Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Donald Trump

Trump Pisses off GOP Lawmakers With Petty Mark Sanford Jokes

The incident says a lot of things about the president's character, none of them good.

Christian Britschgi | 6.21.2018 10:40 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

On Tuesday evening, President Donald Trump held a meeting with GOP congressmen on Capitol Hill where he reportedly made some wisecracks at the expense of outgoing, conservative lawmaker and former South Carolina Gov. Rep. Mark Sanford (R–S.C.).

According to Trump, his jokes brought the House down.

"Had a great meeting with the House GOP last night at the Capitol. They applauded and laughed loudly when I mentioned my experience with Mark Sanford. I have never been a fan of his!" he tweeted Wednesday afternoon.

Had a great meeting with the House GOP last night at the Capitol. They applauded and laughed loudly when I mentioned my experience with Mark Sanford. I have never been a fan of his!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 20, 2018

Trump, you'll recall, helped sink Sanford's reelection chances by endorsing his Republican primary opponent via Twitter on Election Day.

That the president would feel the need to rub salt in the outgoing lawmaker's wounds is petty in of itself. Making it worse are the comments coming from lawmakers who were present for Trump's remarks, and who report a very different reaction to his jokes.

"House Republicans had front row seats to @POTUS's dazzling display of pettiness and insecurity. Nobody applauded or laughed. People were disgusted," tweeted Rep. Justin Amash (R–Mich.).

House Republicans had front row seats to @POTUS's dazzling display of pettiness and insecurity. Nobody applauded or laughed. People were disgusted. https://t.co/FvmDCxElgv

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 20, 2018

"Categorically false," said Rep. Ryan Costello (R–Penn.).

Categorically false https://t.co/mLLyCFB8im

— Ryan Costello (@RyanCostello) June 20, 2018

Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R–Tenn.) told Politico that only "crickets" were heard following the president's jabs at Sanford.

Check out Reason's political obituary of the libertarian-leaning Sanford here.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Trump Rails Against Elites, Hecklers in Minnesota: Reason Roundup

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Donald TrumpMark SanfordJustin Amash
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (134)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. creech   7 years ago

    Trump seems compelled to alienate everyone except his kool-aid drinkers...paving the way for progressive victories and everything that won't make America great. Sad.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      I'm just upset that Amash didn't troll the president by Tweeting: "Not Classy. SAD"

  2. Eidde   7 years ago

    So, what did he say?

    1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

      "Sanford can go back to living in a Junkyard."

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        "But, not his son. He's been detained at the border"

      2. My Dog Bites Better Than Yours   7 years ago

        Someone spends way too much time looking at the MeTV channel.

    2. JoeBlow123   7 years ago

      Better yet, why does anyone care about Mark Sanford, the lying sack of adulterous shit that he is?

      Trump ripping on him is pretty ironic though. Dude who fucked a pornstar while his wife is pregnant. Scumbags abound.

  3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    RINOs hardest hit!

    Well, them and the tortured immigrant children Trump was beating with a rubber tube to separated them from their Familias.

  4. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

    If it wasn't this, they would find some other banal behavior to work themselves into a lather about.

    1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

      True. There is much to choose from. Not everything can be on the front burner.

      1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

        I'm not sure why they bother with his actual behavior any longer, the level of outrage hasn't aligned with it for quite some time.

        1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

          Disagree. The outrage on the behavioral stuff seems to have mellowed as it has been repeatedly been proven impotent. The critics have resorted to merely catalog it now.

          Of course you can find the outliers like Fonda and DeNiro, but I see the proles suffering from outrage exhaustion.

          1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

            Yeah, sorry about your recent coma.

  5. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    "I'm going to take a dump on this conference table and I want you all to eat it" the president said as he began to lower his pants. Representative Scalise gripped Speaker Ryan's jacked sleeve, "I'm scared, Paul" he said. The president squatted over the conference table and proclaimed "It's coming. And it's so classy." "I'm not eating shit!" Justin Amash exclaimed. "You'll eat it." Trump said with a winced face as he struggled through his dump. "And you'll like it." Speaker Ryan stared off into the distance and dreamed about simpler times when he was throwing grandma off a cliff. Nothing matter to him anymore. He was dead inside and there was nothing anyone could do to change that. "Bon appetite" Trump said as his feces slapped down onto the table.

    1. Citizen X   7 years ago

      +1 hot lunch

      1. Cathy L   7 years ago

        Sloppy Joe Tuesdays

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Your cafeteria sounds awful

          1. Cathy L   7 years ago

            I don't work at the White House.

            1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

              Well done

              1. Jerryskids   7 years ago

                Well done, with ketchup.

                1. Citizen X   7 years ago

                  Not Heinz, either. It's that off-brand "fancy catsup" where the vinegar separates out of the tomato paste.

  6. Mike Laursen   7 years ago

    Trump is just a comedian playing to a room that's afraid to laugh.

    1. Brandybuck   7 years ago

      Yeah, the ancient Romans hated it whenever Caligula decided he wanted to take the stage and do his standup routine instead of sticking to the fiddle.

      1. Number 2   7 years ago

        That was Nero.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Far be it from me to decry new blog content, but this is an odd thing to warrant a post. Both men would seem to be proven liars and philanderers.

  8. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

    Trump is a vulgarian. No surprise there. However, this seems to be pretty weak sauce and the GOP isn't exactly covering itself with glory by overreacting to every slight.

    1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

      Thinking that Trump's shit is glory, wallowing in it as some type of baptism, are the ones doing a disservice to the GOP. I hope they succeed in the destruction of their party.

      1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

        Sorry I struck a nerve by talking about you, but I appreciate that you have a group to irrationally hate.

        1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

          Keep rubbing that shit all over you. It's doing wonders for your complexion.

          1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

            Oh wow, you're so stupid and deluded that you come after me even though the posts you're replying to contain "Trump is a vulgarian. No surprise there"

            That is some top shelf TDS.

            1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

              Perhaps you're the Aspy type that understands mathematical equations better than the written word. I hope the following makes is easier for you to understand:
              "Trump is a vulgarian. No surprise there. I love Trump" = wallowing in Trump's shit.

              1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

                "Trump is a vulgarian. No surprise there. I love Trump"

                The fact that you had to lie about what I actually wrote says more than I ever could.

                1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

                  It seems to be easily inferred. Do you deny it? There are a few things with which I can agree with Trump. Is there anything on which you can disagree with Trump? Is there any critique of Trump policy I could make that you would not respond with 'TDS!'

                  1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

                    It seems to be easily inferred.

                    I agree TDS causes thought disorders.

                    Do you deny it?

                    I sure do.

                    Is there any critique of Trump policy I could make that you would not respond with 'TDS!'

                    Try not lying about what I wrote.

                  2. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

                    It seems to be easily inferred.

                    I agree TDS causes thought disorders.

                    Do you deny it?

                    I sure do.

                    Is there any critique of Trump policy I could make that you would not respond with 'TDS!'

                    Try not lying about what I wrote.

    2. Cathy L   7 years ago

      It takes a special thinness of skin to consider any and every response an overreaction.

      1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

        The irony of you posting this cannot be overstated.

  9. chemjeff radical individualist   7 years ago

    Trump is petty, boorish and vindictive.

    In other news, dog bites man.

    1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

      Don't tell Roger that, he'll bark something stupid about being a "Trump-hugger" or something.

      1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

        I'm pretty comfortable with this remark. But not nearly as comfortable as you are with Trump's petty, boorish and vindictive behavior.

        1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

          I'm not surprised you are comfortable with it, it's why you're being made fun of for thinking everyone is a "Trump-hugger"

          1. Roger the Shrubber   7 years ago

            Your such a bully UC. Quit making fun of me!

            1. Unhappy Chandler   7 years ago

              Stop lying and you might get what you want.

    2. John   7 years ago

      Who gives a shit? Lots of very effective people were not necessarily people you wanted to meet or be friends with. People's characters are complex and varied things. History is filled with rogues and raconteurs who did great service to God and country and wonderful people who did great harm. We seem to have forgotten that fact these days and instead have embraced what amounts to a Marxist view of character that says character can be defined as entirely black or white depending upon whatever single criteria are important to that day's politics.

