Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Cryptocurrencies

Feds Still Refusing to Say Why They Shut Down Backpage or What's In 93-Count Indictment: Reason Roundup

Plus: Paying taxes on cryptocurrency, Trump's delusional trade talk, and how the FBI is abusing FOIA to go after whistleblowers

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 4.9.2018 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Mirrorpix / MEGA / Newscom

Still no charges unveiled in Backpage case. As of Monday morning, the indictment that led to a federal shutdown of the classified-ads site Backpage.com, the seizure of its servers, and raids on the founders' homes was still unavailable for public consumption. No entry exists on the Pacer.gov site (a clearinghouse of federal case data), and there's no indication from the Department of Justice (DOJ) when it will be available.

As Scott Shackford reported, a DOJ spokesperson said late Friday that a federal court had ruled that case documents would remain sealed for now. The FBI also confirmed that agents had raided the Sedona, Arizona, home of Backpage co-founder Michael Lacey (reporters also witnessed a raid on co-founder James Larkin's house) and that the website was seized because it was used to facilitate crime.

Notably, nothing so far has directly indicated that the charges relate to sex trafficking. It is possible that the feds built a case around money laundering or some other unrelated charge. The effort was a joint effort of the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service, and the U.S. Postal Service.

Some have attributed the raid and seizure to FOSTA, the new "sex trafficking bill" passed by Congress in March. But it has not yet been signed into law by President Trump.

So far, social media posts from myriad sex workers indicate that the shutdown of Backpage is having the exact opposite of keeping those in the sex trade safe and free from exploitation.

Anti-trafficking bill? My friend who was working off of backpage has gotten texts from THREE former pimps in the past FIVE hours, trying to get her back with promises of clients

— Gemma Paradise (@GemmaParadiseXO) April 7, 2018

FREE MINDS

FBI using "freedom of information" law to crack down on freedom of information. The classified documents released to The Intercept by former FBI agent Terry James Albury "should concern anyone who cares about civil liberties, " writes Zack Kopplin, an investigator with the Government Accountability Project, in The Washington Post. The documents

…outline how the FBI can access journalists' phone records without search warrants or subpoenas approved by a judge. This is despite a 2013 promise by former attorney general Eric Holder to reform rules about spying on reporters […] The documents also identify loopholes in FBI rules allowing undercover agents and informants to infiltrate and spy on members of churches, political organizations and universities — something, the Intercept said, even the FBI acknowledged was a "risk to civil liberties." Additionally, they reveal the FBI was targeting surveillance based on race and religion.

But this isn't the extent of the civil-liberties abuses revealed by Albury's leak and subsequent arrest, asserts Kopplin. The way the FBI went after the whistleblowing agent is itself chilling: They used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Since the FBI can see FOIA requests and who accesses documents on its network, it looked up when the Intercept had originally submitted a FOIA for the documents (a request that the FBI had not fulfilled when The Intercept published the leaked documents) and who had accessed those documents within the FBI around that time.

The Government Accountability Project "suggests news organizations protect sources when making FOIA requests by disguising insider knowledge as part of broader requests for data and documents that aren't specifically tied to the source's work or job responsibilities."

FREE MARKETS

How the IRS handles cryptocurrency. As the 2018 deadline for filing income taxes looms, here's a handy guide to how federal tax collectors will be handling cryptocurrency (which it considers property, not currency).

"If you made some money off bitcoin, ethereum, or another cryptocurrency, you need to declare your wallet," reports QZ. "In the past, the IRS has mainly relied on the honor system for people to report their crypto earnings."

However:

After a summons was issued in 2016, earlier this year Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange on the internet, was forced to hand over the details of around 13,000 users, including their taxpayer ID, name, birth date, address, and transaction records. These were some of the top-earning users from 2013 to 2015 who traded over $20,000 on the exchange in a single year.

Those whose crypto gains come post-2015 are off the hook for now, but that could change. "When US president Donald Trump signed his monumental tax bill into effect late last year, it more clearly defined cryptocurrency as a taxable entity," explains QZ's Georgia Frances King.

