Criminal Justice

ACLU Sues Pennsylvania For Putting Death Row Inmates in Permanent Solitary Confinement

"This is a profoundly damaging practice. It destroys people."

|

MARK MAKELA/REUTERS/Newscom

Five inmates on Pennsylvania's death row have spent a cumulative 115 years in solitary confinement—more than 42,000 days with little to no human contact in a cell the size of a parking space.

Such extreme and prolonged deprivation violates their constitutional rights against cruel and unusual punishment, according to a new lawsuit filed today on their behalf, as well as 151 Pennsylvania death row inmates, by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Abolitionist Law Center.

"Defendants' years of infliction of mental and physical harm on Plaintiffs and the Class Members strips them of their dignity and worth, transgresses civilized society's notions of decency, and constitutes a practice that is disavowed in modern society," the lawsuit says.

Pennsylvania automatically places death row inmates in solitary confinement, regardless of their behavior, and they stay in those 8-by-12-foot concrete cells 22 hours a day, every day, until they're executed or their sentence is overturned.

Because of the rarity of actual executions in Pennsylvania—the last one occurred in 1999, and there have only been three total since the death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court in 1976—this effectively means death row inmates are condemned to decades of mind-scrambling isolation. Eighty percent of the state's death row inmates have been in solitary for more than 10 years, according to the lawsuit. One plaintiff in the lawsuit has spent 27 years in solitary.

"This is a profoundly damaging practice that exacerbates mental illness, creates mental illness in previously healthy people, causes and aggravates a whole range of physical illnesses, and it destroys people," says David Fathi, Director of the ACLU National Prison Project.

One of the most pernicious effects of prolonged isolation, Fathi says, is what social psychologist Craig Haney, a who studied inmates at the "secure housing unit" in California's infamous Pelican Bay State Prison, calls "social death."

"You forget how to interact with other humans," Fathi says. "You've just forgotten how to be a person, really."

Beyond that, there's also the fiscal argument. Holding an inmate in a supermax cell costs two- to three-times as much as keeping them in the general prison population, Fathi says.

The Supreme Court recognized as early as 1890 that solitary confinement has a devastating effect on inmates, but courts have traditionally given wide deference to prison managers when it comes to security.

However, the lawsuit argues the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections' policy serves no penological purpose, and Fathi says courts have become more receptive in recent years to claims that solitary confinement is unique from regular prison practices.

In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required inmates be afforded procedural protections from being sent to supermax confinement.

In 2015, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in a concurrence that "research still confirms what this Court suggested over a century ago: Years on end of near-total isolation exact a terrible price."

Both the federal government and states have been slowly rolling back their use of solitary confinement. In recent years, both the Association of State Correctional Administrators (ASCA) and the American Correctional Association released new guidelines and standards limiting the use of solitary confinement. The Obama administration also banned the use of solitary confinement for juveniles in the federal prison system and limited the amount of time adults can spend in solitary.

While the use of solitary confinement in the U.S. has been dwindling in recent years, there were at least 67,442 inmates in the U.S. locked in their cells for 22 or more hours a day in the fall of 2015, according to a report last year by the ASCA and Yale Law School.

The practice of solitary confinment was in fact invented in Pennsyvania. When Charles Dickens visited Pennsylvania's Eastern State Penitentiary in 1842, where the use of what we now call solitary confinement was pioneered, he recoiled in horror.

"I hold this slow and daily tampering with the mysteries of the brain to be immeasurably worse than any torture of the body," he wrote, "and because its ghastly signs and tokens are not so palpable to the eye and sense of touch as scars upon the flesh; because its wounds are not upon the surface, and it extorts few cries that human ears can hear; therefore the more I denounce it, as a secret punishment which slumbering humanity is not roused up to stay."

But because of a growing number of lawsuits and prison reforms, the secret punishment is now out in the open.

NEXT: Trump is no Deregulator on Immigration

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. You know what else destroys people? Execution.

    1. Yeah, I’m having a really hard time with what the point of this article is.

      We should kill them sooner or allow fewer appeals to make it easier to off them?

      We should put them in the general population so they can be murdered by the general population?

      We should put them in a cell with things like a blanket that they can use the save the state money by hanging themselves?

      I mean, I’m not a huge proponent of the death penalty since the State generally can’t be trusted but it seems to me that if a person has done something terrible enough to be sentenced to die that this would be a bit lower on the hierarchy of shit you should care about.

      Maybe the point of the article is that we should just do away with the death penalty and send these assholes to Australia? ^_-

      1. The prison planet from Alien 3.

      2. The point of the article is that we shouldn’t subject these people to torture. Period.

        ‘Oh, we’re going to kill them . . . one day. So it doesn’t matter if we make their lives a living hell. In fact, its for the best. Then they’ll be *grateful* when the end comes.’

      3. BYODB makin’ sense

      4. ………I just started 7 weeks ago and I’ve gotten 2 check for a total of $2,000…this is the best decision I made in a long time! “Thank you for giving me this extraordinary opportunity to make extra money from home.
        go to this site for more details….. http://www.startonlinejob.com

    2. Pretty sure the poor babies on death row have destroyed plenty of people themselves.

  2. Oh ACLU says life in prison in solitary is torture. Why not make it clean and be done with it?

    Tie a noose and make it tight;
    A feast for crow come tonight!

  3. Putting Death Row Inmates in Permanent Solitary Confinement

    Criminal justice system fans Robby and Riggsy should approve. Solitary almost eliminates prison rape or jailhouse vigilante justice.

  4. So immediately after the initial conviction there is a single appeal to the supreme court. One week for the review, then freedom or the noose. Clean, constitutional, and quick.

    1. So, you trust the judicial system?

      The one that’s constantly having cases overturned because sloppy work by the cops got a pass by the courts and the defendant’s counsel?

      You trust those people enough that in a capital case we should just say ‘fuck it, he was pronounced guilty, hang ’em’.

  5. “ACLU Sues Pennsylvania For Putting Death Row Inmates in Permanent Solitary Confinement”

    So…two to a grave, then?

  6. Hard to muster sympathy for most of these guys. It’s way way way way way way down on most people’s list of things to be outraged about.

    1. Except: what if one of them is actually innocent?

      And, are you really comfortable with giving the state to torture the worst amongst us, knowing that slippery slopes exist?

  7. Get rid of all the victimless crimes. Implement loser pays or some other game theory methodology that eliminates speculative lawsuits.

    Free up our courts to do a much better job and free up our prison space to make them more effective.

    It’s a tragedy that there are people in solitary, but solving that problem isn’t going to solve the bigger problem of our justice system.

  8. If the inmates go insane in solitary, then they can’t be executed.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.