Police

Texas Police Union Kills Effort To Close State's 'Dead Suspect Loophole'

Texas law lets police hide records of suspects who die in custody from grieving families. It could have been fixed, but a police union torpedoed the reform bill.

|

A bill would have closed a notorious loophole that lets Texas police departments hide records of jail deaths. But it failed to pass the Texas legislature, thanks to fierce opposition from one of the most powerful police unions in the state.

Texas enacted a statute in 1997 exempting records of police investigations that didn't end in a conviction from the state's public record law. The aim was to protect the privacy of innocent suspects, but police departments soon figured out they could also use it to withhold information on deaths in police custody, since you don't convict a suspect who's dead.

A Reason investigation published last December found at least 81 instances where police departments cited the so-called "dead suspect loophole" to withhold records of deaths in police custody from reporters, lawyers, and family members of the deceased.

A separate investigation by news outlet KXAN focused on Texas' 21 largest police departments. It identified at least 154 public information requests, related to 52 in-custody deaths, where the authorities cited the exemption to withhold records.

State Rep. Joe Moody (D–El Paso) introduced legislation in January to close what's become known as the "dead suspect loophole." But this week he stripped the language from a larger transparency bill, following intense lobbying by the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT) and a veto threat from Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. The bill would not survive, he realized, if it included the language.

"Those are supposed to be public records, and the people deserve the truth—good, bad or ugly—about situations where their government is involved in a death," Moody wrote in an open letter after he pulled his legislation. "A deliberate disinformation campaign by the very people fighting transparency made it impossible to advance this legislation."

CLEAT argued that Moody's Bill was "pushed by anti-police groups who want access to the information so they can post it on social media and trash officers who are involved in high profile incidents."

But the current law allows police to hide video and other records from families of those who die in police custody. The most infamous case is that of Graham Dyer, an 18-year-old who died in 2013 after being arrested in Mesquite, Texas, while having a bad acid trip. Dyer's parents fought unsuccessfully for years to get video footage of their son's final hours, but Mesquite police refused to hand it over, citing the loophole.

Dyer's parents eventually got the footage from the FBI through a federal Freedom of Information Act request. It shows Dyer repeatedly slamming his head against the interior of a police cruiser after he wasn't properly restrained. An officer repeatedly tases him in the testicles to try and make him stop. The Mesquite Police Department neglected to mention the tasings in the incident report filed after Dyer's death.

The report also claims it took several officers to subdue Dyer, who was 5 feet 4 inches and 110 pounds, and put him in a restraint chair in a padded cell. The video shows Dyer being left handcuffed on the concrete floor of the jail's sally port, where he continued to smash his head against the ground. Jail officials didn't request medical assistance until he was found unresponsive in his cell.

After the footage became public, the Dallas County district attorney reopened the case and declared there was sufficient evidence to charge Mesquite police officers with negligent homicide—if the statute of limitations hadn't already passed.

Dyer's parents have gone to the state capital two years in a row to testify in favor of Moody's bill. "If the law stays as it is, the police will continue to deny families those records," Graham Dyer's mother, Kathy Dyer said in her testimony.

CLEAT's opposition to bill was so strong that it destroyed its working relationship with Moody and led to the fairly rare sight of a politician publicly denouncing a police union. Moody said CLEAT "stabbed me in the back and waged an outrageous campaign of outright lies and character assassination."

CLEAT also sunk another one of Moody's pieces of legislation: an amendment that would have allowed judges to dismiss low-level crimes if police officers didn't explain why they arrested someone for an offense that is punishable only by a fine. CLEAT complained it would discourage officers from arresting suspects in serious cases like voyeurism or groping—a misleading claim, Moody says. The legislation was part of a slate of reform measures introduced in response to the 2015 death of Sandra Bland, who was found hanging in her Waller County jail cell after being arrested after being pulled over for a minor traffic violation.

Earlier this month, a local news outlet published never-before-seen cell phone video by Bland of her arrest, obtained through a public records request to state investigators. As Texas Department of Public Safety attorney Phillip Adkins testified during a legislative hearing earlier this month, the department could have kept the video secret if it had wanted to, although it chose to voluntarily disclose it.

Because of an obstinate police union, families of those who die in police custody in Texas will continue to have to rely on law enforcement agencies' good will to find out what happened to their loved ones.

NEXT: The NYPD Underreported Rape Due to an Outdated Definition of the Crime

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I’m beginning to suspect police unions might possibly be bad for the country.

    1. Welcome back to reality. Where have you been for the last 20 years?

  2. A former NYC mayor once declared dead people do not have rights.

    1. They certainly tell no tales.

    2. A current NYC mayor believes live ones don’t, either.

    3. You have the right to remain dead. Silence will not be an issue. You have the right to have an attorney buried with you. If you cannot afford a casket, you will be thrown into the East River. If you understand these rights, please signify by remaining completely still.

    4. That is correct – dead people do not have rights. Their families, heirs and estates, on the other hand, still have quite significant rights.

  3. I don’t agree with the morality behind it, but I think I understand where the police union and the state is coming from. They’re trying to reduce their exposure, not because they’ve necessarily done something wrong (I’m sure they have), but because even when they haven’t, more info means more frivolous lawsuits that drag on and cost taxpayers in the long run.

    1. After the footage became public, the Dallas County district attorney reopened the case and declared there was sufficient evidence to charge Mesquite police officers with negligent homicide—if the statute of limitations hadn’t already passed.

      That’s the reason.

      1. The statute of limitations starts running from accrual, which is the date “the plaintiff first becomes entitled to sue the defendant based upon a legal wrong attributed to the latter,’ even if the plaintiff is unaware of the injury.”

        I learned something today. I thought limitations kicked in with awareness of injury. Guess the police union leadership has more knowledge of the law than one would assume from the constant display of ignorance we see in the ranks.

  4. >>>After the footage became public, the Dallas County district attorney reopened the case

    so, wouldn’t have reopened w/o whistleblower or leaker

  5. How much money could Texas save by getting rid of the legislature, since the police unions write / veto the laws?
    Oh, yeah; and get rid of the Governor too.

    1. Finally, a true police state.

  6. The article refers to: “law enforcement agencies’ good will”. Is there such a thing? In Texas? They certainly keep it well hidden…

  7. So, not surprisingly, this was a poor piece of reporting because the authors never got the “rest of the story”. CLEAT opposed information about alleged misconduct that had not yet been investigsted from being released. We told Moody that we supported language to allow families to see the video. In fact when Moody refused to accept that language we not only supported another bill, HB 4236, but worked to get it passed since it was filed late. The bill is on the Governor’s desk and when signed it will allow the families of persons who die in custody the ability to view the video of the incident.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.