FDA

Incoming FDA Commissioner Sharpless Shouldn't Stop Snus, the Safer Swedish Smoking Alternative

Even as the FDA continues to crack-down on vaping, it appears ready to allow snus to be sold as what it is: a safer alternative to smoking.

|

Jason Reed/REUTERS/Newscom

Even as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seems poised to continue cracking down on e-cigarettes and vaping as alternatives to smoking, the agency might be loosening its hardline stance on another nicotine product.

That's good news for public health, and something that the next FDA commissioner should encourage.

For more than a year, the makers of snus products—a flavored tobacco packet that's placed inside the lip in a manner similar to dipping tobacco, or "dip," but without the need for chewing or spitting—have been asking the FDA to concede what private researchers have already concluded: that snus is a safer alternative to cigarettes. That doesn't mean it's fully harmless, of course, but Swedish Match is seeking the FDA's permission to put a label on its products saying "no tobacco product is safe, but this product presents substantially lower risks to health than cigarettes."

At a scientific panel convened by the FDA in February, there was broad consensus for making snus the first product to qualify for the FDA's Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP) status. The MRTP designation was created by a 2009 law allowing the FDA to evaluate tobacco products on a spectrum, rather than treating all products as being identical, when they clearly are not.

Snus is an important test for the FDA. A peer-reviewed study published in Tobacco Control found that snus delivers high levels of nicotine with lower concentrations of other chemicals found in cigarettes, and that it "does not appear to cause cancer or respiratory diseases." A study conducted in Norway and published in Nicotine and Tobacco Research found that snus users were three times as likely to quit smoking as smokers using nicotine gum. They believed snus was so effective because it delivered a dose of nicotine that was almost the same as cigarettes and provided a "sensory effect that medicinal nicotine products perhaps lack" because snus smells and tastes like tobacco.

In other words, if snus doesn't meet the FDA's standard for being a safer alternative to smoking, maybe nothing will.

"My sense is that if this is not approved, it might be the death knell for the [MRTP] process because we would be basically saying you can't get anything through this process," Kenneth E. Warner, a professor of public health at the University of Michigan, said during the February hearing.

Under Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, who will be stepping down later this year, the FDA has taken a more aggressive stance against other smoking alternatives, like e-cigarettes, which have a proven record of helping smokers quit and reducing the public health harms of cigarettes. That crackdown has been spurred by a supposed spike in teen vaping rates, even though overall use of tobacco and e-cigarettes among youths has not climbed. On Wednesday, the FDA released data showing that vaping, in rare instances, has caused seizures in young users.

The divergent regulatory prospects for snus and e-cigarettes seem to indicate that the FDA is still grappling with its approach to tobacco and nicotine products. Resolving that situation will fall to Gottlieb's replacement, Norman Sharpless, who will take over as acting FDA commssioner later this month.

There are some indications that Sharpless, the current director of the National Cancer Institute, will continue Gottlieb's hardline approach on vaping. But he would be making a grave mistake to block the current progress on snus' designation as a safer alternative to smoking—doubly important because the FDA's decision on snus will likely determine whether other products can pursue an MRTP rating in the future.

It's fairly obvious that there are differences between cigarettes, e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco, and products like snus. The federal government should acknowledge that spectrum, and do away with one-size-fits-all regulations that ultimately beneift the most unhealthy options by treating less dangerous alternatives as equals.

NEXT: Surveying the statute books and passing judgment on the laws

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

    1. You know you want it.

  1. The divergent regulatory prospects for snus and e-cigarettes seem to indicate that the FDA is still grappling with its approach to tobacco and nicotine products.

    No, Boehm, can’t you even read your own article? It’s because a snus maker has sought FDA’s permission via the MRTP process, while vape makers haven’t. Of course in the case of vape it’s not even clear they’re eligible, because they don’t contain tobacco.

  2. I am getting $100 to $130 consistently by wearing down facebook. i was jobless 2 years earlier , however now i have a really extraordinary occupation with which i make my own specific pay and that is adequate for me to meet my expences. I am really appreciative to God and my director. In case you have to make your life straightforward with this pay like me , you just mark on facebook and Click on big button thank you?

    c?h?e?c?k t?h?i?s l?i?n-k >>>>>>>>>> http://www.Geosalary.com

  3. I used snus for about 3 years, and managed to kick a 25 year, 2 1/2 pack-per-day smoking habit. Then, my state prohibited the importation of Swedish snus, and I went back to the smokes. Thanks, government!

  4. I basically watch reviews on YouTube, I have found The Vaping Bogan to be the best if you’re looking for an in depth but but too technical. But watch a few different ones also and find the different pros and cons, as you might like something they don’t like but a different reviewer might like the con of the other reviewer.https://www.prodissertationhelp.co.uk

  5. I basically watch reviews on YouTube, I have found The Vaping Bogan to be the best if you’re looking for an in depth but but too technical. But watch a few different ones also and find the different pros and cons, as you might like something they don’t like but a different reviewer might like the con of the other reviewer.https://www.prodissertationhelp.co.uk

  6. On Wednesday, the FDA released data showing that vaping, in rare instances, has caused seizures in young users.

    Your link actually says, “Gottlieb said FDA doesn’t know yet whether e-cigarettes are definitely causing the seizures. But he added, “as a public health agency, it’s our job to communicate about potential safety concerns associated with the products we regulate.”

    So no, they don’t know what causes it. Idiots could have just drank their nicotine.

  7. R-α-Lipoic acid tromethamine salt, Boc Sciences is the world’s leading provider for special chemicals. We offer qualified products for 14358-90-8(R-alpha-Lipoic acid tromethamine salt),please inquire us for 14358-90-8(R-alpha-Lipoic acid tromethamine salt).

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.