After Several Major Tax Increases, Connecticut Still Can't Make Ends Meet
The bloated public sector is sinking the Nutmeg State.

Connecticut has long been one of the richest states in the union, but its bloated public sector has now engulfed it in a fiscal crisis.
The rising cost of public employees' retirement benefits has prompted the state to raise taxes three times in the last eight years. The public employee unions are adamant that the problem can be solved only by more taxation, and they have threatened to sue if any changes are made to the present payouts. Gov. Dannel Malloy and the General Assembly haven't been able to agree on what to do, leaving the state without a budget for more than 100 days.
The state is $74 billion short of what it needs to fund those retirement benefits and the state's bonded debt obligations. As of 2014, according to The Wall Street Journal, Connecticut ranked 48th in pension funding, meeting only 50 percent of its obligations. The state is looking at a budget deficit of $3.5 billion, out of a budget of about $19 billion.
The last time Connecticut faced financial difficulties of this size was in 1991. From 1984 and 1990, the cost of state pensions increased by 119 percent, according to The Connecticut Mirror. That led the state to impose its first-ever income tax. But the income tax revenue—$126 billion over the following 25 years—did little to restrain spending, and funding for pension programs is still inadequate. Retirement costs and debt services were 12 percent of the state budget 20 years ago. In this fiscal year, they will be 31 percent.
State workers in Connecticut make about 42 percent more than equivalent jobs in the private sector—the widest such gap in the country, according to a 2014 American Enterprise Institute study. Their retirement health benefits were the equivalent of an individual employee getting an additional 18 percent in wages for each working year.
A JP Morgan report published last year said that to fully meet its unfunded liabilities, Connecticut has four options: It can pay 35 percent of state revenues toward its debt for 30 years, it can cut the state budget by 14 percent, it can increase taxes 14 percent, or it can increase worker contributions to their pensions by 699 percent. None of those choices are palatable to most lawmakers.
In September enough Democrats joined their GOP colleagues to pass the state's first Republican budget in years. The Democratic governor vetoed it, citing its cuts to state pensions as one of his concerns. Until Connecticut gets a budget, Malloy is managing the state finances by executive order.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No budget, no state. It's the law.
it can cut the state budget by 14 percent, it can increase taxes 14 percent
Decreasing any budget, sure, I can see that not being 'palatable', but increasing taxes by 14 percent? That gives most lawmakers a semi.
"Wait up, Connecticut, I'll join you." -- Illinois
"Hey, whatcha guys doin'? Can I come?" -- Pennsylvania
"Psh. Amateurs." -- California
Yah, I think Illinois has even beat California, which is really strange with only one big city to screw over the rest of the state, while California has several (LA, SF, and Silicon Valley in general).
Illinois is way ahead of the game. Connecticut is playing catch up.
Sell the whole thing back to the Pequots and let 'em run it as a casino or something.
Just tax the rich. I mean duh.
They are learning how accurate Thatcher's critique of Socialism was.
As Connecticut goes, ...
So goes Rhode Island?
it can increase taxes 14 percent
That's *nothing* for "one of the richest states in the union", right? RIGHT?!
Or is it one of the richest unions in the state?
Hey Connecticut, let me introduce you to Illinois and New Jersey. They went down the road you're currently on. Take a look. That's where you're headed. Hell, you're almost there. Taxed through the nose (and ears and ass) and still huge deficits and increasing debt.
The people Connecticut is trying to raise taxes on are highly mobile. Many have houses or apartments in NYC and / or Florida. Avoiding CT taxes for them is as easy as a trip to the DMV.
Democrats are controlled by the unions. The speaker of the house is a municipal union leader. The Democrat gov after election said to the unions " I am your servant". The legislature has been Democrat controlled for 45 of the last 50 years. The gov insists towns now pick up the tab for unfunded teacher pensions that they never had a day in the formula. The unions pay into pensions at about half the national average. The guaranteed return for pensions is way too high. The gov and legislature approves a contract giving unions no layoffs for 5 years and no changeable to pension and benefits for 10 years the hands of hopefully a Future GOP controlled govt. The unions and the Democrats have ruined the state.