Baltimore

Baltimore Scrambles to Remove Criminal Penalties for Riders From Dockless Scooter Regs

The accidental criminal penalties in Baltimore's proposed scooter bill reveal the problems with the default criminalization of code violations.

|

Andrei Gabriel Stanescu/Dreamstime.com

Baltimore officials are scrambling to remove criminal penalties from a proposed city ordinance regulating dockless electric scooters that could see riders get as much as a month in jail and $1,000 in fines for everything from speeding to riding underage.

The bill in question was written by staff at the city's Department of Transportation (BCDOT) who've been working on permanent regulations for these vehicles—which can be rented right off the street via smartphone app—since they started popping up on city streets in 2018.

The bill would have allowed up to six providers and 14,000 dockless electric scooters in Charm City, a big increase over the 1,400 currently on city streets. It also came with a number of restrictions for riders.

These include a 15 mile per hour speed limit, and a requirement that riders be at least 16 years of age. Riders are also prohibited from using scooters on city sidewalks unless that sidewalk abuts a street with a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or more. In that case, sidewalk riding is permitted, but only at speeds of 6 miles per hour.

A section of the bill perscribes $20 fines for breaking these rules. However, the same legislation also included a catchall provision making any violation a misdemeanor offense with the possibility of the aforementioned jail time and fines.

That predictably drew the ire of the local American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) who complained about both of the overcriminalization rider behavior and the overly complex nature of these rules.

"The more confusing the rules you're writing, the more opportunity for police intervention and the more potential for disparities in the ways the rules are enforced," David Rocah, an attorney with the Maryland ACLU, told The Baltimore Sun.

After the Sun broke the news of the criminal penalties, BCDOT officials assured the scooting public that their intention was never to jail riders. Rather, these penalties would be reserved for scooter companies who violated the law.

"For a criminal penalty to be imposed, a court would need to find that a violation of the law was so egregious that a criminal penalty is deserved. That situation was never expected to arise for a rider, but potentially might arise for a provider of a vehicle for hire," a BCDOT spokesperson told the Sun, saying that the proposed ordinance would be amended to remove the possibility of criminal sanctions for riders.

This backpedaling is welcome, but reveals an additional problem with the way local governments approach regulation: the default criminalization of any code violation. This hardly a problem unique to Baltimore, but is the case in many American cities.

This issue surfaced in Santa Barbara, California when that city went after straws with a bill that made the distribution of the plastic suckers a code violation, opening up the possibility for offenders to be hit a misdemeanor charge.

The uproar over that possibility saw the criminal penalties removed from the final straw bill, but not before the city officials argued that the criminal sanctions were worth keeping around for the worst offenders.

"We don't know whether we're going to be dealing with an innocent vendor who gives out one straw, or we're going to have Lime Bikes dumping 10,000 straws," said City Attorney Ariel Calonne in one city council meeting (the joke being that a straw provider could one day be as big a menace to public order as the electric scooter company).

The trouble with this logic is it doesn't specify which conduct would actually be deserving of criminal charges. Spelling out where exactly that line falls is important both for the companies and individuals that will have to follow the law. It's also important for voters who can't evaluate the fairness or proportionality of proposed penalties without knowing when they might be employed.

So long as Baltimore's scooter regulations make any violation a misdemeanor, even if it's just for scooter providers, that will continue to be a problem.

NEXT: It's Time For Trump to Tell Stephen Miller 'You're Fired' and Chart a New Course On Immigration

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Hey Christian, did you learn to code yet?

    KAPOW!

  2. Baltimore officials are scrambling to remove criminal penalties from a proposed city ordinance regulating dockless electric scooters that could see riders get as much as a month in jail and $1,000 in fines for everything from speeding to riding underage.

    I did a little underage riding, if you know what I mean…

    But seriously, I didn’t know Baltimore was full of gay fags.

    1. gay fags

      Is that like a double negative?

  3. “The more confusing the rules you’re writing, the more opportunity for police intervention and the more potential for disparities in the ways the rules are enforced,”

    Disparities? I’m sorry sir, but these are rules and rules are consistently enforced every time. How dare you say otherwise.

  4. I see people riding these things in traffic all of the time. You really have to have a death wish to do that. The only issue with these things is when some doofus hits a pedestrian. That is a real problem and something that the riders of these things should be held accountable for when it happens. Beyond that, the whole thing is nothing but first world problems.

    The one thing I don’t get is that these things can’t cost very much. I don’t see how it makes economic sense to rent them rather than just buy one. The fact that people are not doing that makes me think that they are a fad and people really are not using them very much. If you really used them, it would make sense just to buy one.

  5. Cooperate with the police, and the DA will likely drop the charges. #protip #stopresisting

    1. If you are some white hipster with upper middle class parents, likely so. If you are some poor person or black teenager, you are going to the can and staying for a while.

  6. Are rental scooters the new food trucks?

    1. Yes. Wouldn’t it be nice if anyone at reason took up any interesting hobbies or interests? It is never guns or motocycles or fast cars or skydiving or anything interesting or fun. Reason is forever concerned with the latest urban hipster fad.

      1. Seems to be the case.

  7. They *have* to move fast – BPD is running overtime shifts to handle this bonanza. Arresting scooter riders? Shit’s better even than traffic stops for ‘safety-to-revenue’ ratio and you don’t have to deal with smelly junkies.

  8. This is a little known feature of most traffic laws.

  9. Banishing them from the sidewalks NEEDS to happen… 15 mph is as fast as most bicycle riders cruise along, and that is far too fast to be on a sidewalk, The 6 mph limit is perhaps tolerable. As to riding in the street, since the rider does not have to work to keep it going, there should be no issue with riding them in the streets, just like a bicycle. WE know how to keep ourselves out of trouble and alive, most times.
    Riders of rhest things, as well as bikes, should be held accountable legally and financially when they hit and harm someone who is just walking on the sidewalk. Make those punishments commensurate with the harm done, such that when Bozo does knock down some little old lady or a smaller young person, it wilkl hurt Bozo hard enough to make not only Bozo straighten up but when word spreads throughout the community, Wanna Be Bozos will make an informed decision and ride safely. That could mean no ban for riding on the sidewalks, but instead hold riders responible for actual damages, and steep fines when negligence is proven.

    All the rest of it sounds like Nannies in Overdrive. Enough of that garbage already.

  10. I essentially started about a month and a 1/2 agone and i have gotten a couple of test for a whole of $2,200…this is the bestcall I made amidst pretty some time! “grateful to you for giving Maine this incredible possibility to profit from home. This similarly cash has changed my existence in such an excellent measure of courses, to the point that, bypass on you!”…….GOOD LUCK Click this Below
    connect ………. http://www.Mesalary.com

  11. Must be because the protected class is having too much difficulty following laws, as usual, so the left just decriminalizes them.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.