Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Bob Pfahnl

Donate

Brickbats

Brickbat: Prying Eyes

Charles Oliver | 4.23.2018 4:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
magnifying glass
Arne9001 / Dreamstime.com

A new German law gives those who work in firms with more than 200 employees the right to know what their co-workers in similar jobs are paid. The law is aimed at making sure men and women working in similar jobs are paid the same.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Expect Trump's North Korea Talks To Be Fruitless

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

BrickbatsEqual PayWagesGermany
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (30)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Tom Bombadil   8 years ago

    Why aren't these companies required to send a list of employees/salaries to a central bureau? That's how a proper Socialist regime would do it.

    1. Rat on a train   8 years ago

      A proper socialist regime would set the salaries.

      1. Tom Bombadil   8 years ago

        You make a good theoretical point, but my method has a chance of creating a larger bureaucracy and more class warfare, so it might be the practical Socialist ideal.

      2. Longtobefree   8 years ago

        A proper socialist regime would outlaw pay.

    2. buybuydandavis   8 years ago

      You can take the frau out of the Stasis, but you can't take the Stasi out of the frau.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    You know who else wanted to make public spectacles of those they thought had too much?

    1. buybuydandavis   8 years ago

      You didn't build that!

    2. Tom Bombadil   8 years ago

      Robin Leach?

    3. Libertarian   8 years ago

      Every woman ever?

    4. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

      Ioseb Jughashvili (Joseph Stalin)?

    5. Robert   8 years ago

      Ben Franklin?

  3. Nebelwerfer   8 years ago

    Information asymmetry between employees reduced; libertarian screeching ensues.

    1. Jerryskids   8 years ago

      Information asymmetry between employees reduced at gunpoint; libertarian screeching ensues.

      It's the "at gunpoint" part we screech about. If you want to tell your 400 employees what everybody else makes, you're free to do so and nobody's going to screech. Until you put out the press release patting yourself on the back about how intersectionally woke you are, then you'll hear something that sounds like screeching but it'll be poorly-stifled cackling.

      1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

        Nailed it.

    2. Tom Bombadil   8 years ago

      Information asymmetry was my girlfriend's nickname for our "relationship" in college. Or maybe it was something different, I wasn't really listening.

      1. Libertarian   8 years ago

        Was this her?

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....rdeal.html

        1. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

          Wow. She is hot. Does she have a current boyfriend?

          1. Libertarian   8 years ago

            Does it matter?

        2. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

          She has a degree in fine art according to the article. I'm surprised her defense want that this was just performance art.

        3. Tom Bombadil   8 years ago

          "'The physical violence happened for about nine months and for four years before that it was mental abuse.'"

          I bet in England people actually feel sorry for him.

  4. Crusty Juggler   8 years ago

    Public eyes are watching you *clap* *clap*

    1. Libertarian   8 years ago

      I read your comment two hours ago and that song is still in my head. Damn you to hell.

  5. Conchfritters   8 years ago

    My dad told me to never ask someone how much they make. It's a good thing we aren't Germans.

    1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

      Dad never told you to not ask the government how much your coworker makes.

  6. Rebel Scum   8 years ago

    Fomenting resentment. Good luck with that.

  7. Longtobefree   8 years ago

    "The main reasons (for the gender gap) were differences in the branches of activity and the occupations of women and men as well as unevenly distributed leadership and qualification-related job requirements, . . . . . In addition, more women than men work part-time or are marginally employed."

    So 'similar jobs' has to be fraudulently defined in order for there to be a wage gap?
    You have to compare part time and full time work?
    You have to compare different 'branches of activity' (?) as equal?
    You have to compare different occupations as similar?

    I call bullshit.

    Fun fact: in the US, where lots of companies forbid or actively discourage sharing salary information, the department of labor has declared sharing wage data as a necessary step to union organizing. So go ahead and tell the world how little you make. You are protected by the mighty power of the US government.

    1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

      The problem is with all of those suggestions, which only come later in the article after they've clearly stated there was a 16% difference in Germany, was they obviously admitted the wasn't really an issue. They issue they'll have now is that the lazy fucks, men or women, will use the data of their coworkers to insist they be paid the same without doing the same quality of work.

  8. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

    Less work, more money! TOP MEN!

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   8 years ago

      Are you implying that TOP MEN are more important than TOP WOMEN??? How dare you!

  9. Brandybuck   8 years ago

    New law, but old in culture. Given an exact job title one always knows the narrow salary range they are given. It's worse in some Scandanavian countries where everyone's tax returns are public.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Dec. 2 - Dec. 9, 2025 Thanks to 94 donors, we've reached $22,626 of our $400,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

Donate Now! Donate Now

Latest

College Football Teams Can't Keep Making the Lane Kiffin Mistake

Jason Russell | 12.2.2025 1:00 PM

The Poverty Line Isn't a Vibe

Eric Boehm | 12.2.2025 12:45 PM

The Trump Administration Says Nursing Isn't a Professional Degree. Here's Why That's a Good Thing.

Emma Camp | 12.2.2025 11:41 AM

No One Left Alive

Liz Wolfe | 12.2.2025 9:40 AM

It's That Time of Year—Support Reason Today

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 12.2.2025 8:24 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks