Roseanne Returns to Television, Older but Not Necessarily Wiser

Meanwhile a new miniseries on AMC builds a horror mystery out of a failed Arctic expedition.


'Roseanne,' ABC

The Terror. AMC. Monday, March 26, 9 p.m.

Roseanne. ABC. Tuesday, March 27, 8 p.m.

In a 500-channel world where programming demand is sucking Hollywood's creative blood dry, resulting in remakes—S.W.A.T.! Dynasty! Lethal Weapon!—the news that AMC was working on a series called The Terror flipped a lot of lids. This film was the most infamously cheapjack production of any of the 400 or so made by penny-ante director Roger Corman. It was made with production days, sets, and actors swiped from other Corman flicks (including three shooting days extorted from a failing Boris Karloff). It boasted a script written in a single weekend! It had Jack Nicholson tongue-kissing a corpse (severe penalties will be levied on anyone who tells an Anjelica Huston joke here) vying with screen time with a bird that eats people's eyes! Imagine this, week after week, laying waste to the minds of an entire generation.

Well, don't. It turns out The Terror isn't a remake after all but a brand new series based on Dan Simmons' epic "What If?" novel about an altogether real British naval expedition that disappeared in the Arctic in the mid-1840s. And though I still tremble with nihilistic thrill at the depravity potential of a Corman remake for TV, the fact is that AMC's production of The Terror is a slow-burning horror-genre delight.

The voyage upon which The Terror is based set out from Great Britain in 1845 intending to chart the route from the Atlantic to Pacific oceans through the Northwest Passage. But the two ships, the Erebus and the Terror, were caught in the ice and abandoned by their crews, who were never seen again. Reports of Inuit Indian tribes in the area gave rise to rumors of madness, murder and cannibalism; the examination of some skeletal remains discovered 150 years later suggested that at least some of the stories might be true.

Simmons, in his novel, used a Ten Little Indians scenario, with crewmen disappearing from the ship one by one, to launch a book that was much more than a murder mystery. The Terror's writer-director David Kajganich has taken a slightly different route, using the star-crossed expedition's hardships to invite views to wonder if its troubles are super- or supra-natural.

There is evidence for either, or both. Using a remarkable set built in Hungary, Kajganich's cameras emphasize the vast bleakness of the Arctic and its relative imperviousness to the flimsy technology of the day. Even knowing where they were was a major accomplishment for the expedition's leaders; decades before radio or radar, and traversing an area where the magnetic north pole rendered compass results dubious, the ships' navigators had to rely solely on their charts of the stars—when the weather allowed.

The strength of the ice, the unpredictability of weather and ocean currents, and the shortage (and possible contamination) of provisions all conspire against the expedition. Then there's that half-glimpsed-in-the-twilight beast, so improbable that the officers suspect it's a hallucination of their overworked crewmen. Their skepticism also extends to the occasional straggling Inuits they encounter, all warning to run in the face of a nameless dread.

As trouble mounts, one officer declares: "In this place, technology still bends the knee to luck." Retorts another: "This place wants us dead!"

Simmons' novel was originally optioned for a feature film, but the decision to stretch it out to a mini-series was a wise one, allowing The Terror a leisurely development of the crew's growing anxieties. (Whether AMC viewers, accustomed to the rapid brains-eaten-per-minute count of its Walking Dead series, will like the slow-burn pace is another matter.)

The Terror's virtually all-British cast is extraordinarily effective at teasing out the dread, teaspoon by teaspoon, particularly Ciaran Hinds (Game Of Thrones) as the full-speed-ahead commander Sir John Franklin and Jared Harris (Mad Men) as his far more cautious second in command, Francis Crozier. Unlike Corman's, this Terror is worthy of the name.

Fans of cheesy remakes, however, will get their due when Roseannne returns to the air after an 11-year absence. Except—contrary to expectations—it's not cheesy at all. This new version, which returns almost all the major cast members, brings the same rough-and-tumble sensibility to the declining years of baby boomers as the 1988-97 original did to the economic and social tensions of working-class life.

