History

What Frederick Douglass Teaches Us about July 4th and American Exceptionalism

Douglass recognized that embracing freedom and liberty is a process that will continue to unfold and expand over time.

|

I don't think there's a greater Fourth of July speech than Frederick Douglass' 1852 address, "What to the slave is the Fourth of July?"

The titular passage is the most-searing indictment of precisely the sort of cheap and easy American exceptionalism that continues to clot political rhetoric with the phoniest sort of patriotism:

What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelly to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy—a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour.

Contemporary conservatives especially recoil from this sort of auto-critique that is in fact one of the most unique facets of our national identity. Even before the United States was a nation, figures such as Samuel Sewall (one of the judges in the Salem witchcraft trials who recanted his actions, wore sackcloth and ashes in penance, and authored the first anti-slavery tract in the colonies) and Roger Williams (the religious dissenter who first articulated a theory of fully secular government in English and is the subject of this brilliant biography) excoriated the my-country-right-or-wrong mentality that is hardly specifically American.

Sure, there is something grotesque about intergalactic "apology tours" that never seem to right past wrongs or change future policy, but as the constantly shifting valorization of dissent reminds us, partisan politics is a weak foundation upon which to rely for moral standing. Contemporary liberals loved dissent under Bush, found it unpatriotic under Obama, and now with Donald Trump in the White House, are busy rebranding themselves as "the Resistance." Conservatives simply reverse the process.

In pre-abolition America, Douglass was of course specifically addressing slavery, a national original sin so monstrous that he notes its justification is elided in the founding document of the United States. The Constitution is a "glorious liberty document," he notes. But "if the Constitution were intended to be, by its framers and adopters, a slave-holding instrument," Douglass asks rhetorically, "why [is] neither slavery, slaveholding, nor slave…anywhere…found in it"?

Yet for the all fury that courses through Douglass' lecture, he "do[es] not despair of this country." Instead, he paints a picture of globalization, interconnectedness, and progress toward more expansive freedom that resonates well over a century after he first spoke it:

While drawing encouragement from the Declaration of Independence, the great principles it contains, and the genius of American Institutions, my spirit is also cheered by the obvious tendencies of the age. Nations do not now stand in the same relation to each other that they did ages ago. No nation can now shut itself up from the surrounding world, and trot round in the same old path of its fathers without interference. The time was when such could be done. Long established customs of hurtful character could formerly fence themselves in, and do their evil work with social impunity. Knowledge was then confined and enjoyed by the privileged few, and the multitude walked on in mental darkness. But a change has now come over the affairs of mankind. Walled cities and empires have become unfashionable. The arm of commerce has borne away the gates of the strong city. Intelligence is penetrating the darkest corners of the globe. It makes its pathway over and under the sea, as well as on the earth. Wind, steam, and lightning are its chartered agents. Oceans no longer divide, but link nations together. From Boston to London is now a holiday excursion. Space is comparatively annihilated. Thoughts expressed on one side of the Atlantic are, distinctly heard on the other. The far off and almost fabulous Pacific rolls in grandeur at our feet. The Celestial Empire, the mystery of ages, is being solved. The fiat of the Almighty, "Let there be Light," has not yet spent its force. No abuse, no outrage whether in taste, sport or avarice, can now hide itself from the all-pervading light.

In reading the above, I'm reminded that Douglass himself drew early inspiration as a slave boy from writings by the Irish-born playwright and politician Richard Brinsely Sheridan, who argued in Britain for Catholic emancipation. And that just four years earlier, Douglass had attended the Seneca Falls Convention in New York, and joined Elizabeth Cady Stanton and other feminists in pushing for equal rights (the alliance between Douglass and Stanton, abolitionists and feminists, would break down before reasserting itself in the post-Civil War era).

Douglass' genius was not in hailing or excoriating American in hyperbolic and "exceptionalist" terms. Plenty of people before and after him have done that. To simply assert that the United States is the either most perfect or most depraved nation is a form of exceptionalism, to be sure. But it is also an indulgent gesture that presumes that we can't redeem ourselves or ever be held in error.

I think what resonates to this day is that Douglass was able to place America not simply in an international context but also to recognize that embracing freedom and liberty is a process that will continue to unfold and expand (or contract) over time.