It included an amendment to section 1031 (a)(1), which concerns "like kind exchanges," meaning any crypto being traded for another is now legally taxable. So even if you have never converted your crypto into fiat currency (i.e. the US dollar), but you have traded between two cryptos (like buying ethereum using your bitcoin), then you need to declare it. If you unintentionally earned money through one of your currencies forking, even though you didn't have control over it, then that's also a taxable event.

FOREVER WAR

Syrians see chemical weapons attack and airstrike. Syrian state news agency SANA reported that the Monday-morning bombs were dropped by Israeli fighter jets, after first calling them part of "American aggression"—a charge the U.S. Department of Defense denied. Over the weekend, Syrian forces set off toxic-gas bombs outside the city of Damascus, killing civilians including multiple children.

The attack—which produced ghastly images that quickly spread all over TV and social media—may change President Trump's mind about pulling U.S. troops out of Syria entirely, suggests The New York Times:

Within hours, images of dead families sprawled in their homes threatened to change Mr. Trump's calculus on Syria, possibly drawing him deeper into an intractable Middle Eastern war that he hoped to leave.

"Many dead, including women and children, in mindless CHEMICAL attack in Syria," Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter on Sunday. He blamed Iran and Russia—even singling out President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia by name—for their support of the Syrian government.

"Big price to pay," he wrote, without providing details.

QUICK HITS

  • Trump delusions on trade continue.

President Xi and I will always be friends, no matter what happens with our dispute on trade. China will take down its Trade Barriers because it is the right thing to do. Taxes will become Reciprocal & a deal will be made on Intellectual Property. Great future for both countries!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 8, 2018

  • Congress is back in session today after a two-week break.
  • "It's not every day that a press release takes 6 percent of the world's aluminum off-line," writes Bloomberg's David Fickling. But "that's what the U.S. Treasury Department's announcement Friday of sanctions on United Co. Rusal Plc and its co-founder Oleg Deripaska did."
  • Paul Manafort's lawyers are weighing how strongly to build a defense around allegations of political bias at the FBI and from other federal investigators.
  • Facebook said it will notify users if their data was shared with Cambridge Analytica.
  • Longtime Atlantic staffer Conor Friedersdorf weighs in on the publication's hiring and quick firing of former National Review opinion writer Kevin Williamson (whose only column while at The Atlantic declared the death of any "libertarian moment").
  • South Carolina is getting dramatic.
  • The fall of Milo Yiannopoulos.
  • So much winning:

The CBO is about to report that there will be trillion dollar-plus budget deficits for every year of Trump's presidency. https://t.co/8G18oyvG50

— Ben White (@morningmoneyben) April 9, 2018

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: There Are Too Many Kids on the Sex Offender Registry

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Cryptocurrencies
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (142)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Still no charges unveiled in Backpage case.

    The prosecution is still too flustered at what backpage was doing.

    1. bevis the lumberjack   7 years ago

      They're too busy, ummm, "interviewing" Backpage's clients. Got to build a strong case, you know.

    2. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

      Hello.

      I hear there was a huge fight in the Reason staff room over the issue of changing the name from 'AM links' to 'Roundup'. I heard it was so stressful Soave's hair fell out.

      1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

        Robby didn't lose his hair. His hair was giving serious consideration to losing him, however.

      2. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        Nick let him borrow one of his hair helmets.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Congress is back in session today after a two-week break.

    Balls to the wall rethinking that spending bill, to be sure.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Paul Manafort's lawyers are weighing how strongly to build a defense around allegations of political bias at the FBI and from other federal investigators.

    If it's good enough for our president and the original run of The X-Files...

  4. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Facebook said it will notify users if their data was shared with Cambridge Analytica.

    BUT WILL I GET MY VOTE FOR TRUMP BACK?

  5. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

    How's that "global warming" working out for everyone by the way in the Endless Winter of 2018? I hear snow flurries are still falling at low altitude in much of the country.

    It kinds of makes me wish I was huddled in front of Fat Albert Gore's cozy fireplace.

    1. Juice   7 years ago

      It reminds me of 2007-2008. It was cold here until late May and it wasn't all that warm in June.

