Darkest Hour


Darkest Hour poster (detail), Focus Features

To go to war or not to? That is the quandary at the center of Darkest Hour, a film that depicts almost no violence at all and yet shines a searchlight on the stakes surrounding a decision about when and whether fighting among nations is justified.

Set in summer 1940, the movie follows a vigorous debate between newly appointed Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who believes Germany must be met with force of arms, and loyalists to his predecessor, Neville Chamberlain. With the enemy closing in and the United States (at the time) forswearing aid, the latter group concludes the Wehrmacht is too strong to be defeated. To prevent further bloodshed, it favors seeking peace terms with Hitler.

For Churchill this is madness ("You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth!"), and the viewer knows history will vindicate his tenacity. The story's power is that it forces us to consider what might have seemed right, and why, had we also been in the room without the benefit of hindsight.

NEXT: Rhode Island Wants to Treat Drug Dealers Like Murderers

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Forgive me if I don’t watch this movie as I cannot see Sirius Black playing Winston Churchill 🙂

  2. Furthermore, as an ex-Brit I thought the Darkest Hour related to the London blitz and the Battle of Britain air war.

    Still Hollywood are a law unto themselves even when they are not defining it for the rest of us.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.