Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Bill Cosby Is Facing 30 Years in Prison After Being Found Guilty of Rape: Reason Roundup

Plus: Court says bars can kick out Trump supporters, and leaders of North and South Korea share a historic handshake.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 4.27.2018 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Rebecca Nowalski/Polaris/Newscom

Bill Cosby now faces up to 30 years in prison after being found guilty yesterday of drugging and raping a woman in 2004. The result of yesterday's retrial was far from certain. Cosby delivered a deadlocked jury ending in mistrial in June 2017, the last time this case came to court. And for decades, he has dodged both legal and social repercussions for the sexual misconduct and violence alleged by at least several dozen women.

Cosby's conviction "is not just a victory for the 62 of us publicly known Cosby survivors" but "also a victory…for all sexual assault survivors, female and male," one of Cosby's accusers, Lili Bernard, told reporters outside the courtroom.

"There was every reason to believe Cosby wouldn't be found guilty," writes Buzzfeed's Scaachi Koul. "Cosby was in his late seventies before the allegations against him actually coalesced into a widely followed news story in late 2014, largely because a male comedian, Hannibal Buress, started talking about them. Cosby's costars and family were actively defending him in public, as were other celebrities."

After the verdict, Cosby erupted at one prosecutor who suggested he should be denied bail because he was a flight risk who owned a plane. "He doesn't have a plane, you asshole!" Cosby shouted.

Cosby's sentencing will take place in the next 60–90 days.

The news of Cosby's conviction has given rise to a charged and celebratory mood among accusers of another powerful Hollywood entity, Harvey Weinstein, and other celebrities vocal in recent #MeToo campaigns:

America loved Bill Cosby. Nobody ever loved Harvey Weinstein. Thank you to all the courageous women who came forward and changed the world. #TruthPrevails

— Asia Argento (@AsiaArgento) April 26, 2018

You're next, Harvey. We're coming for you. All of you. #TimesUp https://t.co/pW15XLvHmL

— Amber Tamblyn (@ambertamblyn) April 26, 2018

Cosby is guilty. I'm sorry if you loved a lie. His victims can now exhale. Thank you judge and jury. Thank you society for waking up.

— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) April 26, 2018

And a lot of people couldn't resist laying into Cosby's gentlemanly public image, with lectures to other comedians about curse words and to poor black communities about baggy pants and how their problems were all their own fault.

Remember when Cosby lectured other comedians not to curse? https://t.co/VdPrgEpGNO

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) April 26, 2018

And now Bill Cosby. Another leader of Black "social consciousness" has now been found guilty of sexually violating women.

Watching the women he abused walk out the court in tears is tearing me up.

— George M Johnson (@IamGMJohnson) April 26, 2018

The judge unsealed Cosby's depositions where he admitted to drugging women because of Cosby's role as a "public moralist." He was brought down in part by his own desire to lecture poor black people for moral turpitude, while decades of sexual assault allegations were hidden.

— Adam Serwer (@AdamSerwer) April 26, 2018

Cosby accuser Victoria Valentino on what she'd say to Cosby: "Pull your damn pants up" #inners pic.twitter.com/Qc9geVaqge

— All In w/Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) April 27, 2018

Heard a man on tv reminiscing about the Cosby of old, & expressing bewilderment over the duality of such a revered paternal figure also being a predator & rapist. Yep. You're starting to get the point, buddy.

— Andy Richter (@AndyRichter) April 26, 2018

The New York Times' Wesley Morris notes that Cliff Huxtable's groundbreaking normalcy on The Cosby Show helped create the cognitive dissonance many have faced in hearing about Bill Cosby's sexually predatory antics.

"America's Dad" is what we called Bill Cosby. And we called him that because, well, what a revolutionary way to put it. Through him, we were thumbing our noses at the long, dreary history for black men in America by elevating this one to a paternal Olympus. In the 1980s he made the black American family seem "just like us."…Mr. Cosby made blackness palatable to a country historically conditioned to think the worst of black people. And to pull that off, he had to find a morally impeccable presentation of himself and his race. This is what Sidney Poitier, his friend and movie partner, was always up against: inhabiting the superhumanly unimpeachable. But Mr. Cosby might have managed to pull a fast one, using his power and wealth to become the predator that white America mythologized in a campaign to terrorize, torture and kill black people for centuries. Mr. Cosby told lots of jokes. This was his sickest one.

FREE MINDS

OK for bars to boot Trump supporters, says court. It's OK for a bar to kick out someone based on their political beliefs, the Manhattan Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, responding to a case in which a man claims he was kicked out of a New York City bar for wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat. Upon talking to the staffer trying to boot him, the man, Greg Piatek, was allegedly told that "anyone who supports Trump—or believes in what you believe—is not welcome here."

MAGA is not a creed, court says, and being thrown out of a bar for wearing a MAGA hat is not against NY & NYC human rights laws https://t.co/On4ShtOdIS pic.twitter.com/dmLlgdM6UC

— New York Law Journal (@NYLawJournal) April 26, 2018

Piatek's lawyer told the court that "the purpose of the hat is that he wore it because he was visiting the 9/11 Memorial." This, they argued, made the hat "part of his spiritual belief," since he was "paying spiritual tribute to the victims of 9/11."

New York state and city anti-discrimination law covers spiritual and religious beliefs but not political beliefs. But the judge didn't buy their 9/11 spirituality and MAGA-hat claims. "Plaintiff does not state any faith-based principle to which the hat relates," Justice David Cohen concluded, tossing the case.

PEACE…?

War is over—maybe. In a Friday morning summit, the leaders of North Korea and South Korea agreed to "a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization," thereby ending the Korean War.

KOREAN WAR TO END! The United States, and all of its GREAT people, should be very proud of what is now taking place in Korea!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 27, 2018

The Koreas are "linked by blood as a family and compatriots who cannot live separately," said North Korea's Kim Jong Un. Now, the Koreas "will be united as one country."