    2. Zeb   7 years ago

      You realize that's just as retarded as people who say that every hurricane means that global warming is super real and we're all going to die? Maybe not.

      1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

        To be fair, Gore has gotten a little bit chubby.

        1. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

          Chubby on the money he's raking in pimping out his climate change crap like a charlatan.

          1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

            "He talked like a narcoleptic plantation owner so he lost the presidency to a fake cowboy and now he makes apocalypse porn."

      2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        I'll believe global warming when Al Gore and his ilk stop buying houses near the shore

        1. Zeb   7 years ago

          I'm not saying there isn't room for doubt of the dominant narrative. Just that that's a stupid argument.

          1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

            That wasn't suppose to be in response to your comment

            1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

              Hops aren't supposed to be the dominant flavor in beer, and yet here Zeb is.

              1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

                Zeb's beer preference is far too refined for us philistines to understand

                1. Zeb   7 years ago

                  This guy gets it.

          2. cereal_shake   7 years ago

            "Just that that's a stupid argument."

            That seems to be the original poster's point, and something you seem not to have picked up on.

            1. Zeb   7 years ago

              You may be giving him too much credit. Being stupid is kind of his thing.

    3. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      I woke up to a white lawn this morning, April 9th.

      Where's my global warming!

    4. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

      Think how little argument anyone would give if they just called it 'local warming'

  6. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

    The CBO is about to report that there will be trillion dollar-plus budget deficits for every year of Trump's presidency.

    TRUMP DON'T READ CBO REPORTS!

    1. Juice   7 years ago

      He was elected to lead not to read.

    2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Remember when the CBO said that healthcare reform would result in net savings for the federal government? Good times

    3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      CBO stands for Congressional Budget Office.

      Supposedly "Nonpartisan analysis for the U.S. Congress".

      These are the same clowns that said that ObamaCare would result in a net savings for America which was BULLSHIT.

      1. Kivlor   7 years ago

        Yeah, I like plenty about Trump, and I think the CBO is often wrong, but do we have any good examples of the CBO overestimating expenses?

        I'd take this as a sign of even worse debt increases under Trump than they are projecting. Which shouldn't be terribly shocking for those of us who voted Trump. The guy ran on increasing all sorts of government spending as I recall.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          Trump ran to increase some spending and cut other spending. He might be one of the few politicians to tackle Social security and Medicare.

          Everyone chopped his discretionary budget cuts off at the knees, including some staff at Reason.

          Trump also said that the increase to defense was to fix gaps in readiness.

          Trump has signed two outrageously high budget bills so far, so his actions on cuts are not good. With that being said, Its Congress' job to do the budget and make cuts. RINOs are too chicken shit to do it and Democrats want to spend the USA into bankruptcy.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    South Carolina is getting dramatic.

    They'll have a better chance when the rest of the country disarms itself.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    The CBO is about to report that there will be trillion dollar-plus budget deficits for every year of Trump's presidency.

    OFFSET BUT OUR TRADE SURPLUSES. maga.

  9. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    Congress is back in session today after a two-week break.

    Hide yo kids, hide yo wife.

    1. Longtobefree   7 years ago

      Buy why? Congress is here to help the wife and kids.
      And, by the way, they are not YOUR wife and kids - - - - - - -

      1. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

        His wife, but not his kid...

        1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

          Don't insult my relationship with my wife and my wife's son.

      2. StackOfCoins   7 years ago

        Your kids? You didn't build that. Someone else made that happen.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    It's not every day that a press release takes 6 percent of the world's aluminum off-line...

    The price of our hats is about to go up.

  11. Longtobefree   7 years ago

    promise by former attorney general Eric Holder - Look! A Unicorn!
    WTF is a promise from Holder?

  12. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Great future for both countries!

    He plans to end the war in a tie? Boooooo!

  13. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

    Syrians see chemical weapons attack and airstrike.

    The Dotard announced he was pulling all troops out of Syria - why does he tell our enemies? So they can move in safely?

    1. Longtobefree   7 years ago

      So there will not be any friendly fire, just Russians and Syrians, and Iranians, and the like.

