Fuzzy Math Infects the Governor's Race

School spending should focus on results, not just how much is spent.


There are two kinds of math in the world: regular math and the political kind.

In regular math, addition involves the increase of something: Johnny has three apples in a basket. Billy adds three more. Now there are six apples in the basket. Six is more than three. The number of apples has increased.

Political math is different. In political math, addition is often called subtraction. When the Trump administration proposed increasing Medicaid spending from $378 billion to $524 billion a decade from now, critics screamed at the top of their lungs that he was planning to "slash" Medicaid.

This is because baseline spending for Medicaid was slated to reach $688 billion. So because Trump wanted to raise Medicaid spending, but by less than other people wanted to raise it, he was accused of trying to cut it.

Virginians saw political math in action last week, when the Virginia Education Association criticized Ed Gillespie's tax plan. The GOP candidate for governor has proposed cutting income tax rates by 10 percent. He also has made two stipulations.

The first is that the tax cuts will be financed through revenue growth. Analysts expect the state's budget to grow roughly $3.4 billion over the next four years. Gillespie would take $1.4 billion of that for tax cuts, leaving $2 billion to raise state spending.

The second is that the tax cuts are conditional: If state revenue grows too slowly, the tax cuts will not happen.

But last week the VEA tore into Gillespie's proposal, claiming it would "slash funding for Virginia public schools by $404 million." The group said such a funding cut would be a "major blow" to education. Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney predicted that it would be "a disaster—let me repeat—a disaster."

The VEA distributed a fact sheet contrasting current estimates for state spending on local schools in 2021 and estimates under Gillespie's tax plan. Sure enough, if you look at just those two numbers, Gillespie's plan could result in lower state support for local schools.

For instance, Richmond can expect $169.6 million in state aid for schools in 2021 under current estimates. Under Gillespie's plan—assuming the VEA has run the numbers correctly—Richmond can anticipate only $160.3 million. That's a $9 million cut!

But not really. Because this year, the state is giving Richmond $150.8 million in aid to schools. So aid to the city will grow, by either 12 percent or 6 percent. You might think state aid should grow more than 6 percent, but that doesn't make a 6 percent increase a cut.

It's the same for many localities: Aid to, say, Arlington would grow from $69.5 million to either $83.4 million or $78.9 million. Statewide, aid to localities would grow from $6.8 billion this fiscal year to either $7.4 billion or $6.9 billion.

True, some localities could lose money, using the VEA's figures. For instance: According to the VEA, Wythe County is getting $25 million in state aid this fiscal year. In 2021 it will get $26.3 million, or $24.9 million if Gillespie has his way. Note, however, this pertinent fact: Wythe's school population is expected to decline from 4,041 students to 3,945.

Team Gillespie insists the VEA is just plain wrong, and a Gillespie administration would not cut school spending one red cent.

But the whole debate might be beside the point.

That's because the whole debate is predicated on an unstated premise: More spending means better schools. And that premise is, at the least, flawed.

By coincidence, also last week The New York Times ran an article on "Mayor Bill de Blasio's boldest education initiative." That is "his Renewal Schools program, which pledged hundreds of millions of dollars to turn around the city's most troubled schools." After four years, the 78 schools in question have received $582 million. But, reports The Times, "researchers… who have looked at the program's results so far say they ranged from mixed to disappointing."

When the newspaper "analyzed Renewal test scores by comparing their progress with growth of the city's scores over all," it found that "most schools failed to narrow the gap between their test scores and the city average." (That's coming from The New York Times, mind you. Not some right-wing propaganda organ.)

This should not be surprising. The link between spending and performance is so loose as to be nearly nonexistent. The chart nearby, for instance—from a Cato Institute study of spending and academic performance in the 50 states—shows that while spending on schools has soared in recent decades, standardized test performance has scarcely budged.

The same holds true in state after state, and nationwide.

So maybe the real question isn't who would put the most into Virginia's schools. Maybe the real question is who could get more out of them.

