List of '100 Most Influential Libertarians' Topped by Ron and Rand Paul, Riddled with Reasonites
See where Bob Poole, Nick Gillespie, Matt Welch, John Stossel, Drew Carey, Veronique de Rugy, Kennedy, Deirdre McCloskey, and other friendly faces rank in this Newsmax/FreedomFest exercise.


Who is the most influential libertarian in the United States? Ron Paul, according to this fun top-100 list put together by the conservative outlet Newsmax, working from (and supplementing) a poll put together by our friends at FreedomFest, the annual liberty-movement/free-market gathering in Las Vegas. (See Reason's coverage of Ron Paul, read Senior Editor Brian Doherty's book on the man, and browse through Paul's archive in our pages.)
Paul's son Rand (coverage, most recent Reason interview, 2011 cover story) came in second place, and let the furious arguments begin! But first, a few words from the creators about their parameters:
To compile this list, our editors defined a libertarian as a consistent advocate of free-market capitalism, minimal government, and social tolerance (thus distinguishing libertarians from conservatives). Their motto might be "Keep government out of the boardroom and the bedroom." […]
Still, a list like this is subjective at best, and should be viewed as interesting and informative, rather than definitive. We very likely missed people who should have been on the list, and we welcome your input and correction for future editions. Moreover, while selecting only 100 is difficult, coming up with a ranking is even more subjective. We tried to rank the entrants in what we believe is a somewhat logical order of influence, but we certainly recognize that many readers (and perhaps even some people whose names are on the list!) may take exception to the ranking.
Finally, it is important to note that we chose to leave out a few individuals whose credentials as libertarians might be less convincing, such as Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Howard Stern.
The list definitely tilts to the right, and some libertarian credentials have already been greeted with skepticism by the listees themselves, such as #75 Charles Gasparino of Fox News ("Ok I guess I'm a libertarian sort of"). But these things are fun, and, well, let's go ahead and get the most controversial sequence out of the way:
22) Nick Gillespie
23) Clint Eastwood (Reason archive about)
24) Matt Welch
SMDH!
The Reason family overall is well represented on this list, which is as good a reminder as any to subscribe to the damn magazine, donate to the Foundation that makes it all possible, re-read Brian Doherty's great 2008 oral history of the magazine, and by all means come out to FreedomFest this year to see me and Nick and Katherine Mangu-Ward from the main stage, and also a whole universe of futuristic Reason Day goodness on Saturday, July 21.
After the jump, the rankings of our employees, donors, contributors, ex-staffers, and friends.

4) John Stossel (Reason archive, most recent Reason interview, 2004 cover story)
6) Reason Trustee David Koch (archive about)
8) Andrew Napolitano (archive, most recent Reason interview)
17) Trustee Drew Carey (archive, Reason Saves Cleveland)
19) Robert Poole, Jr. (archive, most recent interview)
40) Courtney and Ted Balaker (archive, archive about, 2015 interview)
48) Radley Balko (archive, archive about, most recent interview)
51) Kennedy (archive, archive about)
62) Trustee Joan Carter and John Aglialoro (archive about, 2014 interview)
84) Veronique de Rugy (archive)
87) Deirdre Nansen McCloskey (archive)
Plenty of other friends, contributors, donors, and interview subjects on the list, including Penn Jillette (21), Matt and Terry Kibbe (28), Trey Parker and Matt Stone (43), Andrea and Howie Rich (53-54), Jeffrey Miron (76), Matt Ridley (83), and many more. Only non-Paul politicians on the list are Gary Johnson (7), Justin Amash (20), and Thomas Massie (55).
Am I giving away too much? Go read the full list! And then check out Reason's 35th anniversary "35 Heroes of Freedom" feature, which features several people from this list, and several others who no sane person would precisely describe as "libertarian." And though you need no urging from me, let's hear it in the comments: What's your own top 10? Greatest omission/worst inclusion? And who deserves the top slot on the "100 Most Influential Libertarian Commenters" list?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And who deserves the top slot on the "100 Most Influential Libertarian Commenters" list?
Whoever makes the first comment on this post, I guess.
Can we even make it to 100? Maybe if we include sock puppets...
Shut up, Tulpa.
The proper response is Fuck Off Tulpa. Which you would know if you weren't Tulpa.
I told you to shut up, Tulpa.
Fuck Off Tulpa.
The other day I was reading some Buddhist crap, and they started talking about tulpas, and I just started cracking up.
This is where cultural appropriation claims almost come close to making sense - a rich, 2500-year-old tradition being ruined by some asshole on the Internet.
Can't ruin something on the internet if no one listens to you, Tulpa.
And who deserves the top slot on the "100 Most Influential Libertarian Commenters" list?
I'm not sure I can think of any commenters who I would call Influential and Libertarian.
I wouldn't read the rest of the comments below, if i were you.
We are legion!
...as in an undetermined number.
22) Nick Gillespie
23) Clint Eastwood (Reason archive about)
24) Matt Welch
Clint's reaction to being the meat in a cosmotarian sandwich.
I'd rather watch Clint arguing with an empty chair than read one of Nick's articles, but I suppose the articles are more influential.