    2. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   7 years ago

      Remember that Drumpf does exactly what Putin tells him to do. Whatever he did, or said he would do, was in Russia's interest.

      And this is one of the many reasons I voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Her years of experience in the US Senate and State Department made her obviously the superior candidate from a foreign policy standpoint.

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        ^ This statement is so divorced from reality that it makes your parody seem too forced.

        1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   7 years ago

          Fact: It's not just crazy conspiracy theorists who realize Drumpf is Putin's puppet. See, for example, Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Tribe, who agrees with my analysis that Tillerson was installed at Russia's request, then removed when he refused to play ball any longer with the Kremlin's orders.

          Fact: Hillary Clinton had more relevant experience for the Presidency than Drumpf did. Many observers claim Clinton was the most qualified candidate ever.

          1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

            She was a "fantastic public servant" and also, arguably, the worst Secretary of State in American history.

          2. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

            Yeah! I mean, she knows how to dodge sniper fire! And how to wipe an email server--with a cloth! What else does a President need to know?

      2. John C. Randolph   7 years ago

        If anyone ever doubted that the user who posted this is engaged in satire, this is the proof.

        -jcr

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Anyone to whom that wasn't obvious already probably can't feed themselves without assistance.

    3. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

      You figure that if "the Dotard" didn't tell anybody they wouldn't notice if U.S. troops left? I rather think they'd notice.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    When US president Donald Trump signed his monumental tax bill into effect late last year, it more clearly defined cryptocurrency as a taxable entity...

    The gift that just really keeps on giving.

  15. Palin's Buttplug   7 years ago

    More excellent morning ENB, by the way.

  16. Longtobefree   7 years ago

    When US president Donald Trump signed his monumental tax bill into effect late last year, it more clearly defined cryptocurrency as a taxable entity...

    Cool. I was hoping I would get to deduct my losses.

    1. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

      Heh. That never occurred to me.

  17. Libertymike   7 years ago

    We should all be celebrating the fact that Tiger Woods finished some 16 strokes behind Patrick Reed at the Masters notwithstanding all of the coverage that CBS and ESPN devoted to Woods.

    YEAY!

    If Woods were white, you know damn well the ultra-progressive ESPN and CBS would never have consecrated so much precious air time on a golfer who has not won a Major in 10 years and who has not won a tournament in five years.

    Plus, its not as if Woods is some kind of marvelous human being.

    1. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

      Golf-related comments are the worst comments.

      1. cereal_shake   7 years ago

        I see one that's worse.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Only one?

    2. Zeb   7 years ago

      We should all be celebrating the fact that Tiger Woods finished some 16 strokes behind Patrick Reed

      I'm just going to continue not giving a fuck.

      1. Libertymike   7 years ago

        Zeb, that is rather harsh. You are one of the most urbane commenters here. Unless my memory is failing me, profanity is rarely present in your posts.

        1. Zeb   7 years ago

          I have my moments.

      2. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

        "I'm just going to continue not giving a fuck."

        But what about your wife/girlfriend?

    3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      You know who also finished strokes behind someone else?

    4. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

      It's a clear case of reverse-reverse-reverse-reverse-reverse discrimination.

    5. Get lit   7 years ago

      I call bs on your belief that Tiger gets coverage because he's not white and you sound like one of those snowflakes who quit watching the PGA Tour because they were so offended by Tiger's fist pumps.

  18. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

    "Trump delusions on trade continue."

    I don't think he's as deluded as you think.

    Nice run down here:

    https://bit.ly/2HnR0QM

  19. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    If you unintentionally earned money through one of your currencies forking, even though you didn't have control over it, then that's also a taxable event.

    Uncle Sugar gots ta get his'n.

  20. Brian Dixon   7 years ago

    I'm commenting on Hit & Run in order to buy sex.

    Anybody got a problem with that? I'm asking you, FOSTA/SESTA!

    1. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

      I'm commenting on hit-and-run in order to sell sex. 'Sup?

      1. Necron 99   7 years ago

        Awww, I was hoping you kids would hook up.

        1. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

          What makes you think they didn't?

