Howard Schultz

Will Howard Schultz Really Run as a Libertarian? Don't Bet on it.

Billionaire seeks ballot access, political party seeks cash, both hate the national debt...but Schultz is far more interventionist at home and abroad than, say, Bill Weld.

|

||| YouTube
YouTube

The Washington Examiner today has a piece headlined "Why Howard Schultz could go Libertarian," in which officials from America's third largest political party basically wave their hands in the direction of the billionaire maybe-sorta presidential candidate and say "Over here!"

"Mr. Schultz describes himself as fiscally conservative and socially liberal, so I kindly encourage Mr. Schultz to look at our platform, as that title goes hand in hand with what the Libertarian Party stands for," Florida L.P. Chair Marcos Miralles told the Examiner. Added California L.P. Chair Mimi Robson: "He's definitely a fiscal conservative and he appears to be generally for civil liberties and individual rights—so yeah, those are all things in line with the Libertarian Party." (Robson also added some wait-and-see caveats.)

Both sides in this equation obviously have something the other covets—the Libertarian Party has probable 2020 ballot access in 50 states; Schultz has a personal fortune and the professed willingness to spend up to a half-billion dollars of it on a presidential campaign. (The 2016 L.P. ticket of Gary Johnson and Bill Weld, for comparison, raised $13 million; and the party's annual budget is just a fraction of that.)

So are there wedding bells in the future for these non-duopolists? Only if party members who barely tolerated having Bill Weld represent them as a vice presidential pick will cede the top slot to a less-experienced lifelong Democrat who is far less libertarian.

Start with foreign policy. Schultz has criticized President Donald Trump's plans to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria. Schultz adviser Steve Schmidt (the 2008 presidential campaign manager of uber-hawk John McCain, and before that an adviser to Dick Cheney) explained on the WordsMatter podcast last week that Schultz "thought that Trump's decision announcing the decision precipitously was a mistake," adding: "I think if you go back to his speech at the Atlantic Council, what he talked about was the importance of alliances, the connection within that alliance of free peoples, the idea that America is the indispensable nation in the world that if the U.S. steps back that vacuum will be filled with actors that are not benevolent, not benign, so I think he stayed in that speech well within the boundaries of what we would recognize as a foreign policy that James Baker would be deeply comfortable with."

Good luck selling that foreign policy vision to the Libertarian National Convention in 2020. Bill Weld, on the other hand, was saying as recently as four months ago stuff like, "I don't understand why there are troops in Afghanistan. I'm not sure I understand why all those troops are there in Korea."

The Second Amendment, too, could prove an obstacle to Schultz-L.P. coupling. Whereas Weld is still (inaccurately, in my view) tarred as a "gun-grabber" (despite arguing repeatedly that "anyone who says, 'We have to do something about gun ownership, including AR-15s,' is just going to be dead meat, because their position doesn't make any sense"), Schultz just goes right there: "Seventy percent of the American people want the kind of policy legislation that takes the guns of war out of the American peoples' neighborhoods."

As Libertarian National Chair Nicholas Sarwark diplomatically tells the Examiner, "Schultz seems to hold some libertarian positions on issues like marriage equality and reducing the national debt….On the other side, his position on gun control would probably be very unpopular with libertarians."

Schultz, unlike most Libertarians, thinks the Affordable Care Act "was the right thing to do." He called the Trump/Republican corporate tax cuts "wrong and irrational." The trial balloon phase is still only now taking flight—he'll be doing a CNN town hall tonight—but Schultz is already a significant distance away from the L.P. before fielding many questions about drug policy, or corporate welfare, or the Federal Reserve.

There is one key factor that makes such speculation mostly academic at this point: the calendar. Even though presidential campaign season is well upon us, Libertarians choose their nominee 15 months from now. Like Weld playing footsie with a GOP primary challenge to Donald Trump, Schultz has every material reason at the moment to stay indy—it maximizes Democratic nervousness, and therefore media attention. No Libertarian will be included in polls any time soon.

Howard Schultz has ample time to see if there's really a market in these polarized, emotionally charged times for a centrist independent talking about debt. If that project fizzles on the launch pad, there's still time to bone up on the Non-Aggression Principle, though internal patience for situational Libertarians might well be wearing thin.

Related Reason content:

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

67 responses to “Will Howard Schultz Really Run as a Libertarian? Don't Bet on it.

