Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Sex Work

Sexploitative Feminism: Hot Girls Wanted and How Not to Apologize for Mistreating Porn Stars

"Hot Girls Wanted" producers purport to care about sex workers' well-being but mock their privacy concerns.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.3.2017 6:03 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

screenshot/YouTube

Two weeks ago, the new Hot Girls Wanted documentary series from actress Rashida Jones was released on Netflix. Last week, a host of porn performers came out with complaints about the Hot Girls Wanted producers, whom they accused of lying about the nature of the project in order to obtain their consent and "outing" women as sex workers without their permission. The producers' response: If those women were really so worried about being outed, why were they speaking out in public about producers' exploiting them?

"They saw themselves, and then on Twitter, as themselves, using their own handles, tweeted out, 'Oh my God, we're on Netflix. Oh my God nobody told us. Oh my God, we're sex workers and they've just shown us on Netflix,'" Hot Girls Wanted director and producer Ronna Gradus told Variety this week. "So the great irony here is that they identified themselves as sex workers."

It was, at best, a totally tone-deaf statement. Hot Girls Wanted isn't just any documentary but one that purports to have feminist ambitions and concern for sex workers' well being. Casually dismissing the privacy concerns of sex workers who appear in the series totally betrays both alleged principles.

It's also a horseshit justification. As the women concerned with Hot Girls Wanted outing them have pointed out, the problem isn't that no one knew they were sex workers before the documentary and now they might. It's the fact that these women had chosen to limit their public sex-worker personas to certain audiences of their choosing and Hot Girls Wanted went ahead and, without so much as alerting them, used their images in a production with a much, much wider reach.

In other words: yes, these women are already "out" as sex workers on Twitter and Periscope. No, that doesn't make it OK for people to profit off of outing them to the whole world.

Legally, the producers are probably fine, of course. But the ethics of the move are another story. And for a production that's explicitly marketing itself as a nuanced, feminist look at the porn industry, how producers treated their sex-worker subjects should be a key part of the equation. Yet only a handful of professional publications have even addressed sex worker complaints about the production, while major media outlets from Rolling Stone magazine to The Daily Show have covered the series glowingly, content to let Jones and the other producers speak for sex workers.

No one involved with the film has returned my requests for comment or requests from others asking difficult questions, though they do seem plenty happy to do softball interviews with entertainment media still. Throughout these interviews, Jones, Gradus, and other Hot Girls Wanted spokespeople have refused to even address allegations that they directly lied to documentary subjects in order to secure their participation. At this point, multiple performers claim that producers directly told them this was not a Hot Girls Wanted or Rashida Jones production (a crucial point, as the 2015 Hot Girls Wanted series was considered so biased that performers say they would've refused to work on the project had they known).

In explaining to Variety why she thinks sex workers are criticizing the film, Gradus, who also directed and produced the original documentary, accused them of doing so under coercion from nefarious behind-the-scenes porn industry folk. "The industry is very defensive about people coming in and shining a light on the industry and doing stories about it," she said. "The allegations that have come out are probably the result of pressure they are feeling to stand in solidarity with the industry."

And it all comes full circle!

Step 1: decide women are exploited by the porn industry.

Step 2: make documentary with this foregone conclusion in mind.

Step 3: trick sex workers into participating.

Step 4: accuse any sex workers who object to your exploitation of being sad representations of the very problem you were trying to highlight; rest assured that no one will care what they have to say because they're in porn and you're a hotshot Hollywood filmmaker.

Step 5: become feminist darlings. Who cares about those filthy whores; you've got Trevor Noah on your side now, baby!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Climate Computer Models Right After All: What Global Warming Hiatus?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Sex WorkPornographyMoviesFeminismDocumentaryNetflixSexTelevision
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   8 years ago

    File under: For Their Own Good

  2. Jerryskids   8 years ago

    What the fuck is clap back?

    1. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

      It's the sexual disease that's transmitted while watching this documentary.

      1. Meh.   8 years ago

        It's also a very stupid trendy term for replying to an insult with another burn. The intent is to win the argument by rendering your opponent speechless through shock/shame.

        But mostly, it's the STD thing.

    2. Marty?.   8 years ago

      It's a form of ableism against the deaf & hearing impaired, or so progressive media outlets tell me.