  21. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

    Monster is not the word I would use to describe this angel sent down from heaven

    1. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

      Eff my a

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        Amazing links

      2. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

        Just google Arizona teacher oral sex 13-year-old student, you stupid-faces.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          Some 30 years ago, you would have been a 6th grade stud if your hot female teacher gave BJs out like candy.

        2. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   7 years ago

          Whoa, babe alert.

    2. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      Monster is an appropriate description of someone who'd fuck up a link like that.

      1. Crusty Juggler   7 years ago

        I blame reasons mobile browser. I also blame the jooz.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.

    3. silver.   7 years ago

      Brah

  22. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

    There have been a couple of things happening at the same time over the weekend.

    1) North Korea reaffirmed that they're willing to discuss denuclearization.

    2) The Trump administration flooded the Sunday talk shows with people claiming that Trump's tariffs haven't happened yet, and may not happen at all. That there is ample time to work out a deal with China.

    In short, I'd look to the North Korean denuclearization talks as a weather vane--for the time being.

    That wouldn't happen without China's support, and China isn't about to support that for no reason at all. There's supposed to be a Trump-Fat Kid summit in May. So long as those talks remain on schedule--and so long as the Fat Kid keeps talking about denuclearization--we're looking at a likelihood of there being an agreement already in principle.

    After all, these kinds of summits are usually held to announce agreements. What's the point of having all those cameras about if there's no agreement to photograph?

    1. Sevo   7 years ago

      "1) North Korea reaffirmed that they're willing to discuss denuclearization."

      From everything I've read, that's as believable as 'the check's in the mail'.

      1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

        We won't know until they announce something.

        Still, I wouldn't expect a summit like that on a topic like that over China's objections, right?

        And that's my point.

        That the China trade war deescalation and the talks over denuclearizing the Korean peninsula seem to be moving in the same direction at the moment--and they're both about China.

        If China could wave a carrot in Trump's face, taking credit for making American safe again from North Korea would be it.

        We won't know the details or how likely it is to go all the way until we get more information, but that seems to be the way the wind is blowing at the moment.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          China is the key and they have a lot to lose if trade problems happen with the USA and/or war breaks out between the USA and North Korea.

          Any conflict with between the USA and China would allow the USA to write off Trillions of dollars in US securities held by China.

          If Trump can pull off ending the standoff in Korea, he will would be hard to beat as a great president. Literally every president since Truman has been unable to resolve that Korean standoff.

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Is anyone else prepared for possibility that Kim Jung-Un will try and assassinate Trump?

      I think its a very remote possibility since Trump is deemed the problem not North Korea and China. Lefties here in America and China, NK, and Europe would love to have a less pushy president that does not try and put America first.

      The fact that most Americans would demand North Korea be obliterated might not factor into NK delusions.

      1. $park? leftist poser   7 years ago

        Try to not try and.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          Remember, lc has great faith in the ability of blustery strongmen to do whatever they say they're going to do, so he probably assumes that any attempt would succeed.

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            See, you cannot even get that right Citizen. I don't say that they will do whatever they say they will do. I say look at the actions. Since you mean Trump because you've got the TDS, look at what he does.

            Kim has killed people using chemical weapons.

            Run with that and see if your brain can remember what I say next time you just jump into a convo trying to act smart.

      2. silver.   7 years ago

        I wouldn't want to see NK obliterated. It's a population of brainwashed peasants in a mountainous region. I think war with them would a particularly dirty affair.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          We will probably find out how brainwashed they are.

          If they die to the last person rather than give up after Fat Boy-Un is killed, its more than brainwashing.

          Even brainwashing cannot fully block out people's human intuition about being attacked by overwhelming forces being fruitless. I doubt every North Korea is willing to die for the Dear Leader of Communism. They might as long as their fellow countrymen are pointing guns at their backs.

  23. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    "Syrians see chemical weapons attack and airstrike. Syrian state news agency SANA reported that the Monday-morning bombs were dropped by Israeli fighter jets, after first calling them part of "American aggression"?a charge the U.S. Department of Defense denied. Over the weekend, Syrian forces set off toxic-gas bombs outside the city of Damascus, killing civilians including multiple children."

