Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Department of State

Afghan Girl Roboticists Are Denied Visas and Everybody Is Angry

But the event's sponsor says its visa approval rate was remarkably high and that no other country could offer such access.

Ed Krayewski | 7.5.2017 4:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
via FIRST Global

The State Department has rejected visa applications from Afghan and Gambian teams hoping to visit the United States for a robotics competition. But FIRST Global, the nonprofit that organized the event, expects all 160 other participant teams to be able to attend. Compared to the historical averages on such visa issuances, the group considers that a great success.

"I've been absolutely amazed at how well the coordination of the United States government State Department has been," says FIRST Global President Joe Sestak, formerly a Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania. More than a third of the participant countries have visa refusal rates of 40 to 80 percent, and many more have refusal rates of 35 percent. Given that, Sestak reports that his group "expected to have about a third of the countries potentially not be able to gain visas." Sestak notes that the State Department helped a number of applicant teams who were rejected on their first tries, and sent a memo to embassies all over the world letting them know about the competition.

In 2016, the visa refusal rate for Afghanistan was about 74 percent and for Gambia about 70 percent. Overall last year, the State Department rejected 2.7 million B1/B2 visas (the type of business travel visas used for the robotics competition).

Yet media coverage frequently left the impression that this year's visa rejections were unusual. A Washington Post editorial claimed the all-girls Afghan team's story had ended in tears "thanks to the U.S.," calling the visa denial "inexplicable" and "self-defeating." Many news reports mention that few B1/B2 visas have approved from Afghanistan this year, but few if any note last year's refusal rate. The English-language Daily Times in Pakistan even suggested that the Afghan team was rejected because it couldn't be fit into the "white savior" narrative.

Sestak has written several letters, including one he posted on Facebook, to try to clarify the matter.

"The first interview that I gave, they didn't take what I had said, but you know, I understand that," Sestak says. "Journalists need to do what they feel is right and I accept that."

Sestak also rejects the idea that such competitions should be held outside the country in the age of Trump. "No other nation would have such access as ours," he says. "The proof of that is Iran's coming. Sudan's coming." Both countries are affected by President Trump's travel ban.

The Iranian team did face a different hurdle related to U.S. foreign policy. A number of teams come from countries that face U.S. sanctions. While FIRST Global was able to ship materials to Cuba and Sudan, they were unable to do the same for the Iranians. Instead, Iran's team worked with American high school students to build a robot remotely. The Iranians will attend the competition next week.

The teams from Afghanistan and Gambia were allowed to ship their robots to the U.S. So if they're unable to secure visas at the last moment, they will still participate in the competition via Skype.

Despite the high rate of visa approval for this competition, visa issuances have gone down during the Trump administration. In 2016 the State Department approved about 2,000 B1/B2 visas for Afghanistan, but it is on track to approve closer to 1,000 this year. Last year it approved about 23,000 B1/B2 visas for Iran and 13,000 for Iraq; this year the numbers are on track to be 13,000 from Iran and 7,700 from Iraq. Other travel ban countries have fared worse. More than 1,400 B1/B2 visas were approved for Libyans last year; this year Libya is on track for just 150 approvals.

But Trump's border-control rhetoric is often far harsher than what U.S. laws actually permit. When media outlets paint the grimmest possible portrait of travel to the United States, they end up helping Trump, because they treat his words as the overwhelmingly defining factor in an area that in fact is far more complex and is not exclusively under the president's control.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Los Angeles is Spending $16 Million on a Bridge That Was Supposed to be Free

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Department of StateAfghanistanRobotsDonald Trump
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (35)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. CharlesWT   8 years ago

    But, but, if they are allowed to come here, they will unleash their self-replicating battle-bots that will destroy the country...

    1. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   8 years ago

      And they will be HERE, in this country they are destroying, They will be the first robot-assisted suicide EVER.

      How awesome is that!

    2. SIV   8 years ago

      Aren't they just Legos that were programmed for them by American academics?

      Whenever I hear the words "girls and STEM" I unsafe my Browning.

  2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

    Come on! Afghanistan is a country of rubble (partly thanks to the USSR and USA) where most people don't have much and women are treated as if they lived in the 15th Century.

    We are supposed to believe that Afghan girls are entering this competition for robotics rather than meeting male suitors in the USA on visitor visas?

    I will believe these young women are robotics enthusiasts if I see pictures of their robot experiments and extra parts laying around.

    1. BYODB   8 years ago

      Well, I'm sure they've seen a lot of American robots doing 'work' on the side of the road...and that being said I imagine a lot of girls in countries like Afghanistan probably want out so they can do things like play with robots all day too.

    2. Zeb   8 years ago

      Jesus Crist, dude. Most people don't have much doesn't mean nobody has anything. Check the video on the WaPo link. There are pictures of just that. If that's not good enough, 10 seconds on Google will get you more.

      1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

        I have to go to WaPo then. I will take your word for it that there are great pictures of them with all sorts of parts and its not a propaganda job.

        If there is one thing that people who live day to day in poverty have disposable income for, its robotics.

        Jesus Christ is another one who would not have spent his disposable income on robotics.

        1. Calidissident   8 years ago

          How do you know these specific girls live day to day in poverty? It's not like everyone in the country of Afghanistan lives a Stone Age existence.