This column originally appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

NEXT: Pomona College Investigates Students for Posting Offensive Memes on Facebook

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. There are two kinds of math in the world: regular math and the political kind.

    Wow. Just wow.

    What about non-binary math? Huh?

    1. There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who do not.

      1. There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand decimal, but not binary, octal, or hexadecimal. Those who understand decimal and binary but not octal or hexadecimal. Those who understand decimal, binary, and octal, but not hexadecimal. Those who understand… and so on.

          1. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

            This is what I do…

  2. When you’ve lost the NYT…

  3. since De Blasio was so wildly fucking wrong, does this mean we get to sodomize him with a barbed wire covered baseball bat? asking for a friend

    1. I’d settle for voting him out of office. Hell, buy him and his family a nice little hacienda on the shores of Cuba. And take the city council speaker and fellow communist with them so she doesn’t fail upwards into the mayor’s office too.

    2. Depends on whether your friend works for the nypd.

  4. If an outlay is already on budget for X and new plans are for Y (less than X), it is not outlandish to call Y a reduction, though to be fair a better term would be a ‘reduction in the planned increase’.

    All math would be better if we just used octal triplets.

    1. Your new moniker should be Captain Obvious, sultan of semantics.

  5. I am pretty stoked that i get to vote against both Gillespie and Northam next month.

    1. I like Cliff Hyra too, but I am very worried about what could happen if the dems win back the assembly with Northam in charge, so I am planning to vote for Gillespie. I know he’s a tool, but better that than a prog convert who will roll over for whoever gives him a doggie biscuit.

  6. Yes you mean like the fucking governor of California admitting the minimum wage doesn’t help and makes no economic sense, but it’s good politics so let’s go with that!

    1. He’s another one who should be declared eligible for the BWBBB!

  7. though as I gaze at the graph, my first impression is that this outcome is not expenditure related and that maybe teaching methods or student aptitude my be reasonably examined…

  8. Listen: it’s really hard to measure teacher performance by student performance. There are so many factors, much of which are beyond a teacher’s control. That’s not fair, is it? What can we really know about how good a teacher is?

    All we really know is: if you want students to learn a lot more, pay teachers a lot more. And that’s all you need to know.

  9. I laugh at Virginia’s puny little educational budget cut – here in Georgia we’ve slashed the educational budget by 4 billion by not increasing it by 5 billion.

    1. In neither case is the spending (cut or uncut) related to education. Or even to learning by students.
      The teachers are learning that union plus politics equals more money, even if called a draconian cut.

    2. I’ve personally decreased the GDP of this country by hundreds of thousands of dollars, every year, by continuing to not purchase a yacht.

  10. If you look at the chart, you’ll clearly see that, from 1980 to 2005, education spending increased roughly 100% and SAT test scores increased roughly 5%. OBVIOUSLY, we need to increase spending another 200% if we want to see our children prosper with a 10% increase in SAT scores. STOP DEFUNDING OUR SCHOOLS!

    (I’ve actually encountered arguments very similar to this.)

    1. Actually the SAT is not(!) a measure of how well the students were taught. You could be a choom gangster taught by socialists who don’t believe in homework and your SAT score wouldn’t be affected by the poor teaching/schooling. The SAT is an aptitude test. You should use the ACT or standardized tests which are used to compare schooling by country.

  11. Where I live in NoVa, Arlington and Fairfax counties spend significantly less per student than Alexandria City does and their test scores are consistently higher. Now Alexandria schools are complaining that they are not getting the budget increase they need to attract the best and brightest students and teachers. The numbers certainly don’t support this, but then again, progs always rely on emotion over logic.

  12. The Cato institute has also shown that the figures that the teacher’s unions put out on spending per student are complete B.S. Chicago spends an obscene amount per student for third world schools. Give half the money spent to parents in the form of stipends and they will get a far better schooling for their kids.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.