  1. Schultz > Klobuchar > Brown > Booker > Warren > Kamala imho

    1. That’s quite a visual, Crusty.

    2. So your first choice is a white male and your last choice is a woman of color. Can you see how problematic that looks?

      1. How do you know what metric Crusty used? May be he was expressing how problematic each candidate is. You jump to conclusions too easily, because you are racist.

    3. That list should be in circular form, so the guy in the end gets it too.

    4. I’d vote for the actual Sgt.Shultz and his running-mate Colonel Hogan, before voted for any of those ass-clowns.

    5. Google paid for every week online work from home 8000 to 10000 dollars.i have received first month $24961 and $35274 in my last month paycheck from Google and i work 3 to 5 hours a day in my spare time easily from home. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it..go to this site for more details…

      So I started….>>>>>>>> http://www.payshd.com

    6. Start working at home with Google. It’s the most-financially rewarding I’ve ever done. On tuesday I got a gorgeous BMW after having earned $8699 this last month. I actually started five months/ago and practically straight away was bringin in at least $96, per-hour.
      visit this site right here……..>>>>>> http://www.payshd.com

    7. Google paid for every week online work from home 8000 to 10000 dollars.i have received first month $24961 and $35274 in my last month paycheck from Google and i work 3 to 5 hours a day in my spare time easily from home. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it..go to this site for more details…

      So I started….>>>>>>>> http://www.Aprocoin.com

  2. If Schultz is in favor of child labor, repealing the Civil Rights Act, price-gouging during natural disasters, legalizing heroin and cockfighting he has my vote.

    1. What about price gouging on heroin during a childfighting disaster?

      1. How can you regulate something that is illegal?

  3. Yeah, that’s gonna be a no from me, dawg.

    1. At least we know where Randy Jackson stands. LMAO.

  4. He’s probably better than de Blasio or Occasional-Cortex.

    1. Or John McAfee. Nothing will shed our moniker of “A Party of Kooks” until we stop letting the Kooks try to run our party.

      1. It’s Kooks vs. Sellouts, and like Tom Petty said, I can’t decide which is worse.

        Actually I can. Bring on the whale-diddlers!

  5. “Schultz seems to hold some libertarian positions on issues like marriage equality and reducing the national debt….On the other side, his position on gun control would probably be very unpopular with libertarians.”

    This illustrates that some libertarians are not only gun fetishists, but they also have terrible priorities. Clearly marriage equality is a much more pressing issue than their precious “Second Amendment.”

    Regardless, Schultz should only run if he’s guaranteed to take more votes from the Republican than he takes from the Democrat.

    1. Really? Marriage Equality is a more pressing issue than surrendering the Right of Self-defense? Really. What percentage of the population is gay and looking to get hitched? Now what percentage of the population owns guns and would like to keep them?

      You sir are too stupid to be here. You must work for the LP or something?

      1. I’d call them equally important, but I take your point: Looking at the 2nd Amendment as an obstacle to get around rather than as an ideal to which we should return is a disqualification for the LP Nomination for anything, never mind top of the ticket.

    2. Gays have a right to shotgun weddings too, you know

    3. “This illustrates that some libertarians are not only gun fetishists…”

      But that’s actually what big tent libertarianism is. Just look at all Reason comments sections and you’ll find many weird fetishes from Socialists claiming they have a pro-freedom ideology to weed heads who don’t give a shit what the government does as long as they can smoke their joint in peace.

      Schultz is the perfect fit.

    4. Funny, I know at least one gay person who, based on his political postings, would probably be significantly angrier at the government trying to take away his guns than at the government refusing to give official sanction to his relationship.

      While different people have different priorities on their rights, the principle that makes most sense to me is “those rights are more important which can be used to defend or advance rights.” You can use guns (or speech, or writing, or voting) to defend your right to have sex or smoke pot. You can’t defend your right to speak or own guns by smoking pot or having sex.

    5. I would definitely say that is highly unlikely considering Shultz’s policies and his past as a left of centre candidate. I doubt any of Trump’s base will even consider him.
      I honestly don’t think Trump needs any help to beat any of the shoddy candidates who have already announced for the Dems, but Shultz will certainly split the Dem voters.