But the "Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification on the Korean Peninsula" agreement signed by Kim and South Korean President Moon Jae-in was short on specifics. "In a sense, the vague joint statement… kicks one of the world's most pressing issues down the road to a much-anticipated summit between Kim and U.S. President Donald Trump in coming weeks," writes AP's Foster Klug.

The handshake that made history. pic.twitter.com/JB09Ce9mHt

— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) April 27, 2018

QUICK HITS

  • "He's either very sick or very dumb," President Trump tweeted Friday morning about former FBI director James Comey.
  • To stop sex trafficking, stop arresting sex workers.
  • It's a new crime-fighting era, folks:

Confirming reports, two sources tell me police tracked down the alleged East Area Rapist/Golden State Killer by running crime-scene DNA against consumer genealogical websites, giving them possible relatives of the target, then building a pool and narrowing from there.

— Demian Bulwa (@demianbulwa) April 26, 2018

  • Immigration officials are pushing for the detainment and prosecution of any parents caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally with their kids. This zero-tolerance move would represent "a stark change in policy that would result in the separation of families that until now have mostly been kept together," notes The Washington Post.
  • Trump can't make the Manafort case disappear.
  • Pansexual is the new bisexual. According to Merriam-Webster's blog, "Pansexual (and pansexuality) entered the English language in the early 20th century, although with a different meaning than it generally has today; the word initially meant 'tending to suffuse all experience and conduct with erotic feeling.'"
  • Despite so much winning, "the average American conservative feels bombarded daily with disrespect." Why?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: To Save Lives, Make Naloxone an Over-the-Counter Drug

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Reason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (216)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    "He doesn't have a plane, you asshole!" Cosby shouted.

    That's the worst thing he's admitted to.

  2. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

    Bill Cosby now faces up to 30 years in prison after being found guilty yesterday of drugging and raping a woman

    There went Trump's next pick to head up the VA.

    1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      Decent joke. B+

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        It's not cool to patronize the disabled.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          I believe in positive reinforcement. It works on my dog, maybe it'll work on shreek too.

          1. MichaeI Hihn   7 years ago

            That's the spirit.

        2. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          The disabled are just trying to make a living, like you or I, and if their products are good, it is worth it to buy from them. Refusing to do so on the grounds that they were made by a disabled person is a form of bigotry, and one I'd hope our society had moved past by now. Seriously, Tom, your namesake comes off as somewhat mentally off, but he still appears to be fairly powerful; just because he's differently abled doesn't mean he's not as capable at certain things as other people. If the differently abled create decent products, why not purchase them is all I'm saying.

          1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            "Tom, your namesake comes off as somewhat mentally off,"

            Uh, Frodo would have never made it to Mt. Doom if I hadn't talked Old Man Willow down off of his hobbit-rage.

    2. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

      It's a very good thing that you're a low-testosterone pussy Weigel, otherwise the women around you might be in grave danger given that none of them would ever voluntarily touch you in a million years.

      1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        Do you think Weigel will ever learn, Papa Mikey?

  3. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Bill Cosby now faces up to 30 years in prison after being found guilty yesterday...

    Meanwhile in our nation's capital, Sidney Crosby faces three more wins to get past Ovechkin and Holtby (if he stays in net) to advance. That verdict, however, is not in yet.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    "He's either very sick or very dumb," President Trump tweeted Friday morning about former FBI director James Comey.

    Dumbitis is a sickness, Mr. President. Don't violate HIPAA.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    To stop sex trafficking, stop arresting sex workers.

    Well I don't know what other tools they think law enforcement have getting us to like-minded utopia.

    1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

      Don't you know that law enforcement ARE tools?

  6. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

    "Cosby delivered a deadlocked jury ending in mistrial in June 2017"

    What does this mean?

    1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      It means that hookers are "sex workers" and there's no such thing as sex trafficking, duh!

    2. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

      The jury was hung in his first trial, therefore the government retried him.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        I was referring to "delivered". Was he on the jury too?

        1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          No, he was just pregnant with dodecuplets.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Immigration officials are pushing for the detainment and prosecution of any parents caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally with their kids.

    Yeah, just leave the kids at home.

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

      "Yeah, just leave the kids at home."

      Anchor babies work both ways you know.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    ...the word initially meant "tending to suffuse all experience and conduct with erotic feeling."

    Hot.

    1. Eidde   7 years ago

      I think it means they jack off in your toolshed.

  9. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

    U.S. GDP slows a bit to 2.3% in first quarter

    But conservatives said if we elected a white Republican president GDP would be 4.0% forever!

    1. John   7 years ago

      The growth rate under Obama was lower than that in all but two years of his Presidency. So what is a bad quarter for Trump's economy would have been a banner year for Obama's.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Goddammit. Is another comment thread going to turn into a retard fight?

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Don't they all?

          1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

            We come here for the snark, but we stay for the retard fights.

            1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

              That's retarded.

        2. John   7 years ago

          I don't know. Do you plan to fight it out with Shreek? It takes two retards to make a retard fight and you seem to be just the retard.

          1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

            Geez, John, your dickfor is really acting up.

          2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            " It takes two retards to make a retard fight and you seem to be just the retard."

            You really are not aware of how unaware you are.

      2. Calidissident   7 years ago

        2.3% was the total growth rate last year so this is an average quarter not a bad one. Its also in line with typical growth in the latter half of Obama's presidency. We had a couple strong quarters of growth last year but overall it was a pretty typical year compared to recent history.

        In any case, presidents don't have nearly as much direct control over gdp growth as people think so I think this exercise is a bit pointless.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

          Yes, that was my point. 2-3% is the new normal and all this wingnut bombast about how white Republican presidents boost the economy past 4% is just bullshit.

          Thank you.

          1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

            Did anybody claim that besides you?

          2. Nardz   7 years ago

            It's weird that you think the color of a person's skin is their defining and most important trait.
            Seems racist to me

          3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            Wait until the economy adjusts for the better after 8+ years of Obama holding interest rates artificially low.

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Well, Trump has had the interest rates go up to realistic increases after 8 years of Obama avoiding any reality of the US economy.

      Even with interest rates climbing, the economy is growing steadily.