The United States has much to be ashamed of as a nation and much to celebrate. But as we hurtle through history, what we need more than anything is a compass by which to chart future actions. Douglass' life and writings help provide that in a way few other examples can.

Note: A version of this ran on July 4, 2012.

NEXT: 'Dear George': the Declaration of Independence as 'the greatest break-up letter of all time'

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Oh yeah? Well, I just went up to Walmart and bought a bunch of fireworks and any place that allows you to buy shit that blows up can’t be all bad so fuck you and your memento mori. For one goddamn day eat a half gallon of ice cream and get drunk as fuck and laugh and enjoy it.

    1. Wal-Mart ice cream is the opiate of the masses.

  2. I am ashamed of nothing, as I did nothing wrong.

    1. Forget it, Gillespie is a left liberal fake libertarian retard.

      1. Only to followers of the KKK and Ron Paul.

        1. Get a new hobby horse, Mike, you’ve already fucked this one to death and beyond.

          1. STILL STALKING ME??? NINE MONTHS!!

            PROOF (remove blank spaces) htt p://bit.ly/2tL0kct
            8:22.16 @ 7.08am
            MarkLastname
            And actually privatizing social security is perfectly viable. I’ll provide reasons when you actually start to do so.

            Here’s MY proof! (lol).

            Cato’s privatization hustle
            Workers would keep/invest their 6.2% FICA share. Michael Tanner says (page 10) the transition will be costly, but “a one-time event”
            ? Yeah, a one-time event lasting over 30 years, declining from a first-year cost of $410 billion.

            “Simply restraining the projected growth in nondefense discretionary spending by 1 percent would generate more than $20 billion per year.”
            … Versus $410 billion!

            And how to pay for it is not Cato’s job anyhow!
            “There are short-term costs that will require the president and Congress to make tough choices.”

            Repeats short-term transition costs bullshit
            $410B loss is 50% FICA revenues Page 10 All revenues are budgeted to benefits, losses decline as seniors die off..

            STILL your turn, Mark. PUT UP OR SHUT UP

            He never did. But stalks and punishes me for calling out his aggression … 9 months later.

            As he SHITS on NAP.

    2. Jesus knows what you did when you’re alone at night.

      1. Window peeping you say?

  3. The rhetoric on the 4th is sickening when coming from the likes of, say, Mayor Kinney of Philadelphia. Hypocrisy or ignorance? For a man like him to stand in front of Independence Hall and be cheered by the crowd on July 4th must have the Founders weeping.

    1. Hate Speech!

      And Hate Speech is not Free Speech!

    2. Creech was created by God to be the moral policeman of the world, to impose ONLY Politically Correct values!
      Ooops, policePERSON.

  4. That’s some wicked cool hair he has going on there.

    I wish.

  5. “The United States has much to be ashamed of as a nation and much to celebrate.”

    It balances out!

    Other than that, like pretty much every other nation on earf? Actually America (and America jr.) have more to celebrate than be ashamed I reckon and argue.

    /Puts on badass Douglass wig.

    1. is blackwig as racist as blackface? You may need to consult your RA.

  6. Slavery existed for all of human history, even the Old Testament (where it was not condemned)
    It was brought here from Europe.
    We repealed it in fewer than 90 years.
    Shame? Hardly.

    In the mid-8os, a black WaPo journalist wrote an op-ed that he was glad his ancestors were brought here as slaves.
    Or else he wouldn’t be here, and so much better off than if he was born in (I forget which African country).
    He indeed had a rich life, as a foreign correspondent in (IIRC) a half-dozen CHOICE assignments.
    He touched off a major firestorm. I saw references to it for for a while, before it got lost in the per-Internet days.

    1. Yep. Keith Richburg. I read his book. I remember how pissed people got from the premise.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Richburg

      1. THANKS!! At the time, WaPo had a weekly publication with all their op-eds. GREAT for anyone who read across the spectrum pre-Internet.

    2. Hihn made a useful comment!

      1. First, one must try to!

      2. Not only useful, but truthful.
        You OK, Mike?

    3. Exactly. A lot of people don’t get this point. The US wasn’t founded as some utopia. Far from it. But it was founded in a unique way, and with a set of ideals to aspire to that have let us become better. Of course we make mistakes, and stumble and falll, but we pick ourselves up and keep trying.

