Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

New: How To Impeach the President

There are two ways, basically. And one of involves a transfer of power the vice president when the president is getting a colonscopy. Seriously.

Austin Bragg | 5.18.2017 3:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Want to get rid of the president?

There are two ways, basically.

First, find an impeachable offense. According to the Constitution an impeachable offense: treason, bribery, or "Other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." What counts for that last part? Nobody knows. Some people say it means bad things only people in high office can do—like misusing public assets, dereliction of duty, or having sex and then lying about it. Others say it's any crime or misdemeanor at all, even if it has nothing to do with a president's position or power. Did you steal a pen from work? Petty theft is a misdemeanor. You should no longer be president.

Once you get an impeachable offense, get a majority of House members to vote in favor of the motion and then go to trial in the Senate, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. After the highest-rated programming in C-SPAN history, the senators vote. If 67 senators find the president guilty, he's gone.

There is another way, however, without all that messy legal stuff. But it involves the 25th Amendment, which is used to transfer power to the vice president whenever the president is getting a colonscopy. Seriously. It's not pretty.

About 2 minutes. Produced by Austin Bragg.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Case for Trump's Impeachment is Over-Determined

Austin Bragg is a senior producer at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. DanO.   8 years ago

    Oh no.

  2. DanO.   8 years ago

    Anyway:

    Radical Islamic Terrorist Times Square Driver Crashes Into Pedestrians, Killing 1 and Injuring 22

    NEW YORK ? In the latest incident in a wave of Radical Islamic Terrorist attacks drunken driving incidents, the 26-year-old driver appeared to have been either drunk or impaired by drugs and had been arrested twice for drunken driving, officials said. The preliminary evidence indicated that the episode was not terrorism-related, officials said.

    Dammit, General Cheeto could have used this! How sad for the beseiged President and his demoralized West Wing. And now he has to go to Arabia and stuff! Sad!
    https://tinyurl.com/mseyz2a

    1. chemjeff   8 years ago

      I am sure that the watchful sleuths over at Breitbart right now are concocting stories about how the librul NYPD is covering up the real nature of this terrorist act.

      1. DanO.   8 years ago

        This is a given. Don't have a strong enough stomach to confirm, but would bet at least $1000.

        1. xucaduceza   8 years ago

          I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

          This is what I do... http://www.webcash10.com

  3. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

    When "having sex and lying about it" means covering up that you like to use your office staff as your harem when being sued for sexual harassment (which had been the Left's Most Important Issue Facing the Country prior), it becomes something called obstruction of justice.

    Could the writers here not buy into the Dems talking points, for once?

    1. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   8 years ago

      Sense of humor, lost it is, with this one.

      1. $park? leftist poser   8 years ago

        This is what the Age of Trump has done to people.

        1. Unlabelable MJGreen   8 years ago

          No, YOU'RE the ones going crazy!

          1. $park? leftist poser   8 years ago

            Sane and insane could easily switch places if the insane were to become the majority. You would find yourself in a padded cell, wondering what happened to the world.

    2. nrob   8 years ago

      There were far greater offenses against Clinton than running an in-House brothel.

      1. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

        True, but there wasn't enough evidence to convict. Besides, President Bubba wasn't really attacked for having an affair in the White House. He was attacked for boinking the help, and kinda dumpy help at that. The Leader Of The Free World (tm) is supposed to have higher standards then that.

  4. wareagle   8 years ago

    First, find an impeachable offense.

    that would be the logical place to start. And no, unsubstantiated hearsay material from unnamed sources is not evidence. It may eventually lead to evidence, but it's not much on its own.

  5. DanO.   8 years ago

    I have it on good authority that Trump is a secret Mohammedan, born in Kenya. Let's enact the spirit of his Muslim ban and deny him reentry from his Arab/Jew/Catholic tour. Who's with me?

    1. Migrant Log Chipper   8 years ago

      Fuck off, troll.

      1. DanO.   8 years ago

        Nah, but thanks for replying!

  6. Jerryskids   8 years ago

    There's more than two ways to get rid of a president - ask JFK or Lincoln. It's not a very democratic method, but as the Democrats become progressively less democratic I can certainly see someone progressing to this point.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   8 years ago

      It's ok to say that now. Preet's gone.

      1. Eman   8 years ago

        If this is a threat, the woodchipper incident was literally murder.

  7. Brian   8 years ago

    Impeachment is just practically whatever the House says it is?

    So, when talking heads on TV say:

    Talking Head 0: "So, do you think [whatever the latest thing Trump allegedly said] is an impeachable offense?"

    Talking Head 1: "Most definitely, yes, this rises to that level!"

    They mean:

    Talking Head 0: "So, do you think House Republicans will impeach Trump over this?"

    Talking Head 1: "Most definitely, yes, this rises to that level!"

    Because, it doesn't sound that way when they say it.

    1. DanO.   8 years ago

      You poor dear. Do you need a moment?

  8. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

    Mike Pence for President!

    1. Blue Star   8 years ago

      of Ukraine

  9. Blue Star   8 years ago

    there are no ways to impeach Drumpf as long as Drumpfistas are controlling the House

  10. eyeroller   8 years ago

    "And one of involves a transfer of power the vice president when the president is getting a colonscopy."

    Look, I'm not demanding you send everything past three copy editors, but maybe you shouldn't be writing the posts on your phone.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Add It to the Tab

Liz Wolfe | 7.3.2025 9:30 AM

What Frederick Douglass Can Still Teach Us About the Fourth of July

Damon Root | 7.3.2025 7:00 AM

Cincinnati's Beer-Loving Germans Endured Anti-Immigrant and Anti-Alcohol Resistance

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!