2 places above Matt? Must be because the jacket trumps glasses and a 6th grader haircut any day of the week.
There should be a separate ranking for Nick's Jacket. I demand a recount
The list has quite a few LINOs.
Penn Jillette? That guy is a Hillary advocate.
Sorry Nick and Matt but you two surprise me sometimes that you even want to be Libertarians.
Are you a libertarian?
Now you've provoked the 'Resident Defender of All Reason Writers'
I mean, only a true libertarian should be able the judge the libertarian bonafides of others.
Yeah, it's not like your shtick is beyond boring and predictable. You're so edgy
Answering the "why" someone would want to be a libertarian.
I consider myself a Libertarian. Its a tough road sticking to your principles no matter what the left and right say about you.
Its my opinion that certain people who say they are Libertarians are not. They advocate for things that are not hinged on freedom.
only a true libertarian should be able the judge
*HV rises from his chair proudly, steps forward, trips, face plant*
Remember that time when WakaWaka said that he rarely complains? Good times.
No, I don't remember that. And I wasn't complaining here. I'm only remarking on how lame you two are
Yes, at the time you were quite clear that it isn't complaining when you do it.
Most lamest libertarian contest!
I'm the top contender so far, people.
Most lamest libertarian contest!
I'm kinda sad that I can't participate. Can we just have a most lamest commenter ever contest to be more inclusive?
Physical lameness of certain body parts from chinchilla bites does not count, Crusty.
Dude, people who stand up for Simple Mikey don't get to call other people lame. You've got basically a negative amount of credibility there.
You are one obsessed, pathetic little fairy.
Nah. Keep trying, dummy. Maybe one day you'll come up with an insult that isn't just calling someone gay, but that's probably way beyond your mental faculties.
I keep telling you, Simple Mikey is gonna come out of the closet one of these days, and he will be the most obnoxious gay dude in the history of the universe.
He'll switch to using "breeder" as an insult.
Oh please, someone with lots of free time on their hands find that comment where WakaWaka explicitly stated that he rarely complains and then complained about how people are always accusing him of complaining too much.
Careful. What he means by "complaining" is pointing out that he's a complainer.
Anyone that doesn't have at least two aneurysms a day over fur'ners teckin' our jerbs isn't a real libertarian.
Leave Matt Welch alone.
He got several people to vote for Johnson, but sure, total "Hillary advocate."
Names?
You'll have to ask him. But he might be too classy to name names.
*HV rises from the floor rubbing his bloody nose, stands proudly*
I voted for Gary Johnson!
He admittedly voted for Hillary and his reasoning was absurd.
That does not make him a "Hillary advocate." What was absurd about his reasoning?
Right, so ignore everything he's ever said. All that matters is one vote.
I was surprised and disappointed at Penn Jillette's voting decision. As far as I'm concerned, the only point of voting is to lend what little support you can to a candidate you actually support. But many people see it differently. It's just dumb to assume that one vote reveals a person's true motivations, despite years of promoting a very libertarian viewpoint.
That's the thing about actually looking at what LINOs say and do, its not Libertarian but only seems that way to non-Libertarians.
If you advocate for Hillary over Gary Johnson and even Trump, what Libertarian logic allows that? Hillary is more Libertarian than Gary Johnson. Hillary is more Libertarian than Trump?
I don't much about Penn Jillette but I never considered what he said or did Libertarian.
Some people want famous people to be Libertarians for some reason rather than Libertarians who are famous.
If you advocate for Hillary over Gary Johnson and even Trump, what Libertarian logic allows that?
1) Who are you talking about?
2) Why don't you look into their reasoning?
And you don't need to keep capitalizing the L. Doing so usually refers to the party.
He's not a super-doctrinaire nerdy theory type of libertarian. If that's how you want to define "libertarian" then fine, it means whatever you want it to mean. But Penn, as far as I can see, is very much committed to individual liberty and leaving people alone to do what they think is best.
And I have never seen him say anything that would make calling him a Hillary advocate valid. Yes, he said he would vote for her, but also made it clear that he was only doing so because he thought Trump was much worse and that he doesn't care for any of her policy and that he was encouraging people in other states to vote for Johnson. I think he was wrong in his strategic voting calculation. But that's what it was. It wasn't a revelation of his real political motivations.
No, he's not a perfect libertarian by anyone's standard, but I think he does very well as a public figure promoting individualism and liberty.
Is anyone who voted for Trump over Johnson also not a 'real libertarian?'
It'd be easier to take people who criticize Jillette for the vote-trading thing seriously if I'd ever seen one of them, even just once, give the same mau-mau treatment to a self-professed libertarian who voted for Trump.
If you mean me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
I still support things Trump has done that have limited government. I am against US troops being deployed in Syria and Yemen.
I am against the media lying, so I counter that. Since the media has serious TDS, to a non-Libertarian it comes off like I voted for Trump.
You claim to be against lying and yet characterize Jillette's vote-trading as being an "advocate for Hillary". Interesting, that.
If he'd done the exact same thing but traded votes with a Trump voter, would you be here calling him a Trump advocate and a LINO?
