Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Mueller Investigation

Elizabeth Warren Demands Trump's Impeachment in Wake of Mueller Report

Calling for impeachment is likely a publicity stunt for the Massachusetts senator's flagging presidential campaign.

Christian Britschgi | 4.19.2019 5:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
reason-warren2 | ichael Brochstein/Sipa USA/Newscom
(ichael Brochstein/Sipa USA/Newscom)

In the wake of the Mueller report's release, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) has called for starting impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

In a Friday afternoon Twitter thread, the senator and 2020 presidential contender laid out her case for impeaching Trump, saying that his efforts to obstruct an investigation into Russian election interference necessitate his removal from office.

"To ignore a President's repeated efforts to obstruct an investigation into his own disloyal behavior would inflict great and lasting damage on this country," writes Warren. "The severity of this misconduct demands that elected officials in both parties set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty. That means the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States."

The Mueller report lays out facts showing that a hostile foreign government attacked our 2016 election to help Donald Trump and Donald Trump welcomed that help. Once elected, Donald Trump obstructed the investigation into that attack.

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) April 19, 2019

The odds that Warren will get her wish seem slim. Demanding Trump's head is nonetheless a good publicity stunt for the senator's flagging presidential campaign.

The latest New Hampshire polls show support for Warren at 8.7 percent. That puts her behind former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.), South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and "No Opinion." A Monmouth University Poll from last week put Warren at 7 percent among Iowa Democratic voters.

The senator is likely hoping that demanding Trump be removed from office via impeachment might make her attempt to unseat him in a presidential election a little easier.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Harvey Weinstein Is Terrible. Calling Him a Sex Trafficker Is Absurd

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Mueller InvestigationElection 2020Elizabeth WarrenImpeachment
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (114)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. TrickyVic (old school)   6 years ago

    ""That puts her behind former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.), South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and "No Opinion." ""

    Ha, can't beat no opinion. That's pretty funny. However I would love for No Opinion to win.

    1. Zeb   6 years ago

      No Opinion has my vote.

      1. Liberty Lover   6 years ago

        Present!

      2. Jerry B.   6 years ago

        I'd really prefer "None of the above".

    2. C. S. P. Schofield   6 years ago

      I remember a Shoe cartoon, back when the creator was still alive; there was (maybe still is) a recurring character 'Senator Batson D. Belfry' who ran for President every four years. On strip had him talking to his pollster;

      "Well, Senator, not only did you come in under 'No Opinion', you polled less than the margin or error. Which means there's a good chance you don't exist."

  2. Rockabilly   6 years ago

    Fakeahontus should be impeached for being a fake indian.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   6 years ago

      Lineage fake. War drums real. Liawatha raid big white teepee, make self chief.

      1. Deconstructed Potato   6 years ago

        Medicine wheel for all!

    2. ThomasD   6 years ago

      Bona fide member of the Wanabe tribe.

  3. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

    See? For months I've been saying Warren is in my top 3 2020 candidates. Now she's on the right side of history on yet another major issue.

    #LibertariansForWarren

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   6 years ago

      Don't you mean the left side of history? Do you want to be right, or do you want to be left?

    2. a ab abc abcd abcde abcdef ahf   6 years ago

      How many major issues are you tracking? Are you tracking any minor issues, or is every issue major?

    3. Jerryskids   6 years ago

      I have to ask, if Warren is in your top 32,020 candidates, how many fucking candidates are you keeping track of?

      1. soldiermedic76   6 years ago

        I am sure by the end of the week there will be at least 32020 Democratic candidates.

      2. 68W58   6 years ago

        I think he meant she is 1/32020th top candidate, which tracks with other known facts about her.

    4. tgrondo   6 years ago

      OBL......Sarcasm.....right ??

  4. MotörSteve   6 years ago

    Well if there's anyone who is an expert at lying, it's the Land O Fakes Woman.

    1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

      Ugh, more discredited right-wing talking points.

      1. a ab abc abcd abcde abcdef ahf   6 years ago

        "Ugh"???? You speak with forked tongue.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    Disloyal?

    1. some guy   6 years ago

      You know. When you run for president you pledge loyalty to the status quo. He betrayed that trust by trying to use Hillary's Russian-hacked emails against her. Obviously a serious candidate would not have done that. Not at all.

      1. NOYB2   6 years ago

        No, not at all. A serious candidate asks British ex-spies to fabricate incriminating dossiers with juicy sexual details.

