says Brown. In lockdown, they've retained just three. 

He doesn't see his bar continuing to-go or delivery service after it's allowed to reopen. ("The value proposition is the environment.") But he could see other bars continuing with the option, or new establishments taking up the business model, which has already started to happen in China. 

The rapid experimentation and innovation in the bar business is, in one way, a reason to hope. An industry that could have been wiped out entirely is, day by day, finding ways to survive, to serve customers, to provide something, however imperfect or insufficient, in a time of chaos and distress. 

But make no mistake: Before or just after this is over, many bars will close. Servers and bartenders will lose their livelihoods. Owners will lose their investments and dreams of success. And patrons will lose places that mattered to them—places that gave their lives rest, relaxation, friendship, community, comfort, and pleasure. Bars are far from the only businesses that will be affected by the lockdowns. But for many, including myself, they are special places, and the losses will be particularly felt. 

"We have taken bars and bartending for granted in some ways," says Brown. "We didn't know how much they added to our lives." The New Prohibition, like the old Prohibition, will take a great toll. 

Yet the old Prohibition also offers a reminder and even a kind of hope. Eventually, it ended. And when it did, the bars came back. "That's one thing about the hospitality industry—and the bar side in particular," says Nixon. "Take Prohibition, for example. We always find a way."

NEXT: 2 Decades of Dubious Surveillance Will Make It Much Harder To Track COVID-19 Now

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Nobody needs 27 different kinds of cocktails.

    1. Victory Gin will do!

    2. At least not while there are children walking around sober.

    3. Hannah G Gregg, It is very boring for me, talk to me! Write me. Maybe we will make friends. Looking for hook up with a stranger! Ready for any experiments. –==>>> Raed About

  2. My nieces made me real proud when they scrimped and saved and then started up a nail salon business. They don’t have an option to send you finished nails for free, and no instagram posting or youtube video is going to earn them money.

    If I’m a millennial, like them, I really do wonder why the fuck I should bother. They follow the american dream, and old fuckers destroy their business.

    1. Don’t close; find a good lawyer who works pro bono or on deferred commission, and sue the hell out of everybody. Lead public protests. Start recall petitions on the fascists. Riot.

    2. …. I really do wonder why the fuck I should bother.
      I didn’t know life had risks!

      1. Life has risks. The government arbitrarily making it illegal for you to engage in your business with zero recourse shouldn’t be one of them.

        1. “Should” and all the various conjugates are useless words .

        2. Actually, it is one of the risks. Government provides many risks to your business.

          1. It’s true that government is absolutely a risk, to any business, to some degree. However, as is the case with any risk, one must factor in the degree of risk in terms of the likelihood it will be realized and the impact on the business. The impact can range from, say, a new license being imposed that costs an extra $10 a month to your business being declared illegal and being permanently shut down with no compensation. Currently these businesses are not in the latter category (permanently shut down), but a long term temporary shut down is not far off- definitely on the extreme end of the impact spectrum. Now looking at the other part of the equation, for a nail salon or hairdresser, the probability of something on the order of the $10 license occurring and affecting your business is relatively high probability, while the arbitrary enforced government shutdown is, one would have thought a couple months ago, so minuscule as to hardly be worth considering. I would contrast this to, say, a business selling marijuana in a state where it is currently legal, or a vape shop, or a strip club, or making high capacity magazines for AR rifles, or manufacturing whatever the current equivalent of a bump stock is… if the focus of your business is something controversial like that, you damn well better have contingency plans in place for if the government suddenly declares your product or service illegal, because the probability of a very high impact event stemming from government action is quite a bit higher than an innocuous business like a nail salon. But with what has happened in the past few weeks, what we thought we knew about relative risks from certain areas (especially government action) is out the window. All of a sudden nothing is safe, and it’s just not realistic to say “well, you should have known that could happen.” A lot of things COULD happen, but one has to assume some sort of rationality in assessing the risk of what actually will.

