World

Trump's Quiet War on Iran Gets Loud 

The administration has been quietly escalating against Iran and its allies using a selection of counterterrorism laws that allowed it to act without going through Congress or the public.

|

The U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi paramilitary commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis on January 2, 2020, seemed to many Americans like the start of a war.

Iranian officials vowed enteqâm-e sakht, "hard revenge." President Donald Trump in turn threatened to bomb Iranian cultural sites in response to any retaliation. On January 7, Iran called his bluff, firing over a dozen ballistic missiles at U.S. forces in Iraq. Fortunately, no Americans were killed, and Trump refrained from further military action.

Unbeknownst to many Americans, we've been hurtling toward a worsened conflict with Iran for nearly two years now. The Trump administration has been quietly escalating against the country and its allies using a selection of counterterrorism laws, many of them passed after 9/11, that allowed it to act without going through Congress or the public. Former President Barack Obama, meanwhile, left a force in the region to counter the Islamic State that the Trump administration eventually pointed against the Islamic Republic.

Trump and his advisors objected to the violence carried out by Iran and its proxies across the Middle East. They also disliked Obama's "nuclear deal," which lifted U.S. economic sanctions on Iran in order to get international inspectors access to the country's nuclear research program. So in 2018, the Trump administration replaced Obama's deal with a campaign of sanctions aimed at forcing the Iranian government to change a range of foreign and domestic policies.

Obama had waived many Iran sanctions previously passed by Congress, meaning Trump could simply allow the waivers to expire. But he also used a curious legal tool to maximize the pressure: Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allowed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of the Iranian military, as a foreign terrorist organization in April 2019.

The U.S. government had never used Section 219 to declare the army of a sovereign state a terrorist group. The Trump administration then used the designation to put sanctions on Iran's oil, banking, construction, and steel industries.

"The IRGC is very expert at creating front companies disguised as any number of organizations, including humanitarian organizations," claimed Brian Hook, the State Department official in charge of Iran. "You can never know if you're supporting commerce or terrorism."

In May 2019, the Trump administration took a further step: By slapping buyers of Iranian oil with economic sanctions, it hoped to cut exports to zero. Iran had threatened to retaliate for such a move by disrupting the global trade in foreign oil. Soon thereafter, tankers began to explode off the country's coast.

U.S. officials blamed Iranian sabotage, and U.S. naval forces massed in the Persian Gulf. On June 20, tensions nearly boiled over when Iran shot down a U.S. surveillance drone. Trump reportedly came within minutes of launching airstrikes against the country before suddenly changing his mind.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration was sitting on a massive legal and military apparatus originally designed to crush the Islamic State, an apocalyptic cult rampaging across Iraq and Syria. That apparatus was created when Obama launched Operation Inherent Resolve in 2014, using his powers as commander in chief under Article II of the Constitution.

It's debatable how far these Article II powers stretch. At the very least, they include self-defense. In the most expansive interpretation, they allow the president to take almost any military action, even without permission from Congress. Trump's State Department told a skeptical Senate Foreign Relations Committee in August 2019 that Article II authorities include the "protection of U.S. persons or property, support of allies, support of U.N. Security Council resolutions, promoting regional stability, [and] deterrence of the use of" weapons of mass destruction.

The Obama and Trump administrations also justified the campaign against the Islamic State, previously known as ISIS, under two authorizations for the use of military force (AUMFs) passed by Congress more than a decade earlier. The 2001 AUMF allowed the president to go after Al Qaeda, of which the Islamic State was a spinoff. The 2002 AUMF, which approved the overthrow of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, was vague enough to include the Islamic State because it only mentioned "the continuing threat posed by Iraq."

The House of Representatives voted to revoke the two AUMFs in July and December 2019, after the escalations with Iran began, but the amendments were defeated in the Senate.

Only a few thousand Americans were ever deployed as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the anti–Islamic State coalition, mostly in training and support roles. But the "light footprint" force was stationed along the "Iranian land bridge," a term used in Washington to describe the chain of territories from Iran's border to the Mediterranean coast controlled by pro-Iran factions.

"We actually had to coexist in this environment with Shi'a [Muslim] militia groups that were, again, fighting ISIS, but were being supported by Iran," retired General Joseph Votel, commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East from March 2016 to March 2019, says. "Within the rubric of the Defeat-ISIS campaign, I would not have had any particular military tasks that were related to Iran."

That began to change in September 2018, when National Security Advisor John Bolton declared that U.S. forces would stay in Syria "as long as Iranian troops are outside Iranian borders, and that includes Iranian proxies and militias."

In October 2019, protests against Iranian influence in Iraq broke out, followed by protests against gas prices in Iran. The Iranian government, in a spasm of paranoia, shut down the internet and killed hundreds of protesters in its own country. Iranian-backed militias also massacred Iraqi protesters—and began to act out by firing rockets at U.S. forces in Iraq.