        1. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

          Meh, I know this guy working at a moving company who likes water sports so much he does them in public when he sees me. Either that, or I scare the piss out of him.

      2. JesseAz   6 years ago

        What about using the intelligence agencies to spy on political opponents, is that still loyalty?

  6. a ab abc abcd abcde abcdef ahf   6 years ago

    To ignore a President's repeated efforts to obstruct an investigation into his own disloyal behavior

    Wrong right from the start -- it was NOT investigating his campaign.

  7. a ab abc abcd abcde abcdef ahf   6 years ago

    She's also pretty damned dim if she thinks her call for impeachment will help her campaign. The only way for a Dem to stand out on this would be to NOT call for his impeachment.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   6 years ago

      Makes sense. Want to jump out in front in the primaries? One simple sentence:

      "I'm not going to impeach Trump, I'm going to beat him."

      I think we'll be seeing a 25-way tie for a while.

    2. some guy   6 years ago

      I, for one, hope the Democrats hold lengthy impeachment hearings and then vote to impeach just a few months before the election. He'd be guaranteed to win again. I don't like Trump, but the Democrats have done everything in their power to make me pull for him against them.

    3. DjDiverDan   6 years ago

      “She’s also pretty damned dim . . .”

      I would have thought that was readily apparent long ago. Hell, by the time she proposed the Accountable Capitalism Act, the level of her stupidity should have been apparent. And if you were paying attention, her contributions to the Dodd-Frank Act, including her insistence that the SEC adopt just about the most uselessly inane regulation of all time, pretty much cemented her reputation as an intellectual featherweight.

  8. Ray McKigney   6 years ago

    "Will whore for power."

  9. creech   6 years ago

    All Trump supporters should be praying that the House now impeach him.

    1. Ray McKigney   6 years ago

      I think they won't be able to help themselves. The Dem base is screaming for it.

      1. some guy   6 years ago

        It's amazing how they've learned nothing from last time. Hillary wrote a whole damn book about it. I haven't read it, but I assume she at least got part of it right. Who knows. I doubt anyone has actually read it except her ghostwriters...

      2. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

        You know the Dems forgot where they came from when Moveon.org sells "Impeach Trump" stickers.

        1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   6 years ago

          Why impeach him? He has been revealed as a habitual liar, a cheating jerk, a reckless fool, and a tool of the Russians. Let him continue to twist in the wind, branding the Republican Party with ignorance, intolerance, and corruption for at least a generation, then clear out the slack-jaws in a couple of years and get back to improving America with liberal-libertarian progress.

          Being on the right side of history can be a burden, but mostly it is satisfying and fun.

          1. Sevo   6 years ago

            You, OTOH, have been revealed as a bigoted asshole.

            1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   6 years ago

              And yet you must spend the rest of your life complying with my wishes because my preferences have prevailed -- and stomped yours -- in the culture war.

              I am content.

              Keep toeing that line, and you whine about it all you want, clinger.

              1. Sevo   6 years ago

                "And yet you must spend the rest of your life complying with my wishes because my preferences have prevailed."

                Do all bigoted assholes have such an active fantasy life? I'm sure you must associate with quite a few more of them.

              2. Jack Klompus Magic Ink   6 years ago

                You should have your face beaten repeatedly with a brick.

          2. Last of the Shitlords   6 years ago

            “He has been revealed as a habitual liar, a cheating jerk, a reckless fool, and a tool of the Russians”

            But enough about Bill Clinton.........

          3. Jack Klompus Magic Ink   6 years ago

            Insecure knuckle dragging rubes like you should be on the right side of multiple blows to the head with a bat.

          4. Vaelyn   6 years ago

            History doesn't have sides.

  10. Jerryskids   6 years ago

    OT: This guy gets it.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   6 years ago

      Read that. Yeah he gets it.

  11. Colossal Douchebag   6 years ago

    Christ, what a blithering idiot.

  12. Eddy   6 years ago

    Does Warren intend to take part in the impeachment trial as a Senator? Maybe she could at least pretend to be impartial. I know it's not the historical norm, but she could fake it, it's not like she doesn't have experience faking things.

    1. Vaelyn   6 years ago

      Please don't bring her sex life into this...

  13. Inigo Montoya   6 years ago

    Her campaign is on the rocks so now she’s grasping at straws, except she won’t grasp at straws because her people now consider straws to be terrible and ban-worthy.