      1. Cathy L   7 years ago

        "Raconteurs"?

        1. juris imprudent   7 years ago

          In John's mind he was probably thinking of raccoons that run restaurants.

          1. Citizen X   7 years ago

            Cutest restaurant ever!

          2. John   7 years ago

            No. I knew exactly what I was saying. It just went over her head.

          3. Jerryskids   7 years ago

            John's just jealous somebody picked all the corn out of Trump's shit before he got a chance to get some.

            1. John   7 years ago

              I am just jealous that I can't spend my life obsessing over whether people are nice enough to politicians. You called it Jerry. If only I could be like you guys and understand how evil Trump is!! He just has no respect for anything decent.

        2. John   7 years ago

          a person who excels in telling anecdotes

          http://www.merriam-webster.com...../raconteur

          It is a polite way of saying bullshit artist. The term "rogues and raconteurs is an idiomatic phrase meaning people who skirt the rules of ethics and propriety.

          I guess my post went over your head. I hope this helps you understand it better.

          1. Jerryskids   7 years ago

            I guess the part where nobody laughed at Trump's anecdote went over your head. As well as the part where Trump lied about how much everybody loved his little joke, and the part where even telling the joke shows how petty and insecure Trump is (as if we didn't already know this) and then doubled down on the pettiness and insecurity by braying about what a witty thing he said. It's just sad and pathetic, like making a bad pun and then digging somebody in the ribs and saying, "Get it? I made a joke!" Yeah, they got it, they just didn't think it was funny.

            1. John   7 years ago

              I guess the way I used the term in a sentence went right over your head. I said history is filled with rogues and raconteurs who did great things. The point was not to say anything about Trump in particular. My point was that people with otherwise lousy characters have often done great things. So, the fact that Trump is thin-skinned or not a nice guy is really irrelevant.

              I really need to remember just how unsophisticated some of you people are. I don't see how my point wasn't obvious. But I guess it wasn't. I need to remember to use smaller words and avoid using any but the most common references if I want some of you to understand what I am saying.

  10. TLBD   7 years ago

    /shrug

    Mark Sanford started it, Trump finished it. I don't pity the guy. Sometimes you get kicked while you're down when you start a fight you can't win.

    I realize that he and Amash are good friends, so I'll give him a pass on the outrage.

    1. I can't even   7 years ago

      Trump made some jokes... Sanford abandoned his family and his responsibilities as Governor to chase some foreign tail.

      Obviously Trump is the bad guy in this situation.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   7 years ago

        Didn't Trump get divorced twice, abandoning his family? Didn't he bang a hooker/porn star months after Melania gave birth to his son? Not that either Sanford or Trump's family life has anything to do with anything. Just kinda of hard for Trump to take the family values high ground when he is starting out at the banks of the Dead Sea.

        1. damikesc   7 years ago

          Did he do moral high ground or "dude abandoned his job, lied about it, all to chase unattractive Argentinian pussy"?

          He could've mentioned him violating the restraining order Jenny (his wife and the brains of their political outfit) had on him.

        2. A full 180   7 years ago

          "Didn't Trump get divorced twice"

          Ya

          "abandoning his family? "

          Dunno. They aren't hand in hand you know.

          1. dinkster   7 years ago

            Clearly not since they all work for him

      2. Citizen X   7 years ago

        Given Trump's predilection for chasing foreign tail while married, you'd think they'd have a lot to talk about.

    2. I can't even   7 years ago

      Trump made some jokes... Sanford abandoned his family and his responsibilities as Governor to chase some foreign tail.

      Obviously Trump is the bad guy in this situation.

      1. juris imprudent   7 years ago

        Two midgets in a pissing contest?

  11. John   7 years ago

    Reason is now all about showing proper respect to politicians. If the reason staff had an ounce of integrity and were actually libertarians, this kind of stuff would be the one thing they liked about Trump. Jesus tap-dancing Christ, I am pretty sure insisting on everyone respect the dignity of office holders like they are some kind of royalty or something is not exactly a good way to ensure liberty. Fuck Stanford. Politics is a dirty business. How about we stop acting like it is some kind of noble profession?

