Go Ahead and Ignore Those #BreakUpWithBacon Ads
Nutrition nannies launch new cancer scaremongering campaign.

The activist group Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is running an anti-bacon campaign in the District of Columbia. The campaign includes advertisements on TV and at bus stops throughout the city under the slogan #BreakUpWithBacon.
Neal Barnard, founder of the Physicians Committee group, said the leading cause of cancer deaths for men and women in the United States is lung cancer, largely attributable to tobacco, and the second leading cause is colorectal cancer, reports The Washington Post. "The message is, 'Bacon is the new tobacco,'" Barnard said. In support of this assertion, Barnard cites data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer that finds that eating 50 grams of processed meat daily, equivalent to about 4 strips of bacon, correlates with an 18 pecent increase in the risk of getting colorectal cancer.
Should you quit bacon? First, eating 50 grams daily amounts to a bit over 40 pounds of bacon annually. Keep in mind that only about 18 million Americans consumed more than 5 pounds of bacon annually in 2018.
Second, the lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer in the U.S. is about 4.49 percent for men and 4.15 percent for women. Roughly calculated, an 18 percent increase means that the risk would rise to 5.3 percent for men and to 4.9 percent for women. In contrast, the lifetime risk of lung cancer among current male and female smokers is 17.2 and 11.6 percent, respectively, compared to the corresponding risks of male and female non-smokers at 1.3 and 1.4 percent. In other words, smoking boosts lung cancer risk by more than 1,000 percent compared to eating bacon, which increases the risk by 18 percent.
The far more effective way for a person to reduce the risk of getting and dying from colon cancer is to receive regular colonoscopies. For example, a recent study reports that colonoscopies help reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer by 89 percent.
I don't doubt the sincerity of the folks associated with the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, but comparing the cancer risks of bacon consumption to those of smoking basically amounts to scaremongering.
Disclosure: A precancerous polyp was removed during my first colonoscopy in my early 50s. Two subsequent colonoscopies have found no additional polyps. I intend to continue eating the occasional strip of bacon and to submitting to colonoscopies every five years or so.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Responsible" in the name means ignore everything they say. Ditto "Concerned".
That heuristic has so far never once failed me.
But bacon tastes goooood. Pork chops taste gooood.
wait, is this a Chik-Fil-A ad campaign by pigs to get us to eat more chicken?
So, bacon *might* increase my risk of cancer slightly (generously assuming the effect is real and there is an actual causal mechanism), but it will *definitely* make my mouth happy? I'll stick with bacon, thank you very much.
Keep in mind that only about 18 million Americans consumed more than 5 pounds of bacon annually in 2018.
The year ain't over yet.
Challenge accepted!
I don't doubt the sincerity of the folks associated with the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Well, I do. Most of the people prone to believing this junk science are really motivated by veganism and animal rights nuttery. Can't count the times I've seen vegan activists distort science and just flat out lie for the cause.
Insert C.S. Lewis quote here.
Actually you appear to be right about that assumption....
https://www.pcrm.org/
They are far more sincere about those beliefs than most people about most things. That's what makes them so dangerous.
Is this about bacon-flavored vaping fluid? 'Cause that'd be awesome.
It's not.
should so be a thing
Totally need a "Like" button.
Campaigning against bacon?
Get a rope.
Don't we now know the nitrates are good for us?
The way to make bacon safer is simple - add more bacon!
In the interest of promoting the public good, I hereby offer this valuable service.
Anyone who thinks bacon is bad for your health or has any other need to dispose of their unwanted bacon, you may send it directly to me. I will make sure that it is consumed, errr, disposed of properly.
You're Welcome.
If I have more colonoscopies every year, does that mean I can eat more bacon?
About the only problem I have with bacon is when someone tries to serve it to me in an ice cream sundae.
I think the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine would better spend their time and money and considerable expertise providing free colonoscopies to people who can't afford health care.