Most of these attacks hurt no one, but on December 27, a rocket killed an American translator named Nawres Hamid in Iraq. Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve responded by killing 25 Iraqi militiamen in a series of air raids.

U.S. military officials called their retaliation "precision defensive strikes" and emphasized the need for "force protection"—that is, protecting the U.S. forces already in Iraq for other reasons. But Iraqi militia supporters responded by ransacking part of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad on the last day of 2019. In early January, things spun out of control: Soleimani was dead, and Iranian missiles were in the air.

Trump administration officials offered two justifications in the days after the Soleimani assassination. The first was that the general posed some kind of "imminent" threat to U.S. forces in Iraq. Yet General Mark Milley admitted to reporters in the Pentagon that the intelligence did not "exactly say who, what, when, where" the threat was. In addition, the killing appeared to make the Iranian threat worse, as Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve had to suspend all operations against the Islamic State for security reasons soon after.

The second justification was that the 2002 AUMF provided a blank check for any military action in Iraq—an argument Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) called "insulting."

Trump supporters pulled out a third justification during a January 9 debate in Congress: Militias armed by Soleimani were estimated to have killed 608 U.S. troops during the first U.S. occupation of Iraq from 2003 to 2011. But Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D–Mich.), a CIA veteran who served in the country, wasn't buying it. She proposed a resolution to rein in Trump's war powers.

"I have watched friends and colleagues hurt or killed by Iranian rockets, mortars, and explosive devices," Slotkin said. Nonetheless, "Congress has long abdicated its responsibility, as laid out in the Constitution, to our troops when it comes to authorizing war."

Advertisement

NEXT: "Lakewood [N.J.] Cops Break Up 17 Gatherings"

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I’m all for pulling out of the Middle East completely . And Korea, Japan and Europe. It seems lately the Iranian regime is doing plenty to hurt their standing with their own people. Hopefully ,in time, the Iranian people will be able to rid themselves of theses brutal thugs. Now, about my 1200 $b check ,,,,,

    1. COVID-19 may well bring down the ayatollahs.

      1. And I want a pony – – – –

        1. If you want a pony vote for vermin supream

          1. So this verminous version of Wavy Gravy and Bicycle Charlie has what to say about letting uninspected foreigners come swarming across the borders right now?

      2. Imagine what happens if vaccines and treatments come out of the US or Israel and what type of choices Iran’s gov’t will have to make at that point. Either refuse help and anger their people, or accept help and blunt the impact of their propaganda machine.

      3. Do you have a pay_pal ? because if you do you can add an extra 650 every week in your earnings working on the internet for 4 hours a day, check this… Read More

    2. Exactly.

      And you’re right the regime has been wildly successful at alienating its own people. I know a few Iranians and they all hate their government.

      1. You have a pay pal account… in the event if you have you can create an extra 1500 weekly in your income just working at home a few hours. go to this site… Read More

    3. “Soon thereafter, tankers began to explode off the country’s coast.”

      Trump’s America is a net energy exporter.

      You can file explosions in the Persian Gulf under “Not Our Problem”.
      Even “thanks for blowing up the competition”.

      #AmericaFirst
      #MAGA

  2. It’s debatable how far these Article II powers stretch.

    And that’s the problem – despite everybody pretending to be all hair-on-fire appalled and outraged that Trump would say Article II gave him the power to do anything he wanted, he was arguably correct. Everything is plausibly arguable when you have vast and vague powers like the AUMF. Or the commerce clause when you have a SCOTUS unwilling to do its job and make sure the government sticks strictly to its Constitutional role by striking down whole swaths of legislation with the simple objection that it doesn’t matter how good or necessary you think this law is, if it’s not in the Constitution you’re going to have to amend the Constitution to get it through, them’s the rules.

    1. He’s not doing anything that Obama didn’t do — Obama’s pallets of cash were far worse. And the problem with not complaining about what Obama did is that it set a precedent which empowers Trump to do likewise….

      1. Relative to Obama, Trump is definitely restrained. Which is good. And he needs to maintain that restraint now, so he does not create a bad precedent for future presidents during the current crisis.

  3. “…Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allowed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of the Iranian military, as a foreign terrorist organization in April 2019.”

    And, based on their history, that designation seems appropriate.

    I’d as soon we get out of the Middle East and let them slaughter each other or find peace, but avoiding the obvious is sort’a foolish.

    1. In addition to everything else, there is a grand total of ONE country that has ever seized an American embassy. And wasn’t it the IRGC, or its predecessor, which did that?

  4. The Trump administration has been quietly escalating against the country and its allies using a selection of counterterrorism laws, many of them passed after 9/11, that allowed it to act without going through Congress or the public.

    Well, with all due respect, those laws didn’t pass themselves.

    1. And doesn’t it take two to tango? Are the Iranians so blameless?

      1. Pure as the driven snow, if you talk to a progtard.

      2. hey, all they want to do is throw homosexuals from rooftops in peace! Can’t we all just get along, man?!