    1. Rat on a train   6 years ago

      She's grasping at paper straws.

  14. Rufus The Monocled   6 years ago

    A lying, disingenuous, two-faced opportunist wants to impeach a President. What a foolish woman.

    Oh the stupidity of it all.

  15. Number 2   6 years ago

    You could say she’s after his scalp.

  16. Sevo   6 years ago

    I can't help picturing she and Bern as the crazy aunt and uncle who everybody ignored at Thanksgiving.

  17. Ray McKigney   6 years ago

    Andrew McCarthy has some harsh words for Muller

    In his report, Mueller didn’t resolve the issue. If he had been satisfied that there was no obstruction crime, he said, he would have so found. He claimed he wasn’t satisfied. Yet he was also not convinced that there was sufficient proof to charge. Therefore, he made no decision, leaving it to Attorney General William Barr to find that there was no obstruction.

    This is unbecoming behavior for a prosecutor and an outrageous shifting of the burden of proof: The constitutional right of every American to force the government to prove a crime has been committed, rather than to have to prove his or her own innocence.
    ***
    The obligation of the prosecutor is to render a judgment about whether there is enough proof to charge a crime. If there is, the prosecutor indicts; if there is not, the prosecutor remains silent.

    1. Eddy   6 years ago

      One quibble: The prosecutor doesn't indict, the grand jury does.

      It's thinking like this which lets prosecutors get away with browbeating and deceiving grand juries into abdicating their responsibilities and becoming mere rubber stamps for the whims of the prosecutor.

      1. Rat on a train   6 years ago

        Prosecutors can file charges for non capital crimes without a grand jury.

      2. Brett Bellmore   6 years ago

        The prosecutor has so much control over what the grand jury sees, that it's almost always a foregone conclusion that it will do what he wants.

        Basically Mueller came up short, couldn't find enough evidence of anything on Trump's part that would even convince a grand jury he controlled that something should be charged. So he decided to pretend he hadn't indicted Trump only because of DOJ policy.

        Because that was the best way to smear his reputation without having to prove anything.

    2. Mickey Rat   6 years ago

      Technically, a jury's "not guilty" verdict means insufficient evidence to convict, not "innocent". The prosecution nor the judicial prove innocence, and they should not be expected to.

  18. Inigo Montoya   6 years ago

    Warren seems like the kind of old lady who comes outside to yell at kids to be quiet and get off her lawn. When I was a young lad, we had a neighbor like that. She’d actually peer through her curtains, waiting for the right moment to come out and tell us kids off.

    Warren just has that same kind of expression and mannerisms about her. I doubt she’ll appeal much to anyone under 50.

    1. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

      Except her "lawn" is the millions of acres of undeveloped land in America.

    2. JesseAz   6 years ago

      But she awkwardly had a beer on a facetime stream...

  19. IceTrey   6 years ago

    All of these people started campaigning way too early. I predict someone will jump in late and grab the nomination.

    1. DRM   6 years ago

      The Oprah/Beto ticket is going to kick ass.

      1. JesseAz   6 years ago

        Oprah already failed in Georgia

    2. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

      If Hillary Clinton enters the race, she immediately becomes my first choice.

      #StillWithHer

    3. Eddy   6 years ago

      Someone like this?

  20. loveconstitution1789   6 years ago

    Elizabeth Warren Demands....

    Who?

  21. Echospinner   6 years ago

    When I last saw Red Queen Warren she was running about in circles in her garden seemingly with no particular direction or purpose. Following her were gardeners with rakes and shovels frantically trying to repair the damaged roses and hedge rows.

    Every so often she would stop and shout to no one in particular “Off! With his head!”

    With that I quickly climbed back into my Toyota Prius and sped away.

  22. Ken Shultz   6 years ago

    Elizabeth Warren's campaign is circling the drain as she clocks in fifth place in both national polls and a distant fifth in fund raising--all this despite better name recognition than Buttkrieg, Booker, and Harris.

    She'd say anything to get noticed at this point. If things keep going as they are, she won't have enough money to make it Super Tuesday. Liz Warren sucks. Even Democrats hate her. Fuck Liz Warren.