    3. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      Has anyone ever seen a progressive give a reasonable account of how Obama's policies contributed to GDP growth?

      P.S. If we're using the standard measure of GDP growth, then that number may suggest inflation is growing and becoming a serious concern.

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        I never have.

        Obama inherited a bad economy from Booosh. Obama turned it around to get out of the Great Recession in under 2 years. All while keeping interest rates at 0%. ////lefty argument

        The reality was that the economy was going bad in the 2000s from years of Sallie Mae and Fannie mae bad super risky home loans to people who couldn't afford 20% down, people using home ownership as some speculation shell game, and massive war funding by Democrats and Republican.

        The government TARP bailouts and other government butting in delayed recovery by years until around 2015 for some states and not until 2017 for many other states.

        Trump now has a strong economy but has to raise interest rates to let reality set back in after Obama's shell game. This will cause some adjustments but the economy will be stronger from it. The artificially low 0% interest rates cause massive inflation and it will take years for that to adjust and possibly not until the next recession hits.

      2. CatoTheChipper   7 years ago

        Progressives seem unable to understand the obvious about economics. They think that Bernie's economic plan is serious, whereas they cannot grasp the obvious causes of the 2007/2008 financial crisis.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    In a Friday morning summit, the leaders of North Korea and South Korea agreed to "a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization," thereby ending the Korean War.

    Next up, dismantling the electric fences between Austria and Hungary and not stopping East Germans from traveling through.

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

      This means no more MASH reruns.

      1. Rhywun   7 years ago

        No... the inevitable sexual-predator lawsuit against Alan Alda will mean no more MASH reruns.

        1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

          Poor Radar, he was such an innocent young boy.

          1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

            The fucked up thing is it wasn't even Alan Alda, it was just Peter Serafinowicz doing his Alan Alda impersonation.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    It's OK for a bar to kick out someone based on their political beliefs...

    The end of public accommodation laws. Neat.

    1. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

      No, it is just going to be applied to support goodthink. Though the implication would be that the such laws can force bakers and such to serve gay weddings because is a religious belief...which the government favors...in violation of the establishment clause.

    2. Rhywun   7 years ago

      Some black dude with a MAGA hat (I know there's at least one) needs to test this theory out. I want to see the epicness that ensues.

      1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

        We all know he'll be very well hung.

      2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        I nominate Kanye.

        1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

          Black man, MAGA hat, likes fish sticks (he's a gay fish)... all boxes, checked.

        2. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          I nominate Kanye.

          ?Tom Perez, July 2020.

        3. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

          I nominate Bill Cosby. He needs the gig.

          1. Rhywun   7 years ago

            That pound cake speech was literally Hitler so it does make sense.

          2. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

            Make America Grope Again?

            1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

              "Grab 'em with the roofies!"

  12. End Child Unemployment   7 years ago

    Despite so much winning, "the average American conservative feels bombarded daily with disrespect." Why?
    Maybe it has something to do with how many opinion pieces, social media posts, and in person conversations Team Blue people have about what monstrous dumpster fires conservatives and libertarians are.

  13. TxJack 112   7 years ago

    He is 80 yrs old. Does anyone think he will actually go to prison? He will likely did from the stress and never actually go to jail. If he does, he wont be there long.

    1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      He is definitely going to prison. Immediately after sentencing. Don't care when he dies, as long as it is a grey bar death.

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      If he's smart, he will immediately appeal his conviction and the off himself.

      His convictions will be reversed because he died while his appeals were being reviewed. This would protect his estate.

      Normally, I would be all for going after a rapey perp but this prosecution happened 10+ after it should have gone to trial and he was not convicted by another jury then the government took another crack at convicting him.

      In the USA, we have protections for criminal defendants even pieces of shit.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Interesting angle. How is his estate in jeopardy?

        1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

          You don't think there will be countless civil suits now?

          1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            "You don't think there will be countless civil suits now?"

            lc1789 specifically referred to the criminal trial verdict putting his estate in jeopardy. I was just asking why that is. I understand civil trials.

            1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

              "His convictions will be reversed because he died while his appeals were being reviewed. This would protect his estate."

              This is what I said. His convictions open him up to easier civil actions and I guess I should have made that part more clear for people who "understand civil trials".

              1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

                Civil actions are going forward regardless of his criminal conviction status. See, O.J. Simpson.

                1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                  True and they can be exclusive of criminal actions.

                  Since you pointed out OJ, his civil case proceeded after his criminal trial.

                  1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

                    Yes. after he was found "not guilty". The verdict did him no good.

                    Was that what you meant when you said a reversal of his guilty verdict would protect his (Cosby) estate? You were just referring to civil actions?

        2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          He committed crimes against people. They can sue him/his estate for injury caused by sexual battery or whatever.

          Those statute of limitations might have passed for civil action unlike the criminal charges.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   7 years ago

        His convictions will be reversed because he died while his appeals were being reviewed. This would protect his estate.

        I don't think suicide would legally be considered grounds for reversing the convictions. And besides, given the current judicial system it won't matter if it's legal anyway, because all it takes is for one judge to say that Cosby's victims are entitled to a piece of his estate.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          Its a thing courts do. If a defendant dies while an appeal is pending, the conviction is reversed.

          The thinking goes that the defendant did not get a fair appeal consideration because they died and their conviction is moot since they are dead. More of a gimme for the family left behind, me thinks.

          1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            I'll take your word for it.
            Seems a wrong approach.
            Your record should be the last complete game you played, not some future rematch that never happens.

          2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            "and their conviction is moot since they are dead."

            That can't be the reasoning.

            1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

              You don't know what the reasoning is?

              1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

                Ok, go ahead and cite the reasoning behind that policy. I'll wait.

  14. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

    "But the "Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification on the Korean Peninsula" agreement signed by Kim and South Korean President Moon Jae-in was short on specifics. "In a sense, the vague joint statement... kicks one of the world's most pressing issues down the road to a much-anticipated summit between Kim and U.S. President Donald Trump in coming weeks," writes AP's Foster Klug."

    Really? They didn't unite the two countries and sign a Constitution today? What a letdown.