    2. And the Constitution does order the Executive to jump up and down screaming “Kill! Kill! Kill!” This upcoming election is looking good for the LP. God’s Own Prohibitionists… not so bright.

  5. I don’t see a damn thing in this article here post-Jan retaliation by Iran

    Is this just recycled click bait?

    1. Yes.
      Mr. Koch took an ass-kicking in the market, so Reason writers are doing their bit to help by recycling.

  6. “She proposed a resolution to rein in Trump’s war powers”

    Rep. Elissa Slotkin’s clutching her pearls now, but she was awful quiet when Droney McPeaceprize dropped 26,000 bombs and had military actions in seven nations.
    And before you say “Well she wasn’t elected then”, note that she was bloody Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs at the time. The hypocrite has more blood on her hands than Trump does.

    1. 26,000 bombs and had military actions in seven nations just in 2017 alone, I meant.

      I realize he dropped a fuck of a lot more than that over his eight years.

      1. I was Ok with Obama droning them. And I am Ok with POTUS Trump killing lots more of them. WRT Iran, just keep squeezing, and they will collapse. No need for military action, unless it is to respond directly to an attack.

        The Wuhan coronavirus has caused a global pandemic. So right now, it is pretty much every country for itself. If we happen to step on Iran as a consequence, that doesn’t keep me up at night. We have unfinished business with Iran.

  7. Winning the hearts and minds with the destruction of their infrastructure.

  8. Iran has been at war with the United States since 1979. Now, my understanding of how the President’s authority to wage war works may be in error, but I was under the impression that the President did NOT need to go to Congress if the enemy declared was on US.

    Have the Iranian panjandrums delivered a beautifully calligraphed scroll, sealed with wax, formally declaring was on us? I don’t think so (though the depths of their idiocy frequently surprise me). But various Iranian officials have made fiery speeches calling for Jihad against The Great Satan (us), and if those aren’t declarations of War, then the definition needs work.

    Now, the question of SHOULD we wage war back is open. But we are at war, and it cannot really be blamed on Trump.

    1. Iran was probably responsible for most of our casualties in Iraq. We should have hit Iran back then.

      Now that we’re net energy exporters, we’ve got no reason to pussy foot around with the Iranians.

      1. The Saudis just dealt Iran a blow by announcing production increases.

        1. Agreed…All we really need to do is let the markets collapse their economy.

  9. We need to examine what we’re getting in exchange for bending over backwards to protect Saudi Arabia and Israel. The cost/benefit seems to be way out of wack.

    1. Recall that when the Iranians droned the Saudi oil fields, Trump shrugged. Not our problem.

      I hear that we have our lowest footprint in the Middle East since forever, and we’re scheduled to reduce it further.

      #AmericaFirst.

  10. Painfully bad writing. I hope your teacher gave you a passing grade on this, Matty.

  11. Reason used to defend legalizing nuclear generating capacity instead of letting Kleptocrat Cowboys try to pirate foreign oil to make up for our past cowardice and lack of statistical savvy. One at least has the right to reminisce…

  12. Situs Agen Sbobet Terpercaya I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not

  13. I am creating an honest wage from home 3000 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year agone i used to be unemployed during a atrocious economy. I convey God on a daily basis i used to be endowed these directions and currently it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody, Here is I started…
    Here Articles About

  14. This is very Amazing when i saw in my Acount 8000$ par month .Just do work online at home on laptop with my best freinds . So u can always make Dollar Easily at home on laptop ,,.. Read more

  15. “In early January, things spun out of control: Soleimani was dead, and Iranian missiles were in the air.”

    This statement sure elides and twists. Double passive tense in one sentence. “[M]issiles were in the air”! What type of missiles, targeted at what or whom, to what effect?

    “Out of control” according to whom? The main outcome seemed, in the short term at least, to be exactly what was desired by one of the participants.

  16. Neither of these are passive sentences. A passive sentence would be: Missiles were launched in the air (by militants.)

    If you passivize this sentence: Billy broke the window. it becomes: The window was broken (by Billy.)

    Passive means the object (the window) is moved to the front and the subject (Billy) is optional or moved to the back with ‘by’ tacked on. The verb changes too. Some appropriate form of ‘is’ plus present perfect.

    The ‘out of control’ may be referring to America’s attempts to reign in Iran’s nuclear program, which has continued despite Trump’s reneging on Obama’s agreement and economic sanctions. I’m not sure how much America’s leaders care about nuclear development in places like Iran, Israel, North Korea etc, my guess is not much, but leaders seem to think it necessary to pay some lip service to the issue when convenient.

  17. Before or after Iran keeps launching missiles at american troops?

  18. I am making 7 to 6 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 4 hour Dailly and make 40 dollar Easily .. This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily…. Read more  

  19. Six months ago I lost my job and after that I was fortunate enough to stumble upon a great website which literally saved me• I started working for them online and in a short time after I’ve started averaging 15k a month••• The best thing was that cause I am not that computer savvy all I needed was some basic typing skills and internet access to start•••
    More Read Here

Please to post comments