    It absolutely makes sense that Assad would use chemical weapons after the president announced his intention to withdraw American troops from Syria. And it is completely logical to kill children in bombing campaigns in order to avenge the killing of children by the regime. Genius

  24. Rhywun   7 years ago

    So far, social media posts from myriad sex workers indicate that the shutdown of Backpage is having the exact opposite of keeping those in the sex trade safe and free from exploitation.

    Then it's working as intended. Anyone who thinks the Feds (or really, any law enforcement) has their safety in mind is delusional. The quote from last week about this making it easier to find dead hookers in ditches is a perfect representation of their mindset.

  25. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    "South Carolina is getting dramatic."

    Yeah, they should just declare their state a sanctuary state for guns. That's totes cool, right?

  26. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

    Rather interesting that someone apparently launched a chemical attack in Syria right after Trump speaks of withdrawing U.S. troops. I wonder who it is that doesn't want U.S. troops to leave Syria.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Tread carefully, my friend

      1. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

        Understood, although I genuinely don't know who it might be. I can think of more than one candidate. Syria is quite the confusing mess.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Questioning the narrative is worse than Hitler. Unless you have some Russia fever dreams about how the NRA is a Russian front or something just a wildly ridiculous you must accept the wisdom of your betters. Especially when they lie to you

          1. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

            LOL reminds me of the scene in The Great Escape where James Garner's character is cozying up to one of the German "ferrets" to set him up for blackmail. The German complains about the camp dentist but then asks Garner not to tell anybody he said that. Garner replies that it's a soldier's right to complain; the German says "Maybe in your army. Here, one little criticism and zzzt! it's straight to the Russian front!"

            1. Ska   7 years ago

              That's a *focal* plane shutter.

    2. Kivlor   7 years ago

      My best guess is the Syrian Rebels / ISIS. Although I don't make much distinction between the two personally.

      Wouldn't be the first time. Or the 50th even. And both need us interfering to maintain their last footholds. I hope Trump just backs off of all this and let's Assad do his thing. He's by far the best option for us.

  27. Rhywun   7 years ago

    The fall of Milo Yiannopoulos.

    I tried to skim this, honestly. But it didn't make a lick of sense. Or even try to explain its title.

    1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      Seems like an apt tribute to the man, then.

    2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

      It's a weird article, it's truly nothing but snide digs at Milo. Which is probably appropriate enough.

  28. Sevo   7 years ago

    Tom Steyer: As if we need more proof that money does not equal brains:

    "Tom Steyer wants Trump impeached, and he's mad that many Democrats don't"
    [...]
    "Trump could be impeached for several reasons, Steyer said, including obstruction of justice and violating constitutional bans on profiting from holding his office."
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/
    Tom-Steyer-wants-Trump-impeached-and-he
    -s-mad-12816661.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result

    Proof? Who needs proof when you're a lefty?

    1. Rhywun   7 years ago

      I think it's amusing that even the Democrats are finding him a bit of an embarrassment now.

  29. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

    Most libertarian thing I've read anywhere in a long time wasn't written by a libertarian.

    "The Dark Side of the Enlightenment"

    "I think of these moderate, skeptical words frequently these days, as I follow the political and cultural transformation of the English-speaking world. American and British elites, once committed to a blend of tradition and skepticism, now clamor for Enlightenment. They insist that they have attained universal certainties. They display contempt worthy of Kant himself toward those who decline to embrace their dogmas?branding them "unenlightened," "immature," "illiberal," "backward-looking," "deplorable" and worse."

    ----Yoram Hazony

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/th.....1523050206

    (Use the archive, dummy,)

    1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      He blames communism and Marx on the enlightenment--the continuation of the enlightenment thinking that culminated in the horrors of the French revolution and the Napoleonic wars. He contrasts that with conservatives like Adam Smith, whose thinking taught that stupid individuals when working together in markets will outperform the enlightenment wisdom of intellectuals.

      Think Voltaire ridiculing Leibniz in "Candide" or Swift going after the intellectual Houyhnhnms in "Gulliver's Travels".