    1. creech   7 years ago

      Contrast Trump with Reagan. Lots of libertarians liked some of their policies and hated others. Liberals thought the same too. But Reagan disarmed many of his critics with good humor, charm and self-deprecation. People who hadn't voted for him the first time, supported his re-election. Trump seems to be deliberately alienating everyone who isn't his base. Guess what? The base is too small to decide national elections. The proggie base is also too small to decide national elections. The future of our country is going to be decided by those 20-25% who don't follow the intricacies of political issues like we do, but get a sense of who is a good guy or girl from the media. And who just might believe that their economic well-being was due to Obama's groundwork. And if Trump continues to act like an asshole, or keeps being portrayed as an asshole even when he isn't, then America will be ruled by Democrats for a long time to come.

      1. John   7 years ago

        It is not 1980. Progs can no longer be disarmed by good humor and cheer. People are tired of Washington pushing them around. It is a different world. The last thing that is going to hurt Trump is being mean to someone in Congress.

        1. creech   7 years ago

          Agreed; progs can't be. But they are hopeless and can't swing election victories. As I said, it is the 25% who pay little attention who are the ones who swing elections and are susceptible to "good humor and cheer."

    2. juris imprudent   7 years ago

      Fuck Stanford

      I thought it was Fuck Duke?

    3. Jerryskids   7 years ago

      Yeah, John we get it, Trump is your little Orange Jesus and you'll stand no criticism of Him. Your faux outrage would be a little bit more believable if you didn't so predictably leap to his defense Every. Fucking. Time. while at the same time failing to leap to defend any other politician - like say Sanford when he started talking shit about Trump. What about that, John? Did you applaud Sanford for talking shit about politicians when the politician in question was Trump?

      1. John   7 years ago

        Why do I have to defend Stanford? Yeah, I really don't care what politicians say about each other. You don't seem to understand how this works.

        I don't applaud Standford. I don't fucking care, just like I don't care if Trump is mean to him. What about that do you not understand?

  12. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

    Trump rubs it in the faces of those who went against him?

    Oh noes!

    This doesn't do much for the site's credibility.

    Isn't TDS about people (especially journalists) not being able to see the issues clearly because of their personal hatred of Trump?

    Now you want to tell us why we shouldn't like Trump--personally? You mean he isn't the kind of guy you'd have over for poker and pizza?

    TDS may be worse now than Reagan Derangement Syndrome ever was.

    The journalists of today are starting to sound like the hardcore bands of the Reagan era.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYlbWKtoEmg

    1. Cathy L   7 years ago

      Trump rubs it in the faces of those who went against him?

      Oh noes!

      This doesn't do much for the site's credibility.

      Why would it harm their credibility to report accurate information?

      1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

        What are we supposed to do with this information?

        You don't like Trump personally. He's an obnoxious jackass.

        So what?

        Because Trump is a narcissistic asshole, . . .

        Go ahead and finish the sentence with anything rational. I dare you.

        1. Cathy L   7 years ago

          Because Trump is a narcissistic asshole, I don't like him or the way he acts, would never vote for him, and wish other people wouldn't reward him with praise.

          1. damikesc   7 years ago

            And this requires columns about him being mean to another politician...why?

            Poor Mark Sanford needs his feelings protected?

            Keep in mind, his wife --- whom he did cheat on --- was the one who got his aides to get his aides to drag him away from the microphone while he was politically committing suicide.

            Yes, she called them and told them to get him out of there. AFTER she had already left. He was THAT pathetic in that press conference.

            1. Cathy L   7 years ago

              And this requires columns about him being mean to another politician...why?

              I thought this was a column about how he's a liar.

              1. John   7 years ago

                Considering your limited vocabulary, can we really trust your understanding of the article?

                1. Cathy L   7 years ago

                  You think a phrase with fewer than 200 Google results is an "idiom."

                  1. John   7 years ago

                    Most people are poorly read Cathy. It is not my fault I am not. If you don't like it, get smarter.

                  2. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                    You think a phrase with fewer than 200 Google results is an "idiom."

                    Idiom - a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light ).

                    Google results - About 125,000 results (0.36 seconds)

                    Get your Google machine fixed.