      Which is a large part of what American exceptionalism is all about.

      1. That’s the best I’ve seen this Fourth.

      2. Thank you Elias: it seems taken for granted that the US is supposed to be virtually without fault, and any error or sin is spun into an indictment of the entire history of the Nation. No such standards exist for any country in Europe or elsewhere on the globe. We even [are supposed to] make accommodations for North Korea.

    4. How does he know that if that hadn’t happened, he wouldn’t’ve been born to parents who were in the USA? We don’t get to choose our parents; we don’t even get to choose our own bodies. You think you could change one thing in hx & have your descendacy remain the same?

      1. Or maybe he’d be among the untold nos. who’ve never been born! We don’t know how many there are, so no way to compute the odds of incarnation, but it could be that the non-existent outnumber the existent by a lot, in which case if you changed hx, you’d be significantly diminishing your chances of material existence. A priori, considering the non-material don’t take up space or stuff, it would be reasonable to think there are vastly more of them than there are of living things.

        1. Or maybe he’d be among the untold nos. who’ve never been born!

          An even worse reversal of foresight and hindsight. Why do you question his existence? He had to have parents. Each of them had parents. Etc.

      2. We don’t get to choose our parents; we don’t even get to choose our own bodies.

        You may have confused foresight with hindsight.

        1How could he have been born here if SOME ancestor had not come here first, from Africa? Even his parents.
        He could not have.
        Then, quite simple, which ancestors came here, and under what circumstances?

  7. Douglass himself drew early inspiration as a slave boy from writings by the Irish-born playwright and politician Richard Brinsely Sheridan

    Cultural appropriation!

    Douglass had attended the Seneca Falls Convention in New York, and joined Elizabeth Cady Stanton and other feminists

    Mansplaining!

    Remember, all blacks, all women, all gays, all poor people think alike and act alike and to the extent that they don’t they’re victims of false consciousness that causes them to work against their own self-interest. There’s a genetic pre-determinism here, a different way of knowing that ineluctably shapes the very soul.

    Except for middle-class, middle-American straight white males. MCMASWMs are the only humans endowed with free will, the only ones who can choose to believe certain things and are capable of being re-educated to choose to believe other things. They are the only ones for whom biology isn’t destiny.

    Now you might think that being endowed with free will makes MCMASWM’s a superior form of animal, next to whom the predestination-ruled women and blacks and gays who just can’t help themselves because that’s the way they were born are inferiors fit to be treated as property or as children or as livestock, but it would be wrong of you to think this. At the moment, the reason why it would be wrong to think this escapes me, I may have to get back to you on that point.

    1. Curious POV, elegantly laced with the most egregious sarcasm. Would love to hear more.

    2. It’s only wrong when the rest of the scam unfolds and falls apart. The next enemy after they purge all of the white working class producers will most likely be an alien from a yet to be determined planet.

  8. “There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour.”

    The hell there wasn’t in 1852, Freddy.

  9. Nice post – Thanks for sharing this kind of post with us. really very great stuff, keep posting…

    Visiter Cette Page CrazyBulk Avis.

  10. L’acc?s physique ? l’appareil cible est n?cessaire pour installer mSpy. Une fois qu’il est install?, vous pouvez surveiller ? distance et de suivre leur t?l?phone ou de l’ordinateur, n’importe o? vous ?tes. Voici comment faire pour commencer.

  11. Feeling full reduces our feeling of hunger. Feeling hungry causes us to eat. Eating causes us to gain weight. So feeling full more often will help us lose weight. One way you can “trick” your body into feeling full more often is by adding more fiber to your diet. Fruits and vegetables have lots of fiber, so do whole grains. But, if you can’t eat more of either of those you can also add a powdered fiber product to drinks, sauces, and even dips.

    If someone who likes to cook is looking for something they can do for themselves to lose weight they may be in luck. By preparing homemade meals as opposed to eating out a person can closly monitor what is going into the foods they are eating. Meals can be tailored to individual dietary needs to aid weight loss. Visit this page for more Phen375 Reviews

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.