      Sometimes it seems like the elitists in their fetish for inflicting their will on the rest of stupid humanity in the name of reason are everywhere and unstoppable--but we've seen all this before. The computer revolution may have given the elites more data to play with, but the enlightened elitists are just as vulnerable as they ever were to the same factors that brought the Age of "Reason" to an end.

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        One word: Rousseau

      2. $park? leftist poser   7 years ago

        Sometimes it seems like the elitists in their fetish for inflicting their will on the rest of stupid humanity in the name of reason are everywhere and unstoppable

        Oh come on. Libertarians are few and far between.

  30. John C. Randolph   7 years ago

    What I want to know is how the Feds are able to seize this property before obtaining a conviction in a court of law.

    -jcr

    1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      FYTW?

    2. Kivlor   7 years ago

      We have to seize your property so we can get the evidence to build our case?

      1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

        What was it that Pelosi said about the ACA?

        You have to seize to know what's in it.

        1. Kivlor   7 years ago

          No, no, you're thinking Bernie, who in his bid for nomination said the paychecks of anyone making over $20,000/year "We have to seize it to find out what's in it". It was in his big speech on closing the tax loopholes for the rich.

    3. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      It's evidence. Of what, they won't tell us, but we just need to trust them.

  31. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

    "South Carolina is getting dramatic."

    I just saw that episode on 'This Old House!'

    1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      LOL

  32. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

    "Trump delusions on trade continue."

    Again, I'm not sure people are getting the difference between things that have happened and things that have only happened in the media.

    The retaliatory tariffs both China and the U.S. announced last week have not yet gone into effect, and the markets are pricing them into both stock (Boeing) and commodity prices (Soybeans) as being a risk but unlikely.

    I find market prices more persuasive than the opinion of journalists--especially when we're talking about the effects of events that haven't happened yet. If anything is "delusional", it's the idea that the Washington Post knows more about what's happening than the market.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      "I find market prices more persuasive than the opinion of journalists"

      You're telling me that they don't teach economics in journalism classes? I do enjoy the media pressuring the administration to impose trade sanctions against Russia for reasons, but the abject horror of the same people at trade sanctions being imposed on China. That literally makes no sense

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        Hi, Cathy Young

      2. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

        What they're saying is that Trump is "delusional" because he's saying there's no damage from the trade war.

        Trump might be wrong about that--if that were what he was saying. What he's saying is that there probably won't be a trade war.

        The Washington Post is saying that there already is a trade war. Why, they've been writing about these press announcements for days already!

        It's just that:

        a) Trade wars don't happen in the media.

        b) The announcements were not tariffs themselves. The tariffs in question haven't gone into effect yet.

        c) The markets seems to be taking Trump's side--that the tariffs are unlikely to happen.

        Are market prices delusional, too?

        Are market prices deplorable for being unwoke?

        Who's delusional here? Isn't it the Washington Post?

        If a tree fell over on the Washington Post building and destroyed their offices, the market would notice the change in value to their property even if their journalists didn't.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          Ken, the media reported that the tariffs already took effect immediately after Trump mentioned them.

          The media never even bothered to find out if they had taken effect, what the actual costs would be, and what possible outcomes might result. That kind of journalism is rare these days and certainly doe snot happen at the WaPo.

          Its TDS all the way down.

          1. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

            Make no mistake, the threat of a trade war is real, and I oppose what Trump is doing.

            Treating things that havne't happened yet as if they had already happened is delusional.

    2. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

      I just double checked.

      Boeing is trading higher than where it was before April 4, when China announced they would hit them with retaliatory tariffs.

      Soybeans are trading higher than they were too--with the futures contracts all higher.

      So, you know, I can look at that for my rule of thumb predictions based on what we know right now.

      Or I can believe the journalists who write at the Washington Post.

    3. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

      Trump announced the first wave of tariffs on March 5. The S&P is down about 3% and the DOW is down about 2.5% since then. I'm not trying to imply causation, necessarily, only that your very narrow view of the market is misleading.

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        The Dow is down from an all time high going into 2018.