    1. MotörSteve   6 years ago

      I've always known her appeal was really narrow. She has her True Believers, but I have to believe everyone else can see she's a disingenuous, lying, humorless scold.
      Personally, I'm self-employed and I've also visited/volunteered on Indian Reservations, so it's either her smack-talk or her phony "Native American " bullshit that offends me most. Maybe both.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 years ago

      Her only constituency at this point are BoomerLib yuppies. People who spent the late 60s and early 70s bandwagon-hopping on the peace train before settling in to spend their adult years racking up massive personal debts that they'll leave to their kids to clean up after they die.

    3. C. S. P. Schofield   6 years ago

      Y'all f*ck her. I'm picky about where I put that part of me.

  23. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   6 years ago

    One of my favorite #Resistance groups MoveOn.Org has started a petition calling for Drumpf's impeachment. I encourage everyone to sign.

    1. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

      Do you know what inspired the left to create MoveOn.org?

      1. Sevo   6 years ago

        Soros' wallet.

      2. JesseAz   6 years ago

        Chinese dollars that could no longer fund the Clinton campaign?

  24. Mongo   6 years ago

    I ain't voting for nobody over 70. *spit*

  25. Cyto   6 years ago

    Some text between tags

    Some text for acronym title

    text for blockquote cite

    cite tag

    what does code do?
    #include
    using namespace std;

    class B {
    public:
    virtual ~B() = 0; // Pure virtual destructor
    };

    Why do we have a deleted timestamp tag but no edit button?

    Insisting she was not culpable for the inexplicable contents of her spoken communications, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defiantly claimed Friday that she doesn’t know where the voice comes from when she opens her mouth.... this is how q works

      • first in list
      • second in list
      • third in list
      • fourth in list

    1. sharmota4zeb   6 years ago

      I see that my comments get monitored now. One cathedral burns downs and ...

      Uggh, this is annoying.

    2. Sevo   6 years ago

      Warren:
      "The Mueller report lays out facts showing that a hostile foreign government attacked our 2016 election to help Donald Trump and Donald Trump welcomed that help."
      Pretty sure that's 'economical' with the truth, but even if so, it's irrlevant. Unlike the hag, he didn't go buy it.

      "Once elected, Donald Trump obstructed the investigation into that attack."
      That's a flat out lie.

    3. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   6 years ago

      Impeachment is a sideshow.

      The important point is that there aren't enough superstitious, ignorant bigots left in America to keep the Republican electoral coalition afloat in national elections. Trump and his band of malcontents will be swept aside soon enough.

      Conservatives will get to continue to lord over Mississippi, Utah, and Alabama, though.

      1. Sevo   6 years ago

        "Conservatives will get to continue to lord over Mississippi, Utah, and Alabama, though."

        And bigoted assholes like you.

        1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   6 years ago

          You figure the slack-jaws have turned that 50-year tide of the culture war toward right-wing preferences?

          You seem dumb enough to miss that you are in the process of being replaced . . . by your betters and for keeps.

          1. Sevo   6 years ago

            "You seem dumb enough to miss that you are in the process of being replaced . . . by your betters and for keeps."

            Bigoted assholes like you are the 'betters' of the liquids which go through the sewage treatment plant down the road from your double-wide.
            Fuck off, you pathetic piece of shit.

            1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   6 years ago

              How's the wall coming, you gullible bigot? Mexico keeping up with the payments, you inconsequential right-wing malcontent?

              1. Sevo   6 years ago

                "How’s the wall coming, you gullible bigot?"
                I wouldn't know, you bigoted asshole. Why don't you find someone who cares outside of the voices in you head?

    4. DjDiverDan   6 years ago

      I see that Arthur L. Kirkland has gone off his meds again. Makes me long for the good old days when folks like him would be committed to an asylum and forgotten.

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   6 years ago

        Right-wing bigots like you seem to dislike me.

        I blame my education. And winning the culture war at your expense.

        Carry on, clinger.

        1. Sevo   6 years ago

          "Right-wing bigots like you seem to dislike me."

          Most everybody despises bigoted assholes like you. I blame your bigotry and your assholery

        2. DjDiverDan   6 years ago

          I, too, blame your education. If only the law recognized a cause of action for educational malpractice, you’d have a hundred-million dollar lawsuit.

        3. Jack Klompus Magic Ink   6 years ago

          No we just think that you're a tool playing some excruciatingly stupid character whose dipshit attempt at baiting deserves nothing more than encouragement to off yourself in the most painful manner possible.