    1. John   7 years ago

      Agreeing to end the state of war is North Korea admitting South Korea is a legitimate sovereign and not a foreign occupied territory. North Korea never agreed to end the state of war because it never recognized South Korea's legitimacy and considered itself in a state of war to unify the peninsula under the legitimate government of North Korea. Ending the state of war is a very big deal.

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        I think its a NK delay tactic to make their missiles more accurate.

        Its still worth the try since war will happen without a peace agreement.

        1. John   7 years ago

          I don't think so. I think this is North Korea being forced to look reasonable because it no longer has China's assurance that it will intervene in a war. What people forget is that China doesn't want the North to have nukes either. Those nukes make the North harder for China to control.

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            I just don't see how the USA or China can offer Kim Fat Boy anything that protects him like nukes do.

            I am truly curious at what the carrot might be that has Kim acting like he wants to resolve this tension.

            Dude has killed family members that are a threat to his power. Who gives that up? Stalin didn't. Hitler didn't. Mao didn't. Fidel gave power to his brother.

            If he went to China and China said they would not intervene if the USA attacked, is really the only way that can see the entire plan has changed. Even then, Kim just lay low until he dies and then its someone else's problem.

            1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

              I think Fat Boy is under a lot more internal pressure than that. He may be looking for a way out of his hellish existence, just as his "people' are.

              1. John   7 years ago

                I think you may be right. And I think he has an advantage in doing that because he has not been in power very long and can blame all of the horrors on his father and grandfather.

              2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                Kim might be looking to go back to his lifestyle when he lived in Switzerland. Of course, his father's tyranny and theft of labor from his people paid for that rich lifestyle.

            2. MP   7 years ago

              What threat is there to Kim's power if the war ends and he gets rid of the nukes? No one is going to invade NK to free them. We'll all just sit back and wait 40 more years for either the final collapse or a successful internal revolt.

              1. John   7 years ago

                The threat is that his people will revolt and finally give those running the country the ghastly fate they deserve. North Korea doesn't have nukes to defend themselves MP. They have nukes so they can extort money from South Korea, Japan and the US that will allow them to stay alive.

          2. Eidde   7 years ago

            "Those nukes make the North harder"

            That might explain its aggressive behavior.

      2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Are you failing to see my sarcasm or are you explaining it?

        1. John   7 years ago

          Failing to see your sarcasm. Sorry.

          1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

            It's a common symptom of having a dickfor

            1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

              John just is not falling for your "what's a dickfor joke" is he?

              1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

                Lc's never met a joke that he didn't explain, step all over, tell wrong, or otherwise murder.

    2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

      I don't even view uniting the nation's as a goal. I can see why, emotionally, many Koreans might have feelings about it. But why would us foreigners care about that detail of their affairs?

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        East and West Germany. Uniting seems to be better.

      2. Rhywun   7 years ago

        Yeah, that part got my attention. I foresee all kinds of problems with that.

      3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        War in Korea, where NK won, would destabilize the entire region. Any war in Korea would cause disruptions but a free and united Korea would quickly recover.

        The USA kind of failed to end this debacle decades ago, so we're involved until a resolution happens.

        1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

          You're making a huge assumption about what a United Korea looks like.

          1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            Yes, but can it be more insane that NK currently?

            1. MP   7 years ago

              Why would SK ever want to reunite? They'd be happy enough to simply end the constant threat of war. It's been over 60 years. They're nothing but distant cousins now.

              1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                "Why would SK ever want to reunite? "

                Korea has not been a free united nation in almost a thousand years?

                1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

                  That begs the question though. That Korea is a meaningful unit that should be made whole. Rather than a varied historical region that has had various political organizations over a long period of time.

                  There's nothing sacred about that particular border line being shifted.

                  1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                    There's nothing sacred about the 49th Parallel DMZ existing at all.

                    That is the the approximate location of Chinese and NK vs U.N. and SK troops after the Chinese pushed the UN troops back from the Yalu River. Its also the location that Stalin pushed for a dividing line to divide Korea that Truman accepted.

                    1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

                      I agree, but there's also nothing sacred about the border before the Korean war. You yourself admit that they have not been free or united for a thousand years. And thus they have been either absorbed by other states or divided into city states. Or even extended further in, as I believe one of the final Chinese dynasties actually came out of the Peninsula.

                      Whether they unite, or continue to be separate, or NK joins China, or Godzilla sinks SK into the sea, these are a normal part of changing political situations over time. There might be some traditionalist vision of a united Korea, but it's largely rhetoric.

                    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                      It was a trick reply. Korea was united under the Choson Dynasty from about 1392 to about 1897. The Korean peoples were not free but they were under a Korean ruler.

                      In 1905, Korea became a protectorate of Imperial Japan.

                      Korean people are different than Chinese, Japanese and certainly Russians that occupy that part of Asia. Not only is their language different but their culture is different. They have tried to fight off aggressors from every country in that region for hundreds of years with varying success.

                      Stalin made North Koreans enemies of the South Koreans. As with the East Germans, Stalin made the East Germans enemies of the West Germans.

                      These old beefs have got to be resolved and Stalin has been dead since 1953, the year the Korea War ended in armistice.

                    3. JoeBlow123   7 years ago

                      "Its also the location that Stalin pushed for a dividing line to divide Korea that Truman accepted."

                      Not true. It was proposed by Americans in DC.

              2. JoeBlow123   7 years ago

                I was just in South Korea and I can assure you that the people I spoke to want a united Korea. Why? They are all Korean.

                Plus one guy said they can find good wives easier because they think they are so rich from the North.

          2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            YOU are making a huge assumption about what a united Korea would look like.

            I said that a "war", where NK won, would destabilize the entire region. NK winning would mean that they bested the USA, South Korea, Japan, and possibly China to win. I can safely assume that the region would be destabilized from its current political, economic, and social positions.

            1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

              It sounds like I made assumptions about what you meant by, "Any war in Korea would cause disruptions but a free and united Korea would quickly recover." Could you clarify that then?