But you're more or less fine with the Trump administration lying, it seems.
THERE WERE REASONS TO VOTE FOR TRUMP! TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
Penn Jillette? That guy is a Hillary advocate.
No he's not. He traded his Johnson vote for a Hillary vote, using a strategic vote-swap model.
Congratulations, guys! Keep up the good work.
Fun list. Of course, it does suggest that the Cato / Reason / Paulista crowd may be living in our own little echo chamber, but at least we finally have enough names to have a decent party.
at least we finally have enough names to have a decent party.
Will there be COCKTAILZ served there?
Those are two separate crowds that hate each other more than they hate the two major parties.
*pores over list*
Huh. I don't see Palin's Buttplug anywhere!
He is the measuring stick they used to create the list. Everyone on the list is numbered by their relative libertarianess compared to the Plug.
Nobody got more than 8%.
I thought this was supposed to be the top 100 most Influential Libertarians, not the Top Secret Proggies posing as Libertarians for a paycheck. /just kidding
Seriously though, riddled with Reasonites? I hear there's a pill for that...
Not a pill - infestations of Reasonites require a spray.
More like a list of the too 100 most influential people on the DC cocktail party circuit!
*patiently awaits high fives*
I am barely speaking to you.
That said, i would attend the fuck out of a cocktail party if Clint Eastwood was there.
You wouldn't be able to find a seat because they were all occupied by his imaginary foils.
I love his performance art career.
+1 stirring debate
Do you feel lucky, punk? Well do ya?
*do you feel lucky? Well do ya, punk?
Im the assigned pedant this week.
We're still on this? I keep telling you: I didn't mean to get it in your eyes. Sorry!
And i don't know how many times i told you: you can't just hurl handfuls of glitter around like that.
Rare footage of Crusty spreading libertarianism.
I was sure that was going to be a video of Rip Taylor. God you people can disappoint.
I know! You paid me $4,000 to strip you nude, oil up your body, and heave glitter and orange slices at your anus - but not get any in your dark, devilish eyes - and I failed you.
You didn't look closely at your PayPal account, did you. It was $4.00.
One bottle of glitter, one orange, one quart of 5W-30 motor oil - he didn't even cover his costs!
I'm pretty sure he stole the orange.
Close enough to be funny.
Hey, are you trying to make me question the consent of the sexual encounter between the taco and the hot dog bun?
Tony.
Reading his mental diarrhea on these pages every day has certainly influenced me ... to start drinking heavily and cutting myself because of the realization that there's a lot more people like him out there than there are of us.
Start?
"To compile this list, our editors defined a libertarian as a consistent advocate of free-market capitalism, minimal government, and social tolerance (thus distinguishing libertarians from conservatives)."
Just out of curiosity, is that parenthetical intended to refer to the whole list or just the last item (social tolerance)? I'm betting it was only intended to apply to the last item, but it seems more appropriately applied to the entire list.
True that. While most conservatives are at times advocates for most of those things, they are rarely very consistent about it, in their actions particularly.
And who deserves the top slot on the "100 Most Influential Libertarian Commenters" list?
Pfft... like you'd care...
What's your own top 10?
I like True libertarians, which inherently means they're not influential.
From this list, I would probably take David Friedman, Deirdre McCloskey, Randy Barnett, and Tom Palmer for my Top Ten. Maybe Richard Epstein, I dunno.
Greatest omission?
Kmele, obvs.
Again, that "influential" qualifier is tough. Ken White, aka Popehat? Michael Malice is growing in power thanks to NK. Thad Russell probably wouldn't want to be on a list that includes Rockwell and Block.
Greatest omission?
Kmele, obvs.
Wow. The list is meaningless.
Kmele is too busy making money to appear on lists.
If you're Libertarian, you have probably influenced someone at sometime.
Libertarians have to be aware of issues and not just what their team wants. I find people get something out of me bad mouthing both Republicans and Democrats.
Iowahawk is the greatest omission. In fact, I'd probably put him #1 on my list.
I'd bet his Twitter feed gets more unique vistors each day than this piece of crap site does now, since most of the real Libertarians have fled this coop for good.
You should leave, too.
You say "go away" and all he hears is "who wants cake".
Colbert's best work.
Please, please join them!
If I ain't on it then it ain't worth the pixels it's printed on.
??????ODo You want to get good income at home? do you not know how to start earnings on Internet? there are some popular methods to earn huge income at your home, but when people try that, they bump into a scam so I thought i must share a verified and guaranteed way for free to earn a great sum of money at home. Anyone who is interested should read the given article....??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-
I'll believe AI has arrived when comments like this can be automatically filtered out. It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult.
Dude if anything Spam Bot is the top libertarian commentator. Just think about it, Spam Bot's existence is exemplary of all the party virtues.
Did anyone see the original list? There were countless names who aren't even tangentially associated with Libertarianism. For on, Charlie Gasbagarino is the biggest Trump cock holster around.
Am I to assume that this list is only for people still alive? Most people who were influencial when they were alive remain so after they die,
Katherine Mangu-Ward???
No.
I know that I top the list of most influential libertarians among my circle of friends. So I've got that going for me.