    5. Tony   6 years ago

      Can we have a preview button at least?

      1. JesseAz   6 years ago

        C'mon Tony, trust your gut instincts. Dont sow doubt into your idiotic comments by reading it in a preview.

    6. Jerryskids   6 years ago

      The richest part of all this faux outrage and alarm coming from the people swooning and clutching their pearls over Trump wreaking havoc on our most sacred institutions is that these are the same people who want to "fundamentally transform" America anyway. Trump's trampling on the Constitution? I get to be outraged by that, you don't, not when you're the one disparaging this hundred-year old piece of paper written by old dead white men as no longer relevant to today's modern world when it doesn't even say a damn thing about left-handed lesbian African-American illegal immigrant Muslim vegan single mothers who want an abortion and free college for the dead fetus.

      1. Tony   6 years ago

        Trump's vulgarity is enough to earn hatred. He embarrasses our country. Forget his crimes. He's from a crime family. It's his gold toilets that truly offend me.

        1. Brian   6 years ago

          “Forget his crimes...”

          Might as well, at this point.

        2. Sevo   6 years ago

          "Trump’s vulgarity is enough to earn hatred. He embarrasses our country. Forget his crimes. He’s from a crime family. It’s his gold toilets that truly offend me."

          Poor, poor, Tony -
          "Collusion!!!!!!!!!!!!!" - bullshit.
          "Obstructing justice!!!!!!!!!!!!! - more bullshit.
          "Impeachment!!!!!!" - How much more bullshit does Tony have?
          "Gold toilets!!!!"
          Poor, poor loser Tony.
          Fuck off, shitbag.

          1. Tony   6 years ago

            What even are you?

            1. Sevo   6 years ago

              Poor, poor loser Tony.
              What's your next whine about Trump?

              1. Cyto   6 years ago

                Nah, Tony is right about this one. Trump's taste is gaudy for any era. The gilded toilets... gilded everything.... it is truly hideous.

                Having such poor taste in interior design is definitely a sign of a deep-seated character flaw.

        3. Jack Klompus Magic Ink   6 years ago

          Your fucking retarded existence is an insult to every sane human being on the planet you dipshit Okie turd.

          1. Tony   6 years ago

            You morons defend Trump with less hesitation than you practice when deciding to let out a fart.

            1. Jack Klompus Magic Ink   6 years ago

              You couldn't even tie your shoes without an instructional manual you dipshit inbred retard.

        4. Vaelyn   6 years ago

          True. Gold toilets make for cold asscheeks.

    7. Libfascists are glomming onto this tweet with the desperation of a drowning response. | Prime Patriot   6 years ago

      […] View Reddit by cobaltcolander – View Source […]

      1. Brian   6 years ago

        If there’s anything we learned last time, it’s that supercunts can’t be presidents.

    8. Ordinary Person   6 years ago

      Nixon was forced out for less, Clinton was impeached for less. I say keep building the case. There's no rush and there's alot more to learn.

      1. Cyto   6 years ago

        Yeah, but Obama is already out of office, so nobody is ever going to pay for all of the abuses of power.

        1. Tony   6 years ago

          Have you ever tried not being a parasite on Sean Hannity's anus?

          1. Jack Klompus Magic Ink   6 years ago

            Have you ever tried to not be a cancerous retarded faggot, you worthless retard?

    9. Ordinary Person   6 years ago

      The Republicans would have impeached Obama for doing business with Putin and using asking Russia for dirt on Romney. If I didn't think there was alot more to learn I would favor impeaching immediately just on what we already know about the guy, his campaign manager, his lawyer and his children. It's time to make a stand against this sickening corruption and lying. Let history know in no uncertain terms where we stand on this.

      1. Cyto   6 years ago

        Wait, are we against asking Russia for dirt on your political opponents? Because we know for certain that one of the Candidates worked on the same side with Russia during the Republican primaries, attempting to influence the election through fake grass-roots campaigns and connections in the media. Then after the primaries were over, we know that this same campaign and their parent political party did more than take a phone call... they paid millions to obtain help from the Russian government.

        We also know that their friends in the administration spied on the opposing party's candidate, using the FBI, CIA and NSA. Remember the claims that 27 agencies agreed that Trump was colluding with Russians (and they knew this because they were wiretapping the Trump campaign)? No? Conveniently memory-holed, huh? Well, we do know that the number was more like 7, rather than 27. But they were all being used to spy on a political campaign for president, by the opposing party.