              1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                A war in the region that ended back with the status quo would have some disruption affect but probably jsut return to a tense standoff situation like we have now.

                A war in the region that ended with Korea being united as a free state would disrupt the region but quickly recover like after 1953 and like for Germany in 1990.

                A war in the region that ended with Korea being united under NK would destabilize the region. My assumption base don past history is that NK would try and and take more land or islands from surrounding countries. Or jsut generally cause trouble like they do now but controlling more people and more resources. China would smash NK. Russia probably would too. Japan might lose Tsushima to NK. Either way, this mess would never end if NK won.

    3. Robert   7 years ago

      Think this would've happened had Trump not threatened to hold China to the trade rules it was a party to?

  15. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

    Does Cosby have a plane? If he does not, should not the prosecutor be up on contempt of court charges for lying to the court trying to deny bail?

    If Cosby is correct it would be something to be legitimately angry about.

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Prosecutor rarely get in trouble for lying.

      Defendants get threatened by judges all the time about potentially lying on the stand.

      Our criminal justice system is fucked.

    2. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

      He doesn't have a plane you asshole.

  16. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Any prosecution of Cosby should have happened 10+ years ago or not at all.

    He was not found guilty but another jury and the judge dismissed the case only for the prosecution to get another crack at Cosby. Sounds like double jeopardy to me. Another example of the government ignoring the protections of the Constitution to get that conviction.

    1. Adam330   7 years ago

      The first trial ended in a hung jury. He wasn't found not guilty.

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        They said you was hung?!

        And they was right!

      2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        That is the tricky Dick about it. Defendants are presumed innocent so they should not have to be found "not guilty". They are always "not guilty" until a jury says they are guilty.

    2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Sometimes you're the raper, and sometimes your the rapee.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        *you're x 2

        1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

          I'm not a double rapist.

          1. gormadoc   7 years ago

            Give it time, give it time.

  17. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

    "Upon talking to the staffer trying to boot him, the man, Greg Piatek, was allegedly told that "anyone who supports Trump?or believes in what you believe?is not welcome here."

    Freedom of association isn't confusing. It's the selective application and hypocrisy that's confusing.

    Yes, businesses can discriminate against customers because of their customers' beliefs--so long as they aren't religious beliefs?

    No, businesses can't discriminate against customers because of the business owner's beliefs--not if they're religious beliefs.

    And if you have trouble understanding why this is as it should be, then you're an intolerant redneck.

    P.S. Businesses can reject intolerant customers for what they believe because not to allow them to do so might make the businesses and society seem intolerant?

    Someday, kids will rebel against the absurd orthodoxies of their parents again--if only because our current orthodoxies are so absurd.

    "Freedom is the divine spark that causes human children to rebel against grand unified theories imposed by their parents."

    ----Freeman Dyson

    http://www.nybooks.com/article.....verything/

  18. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

    He would never have been convicted if he hadn't made the poundcake speech - anyone who accused him would have been called some *ist variant.

  19. Rhywun   7 years ago

    "He was brought down in part by his own desire to lecture poor black people for moral turpitude, while decades of sexual assault allegations were hidden."

    I can't wait to see what the takeaway from this... thought... is supposed to be.

    1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

      You live in a glass house, don't throw stones.

      You live in a brick house (MIGHTAY MIGHTAY, JUST LETTIN IT ALL HANG OUT), throw as many rocks as you want.

      Don't put windows in your brick house unless you want a rock to sail through them.

      Liberals love throwing rocks and then are always surprised when it turns out their windows are breakable.

      Conservatives love to throw rocks and aren't that surprised when it turns out their windows are breakable.

      Libertarians live in glass houses.

      Communists live in glass houses.

      This comment should have ended five lines ago.

      1. Rhywun   7 years ago

        I'm not terribly comfortable with the idea that only perfect angels are allowed to criticize the problems they see around them.

        Weak minds use this tactic to deflect attention from problems they'd rather sweep under the rug.

        1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          Yeah, but if a guy presents himself as an upright fine fellow and proceeds to tell everyone what to do, and it then turns out that no, he's a major creeper?well, there's gonna be a sense of vindication from everyone who hated what he was saying, even if he's right.

          1. Rhywun   7 years ago

            there's gonna be a sense of vindication from everyone who hated what he was saying

            Yes. Still unprincipled, though.

        2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

          You have no right to say that.

          /weak mind

      2. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

        Greens' glass houses have hawk-silhouette stickers on them so that birds won't crash into them.

        Libertarians' glass houses also have stickers, but they just say COME BACK WITH A WARRANT.

        1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          And then when they come back with a warrant, the cops scrape off the sticker and it leaves behind sticker residue.

          STICKER RESIDUE, MR. B!

        2. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

          Libertarians' glass houses also have stickers, but they just say COME BACK WITH A WARRANT.

          That and "This property secured by Smith and Wesson."

          1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

            And a "My Other House is signed copy of Atlas Shrugged" bumper sticker.

  20. Rhywun   7 years ago

    I hope everyone with a twitter account gets all the tedious sanctimony out of their system fast, because based on what I've seen so far it's already nauseating.

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Its all fun and games for people until the government comes for them 10+ years later.

      That first jury had it right. The government just has a tricky way around that thing called double jeopardy. The government requires unanimous Not Guilty verdicts too, even if jury members are too retarded to follow the rules. The state gets more cracks at the defendant. The state can keep shopping for a jury that will convict the defendant.

      Its bullshit and what double jeopardy means needs to be set right that the government gets one prosecution of you and that's it.

  21. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    Pansexual is the new bisexual.

    In this, Crusty has been ahead of the curve for years.

    1. John   7 years ago

      Does that mean someone who has sex with frying pans?

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        No, it's a Peter Pan fetish

        1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          ...so is Peter Pan's constant youth a metaphor for his inability to move past Captain Hook's molestation and truly mature, and Captain Hook a metaphor for his abuser?an abuser that was never brought to justice except in Pan's fantasies, which attempt to create a world in which Captain Hook was defeated? And if so, is Wendy a metaphor for his attempts at normal relationships that he can never form, or is it intended to portray how the cycle of abuse gets passed on?