      Not to repeat the mistakes made in 2016, but Trump is far more likely to win in 2020 than any of these declared. He has an excellent record on the economy and Rasmussen have now put Trump’s popularity at 52% admittedly, this is an outlier poll, but Rasmussen as usually reasonably accurate. I suspect the next few polls to come out will put Trump in the high 40s, especially after the STOU speech.
      During the primaries, I suspect the Dems will eat each other to get the nomination. It will be a bloodbath and Trump will be able to just sit back and enjoy the show.
      Absolutely none of these candidates have any scruples or integrity and I expect them all to run a real dirty campaign.
      Someone pass me the popcorn.

  6. Whereas Weld is still (inaccurately, in my view) tarred as a “gun-grabber”

    “The five-shot rifle, that’s a standard military rifle; the problem is if you attach a clip to it so it can fire more shells and if you remove the pin so that it becomes an automatic weapon, and those are independent criminal offenses,” Weld said. “That is when they become, essentially, a weapon of mass destruction. The problem with handguns probably is even worse than the problem of the AR15.”

    1. “. “That is when they become, essentially, a weapon of mass destruction. ”

      The man was an idiot.

      1. Was?

        “Hello, I’m still here!” /Weld

        1. Yeah, Imbouta pull the pin outta my clipazine and blow this fuck thing to the ground!

    2. So, if accurate, Weld can charitably be described as a Moron.

  7. If he wants it, he has the Demo nom in the bag. All those left extremists & more to come will knock each other off in the primaries, while as the only moderate in the race he’ll win enough delegates to have what’s perceived as unbeatable momentum before the field is winnowed. If there were a nationwide primary to apportion delegates at the con, he’d have no shot, but going state by state he’s a shoo-in.

  8. Only Reason staff are fooled that Schultz is a “Libertarian”.

    Of course, they were fooled about Bill Weld too.

    1. Careful! Lest we be accused of being purests do purity tests.

      Even though out purity test amounts to a single question : Is this candidate a Libertarian in any reasonable way?

    2. They’re not fooled. They’re not libertarians.

    3. Schultz had libertarian tendencies, but he also has statist tendencies. But mostly, we have very little idea what government polices he support. For that reason, he won’t get the libertarian nomination unless he bones up on libertarianism and publicly supports libertarian policies.

      You can’t be a fiscal conservative and be for socialized medicine. And you can’t be socially liberal and support gun control.

  9. “but Schultz is far more interventionist at home and abroad than, say, Bill Weld.”

    Fuck Bill Weld.

    1. seconded.

      And if thats what we think of Bill Weld, they you know the response we have for Shultz.

      Basically, Fuck Bill Weld with Shultz tied to a stick.

      1. Austin Peterson impostor, Bill Weld more libertarian than A-M*A*S*H and Randal put together.

  10. Will Howard Schultz Really Run as a Libertarian?

    What, are you kidding?

    1. No, they are probably completely serious.

  11. I’ve about had it.

    If the LP doens’t think it can win an election running a Libertarian, then what is the fucking point. Close shop and go home. Shit or get off the pot. Put up or shut up. Call or fold. Am I making myself clear?

    1. *ahem*
      BET or fold.
      Calling everything down and never making a move is the surest way to go bust.
      It’s what the LP has been doing for at least the last 5 years

      1. *raise, rather than bet, would be the proper term

    2. Transparently clueless about the law-changing power of spoiler votes. Does Sonny Boy imagine the Communist Party elected 2/3 of Congress and passed it manifesto as the 16th Amendment? The commie-sockpuppet party got 9% of the vote in 1892 and looters went apeshit to do their bidding. An income tax was tacked onto the tariff, the economy collapsed, La Suprema had to strike it down or there wouldn’t be banks to cash their paychecks. Then pre-Hitler socialists whined they wuz backstabbed, Teedy Rosenfeld’s looters backed the tax and your home is theirs if you’re not quick about paying their taxes. Since the LP formed, Dixiecrat and Comstock bans on birth control, the draft, blue laws, Sunday baseball bans, plant leaf prohibition… all these crappy laws were crushed by Libertarian spoiler votes. We elect freedom and defeat politicians.

  12. One should remember that the 47 year slogan of the LP – socially liberal and fiscally conservative – meant something very different back then when the Party was founded and the major parties might have resembled that remark.