            I have to wonder what impact this will have on things like business loans going forward. How much harder will it be to get a loan for a restaurant or bar or whatever, now that the government (and society) have made it clear that these business are subject immediate shutdown for an indefinite period based upon the whims of the state executives? Again, some will say “well that’s always been a possibility,” which may be true, but it has never really been acted on, at least on this scale. If this is truly a once in a century (at least) event, then OK, it doesn’t change things that much. But I don’t believe that, and I don’t think anyone in risk management should right now either. We have shown that as a society, we are willing to sow massive economic destruction for relatively modest reasons. And everyone is going to have to pay for that in the future- it’s going to cost more to operate restaurants and bars because now they have to price in the possibility that they can be shut down with the flimsiest of justifications.

            1. What do you suppose are the low risk careers for the coming generation? Health care? Farming? Law enforcement?

    3. I have to think that hairstylists and the like are getting hammered in this. Many of them rent their chairs in a salon- basically, they are an independent business of one leasing space from a salon owner. So they are not employees, with unemployment benefits, etc. And the risk/reward for operating that way typically isn’t that bad- one of the key advantages of being a hairstylist is that it is a portable skill that has a reasonably stable demand; you should never really have to worry all that much about being out of work, because hair is always going to need to be cut and it is relatively easy to pack up your shears and combs and blowdryer and find another salon at which to get a chair. So I can’t blame hairstylists and the like for not having overly large contingency plans/emergency funds/etc. for hard times- one of the basic tenets of the profession is that there is always SOME way to work if you want to. Unless, as it turns out, the government makes it illegal for anyone to seek out your services and/or for you to provide them.

      1. Maybe do it remotely via waldos.

  3. My Favorite drink was rum and coffee ( Some time with vanilla ice cream in it). But most bars I went too where shock to here of such a mix. Does any one else drink rum and coffee out their and why is so hard to get one at a bar. Since most bars do serve coffee.

  4. “watermelon soda”

    Racist!

    And, ewww, watermelon soda.

  5. COCKTALEZ!11!11!!!!!!!!

  6. a petite craft cocktail bar located near Reason’s office in D.C.

    Sell that rat-infested dump and move back to L.A.

  7. to enjoy the silent comforts of a cheap beer or a well-made cocktail, or to have conversations mediated by oak bartops and the taste of whiskey rather than the dim-blue glow of a screen.

    Nick Gillespie: Welcome to the 21st century…

    1. this whole article and that line especially has a strong “written for award consideration” feel to it

  8. You might end up with 100000000 closet drinkers. LOL

  9. I will be impressed if they can deliver a bottle of Jameson, live band, and an already half drunk chick to my doorstep.

    1. This article has the distinction of being one of the dumbest I’ve read since all of this has started. Okay, bartenders are laid off just like every other worker whose job was deemed non-essential. So what?! Bars and/or bartenders are NOT being singled out. Remember that whole social distancing thing? No? Guess they were drunk at the time and forgot about it later. Between having to do their own laundry instead of dropping it off at the cleaners and having to mix their own drinks, the mortality rate is going to skyrocket due to exhaustion. Anyone who thinks that the closure of bars is prohibition-like probably drinks in order to forget what an idiot they are. They’re the people who think that bars have “added so much to their lives”. Reason really upped their whiner status with this drivel.

  10. Is this the ‘New Prohibition?’

    No. No, it isn’t. The trillion-dollar, 50+ year-old failed War on (some) Drugs easily claims that title. And considering its chief architect, that last line “we always find a way, says Nixon” is especially ironic!

  11. It seems to me that the faux speakeasies that have sprouted up in the last 20 years should grow pairs and become real speakeasies.

  12. I miss bars as much as the next guy, but given what is actually going on (authoritarian overreach as opposed to simple prohibition) the tone of this article seems way off.

  13. Facebook is paying $530 Per day. Be a part of Facebook and start getting Extra Dollars every week from your home. JVc..I just got paid $8590 in my previous month……….,Visit Site

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.