          1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

            True fact: Captain Hook was originally called Mister Fister prior to the promotion and "accident"

            1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

              Looked it up, you lie.

      2. bevis the lumberjack   7 years ago

        I thought maybe her method of getting her jollies involved bread.......

      3. SRVolunteer   7 years ago

        Alex: Yeah. We talked about getting help. You know, maybe sending him somewhere. He started getting these nervous tics. You know, funny little cough. Blinking all the time. And now it's got completely out of hand. I mean he's scared to death of everything.

        The Doctor: Pantophobia.

        Alex: What?

        The Doctor: That's what it's called. Pantophobia. Not fear of pants though, if that's what you're thinking. It's fear of everything. Including pants, I suppose.

        By this logic, yes. Sex with everything. Including frying pans.

  22. John   7 years ago

    Fun fact; until this North Korea thing, a lot of people had forgotten that the US is allowed to negotiate with rogue nations without late night air drops of cash.

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      You can even pressure the rogue nation's allies to work on your side to resolve the problem.

      It really is nice to have a few government people actually working in Ameerica's best interests.

  23. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

    If you can kick someone out for political beliefs, is it acceptable for a baker to require a positive assertion from a potential customer that they support a candidate that mirrors the baker's beliefs to allow that customer in their shop?

    (That is a far more convoluted sentence than needs be. It's one of those days...)

    1. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

      This is more evidence that there is no way to square public accommodation law with freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association and equal treatment under law. What you get is arbitrary enforcement depending on who is favored by the judiciary at the moment

    2. Ecoli   7 years ago

      I actually understood your sentence, and it makes a good point. A business should be allowed to demand affirmative consent every step of the way, just like modern sex.

  24. Rhywun   7 years ago

    Pansexual is the new bisexual.

    Claiming there are only two genders is so hateful and bigoted, so this changes is entirely expected.

  25. Nardz   7 years ago

    I'm a little confused by the reaction to Cosby. His crimes were horrible and he deserves conviction and punishment for them.
    But the impression I get is not that people are glad a rapist was caught, but that they're glad Bill Cosby was a rapist.
    That is, justice is not being seen as conviction for the crime, but justice is seen in the fact that the crime took place.
    Progressives are doing touchdown dances because Bill Cosby is a rapist, not because the rapist was convicted.
    That's the impression I'm left with.
    Am I off here? And if not, wtf?

    1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      People want to nail somebody's dick to the floor over sexual harassment right now.

      I don't know the details of Cosby's case because I don't care, but when a public figure like this is offered up, . . .

      http://www.allmystery.de/i/tfW.....n_1280.jpg

    2. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

      At the start, I got the sense that it was everybody being shaken because it was Bill fucking Cosby.

      A couple years later, it's basically "hooray we caught a rapist, the rape crisis is real, believe the victim!"?especially since the accused was Bill fucking Cosby, who (five years ago) didn't seem at all like a rapist.

      So it went from "holy shit Bill fucking Cosby might be into date rape" to "got 'im, hashtag me too, believe the victim, rape crisis is real, we need to rejigger society in was that ever-so-coincidentally fit my policy preferences and give people of my ilk more political power".

      At least, that's my impression.

    3. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

      Cosby had been a thorn in the side of the progressive narrative that all things wrong in the black population are the product of racism.

      1. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

        Bingo. He was 100% protected till he started rocking the boat. Then he was doomed.

    4. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Nardz, there are definitely some who are experiencing schadenfreude due to his years of Holier-than-thou persona.

    5. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

      No, your impression is 100% correct. Yeah, Cosby is clearly guilty, and I honestly don't know one person who doesn't think he's getting exactly what he deserves.

      But Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a virulent man-hating leftwat with a fake "husband" who wishes all men were in prison for life. So let her and her feminazi brethren get to spike the football here, because Cosby is a bad guy.

    6. John   7 years ago

      That is an interesting point. I always like Bill Cosby. I find it incredibly sad that he did these things.

      but that they're glad Bill Cosby was a rapist.

      And that is a sign of unbelievable moral narcissism on the speaker's part. Bill Cosby being a rapist necessarily means someone is a victim of his rape. These people are happy Bill Cosby is a rapist because it confirms their worldview and gives them a feeling of moral superiority. The fact that their feeling that way came at the cost of someone being raped either never occurs to them or doesn't matter to them. That is a pretty sick mentality when you think about it.

    7. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Another rich powerful black man in custody and the criminal justice system is stronger because of it...goes the thinking.

  26. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

    In a Friday morning summit, the leaders of North Korea and South Korea agreed to "a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization," thereby ending the Korean War.

    Holy. Shit.

    1. Adam330   7 years ago

      Here's what the declaration actually says: "South and North Korea confirmed the common goal of realizing, through complete denuclearization, a nuclear-free Korean peninsula, South and North Korea shared the view that the measures being initiated by North Korea are very meaningful and crucial for the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and agreed to carry out their respective roles and responsibilities in this regard. South and North Korea agreed to actively seek the support and cooperation of the international community for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula."

      1. Rhywun   7 years ago

        I wonder where Tiny is going to stash his nukes away while the South disarms itself.

        1. Mr. Gus   7 years ago

          you're gonna feel a little pinch now, prisoner #561313

        2. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

          Ever hear of something called a "snuke"?

          1. gormadoc   7 years ago

            Death by snuke snuke?

      2. Sevo   7 years ago

        So it's sort of like CA's "goal" of being oh, totes GREEN sometime in the future.

      3. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

        There's definitely a lot of work to make denuclearization and a formal end to the war happen, and about a million ways it can all go sideways, and probably only a handful of paths that will lead to a happy ending, but the fact that they're even talking about it is pretty yuge.

  27. Ecoli   7 years ago

    Brokaw tickled Linda Vester. He is the next in line for the Gulag.