                    1. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      "Rogues and raconteurs"

                      About 125,000 results (0.36 seconds)

                      Cathy L|6.21.18 @ 12:25PM|#

                      Way to admit you were wrong.

                      This is where you put your money where your mouth is.

                    2. Cathy L   7 years ago

                      Now try it with quotation marks around the phrase. 154 results.

                    3. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      Ah, so you don't know how to use google, and it's not your fault.

                      I knew you'd make stupid excuses.

                      You sound like John defending his "pissed on" post, what the fuck is it with you clowns who can't just admit you were wrong.

                    4. John   7 years ago

                      How I am I defending my post? I said it. And Obama did piss on the country. I don't really see how that applies here. Not going to a funeral is a bit different than calling some congress creature a poopy head. And Obama was an asshole. Maybe Trump is too. Obama wasn't a bad President because he was an asshole and neither is Trump.

                    5. Cathy L   7 years ago

                      One of us definitely doesn't know how to use Google, but it's not me.

                    6. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      That big stinky link I posted says otherwise, linkless.

                    7. damikesc   7 years ago

                      Now try it with quotation marks around the phrase. 154 results.

                      So, because you suck at Google, it makes John wrong?

                      Keep doubling down on it. Please.

                  3. damikesc   7 years ago

                    You think a phrase with fewer than 200 Google results is an "idiom."

                    1. damikesc   7 years ago

                      Perhaps she needs more monosyllabic words to keep up?

              2. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                Trump Pisses off GOP Lawmakers With Petty Mark Sanford Jokes

                I don't think you did, I think you are covering because you realize it's a silly article.

              3. damikesc   7 years ago

                WHAT?!?

                A POLITICIAN TOLD A LIE??!?

                GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE!!!

                I am now cynical about our political establishment.

          2. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

            "Because Trump is a narcissistic asshole, I don't like him or the way he acts, would never vote for him, and wish other people wouldn't reward him with praise."

            I don't care whether Tom Brady is a nice guy. I'm not looking for him to be my kid's piano teacher. I want him to be a good quarterback. I want him to make the plays so that our team wins. I want him to make the plays that all the experts on TV say are wrong because they're insufficiently progressive.

            You don't pick quarterbacks based on whether they're nice guys. You shouldn't pick a pediatric surgeon based on his bedside manner. Sometimes colonels order their men on the ground to do things that will get some of them killed. Sometimes, the last thing you want in a boot camp sergeant is a nice guy. His job is to turn nice guys into killing machines.

            And please consider the other view. Oprah Winfrey is not a nice person. She's a narcissistic terror. All our politicians are narcissists. The ones we think of as nice people have merely fooled us. If a nice guy wants to raise my taxes, does that make him better or worse than a narcissistic asshole who wants to lower my taxes? Whether politicians are nice people is completely beside the point.

            I have no faith in a politician's character anyway. That's one of the reasons why I think their power should be severely limited.

      2. John   7 years ago

        What harms their credibility is acting like this kind of thing is important enough to report. The whole thing is just a long virtue signal by the author.

        1. jcw   7 years ago

          Remember when you said Obama pissed on the american people because he didn't attend Scalia's funeral?

          I have no idea how you feel comfortable talking about the lack of credibility of someone else.

          1. John   7 years ago

            Did I ever say that? I don't recall ever saying anything like that. If I did, show me where and I will admit i was wrong. Most of America no doubt didn't give a shit if he did. And I doubt Scalia would have wanted him to anyway.

            So, provide a link to my saying that or admit you made it up. I don't remember saying any such thing. So, I think you are just talking out of your ass and can fuck off. Seriously, if you can't make an honest point, don't make one.

            1. Cathy L   7 years ago

              That wasn't hard to find AT ALL

              John|2.17.16 @ 5:38PM|#

              He really doesn't give a shit. I honestly think he enjoys pissing on the country.

              http://reason.com/blog/2016/02.....nt_5912258

              1. John   7 years ago

                I don't think Obama did give a shit. Did he piss off the country? No. But he pissed off his enemies, which meant nothing because they were not going to vote for him anyway.

                Trump is the same way. It didn't hurt Obama and I doubt it is going to hurt Trump.

                1. Cathy L   7 years ago

                  Way to admit you were wrong.