        On Jan 20, 2017 the DOW Jones was 19,827.25
        On Dec 29, 2017 the DOW was 24,719.12

        The peak DOW was 26,616 on Jan 26, 2018. As of right now its, 24,288.67

        Don't believe the media hype as they are dumb as door nails.

      2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Besides, the DOW is not the sole single indicator of a strong economy. Its possibly one indicator.

        GDP, unemployment numbers, construction permits for new homes and businesses, and many other indicators combined would give a better picture of the US economy.

      3. Ken Shultz   7 years ago

        "Trump announced the first wave of tariffs on March 5. The S&P is down about 3% and the DOW is down about 2.5%"

        The FAANG stocks, including Facebook and Google, were down some $370 billion in market capitalization alone in the wake of the revelations about Facebook's use of user data and anticipated regulation. That figure was as of Friday, anyway.

        The S&P 500 is a weighted average.

        Tech stocks have been taking a pounding, but that has little or nothing to do with steel and aluminum tariffs.

        I pointed to soybean prices and the price of BA--both of which were specifically targeted for Chinese retaliation last week and both of which took a hit relatively small hut but have since recovered.

        Why would I ignore those facts and believe the Washington Post?

        For goodness' sake, there was this guy Adam Smith and these other guys named Mises, Hayek, and Friedman.

        Maybe you've heard of them?

  33. Weigel's Cock Ring   7 years ago

    Congress is back in session today after a two-week break.

    Senator John McCain however is still barely clinging to life in his Sedona hideaway, collecting that sweet ass paycheck for doing nothing (and denying Arizona full representation) while his ghostwriter churns out mini Tweetstorms in his name every day.

  34. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    Where's Lenore on this one, hmm?

    1. Kivlor   7 years ago

      HAHAHAHA!

      My first thought when I saw that shirt was "WTF went wrong when they printed that McDonald's Logo?"

      The lesson I learned from this was "I need to drink at least 1 cup of coffee before reading links from H&R."

    2. mad.casual   7 years ago

      Is it weird that I can almost see a white face and red afro between the arches in my mind's eye?

      I hope the kid finds a Hooters shirt in the box this week.

      1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

        That says some pretty odd things about your fantasy life, yeah.

        Next week: the kid gets into the Big Johnson collection.

  35. Kivlor   7 years ago

    South Carolina reps introduce bill to allow debate on secession

    If at first you don't succeed...

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      .....try to take everyone's guns again?

      1. Kivlor   7 years ago

        I'd have said "Wait until those who thwarted you disarm themselves"

      2. mad.casual   7 years ago

        Yeah, murder the shit out of half a million more Americans on each side and then declare The Union stronger than ever.

        1. Zeb   7 years ago

          Well, no states have seceded since. Can't argue with results.

        2. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

          Hey, sometimes ya gotta break half a million eggs to make an omelet.

  36. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    So far, social media posts from myriad sex workers indicate that the shutdown of Backpage is having the exact opposite of keeping those in the sex trade safe and free from exploitation.

    ...

    FBI using "freedom of information" law to crack down on freedom of information.

    One might almost notice a theme.

  37. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Feds unsealed the indictments.
    ... crimes of conspiracy to facilitate prostitution using a facility in interstate or foreign commerce, facilitating prostitution using a facility in interstate or foreign commerce, conspiracy to commit money laundering, concealment money laundering, international promotional money laundering, and transactional money laundering.

    Looks like typical bullshit government tyranny to me.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Is Openly Using the Presidency To Enrich the Trump Brand

Matt Welch | 8.1.2025 5:00 PM

A Cop Lied, Fabricated a Sex-Trafficking Case, and Jailed a Teen on False Charges—and Still Can't Be Sued

Billy Binion | 8.1.2025 4:49 PM

Shattering Norms: Federal Immigration Agents Aren't Afraid to Smash Your Car Window

Autumn Billings | 8.1.2025 4:01 PM

Hiking Tariffs on Canada, Trump Demands 'Adequate Steps' To Achieve an Impossible Drug War Goal

Jacob Sullum | 8.1.2025 3:20 PM

The National Debt Is Becoming Your Local Problem

Mariana Trujillo | 8.1.2025 12:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!