  28. Nardz   7 years ago

    Another thought: why is Reason, who paid someone to write an "article" about Russia shutting down Telegram app, burying the "Baby "Alfie" story?
    British courts have denied the parents the ability to legally travel, using their own/private funds + donations, to Italy where treatment has been offered by doctors there.
    They can't risk that treatment working and making State healthcare look like an inhuman, monstrous system. So instead the courts bar travel so State Bureaucracy can have some form of ritual child sacrifice...
    Seems like a libertarian's issue.

    1. Nardz   7 years ago

      At the very least I'd thought it would be mentioned in the RoundUp

    2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      You comment has been pre-echoed several times recently.

      Theory: Remember a few months ago when a sugar daddy showed up and blew Reason's fundraiser through the roof? I'm guessing said sugar daddy is a socialized medicine fan.

      Otherwise, no story could be more in Reason's traditional wheelhouse.

      1. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

        Reason's sugar daddies names are Jeff Bezos, George Soros, and "Prince" Alaweed.

        Not that Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie really needed much monetary incentive to go full leftard. They were already doing that on their own anyway.

    3. Rhywun   7 years ago

      Too local...?

    4. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Two thoughts:

      (1) the radical abortion position has now been extended to 24 months after birth. It would not surprise me.

      or

      (2) you need to go to a libertarian website (or conservative or Catholic) in order to read about this offensive state action. This is a neoliberal publication now, but it's cute how we all continue to pretend like it's still libertarian

      1. gormadoc   7 years ago

        It was already dumb when liberals were whining about the phantom neoliberals; don't you start it too.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          They hated neoliberals because they like free trade and generally liberalized economics. My criticism is that that's all they care about. The state can grow, but so long as there are managed trade deals and no restrictions on Uber, all is well.

          1. gormadoc   7 years ago

            Neoliberal just meant anybody the liberals didn't like. Even neocons were neoliberals if a liberal felt the spirit move them. They took a term for a small and unimportant group and expanded to be the term for anybody they didn't like. Contract out to non-union shops? Neoliberals. Okay with invading foreign countries? Neoliberals. Oppose expansive minority rights? Neoliberals. It's just whatever the liberal core disagreed with. Frequently, these people didn't even exist; it was just a way to blame some puppeteer group, like the Kochs or Soros.

            To see libertarians or conservatives start to do the exact same thing is just sad.

            1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

              I agree, your verbal diarrhea is sad. And getting upset about people noting that what is happening in the UK is the opposite of liberty is quite pathetic

            2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

              To be fair, RINOs support things that Republicans don't.

              LINOs support things that Libertarians don't.

              Political parties are made up of many people with different views. Under the big umbrella are many smaller umbrellas as long as they follow the writing on the big umbrella.

              As an example, the GOP platform states that fiscal responsibility is a fundamental tenant. RINOs spend money like Democrats among other things RINOs do. RINOs also have a funny trait- they cannot win as a Democrat in their district. So they run Republican but are not.

              1. Nardz   7 years ago

                I see two sides:
                Progressives,
                and People.
                No, I do not consider progressives people anymore. Hive minds disqualify them.
                Progressives currently infest the ruling structure (politicians, bureaucrats, media, academics, massive multinationals) to almost 100% dominion. Progressives are the swamp. While there are far too many progressives in the R party, the Ds are completely lost.
                Libertarians need to take over the Rs - the establishment (are progressives) is the problem, but the base largely agree with libertarian principles.

  29. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    "OK for bars to boot Trump supporters, says court"

    Remember when your publication went all in on Gary "Bake the Cake, Bigot" Johnson?

  30. Sevo   7 years ago

    "Editorial: Why labor finally lost one in Sacramento"
    [...]
    "California legislators may have discovered the only Sacramento special interest more sacrosanct than organized labor: themselves.
    Forced to decide whether to allow their own beleaguered staff to organize ? the sort of question that almost invariably goes the unions' way in a Democratic-ruled, labor-underwritten Legislature ? a legislative committee last week gave organized labor something it doesn't often get in Sacramento: an unqualified defeat."
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/
    editorials/article/Editorial-Why-labor-
    finally-lost-one-in-12867866.php

    Same reason Congress doesn't have to deal with crap-O-care; they're special!

    1. Rhywun   7 years ago

      As Gonzalez Fletcher put it, "The #MeToo movement has shed a spotlight on legislative employees' lack of tangible workplace protections."

      Oh FFS

    2. Illocust   7 years ago

      It would be amazing if legislature critters staffs all unionized. Law passing would crawl to a halt. Legislatures of all sorts don't write their own proposals or responses or even really decide on their own which laws they are going to support. If their staff required had all the union rules in place, slowing things down. Nothing would ever get done.

      1. Rhywun   7 years ago

        Heh good point. "Sorry, that's not in my job description."

  31. chipper me timbers   7 years ago

    as far as a I can tell, the whole conviction rests on one testimony from one woman about an event 14 years in the past, and her story went through more than one iteration.

    Pray you never have to face a jury of your peers. They don't have the first clue what "reasonable doubt" means.

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      The first jury did but a few dummies on there could not understand that if you cannot unanimously find a defendant guilty, you MUST find him not guilty.

      Its reading comprehension really.

      Shame too because juries are one of the last lines of defense against prosecutorial tyranny.

  32. CatoTheChipper   7 years ago

    Despite so much winning, "the average American conservative feels bombarded daily with disrespect." Why?

    Seriously? You ask why?

    First, conservatives are not winning. Despite a measure of electoral success, they've lost every battle in cultural war and have failed to curtail the expansion of government. Progressivism dominates in most institutions of government, education, and even religion. It has become much more popular to be anti-capitalist than to be anti-communist. Progressives are now so confident that they contest entire Bill of Rights when it is to their political advantage, and they do so to silence and humiliate conservatives and libertarians.

    Progressives dominate in media and popular entertainment. The progressive-dominated media presents news of the day with a progressive slant that exaggerates conservative foibles, impugns conservative motives, and unceasingly covers any conservative misdemeanor whereas it ignores progressive foibles, praises progressive motives, and spins or ignores the news of any progressive misdemeanor. Sure, Fox News is an exception, but it's an exception that that gets criticized even when it gets the story right. Progressive late night comedians have ridiculed conservatives mercilessly for decades as being stupid and craven. Popular entertainment unfailingly reinforces a progressive worldview that is hostile to conservatives.