          In the absence of any evidence to suggest your pulled-out-of-the-ass explanation about seeking male suitors, I'm going to guess that a team participating in a robotics competition is probably seeking a visa for a robotics competition. It's not even like you can just meet a guy and get an instant marriage visa to stay in the US, that isn't how it works.

          1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

            It was a general assessment of quality of life for Afghanis and there is nothing wrong with that, since this is not kids from South Korea wanting to attend in the USA.

            I am sure these girls get just the parts they need delivered via FedEx next day service in their city of Herat.
            /sarcasm absolutely intended

            Afghanistan is still in a state of war with Americans still fighting there. Afghani roads and other infrastructure are horrendous. Afghani literacy rate is ~38%. UniCef estimates that 33% of Afghani girls under 18 are married.

            There is a 74% visa refusal rate for Afghanis and "B" visas.

          2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

            Furthermore, we are in a state of war with Afghanistan or people in Afghanistan. Americans are dying there and we are supposed to feel sad about Afghanis not being able to come to the USA?

            Our troops leave Afghanistan, Afghanis get a stable government and then we can talk Afghani kids coming to the USA for a robotics competition.

            1. Calidissident   8 years ago

              We aren't in a state of war with Afghanistan. Nominally, we are supposed to be allies with the government of Afghanistan that nominally represents the people there. Obviously it's more complicated than that, but it's also inaccurate to make the country or people overall out to be our enemies.

              1. Calidissident   8 years ago

                *And to add extra clarification, I'm aware we are war in Afghanistan. I'm merely pointing out that's not the same thing as being at war with the country of Afghanistan.

              2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

                We invaded Afghanistan. We have military fighting, occupying and dying in Afghanistan.
                AUMF
                I was careful to not say at war with Afghanistan but we are not allies. We have no declaration of war against Afghanistan but they do not get to tell the USA when we are leaving.

                True that all Afghanis are not deemed military targets but they are not trusted by our military forces.

                I use the term "state of war" with Afghanistan because we were not invited and invaded a sovereign nation.

    3. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

      Let's just assume that the only reason women leave Afghanistan is to attempt to marry foreign men. Why exactly should I be offended or give a shit about that?

    4. Magnitogorsk   8 years ago

      You're one of those people that has never traveled more than 100 miles from their home town, aren't you?

      1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

        I have been on every continent, so right back at ya.

    5. Migrant Log Chipper   8 years ago

      Are you really this stupid or are you just trolling?

      1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

        Are you stupid to believe everything the media tells you? Or are you just trolling?

        Why is this national news? This is national news because this fits the narrative that questioning visa applicants and immigrants is part of the evil plan to block all these innocent and great people wanting to enter the USA.

        See, its kids just wanting to do robotics and Trump's evil henchmen stopped that.

    6. Len Bias   8 years ago

      Maybe they want to learn a useful skill and get recognition for it so they can pull themselves out of poverty. But, hey, let's close the door on them and then blame them for their poverty.

      1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

        They can also learn about disappointment and how the USA has not obligation to let in people from countries where our soldiers are still dying.

        Not that its a kids fault.

  3. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    The Afghan Girl Roboticists would be a pretty good name for a band.

  4. Don't look at me.   8 years ago

    More evidence of winning. So much winning you won't believe how much winning.

  5. Number 7   8 years ago

    does their robot dig a hole, push the other robot in and then stone it?

    1. Dillinger   8 years ago

      "our model shoves the infidel *off the building* for you..."

    2. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

      Only if its a lady robot that does not wear a hijib or burka.

  6. Seamus   8 years ago

    "In 2016, the visa refusal rate for Afghanistan was about 74 percent and for Gambia about 70 percent."

    That should be "and for *the* Gambia about 70 percent." (The government of The Gambia is so insistent on their definite article that they capitalize it, as I just did. They're probably afraid that if they don't make special efforts the article will be lost, as in the case of the Sudan, the Upper Volta--and eventually, I suppose, the Philippines, the Maldives, and the Netherlands.)

    1. Zeb   8 years ago

      And yet people still say "the Ukraine" even though that's never really been correct.

      1. Dillinger   8 years ago

        Ukraine is not weak!

        1. MWG   8 years ago

          Well we're playing a game here, buddy.

      2. gah87   8 years ago

        That's to avoid confusion with that other Ukraine.

  7. ImFeklhr   8 years ago

    Don't understand the paragraph beginning "Despite the high rate of approval..."
    It says something about the state department issuing 2000 visas this year and on pace for only 1000 this year. What is that in reference to? The following sentences contradict that with much higher numbers.

    1. Calidissident   8 years ago

      I'm guessing this was in reference to a specific country, but you're right that as is it's not clear what it's referring to.

      1. gaoxiaen   8 years ago

        IANAM, but I noticed that, too.

  8. gah87   8 years ago

    Ed, serious question here: you state that visa approvals are down from 2016; what about relative to applications? One could surmise that Trump's rhetoric has lowered the number of applicants. I'm curious whether this is so.

  9. charlenecoleman   8 years ago

    I found a great site that focuses on stay at home mom's complete guide to gaining a serious amount of money in very little time. While being able to earn an passive income staying home with your kids. If you are someone who needs more money and has some spare time, this site is perfect for you. Take a look at...

    follow this link?..????????????

    Trump"s New Opprunuties See Here

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use

Autumn Billings | 6.4.2025 11:40 AM

A First Amendment Right To Preach Orgasm?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.4.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!