                  1. John   7 years ago

                    It didn't piss off the country. It pissed off his enemies. That part was wrong. The rest is true and just shows how little this matters.

                    1. Cathy L   7 years ago

                      Piss on. You said he was pissing on the country. Exactly like jcw claimed, and you said he was wrong and that you would apologize if he could point to your words. I provided a link. He didn't make it up.

                    2. John   7 years ago

                      He was pissing on the country. He refused to go to a Supreme Court Justices funeral. I don't see how Trump calling out one Congressman is in any way analogous to that. In that sense, I was more right than I remember. Good catch. I didn't say he was pissing off the country. I said he was pissing on the country, which is exactly what he was doing.

                    3. Cathy L   7 years ago

                      Anytime you want to apologize to jcw is fine by me.

                    4. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      Does that mean you're going to apologize to John?

                    5. Cathy L   7 years ago

                      For knowing how to use Google better than you? No.

                    6. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      You do understand, you didn't actually use it properly? And you're pulling a Buttplug now?

                      No one is surprised you have no integrity.

                    7. John   7 years ago

                      Cathy, you don't need to apologize to me. It was my fault for using words and concepts that were unfamiliar to you. I need to use smaller words and speak in terms that you can understand in the future. That isn't your fault.

                    8. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      She isn't going to apologize anyway, she has all the integrity of a Buttplug.

                    9. John   7 years ago

                      Why do I have to apologize? What I said was not wrong and not analogous to this. I was ready to say he was right. But you made the excellent point that I said he was pissing on the country, not off it. I had long forgotten ever saying that and assumed I was saying pissing off. But you correctly pointed out that I said Obama was pissing on the country, which is completely different.

                      Thanks a lot. It isn't often that someone scores an own goal on your behalf like this. Don't think I am not grateful.

                    10. Cathy L   7 years ago

                      Why do you have to apologize? Gee, I don't know...

                      So, provide a link to my saying that or admit you made it up. I don't remember saying any such thing. So, I think you are just talking out of your ass and can fuck off. Seriously, if you can't make an honest point, don't make one.

                      And jcw initially said you said "pissing on." He was right. He didn't make your comment up. But instead of searching for it yourself, you acted like a huge asshole.

                    11. John   7 years ago

                      I did say it. So what? But it doesn't show what he says it does. You are the one that made that point. And I thanked you for it. What else do you want me to do?

                    12. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      John, she lied, I caught her, and she made excuses. She has no qualms about lying and you should see now that you're wasting your time.

                    13. John   7 years ago

                      I honestly thought the term "rogues and raconteurs" was something commonly known and that its meaning in this context was obvious. I really don't think it is some obscure phrase. But maybe it is to some people.

                    14. Mr. Grendell   7 years ago

                      It is, she's just an imbecile with no integrity.

                    15. Just the Tip   7 years ago

                      Holy fucking shit. A real live cripple fight!

                    16. Just the Tip   7 years ago

                      Maybe not live (it looks like It happened hours ago) but the remnants are something to behold.

        2. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

          It's all attacking Trump personally--which is mostly a non-issue and may go in his favor.

          Fighter pilots, NFL quarterbacks, heart surgeons, . . .

          When I worked in the hospital, there was this surgeon everybody hated. The guy was a narcissistic asshole. He treated everyone around him like shit. Party of my job was to keep him happy--and make him do his paperwork. I could hardly stand being in the same room with the guy he was so obnoxious.

          He was a hell of a pediatric surgeon. He'd take children, slice their chests open, break open their rib cages, and cut into their organs. Sometimes, they'd die on the operating table. He couldn't let that bother him for long, though, because there was often another child getting anesthetized in the next OR, waiting for him to break open their rib cages, too. He'd come out of the surgeon's lounge, say the terrible things that needed to be said to the screaming mothers of the child who'd died, scrub up, and get back in surgery.

          To do that job well? You may need to be a narcissistic jackhole.

          The last thing the next kid on the operating table needed was the kind of guy you'd invite over for poker and pizza.

          You know who the real phonies are? The people who act like they care--kiss babies and puppies--and then turn around and treat us to shit like the drug war and ObamaCare. Yeah, Trump is an unrepentant narcissistic asshole.

