Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Michigan

A Detroit Cop Loses His Badge After Mocking a Black Woman on Social Media

Gary Steele made a woman with expired plates walk in below-freezing temperatures. Then he pulled his phone out.

Zuri Davis | 2.28.2019 2:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
|||Screenshot via WXYZ Detroit
Screenshot via WXYZ Detroit

Gary Steele, a white police officer in Detroit, has been fired after mocking a black woman following a traffic stop.

Earlier in the month, Steele pulled a woman for having an expired license plate. Steele told the woman to leave her vehicle where it was and walk home in the below-freezing temperatures. He then took a Snapchat video using Black History Month filters to mock the woman's predicament, saying things such as "priceless" and "Bye Felicia" in the background.

An investigation and month-long accusations of racial insensitivity followed the Snapchat video. Investigators found other instances of Steele making similar remarks about black residents. Police Chief James Craig announced on Wednesday that a combination of the social media post, past comments about black residents, and disparities in Steele's testimony to internal affairs led to his firing.

Steele reportedly has a history of behavioral issues. In 2008, he was charged with attacking his girlfriend and firing a gun next to her head. Steele remained employed on the police force despite the violent incident.

It is possible under union rules that Steele could contest the firing in arbitration. If he were to prevail, it would not be the first time a department's attempts to fire a bad cop have been undermined by a police union. For example, the Opa-locka Police Department has struggled to fire the infamous sergeant German Bosque for several years.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Impartial GOP Arbiter Says Trump Challengers Will 'Lose Horribly'

Zuri Davis was an assistant editor at Reason.

MichiganPoliceMisconduct
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (20)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Titanian   7 years ago

    "In 2008, he was charged with attacking his girlfriend and firing a gun next to her head"

    Sounds like he skated on an AggBatt with gun modifier, 15ish years minimum in my state.

    1. Nardz   7 years ago

      I guess his girlfriend wasn't black, so...

  2. LynchPin1477   7 years ago

    If he had shot her he would have been put on paid administrative leave.

    Unfortunately, that's not a joke.

    1. Falcon53   7 years ago

      You're god damn right. Police can kill with near impunity, beat people, steal, and commit all sorts of crimes without being fired. Get caught being racist or perceived as racist, it's bye bye.

      How long until cops figure this out and just start shooting people even more?

  3. Eddy   7 years ago

    "In 2008, he was charged with attacking his girlfriend and firing a gun next to her head. Steele remained employed on the police force despite the violent incident."

    If he used the n-word when he shot her he'd have been fired.

    1. Eddy   7 years ago

      Oops, shooting next to her head, and attacking her in some separate, non-gun way. Sorry.

  4. Eddy   7 years ago

    "It is possible under union rules that Steele could contest the firing in arbitration."

    Arbitration between the public and one of its servants?

    If he can find some law they broke in firing him, the regular courts are open to him. That would simply be appealing from the immediate representatives of the public to the public will as expressed in law and articulated in a real-world court.

    But arbitration? That puts the public and its servants on an even footing, which the servants don't deserve. It also undermines our republican form of government, in case Congress is interested (they're supposed to preserve our republican form of government even at the state and local level).

    1. bevis the lumberjack   7 years ago

      He gets whatever appeal process that the police union's contract with the city provides. Frequently, that's an appeal before an arbitrator in the case of termination.

      1. Eddy   7 years ago

        Yes, I got that part.

        In fact, it's that part which I'm criticizing.

  5. Agammamon   7 years ago

    An investigation and month-long accusations of racial insensitivity

    Because it would be ok if the cop was the same race?

    1. Brandybuck   7 years ago

      You missed the story, didn't you? Go back up and read it.

      1. Agammamon   7 years ago

        I didn't miss the story.

        The investigation over his actions was filled with questions and accusation of *racial biases*. Over an action that is horrible no matter who perpetrated it on who.

        But the still put focus on 'white cop, black victim' instead of 'cop, victim'.

        1. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

          You're right. It's a horrible act by a power-drunk cop against a helpless citizen.

          Yes, it's exacerbated, perhaps even motivated, by race.

          But sooner or later we have to stop looking at everything through the filter of race. The overwhelming majority of our citizens can unite behind a shared sense of humanity if we approach things that way instead of through filters that divide us. Just look at what has just happened with Van Jones and CPAC.

          The sooner, the better.

  6. Juice   7 years ago

    Kinda like the Maryland Democrat calling PG County a You-Know-What District.

    She thought others around her shared her sense of "humor."

    This cop thought that everyone else is also as much of a sick sadistic fuck as he is and like also finds glee in others' misery.

  7. Nardz   7 years ago

    What are "black history month filters"?
    What is the racial component of this story? Did he only do this to black people?
    What is gained from Reason injecting race into their headline? If race isn't specified in a headline - such as, "cop is dick to woman" rather than "cop is dick to X woman" - are we safe in assuming that the person referred to is white?
    Is it less, or more, racist to interpret stories differently based on the "race" of any of the parties involved?

    The glaring disparity I see here is that he held a woman down and fired a gun next to her head, but wasn't fired, while he was fired for mocking other people he'd detained.

    1. Nardz   7 years ago

      Note: both actions referenced above warrant firing the officer. Just seems like the DV is a bit underplayed here.

    2. Calidissident   7 years ago

      A filter is a pre-made template or visual effect you can add to videos on snapchat. The officer added filters to his video explicitly mocking the woman's race. He also apparently had made disparaging remarks about black residents in the past. If you want to get mad about race being a part of this story, get mad at the officer, not Reason.

      I agree that it's absurd that he was kept on the force after the DV incident.

  8. ToddP   7 years ago

    It was hilarious!!!! He offered her a ride, she refused.

    1. Observant   7 years ago

      Where'd you read that?

  9. Think It Through   7 years ago

    That he is a dick, clearly evident from this story, is far more important than he is a racist, which is mildly consistent with, but not proven by, this story.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Orders the 'Expeditious' Reclassification of Marijuana

Jacob Sullum | 12.18.2025 6:50 PM

Trump Claims He's Turning America Around. He's Really Doubling Down on Executive Overreach.

Lora Karch | 12.18.2025 5:30 PM

This Tennessee Man Spent 37 Days in Jail for Sharing an Anti-Trump Meme. He Says the Cops Should Pay for That.

Jacob Sullum | 12.18.2025 5:15 PM

The House Just Passed a Bill To Curb Environmental Lawsuits and Speed Up Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 12.18.2025 4:01 PM

The U.S. Is Stealing From Millennials and Gen Z To Make Boomers Even Richer

Veronique de Rugy | 12.18.2025 3:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks