Bill Weld

Bill Weld So Far Getting Chilly Northeast Reception to Possible GOP Primary Bid

"As far as we're concerned he's a Libertarian and he can't flip-flop back and forth for political expediency," says New Hampshire GOP chair.


Look who's ready to eat! ||| People for Bill Weld Facebook page
People for Bill Weld Facebook page

As Elizabeth Nolan Brown noted yesterday morning, 2016 Libertarian vice presidential nominee and heretofore presumed 2020 L.P. presidential contender Bill Weld changed his Massachusetts voter registration to Republican on January 17, six days before the Boston media began reporting that Weldworld was considering a potential GOP primary challenge to President Donald Trump.

The party-swap, first reported by Commonwealth magazine Monday night then matched by the Associated Press and the Boston Herald, has served to drum up some national media interest in Weld's February 15 appearance at the New England Council's Politics & Eggs event, considered a must-stop for presidential candidates eyeing the New Hampshire primary. If the former Massachusetts governor indeed announces his candidacy there, he'd likely be the first entrant into the longshot #NeverTrump primary sweepstakes that the president and Republican National Committee have been taking extraordinary steps to cut off at the knees.

Weld isn't talking to reporters until then, so stoking this speculation is clearly part of his strategy. But there are some preliminary warning signs that, even though he potentially stands to gain first-mover advantage in a presidential primary, the carefully worded corporate lawyer may have stunted his own prospects—even among his previous supporters—through his ideologically slippery journey to this point.

Jeff Jacoby, a libertarian-leaning conservative Boston Globe columnist who voted for Weld in both the 1990s and 2016, wrote last week that, "After years of following Weld's political career, there is only one thing about him I'm sure of: He regards politics as a form of intellectual entertainment, and nothing he says on the subject should be mistaken for conviction." More:

Weld walked away from his governorship in 1997, bored with the job and angling to become Bill Clinton's ambassador to Mexico. In 2006, he decided he wanted to be a governor again—not in Massachusetts, but in New York, where he sought both the Republican and Libertarian endorsements. When Republicans decided they weren't interested in Weld, Weld decided he was no longer interested in the Libertarians. Two years later, he endorsed Barack Obama for president.

There is no point seeking the philosophical thread that connects these meanderings. Weld has no fixed political or electoral outlook; he isn't consistently conservative or liberal, and he's certainly no diehard Republican….

A Weld run would enliven the 2020 campaign with erudition and quirky wit. That alone might be reason to hope he jumps in. Remember, however, that when it comes to politics, Weld will say and do just about anything to keep from being bored. He's not likely to take a Weld candidacy too seriously. We shouldn't, either.

New England Republicans, meanwhile, aren't exactly welcoming Weld back into the fold.

"He ran as a Libertarian vice presidential candidate in 2016. As far as we're concerned he's a Libertarian and he can't flip-flop back and forth for political expediency," New Hampshire GOP Chair Steve Stepanek told Fox News. "We don't consider him a Republican. We don't want him back as a Republican."

"It would be wonderful to have a moderate Republican running against Trump to give other voters in a Republican primary someone to vote for," former Massachusetts GOP chair Jennifer Nassour told Commonwealth. "The downside for Weld is he left the party and party voters, whether a Republican or Democrat, don't look too kindly on someone who leaves the party and comes back."

Even Weld's own proteges, such as the Trump-averse Massachusetts Lt. Gov. Karyn Polito, won't say anything more encouraging than "Bill Weld and [former Republican governor] Paul Cellucci are individuals that served as role models to both Gov. [Charlie] Baker and to me in our earlier days in public service, and if Bill Weld wants to run for president, that's his choice, and he may very well do that."

Potentially narrowing Weld's lane still further is the curious fact that the main organizational drivers thus far behind the #NeverTrump GOP primary have long track records of distancing themselves from libertarians.

||| The People for Bill Weld Facebook page
The People for Bill Weld Facebook page

The Trump-challenging 501(c)4 Defending Democracy Together was founded by neoconservative stalwart Bill Kristol, whose recently shuttered Weekly Standard magazine was the anti-libertarian standard-bearer on the opinion-magazine right. Several of the political operatives on the hunt for a primary challenger are former employees of the late John McCain, an outspoken opponent of what he called "the 'leave us alone' libertarian philosophy." And the Niskanen Center, which has been gathering anti-Trump forces for 2020 strategy sessions, sells itself as "rejecting both Trump-style ethno-nationalist populism and libertarian-inflected 'small government' conservatism."

Ironically, given his reputation for ideological shape-shifting, Weld may have further scared off his potential base of support among big-government conservatives through his prior 14 months of trying to impress Libertarians more than centrists. As I wrote after his speech at the Masschusetts Libertarian Party convention less than four months ago,

Weld since 2016 has been tacking noticeably more libertarian—on guns ("I think that anyone who says, 'We have to do something about gun ownership, including AR-15s,' is just going to be dead meat, because their position doesn't make any sense," he said Saturday), non-interventionist foreign policy ("I'm there with bells on"), and drug legalization.

Is there really room in the #NeverTrump primary for a small-l libertarian, let alone a libertarian-leaner who changes his mind a lot about party affiliation? Looks like we might soon find out.

NEXT: When it Comes To Debt, Politicians and Academics Are All Like, 'What, Me Worry?'

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. That’s what not having a personality and endorsing Hillary will get you.

    1. Weld endorsed Obama too. Maybe Reason could hire him.

      1. In all seriousness, people should get a pass on backing Obama in 2008

        1. Why?
          Obama was pretty clearly an empty suit who wanted to take the country in a socialist direction. He was obviously completely full of shit, and him making race relations worse was the most predictable thing that’s happened this century.
          Just because McCain was an evil pos doesn’t mean Obama clearly wasn’t also

          1. Wow! Its like you are in my head!

        2. Yeah he didn’t seem that bad at the time, and McCain was a crusty old warmonger. Supporting Obama in 2012 though, totally different story.

          1. Yeah. No one gets a pass on 2012. You’re just an idiot at that point

        3. Why not back the Libertarian candidate? Why not Ron Paul? Obama/McCain was as bad as Clinton/Trump.

  2. “Potentially narrowing Weld’s lane still further is the curious fact that the main organizational drivers thus far behind the #NeverTrump GOP primary have long track records of distancing themselves from libertarians.”

    Except they’re primarily neocons or generally war hawks and considering that so many “bleeding heart” libertarians are full-on embracing neocons and war hawks (look no further than Niskanen’s conference with Max Boot, Bill Kristol, and Jennifer Rubin) I don’t see how this would be a problem.

    You obviously know that Weld’s biggest opposition within the LP were the anti-war contingent. And yet the leadership still embraced him which says more about the current leadership of the LP than it does Bill Weld, because we already knew he was shit, but some people couldn’t help themselves.

    1. Long story short, all the “respectable Republicans” will be all about Bill Weld. Because he would never be irresponsible enough to end a war.

    2. I enjoyed respnding to the LP’s last request for money with a letter that summed-up to, “Until I am certain the Bill Weld isnt even a glimmer in the LPs eye ypu can go fuck themselves, and pan for shekels in some other stream.”
      They shit the bed with Weld and I’m not doing thier laundry for them.

  3. Trump’s in trouble because Weld is legit.

    1. Too legit to quit.

  4. Well, he can’t get a worse reception then among 2015 Libertarians.

  5. As far as we’re concerned he’s a Libertarian


    1. for def, citation needed. amIright?

  6. I’m thinking of the story of the guy who, after he died, neither heaven nor hell would have him so he was compelled to wander the earth from one speaking engagement to another. They say if you’re at a dinner and you suddenly feel tired, it’s that ghost giving a speech.

  7. in-party challenge v. T likely over quickly.

  8. There’s not enough laughter or tiny violin’s in the universe to properly illustrate how I feel about this.

  9. The idea that New England Republicans are different from, say, Southern Republicans is no longer true (if it ever really was). That’s why there are so fewer Republicans in New England versus the rest of the country.

  10. Lol, Trump is a moderate Republican. It would be nice to have a conservative Republican candidate to vote for instead of him.

  11. Weld is all about Weld. He’s an also ran that is desperate to get back in office and has delusional presidential aspirations. Kind of like Charlie Crist.

  12. Oh, I’m sure the Rs are itching to nominate a guy who will then endorse the D

  13. I don’t care what label Weld puts next to his name. I’m not voting for the big government establishment politician no matter what he tries to peddle as his philosophy of the day.

  14. Who is paying Reason to write articles about Bill Weld?

    1. Not me, that’s for damned sure. I haven’t given a dime to the LP or Reason since pushing Weld on us.

  15. “Is there really room in the #NeverTrump primary for a small-l libertarian, let alone a libertarian-leaner who changes his mind a lot about party affiliation?”

    I’m sure Weld will have no more problems with the transition from libertarian to neocon than the Niskanen hacks did.

  16. Big fricking deal. If voting changed anything, it would be made illegal. Just look at all the flip flopping we have done since WWII. We still have heaps of major problems with their fuses lit just waiting to burn down and explode. All the changes in Presidency and Congress have resulted in no major problem fixing. If one party does something, the next party undoes it. The only common thread is that those in power seek only to take care of themselves and the people of this country are ignored and made slaves to the will of the dictators running the show.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.