Dan and Roseanne Connor (John Goodman and Roseanne Barr) are back, older but not particularly wiser, facing the problems that have become entirely too familiar to boomers headed into retirement: rising drug prices; the tenuous economics of fixed-income life; the financial failures of their adult kids, resulting in no-longer-empty-nest syndrome; the perplexing gender ambiguity of their grandchildren; and of course, the eternal question, Trump vs. Clinton, with the debate being carried out at bumper-sticker levels of acuity, just as it is on Facebook and Twitter.

With Bruce Helford (The Drew Carey Show) and Whitney Cummings (2 Broke Girls) overseeing the writing, the punchlines come fast and furious. The first episode is perhaps a bit heavy on internal jokes to paper over deviations from show history—particularly the fact that Dan Connor's death during the 1996-97 season was not quite as serious as it looked—but by the second, it's settled into a familiarly brassy and vulgar groove. For instance, here's Roseanne's brief explication on how alcoholism marred her family history: "The ones who didn't drink were killed by the ones who did."

NEXT: It Shouldn't Be Illegal to Work at Home

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I’m told by people who ought to know that the original was funny.

    That means that any rerun or reboot will be funny, too, right?

    1. Prepare to be disappointed.

      1. I am making $200 to $300 by simply working for just 3 hours on Facebook. It gives me an exceptionally well sum for every month. With this sum i can meet my costs effectively and easily. this work is such a great amount of simple for a client. the event that you appreciate my work then you can check my working points of interest by tapping the site join below look here more

    2. As funny as the last Ghostbusters.

    3. Whitney Cummings is about as funny as a plantar wart.

  2. All of this revival of old TV shows and movies proves one thing: The entertainment “industry” is incredibly lazy and lacking in talent.

  3. I could care less about this reboot/remake/rehash.

    My interest begins and ends with the observation of:

    Sarah Chalke is the hotter Becky.

    Now I want to watch Scrubs re-runs.

    1. One of the best jokes on “Roseanne” was when the family was watching “Bewitched” on TV and Sarah Chalke as Becky says, “I like the second Darren better.”

  4. Hell, I wasn’t interested in the FIRST round. Before TV Guide blew up they ran a cover of Rosanne mad up as Lucy. I thought that was about right; both always struck me as extravagantly stupid. Both were as annoying as a root canal. And both could go jump in a deep lake for all of me.

    1. But Riiiiiiickyyyyyyyyy!!!!!


      The golden age of television.

  5. A single token? An entirely white cast would be less embarrassing.

    1. The token was probably forced on them by network bosses.

  6. Did they not kill off Dan in the last season of the original Roseanne or did that end up being a dream?

    1. Zombie shows are big these days…

      1. Now that idea sounds awesome. Or better yet bring back Friends with Mathew Perry as the zombie.

  7. How about a prequel? How Roseanne and Dan met, got married, and got fat.

    1. They were born that way. Its genetics and they have zero choice but to be fat.

  8. “Roseannne returns to the air after an 11-year absence. Except?contrary to expectations?it’s not cheesy at all. This new version, which returns almost all the major cast members, brings the same rough-and-tumble sensibility to the declining years of baby boomers as the 1988-97 original did to the economic and social tensions of working-class life.”

    It’s 21 years, not 11 years. 2018 minus 1997 equals 21. Jesus Christ, this is why many Americans do not give a fuck about what stupid kids in school think about banning guns. They are stupid kids who have zero idea what they are talking about and are advocating taking away one of two fundamental rights protections that sets the USA apart from every other nation in the World- 1st Amendment and 2nd Amendment (right to protect yourself and others).

    If this is typo, what good are computers if you don’t double check your work before publishing it? I wouldn’t have been so harsh if this wasn’t a fluff piece for Rosanne and all its lefty bullshit.

  9. I say let the market decide. I only was ever slightly entertained by the original. John Goodman was the only good thing about the show. Roseanne was annoying, the kids were annoying, and Dan always seemed to be the rock of the family.

    1. “John Goodman was the only good thing about the show.”

      Laurie Metcalf was brilliant.

  10. How dare you mock Roger Corman?!

  11. Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.


Please to post comments

Comments are closed.