Los Angeles

L.A. Times Investigation Tells Sad Story of Attempts to Electrify the City's Bus Fleet

The paper found city officials have spent $330 million and don't have much to show for it.

|

CHINE NOUVELLE/SIPA/Newscom

A quick update on Los Angeles' plan to electrify its bus fleet: The government has now spent millions of dollars on shoddy, nonfunctional vehicles from a manufacturer that transit officials had a direct financial interest in supporting.

Last year Metro—that's the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which runs bus and train service in most of Los Angeles County—promised to replace all 2,200 of its natural gas–powered buses with battery-powered vehicles by 2030. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has pledged to purchase only zero-emission buses by 2025.

To achieve these ambitious goals, Metro and other city and county agencies have funneled $330 million in public contracts to BYD, a vehicle manufacturer based in China. An exhaustive Los Angeles Times investigation shows that taxpayers got very little in return for that money: The company produced buses that could not travel the advertised ranges, that stalled on the city's steep hills, that had doors that wouldn't close, and that required far more service calls than the buses they were designed to replace.

The Times also found that some of the officials responsible for awarding grants to BYD owned BYD stock, attended BYD-funded junkets, or received tens of thousands in campaign contributions from BYD.

Take Mike Antonovich, a longtime Los Angeles County supervisor and the chairman of Metro's board. The Los Angeles Times reported that in 2009 and 2010 ethics filings, Antonovich disclosed that he held BYD stock worth less than $10,000.* During that time his wife counseled the company. The stock no longer appeared on disclosures the following year, when Antonovich co-sponsored a $30 million grant for new bus technology. In the following years, he supported initiatives that would directly benefit the company, including a plan to convert the entire Metro fleet to electric vehicles. Antonovich reportedly helped secure a $9.45 million in incentives for BYD to establish a headquarters and manufacturing facility in Los Angeles County.

Also benefitting from BYD's largesse was Len Engel, transit manager for the Antelope Valley Transit Agency. Engel's agency awarded a $72 million contract to BYD to electrify its entire bus fleet in 2016. That same year, the company paid Engel's expenses for week-long trips to China and Ecuador and also hired his sister-in-law for an administrative post.

While has BYD proved to be a deft influence peddler, the Times reveals that it is a less than sterling bus manufacturer. When the first five BYD buses hit Los Angeles' streets in 2015, the vehicles averaged only 59 miles between charges, despite promises they could reach ranges of 155 miles. (Normal Metro buses have a range of about 385 miles before needing to refuel.) The BYD buses also stalled going up hills and required service 10 times more frequently than other Metro buses.

All the problems forced BYD to buy its own buses back from Metro after a couple months on the road in 2016. No BYD buses are currently being operated in the city by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.*

Despite these problems, Los Angeles has continued funneling money toward BYD. Last year the company scored another $47 million contract to provide Metro with 60 buses despite its staff offering negative technical reviews of its bid. That same year the city requested $10 million in grants to buy electric BYD garbage trucks the sanitation agency doesn't even want.

The warped incentives here extend beyond direct payments to officials or their campaigns. By locating its manufacturing facility in Los Angeles County, BYD has been able to argue that the additional money spent on their buses (electric buses cost about twice that of their traditional diesel counterparts) will come back to their community in the form of jobs and tax revenue. The economics of that argument might not pencil out, but the politics of concentrating jobs in an official's district while spreading the cost of those jobs across all taxpayers is tried and true.

Likewise, politicians with higher aspirations may find more political rewards by looking tough on climate change than by running a good bus service. That's particularly true of Garcetti, who is eying a run for president in 2020 and who has raised his national profile by attacking Donald Trump on climate change. When the president announced he was pulling out of the Paris Climate Accords, Garcetti vowed that L.A. would abide by the emission target agreement nevertheless, a move that attracted national headlines.

Garcetti even jetted off to Paris, where he made that pledge to only purchase emission-free vehicles by 2025.

Meanwhile, the local taxpayers one might expect to raise a stink about spending on useless buses have been quieted somewhat by the fact that much of the money for electrifying Los Angeles' bus fleet comes from state and federal grants. Just this past month, for instance, Los Angeles got $36 million in state funds to buy 112 electric buses.

The moral: Public transportation agencies have a lot of goals. Just one of them is transporting people.

*UPDATE and CORRECTION: This story has been updated. The original version of the story incorrectly stated that no BYD buses are currently operating in Los Angeles. The story should have said that the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority is not currently operating BYD buses in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Department of Transportation has at least 4 BYD buses on the road, and the Antelope Valley Transit Authority and the City of Gardena, both of which are in Los Angeles County, have some BYD buses, too. Reason did not intend to suggest that BYD engaged in criminal wrongdoing.

The original story was also unclear about the timing of Mike Antonovich's disclosures of BYD stock ownership as reported by the Los Angeles Times. The story has been updated to clarify the timing.