        That should raise a few red flags. As in "Nixon was impeached for less" style flags.

        This is an excellent Rorschach test... At any moment prior to 2012 you could have asked anyone in the country "do you think it would be OK for the White House to wire-tap members of the opposing party's campaign" and you would have gotten a resounding and unanimous NO. But since we have Trump attached to it, people have their partisan blinders on and cannot see the giant dumpster fire right in front of them.

        Trump stands accused of wanting the Russians to release something embarrassing about HRC. That's it. That is the entirety of the accusation. And Mueller just proved that even that tenuous link didn't actually exist.

        The Obama administration proudly admits to a half-dozen things that are way, way worse than that. So does the HRC campaign.

        Rigging a primary election is way, way worse than asking a foreign government to release dirt on you opponent. Like, they are not even in the same realm.

        The same goes for using the IRS to attack your political enemies, something Obama is proud to tell you about - and disclaim it as not actually partisan in any way.

        And using foreign intelligence assets to spy on the Trump campaign. That's worse than Nixon at his worse. And they are proud to tell you about it. They have this tiny fig leaf - "there was a warrant, so it was legal!" That's it. They jumped through the hoop of getting a friendly judge to sign off on a decidedly incomplete warrant request. So magically there's nothing wrong with spying on your opponent's campaign, illegally "unmasking" american citizens, planting classified information so it could be leaked...

        Even if the "Trump Tower Meeting" was not a set up from the HRC campaign and Fusion GPS (which it looks for all the world like it was), the Obama administration, the DNC and the HRC for President campaign all went way, way beyond Nixon - simply based on what is publicly available.

    10. Quo Usque Tandem   6 years ago

      "Demanding Trump's head is nonetheless a good publicity stunt for the senator's flagging presidential campaign"

      That is the essence of this article, and really all that needed to be said.

    11. TxJack 112   6 years ago

      Since Mueller found no evidence of collusion, what exactly is the President’s “disloyal behavior” she is referencing? As a lawyer you would hope she might grasp you cannot obstruct the investigation of a crime that does not exist. The problem with this “investigation” is it was not the investigation OF a crime but rather an investigation IN SEARCH of a crime. Warren is attempting to gamer favor with a base who sees her as the fraud she is. Like Harris, Gilibrand, Swalwell, Beto and a host of others she knows she will likely never make it past Iowa or at best NH. Her campaign will be over by SC. Remember, this is the woman who while running for re-election to the Senate insisted she had no intention of running for President and promised to complete her full term. Less than 6 months later, she declared she is running for President.

      1. Tony   6 years ago

        He found plenty of evidence of collusion and pretty much indicted him for obstruction (except for the fact that he felt he couldn't indict a president). Stop taking self-serving talking points from Trump as fact.

    Please log in to post comments

    Mute this user?

    • Mute User
    • Cancel

    Ban this user?

    • Ban User
    • Cancel

    Un-ban this user?

    • Un-ban User
    • Cancel

    Nuke this user?

    • Nuke User
    • Cancel

    Un-nuke this user?

    • Un-nuke User
    • Cancel

    Flag this comment?

    • Flag Comment
    • Cancel

    Un-flag this comment?

    • Un-flag Comment
    • Cancel

    Latest

    There Are Better Ways To Help Restaurant Workers Than No Tax on Tips

    C. Jarrett Dieterle | 7.12.2025 7:00 AM

    Digital Nomads Are Getting Caught in the War on Tourism

    Fiona Harrigan | From the August/September 2025 issue

    Trump Walks Back Talk of Abolishing FEMA

    Autumn Billings | 7.11.2025 5:18 PM

    Watch a New Mexico Sheriff's Deputy Jovially Hurl a Baby Rabbit to Its Death As His Supervisors Laugh

    Jacob Sullum | 7.11.2025 4:10 PM

    Americans Don't Party Enough. Here's How To Change That.

    Emma Camp | 7.11.2025 2:30 PM

    Recommended

    • About
    • Browse Topics
    • Events
    • Staff
    • Jobs
    • Donate
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Contact
    • Media
    • Shop
    • Amazon
    Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

    © 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    r

    Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    This modal will close in 10

    Reason Plus

    Special Offer!

    • Full digital edition access
    • No ads
    • Commenting privileges

    Just $25 per year

    Join Today!