    1. CatoTheChipper   7 years ago

      As a consequence, many ordinary progressives have become uninhibited in their public discourse to assert the superiority of their worldview with what would have been widely considered impertinence in the past. Among progressives, it's perfectly fine, even commendable, to insult those who disagree with the progressive worldview as being deplorables. Racist. Sexist. Homophobic. Islamophobic. White-privileged. Etc.

      1. John   7 years ago

        There are entire career fields that you simply cannot pursue if you are openly conservative. You can't go into anything involving Hollywood. You can't work in silicon valley. You can't work in academia outside a few small conservative colleges.

        You cannot be an open Christian in many places. You can be a Christian but only if you profess the state approved variety that endorses gays and transvestites actually being the sex the imagine themselves to be. You have to live in one hell of an intellectual bubble to think that "conservatives are winning".

      2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        While you are correct about bastions of socialism being alive in the USA, they are not alive and well.

        Trump won over the whom the socialists picked. Republican control 32 state Legislatures and only need 34 to convene an Article V Constitutional convention. If 38 state ratify those amendments, the government can be fixed to limit government in some areas socialists have exploited.

        Ultimately it comes down to an informed electorate reigning in government and I think Trump is the response to people who say the socialists have won.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          *The whom.... a new wave band.

        2. Nardz   7 years ago

          Trump is the first victory against progressives in 20+ years.
          Yet socialism (progressivism = totalitarian socialism [redundant, I know]) continues to have a huge advantage, and Rs aren't always on the side of liberty or opposed to progressives. Many Rs are progressives, but at least their victories show wider support for liberty among the populace.
          It's a long fight, and literally an existential war.

        3. Hank Phillips   7 years ago

          Mystical conservatives are welcome in Bavaria, where swastikas modified to look more like crosses are back in government buildings and Hitler bells ring the changes in church steeples.

        4. Hank Phillips   7 years ago

          National Socialists rool and drool. Here it's been 79 years and Americans are still thinking like European socialists who root for different soccer teams. 3.28% of the U.S. electorate is informed, 0.1% of the European and Bandana Republic electorates.

  33. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

    the average American conservative feels bombarded daily with disrespect."

    This from a thin-skinned, whiny-ass, hair-trigger cunt who just about burst a blood vessel in her brain because some jerk on Twitter told her "go in the kitchen and make a sandwich".

    1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      Stay classy, Simple Mikey.

      1. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

        The truth hurts like a bitch though, doesn't it?

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Post something that isn't inside paranoid ranting and maybe we'll find out.

          1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

            That should be "insane," not "inside." Jesus.

    2. gormadoc   7 years ago

      I'm pretty sure ENB tried to clarify that this was just a bad joke on her part.

      1. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

        Bullshit.

      2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        She did. Though I doubt Weigel here would trust her intentions. She also deleted her tweet and such, which seems like backpedaling. But really, it doesn't matter that much. He's going to call her a jew regardless.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Mikey is a simple man with an angry little brain, who rages incoherently in a futile effort to stave off the pending abyss.

  34. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

    The radio just claimed that the "most stinging sanctions yet" were there cause of this treaty.

    1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      What is this "radio" you speak of?

      1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        It's the name of my dog. And let me tell you, his politics are getting more and more left-wing each day.

        1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

          Natch. See, "wag the dog".

  35. Rebel Scum   7 years ago

    Immigration officials are pushing for the detainment and prosecution of any parents caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally with their kids.

    Go on...

    This zero-tolerance move would represent "a stark change in policy that would result in the separation of families that until now have mostly been kept together,"

    Are the kids not being detained and/or deported with their parents?

  36. Rebel Scum   7 years ago

    Despite so much winning, "the average American conservative feels bombarded daily with disrespect." Why?

    This?

    1. Eidde   7 years ago

      Conservatives, if they actually believe their principles about the limits of human nature, shouldn't be surprised if society is f'ed up.

      The main thing to avoid is to say there used to be a golden age, because there wasn't (apart from Eden itself).

      And of course, avoid any "I'm a victim" talk, leave that to the experts (progs).

  37. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

    OK for bars to boot Trump supporters, says court. It's OK for a bar to kick out someone based on their political beliefs

    Good, maybe this will finally settle the fucking retarded gay cakes issue.

    1. Eidde   7 years ago

      No, because I'm fairly sure sexual orientation, unlike political affiliation, is a protected class under the laws of NYC and NY state.

    2. Eidde   7 years ago

      But in an analogous issue, here's a couple of progs saying that political opinion should be a protected class as least re employment-discrimination law.

      So if their plan was attacked the bar wouldn't be able to fire an employee for being pro-Trump, and any dress code about hats would have to be politically neutral.

      The next step would be to protect *customers* against political discrimination under the public-accommodations laws.

      I'd like to hear some progs go on the record and say political affiliation/opinion should *not* be a protected class.

      1. Eidde   7 years ago

        "if their plan was enacted," not attacked, sheesh.

  38. Brandybuck   7 years ago

    ""Pansexual is the new bisexual.""

    Of course! The word "bisexual" is inherently bigoted because it asserts there are only two genders. Fucking bigots. A pansexual loves all 56 genders equally and without reservation.

  39. Hank Phillips   7 years ago

    The average libertarian doesn't coerce anyone, and is bombarded with "cool platform, but howcum you guys are never on teevee?"

  40. inoyu   7 years ago

    The verdict is in. Women can no longer sell their goodies to powerful and influential men.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Does Drug Use Lead to Addiction, or Are Some Brains More Prone To Use Drugs?

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

An Empty Pool in Peru Is a Monument to the Drawbacks of Historic Preservation

Bekah Congdon | From the July 2025 issue

Trump Shreds the Constitution By Bombing Iran

Matthew Petti | 6.21.2025 11:04 PM

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

The Criminal Justice System Was Found Guilty in the Karen Read Trial

Billy Binion | 6.21.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!