    1. That slogan was invented by a non-libertarian hippie candidate in Austin Texas named Max Nofziger. Vote with the conservatives and party with the liberals was his version. After debates, Max leaned into the camera and asked voters to “listen closely to what my opponents are saying about each other, and remember that on election day.” The guy got elected and to this day runs on cut taxes and spending platforms. The Kleptocracy, on the other hand, has used the Nixon subsidies and IRS to slit our throats since 1971.

  13. A marriage made in Heaven.

  14. Not a clue.

  15. Now that the Libertarian hockey stick vote is clearly visible, the Kleptocracy HAS to infiltrate us with looters, whack jobs, warriors for the babies and foreign agents to make us look bad. The alternative is for voters to compare and see THEM as bad–no jobs, no boodle, no platform bullying. Look at the idiotic planks and resolutions just now injected by Tokyo Rose and the Libertarian National Commit-mes. Since Bill Weld helped us fit that logistics substitution curve, the kid gloves have come off and the Kleptocracy is out for blood!

  16. That ain’t how it works where I live. Any private business is free to put up any stupid sign they want, and you are free to ignore it. On the off chance that the proprietors noticed you were carrying a concealed weapon (and how would they?) they can ask you to leave. If you refuse, you are then guilty of trespassing… nothing more.

    1. Brave New Books in Austin hosted Timothy Leary visits back in the day. The store owner recently offered discounts to customers packing heat and local looters pressured the landlord to not renew their lease. Conclusion? Darts don’t live in Austin.

  17. Schultz could spend $50 million convincing independents who think like him that they are Libertarians and should join the party. He could triple the size of the party in 6 months and 2/3 of the total membership would be his admirers.

    If you think he can’t be the nominee you are underestimating what deep pockets can do.

    Just remember, Trump was never a Republican until he got it in his head that he wanted to be President.

  18. I am making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people say to me how much money they can make connected so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my existence. This is what I do?. http://www.Mesalary.com

  19. Libertarianism is NOT centrism (though ideally, a Libertarian candidate would raid voters from left and right). Nor are Schultz’s policy preferences consistent with Libertarian values. You cannot be for socialized medicine or gun-grabbing headliners and call yourself a libertarian (and I assume that it is libertarians who primarily populate the Libertarian Party).

    If Schultz wants to support the Libertarians in 2020, before we let him run off with the nomination, let me suggest that we tap him for a small part of the hundreds of millions he says he would spend on himself. There are ways for him to support paying down the national debt without running up a big debt of his own.

  20. Start earning $90/hourly for working online from your home for few hours each day… Get regular payment on a weekly basis… All you need is a computer, internet connection and a litte free time… Read more here…

    So I started….>>>>>>>> http://www.Aprocoin.com

  21. I am getting $100 to $130 consistently by wearing down facebook. i was jobless 2 years earlier , however now i have a really extraordinary occupation with which i make my own specific pay and that is adequate for me to meet my expences. I am really appreciative to God and my director. In case you have to make your life straightforward with this pay like me , you just mark on facebook and Click on big button thank you?

    c?h?e?c?k t?h?i?s l?i?n-k >>>>>>>>>> http://www.Geosalary.com

  22. Sounds ,,,,,,like a DemocRat plant.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  23. …and Mia Love as the VP candidate. Why have any Libertarians on the ticket?

  24. Is it worth listening to some bullshit I’d scan and bypass?
    Transcript or STFU.
    You $2 donation is falling fast.

    CLICK HERE…?????? http://www.Aprocoin.com

  25. Start working at home with Google. It’s the most-financially rewarding I’ve ever done. On tuesday I got a gorgeous BMW after having earned $8699 this last month. I actually started five months/ago and practically straight away was bringin in at least $96, per-hour. visit this site right here…….WWW.2citypays.com

  26. Start working at home with Google. It’s the most-financially rewarding I’ve ever done. On tuesday I got a gorgeous BMW after having earned $8699 this last month. I actually started five months/ago and practically straight away was bringin in at least $96, per-hour. visit this site right here…….WWW.2citypays.com

  27. I am getting $100 to $130 consistently by wearing down facebook. i was jobless 2 years earlier , however now i have a really extraordinary occupation with which i make my own specific pay and that is adequate for me to meet my expences. I am really appreciative to God and my director. In case you have to make your life straightforward with this pay like me , you just mark on facebook and Click on big button thank you?

    c?h?e?c?k t?h?i?s l?i?n-k —->> http://www.payshd.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.