NEXT: Richard Nixon Probably Would Not Have Been Saved by Fox News

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Corruption and Incompetence Mark [insert national, state, or municipal government entity] Attempt to [insert activity]

  2. Corruption And Incompetence Mark was my roommate’s nickname in college.

  3. More shit talking from Christian.

  4. Government officials, making a mistake? No! How could this be?

  5. Business as usual.

  6. You overestimate the goals. Subtract the one about transporting people.

  7. Transit officials have spent $330 million on nonfunctional buses from a politically connected company.

    Environmentalism is a political movement, not a scientific one.

  8. OH and remember kidz, California is… “on track” to be carbon-ey neutral-ey by next Wednesday! The weekend at the latest!

    1. They do seem to have ramped up the effort to drive all humans and human activities out of the state.

  9. The company produced buses that could not travel the advertised ranges, that stalled on the city’s steep hills, that had doors that wouldn’t close, and that required far more service calls than the buses they were designed to replace.

    Close the circle, Los Angeles, make them self-driving and your turn to the dark side will be complete.

    1. You don’t want self-driving busses, you want busses that require two operators. The busses breaking down provides extra jobs for the mechanic’s union, the bus driver’s union gots to get theirs.

    2. If they’d have bought them from Musk, they’d be 4 or 5 years late and had brakes that doen’t work!

      1. A software patch will fix that.

  10. Last year Metro… promised to replace all 2,200 of its natural gas?powered buses with battery-powered vehicles by 2030.

    I assume that all the state’s electric generating plants are powered by electricity, too.

    1. No, they’re powered by the political winds of change.

      1. You win the thread, D.R!

    2. A nice point given that California tends to have brown outs. How much worse will those be with expanded electric vehicle rollouts without a corresponding increase in electrical generation? Why, don’t even think about it! They’ll just import all that electricity, thus being totally and completely carbon neutral!

      1. There’s an argument that electric vehicles plugged into the Grid would help stabalize it. Like localized capacitors

        1. Someone’s fantasy, we’ll stay out of it.

    3. Not to mention that I thought natural gas was good because it burned clean.

  11. “The Times also found that some of the officials responsible for awarding grants to BYD owned BYD stock, attended BYD-funded junkets, or received tens of thousands in campaign contributions from BYD.”

    Put them in jail or stop pretending that we care about this.

      1. My guess is that Los Angeles voters don’t agree with you. They deserve to get the government they vote for, good and hard. My only hope is that us federal taxpayers aren’t paying for this graft.

        1. The voters probably don’t give a shit, but I suspect the tax payers might. Notably, those two groups might overlap on a Venn diagram but they are still two separate groups.

      2. I think most of us pretty much agree with this. Nothing will happen though, and I doubt anyone will bat an eye at it.

  12. Seems ironic. Kind of how they killed the Los Angeles & Pacific Electric Railways back right after WW2 in the 1st place. Politicians win coming and going……

  13. I always wonder about these things. I mean, you got a government contract from your cronies that pays waaaay above market. There’s tons of money here even if you delivered MVP.

    Yet these people don’t even do that. They just churn out some shit and then scramble when its – inevitably – discovered and broadcast. Its not like you have to deliver a quality product. You just need to deliver one that works, you’ll still be pocketing a ton of money.

    1. You don’t even have to deliver one that works. You just need to deliver an expensive program and then claim at least you tried to do something.

      1. And when it doesn’t work, just claim they didn’t spend enough.

  14. Maybe they can use them to house all the homeless.

  15. A few more new nuclear electrical generation plants and all this zero emission BS goes down the drain. Reduce our dependency on natural gas and coal-fired plants and use nuclear. No need for the roof-top solar panel mandate and it makes a whole lot more sense to use electric cars which will really be clean instead of displacing the point of CO2/pollution production.

    Quit it already with all this expensive, liberty-sapping insanity.

    1. I agree, but the plants would have to be in like Nevada and transfer the power to CA. Ring of fire and what not

  16. To see how to do electric buses properly, look at Chattanooga, TN and their shuttle bus service they’ve been running since 1992.

    Step one. BUY AMERICAN. Their shuttle buses are made in the USA and the city has worked closely with the manufacturer over the years to improve them as battery technology has developed.

    Step two. Make them pay for themselves. The program was started with an initial government grant but runs on a share of parking lot fees and donation boxes on the shuttle buses and at both stations. NO TAXES go to fund the electric buses and paying for rides is optional.

  17. It’s too bad they didn’t try retrofitting the powertrain of conventional buses with a EV or hybrid one. There’s a company called Wrightspeed (https://www.wrightspeed.com/) that makes one.

  18. prolly should not forget that gerry browns’ own father edmund g.(pat) brown was bought and paid for by general motors and firestone to take the electric buses and railways of the streets in the 1960 and install gas and diesel buses.

  19. Watching California’s government is like watching a Road Runner Cartoon and they are Willie. They keep ordering from the ACME central planners catalog and disaster seems to strike every-time.

  20. So, let me get this straight, the same city that conspired with GE to kill the electric train in favor of combustion engines in a bus can’t get a fleet of the same…..electrified….without a bunch of graft and collusion? Unpossible!

    1. *GM not GE. Sorry.

  21. Well good. The “great people” of Los Angeles deserve everything they get. In this case, screwed.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.