          So what?

          Where does he stand on the issues?

          1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   7 years ago

            Where does he stand on the issues?

            Intolerance, ignorance, backwardness, and authoritarianism, mostly.

            1. juris imprudent   7 years ago

              Oh, he speaks to your heart.

              1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

                +1

                The left can't even understand the question of where he is on the issues.

        3. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   7 years ago

          What harms their credibility is acting like this kind of thing is important enough to report.

          Those who dislike a libertarian site's content can always head toward Breitbart, FreeRepublic, and Stormfront.

          1. John   7 years ago

            And miss you showing me that yes people with 70 IQs are allowed on the internet? No way.

    2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      I'd take Amash's side over Trump

    3. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   7 years ago

      Trump is going to need help from right-wingers in Congress if he is to accomplish any substantial part of Republicans' intolerance-and-ignorance agenda.

      He is alienating the people whose help he needs if he is to do anything other than cave and fail, as he did yesterday. Being a great "dealmaker" was his ostensible strength (everyone understood he was not much on reading, insight, or experience). So far, he has been mostly bluster, with few or no "deals" to show for more than one year in office. No wall. No payments from Mexico. The only one locked up so far is his campaign manager. No repeal of Obamacare. No international deal.

      I am content. Faux libertarians, bigots, and other right-wingers probably should not be.

      1. juris imprudent   7 years ago

        Do tell us about the Republican agenda to cut the federal govt, we could all use a good laugh.

        1. damikesc   7 years ago

          Yes, the Republicans refused to cut a fraction of 1% of their recent budget.

          The loss of their support for budgetary concerns has to be crushing.

      2. Norska Den   7 years ago

        I am content

        Anyone who reads your posts can see that this isn't true. You have this weird, pathologcial need to drag people down as a way to elevate yourself.

  13. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

    Why do writers so often quote a tweet in "" and then immediately follow it with the tweet itself? It ain't just here, it's everywhere. WTF is wrong with these people?

    1. John   7 years ago

      WTF is wrong with these people?

      The most 2018est statement ever made.

  14. damikesc   7 years ago

    Trump, you'll recall, helped sink Sanford's reelection chances by endorsing his Republican primary opponent via Twitter on Election Day.

    Yes, the tweet shortly before the polls closed was the deciding factor. Sure.

    1. juris imprudent   7 years ago

      Hey Russian social media campaigning out Trump over the hump. /derpaliciousness

  15. damikesc   7 years ago

    I am touched, though, to see Reason come to the defense of the feelings of Republicans. It is always needed.

  16. SIV   7 years ago

    MAGA

  17. hello.   7 years ago

    Lol. Mark Sanford is "libertarian" now. Other than having a taste for brown pussy what else is required? Do you just have to be a disgraced Republican party washout like Gary Johnson and Bill Weld?

  18. Imissbuckley   7 years ago

    Mark Sanford was/is a conservative who at least appears to have become more libertarian over time, if his votes against NSA spying are to be believed to have originated from libertarian principles. Like Jeff Flake in Arizona, he was a less than "perfect" advocate for our ideals. If he is missed it will only be because his successor ends up being worse.

    In any case Justin Amash and other libertarian leaning congressmen should focus more on how to be effective legislators for liberty in the Trump era, and help elect more liberty advocates, leave the pissing matches with Trump to the NeverTrumpers.

  19. Think It Through   7 years ago

    "Trump lies, aggrandizes self."

    Can't we just record that and let it be the lead story every day? Then move on to new news in minute 2.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Subaru Is the Latest Carmaker To Hike Prices in Response to Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.20.2025 4:50 PM

What Kristi Noem Gets Wrong About Habeas Corpus

Billy Binion | 5.20.2025 4:33 PM

Will Trump's Order To Lift U.S. Sanctions on Syria Be Followed?

Matthew Petti | 5.20.2025 4:00 PM

Judge Rules in Favor of New Hampshire Bakery in Fight Over Donut Mural

Emma Camp | 5.20.2025 3:20 PM

The Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects a 'Very Narrow Approach' to Deadly Force by Police

Jacob Sullum | 5.20.2025 3:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!