      1. Inigo Montoya   8 years ago

        I thought it was when you use The Clapper to turn off a light, only to realize it's now too dark and you clap it back on.

  3. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

    If there's one thing that women in Hollywood don't do, it's exploiting either their own bodies or the bodies of others to make money, which is why they are morally superior to silly, icky prostitutes.

    1. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

      I know prostitutes, and believe me Oscar-winning actress Halle Berry is no prostitute.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   8 years ago

        Link fail broheim.

        1. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

          I keep disappointing you.

        2. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

          I keep disappointing you.

          1. Chipper Mourning LackOfSerifs   8 years ago

            How dare you accuse a stripper of being a prostitute? Nobody looks down on prostitutes more than strippers, as I am sure you have personally been told many times.

  4. DanO.   8 years ago

    If there's nothing wrong with "sex work" (prostitution), why are the sex workers (prostitutes) upset at being identified as such in a medium in which they willingly participated? Is anyone still so naive in 2017?

    1. Get To Da Chippah   8 years ago

      I can't imagine, unless prostitution were still largely illegal or something.

      1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

        Or socially frowned upon. I mean, there are no instances on record where someone was fired after they left the porn industry. Not at all. /sarc

        But here is DanO, who would be the first to talk about not victim blaming in other instances, taking the opposite tack as fast as possible. Because they are not the right kind of feminists.

  5. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

    I am confused. They appeared on camera and then were upset that this footage was used?

    I am also a bit amused by the idea that they were concerned about being exploited but apparently relied on the word of the alleged exploiter.

    "I am not a crook."

    1. DanO.   8 years ago

      Maybe they are trying to prove that one can have her cock cake and eat it too.

    2. Hugh Akston   8 years ago

      They are upset that they appeared on camera under false pretenses after the producers lied to them about the nature of the project and then edited the footage to tilt the interviews to suit the producers predetermined conclusion.

      1. DanO.   8 years ago

        So they say. If you can't trust a sex worker...

      2. SIV   8 years ago

        Like on the Daily Show.

      3. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

        They were afraid this might happen. And then relied on the word of the person who was likely to do it.

        In what scenario will someone actually say "I plan to make you look bad"?

    3. Marty?.   8 years ago

      > They appeared on camera and then were upset that this footage was used?

      If only the article had explained their complaints in detail....oh wait....

  6. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

    I also don't understand the idea that they are "out" on twitter but not on Netflix.

    Has twitter really lost that much audience share?

    1. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

      Read the leaked Variety interview for a few relevant details.

  7. ChipToBeSquare   8 years ago

    In solidarity I'll be doubling up on my porn consumption today

    1. esteve7   8 years ago

      There's not enough hours in a day to do that

      1. Hugh Akston   8 years ago

        Two monitors.

        1. Chipper Mourning LackOfSerifs   8 years ago

          One cup

          1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

            No! And no four girls one finger paint!

  8. Microaggressor   8 years ago

    Step 4: accuse any sex workers who object to your exploitation of being sad representations of the very problem you were trying to highlight

    They are just suffering from false consciousness, comrade.

  9. jdgalt1   8 years ago

    I suggest we respond in kind. Start by publishing the names, addresses, and phone numbers of the producers and of anyone in their employ who has helped them trick women into appearing on their show. Then if they move or change numbers to try to get back their privacy, keep "outing" them again. Once they experience how great it is (not) to be "outed" at someone else's will, maybe the next wanna-be abuser of women in Hollywood will decide to behave herself.

  10. nezalazeg   8 years ago

    ??????O Super and Easiest NLRB!nee Home opportunity for all. make 87 Dollars per hour and Make 52512 Dollars per month.All you just Need an Internet Connection and a Computer To Make Some Extra cash. .... .??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How To Fix California's Self-Inflicted Homeowner's Insurance Crisis

J.D. Tuccille | 5.21.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Breathe It In

Charles Oliver | 5.21.2025 4:00 AM

By Trump's Logic, Biden Deserves Credit for a Dramatic Drop in Overdose Deaths

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 12:01 AM

Subaru Is the Latest Carmaker To Hike Prices in Response to Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.20.2025 4:50 PM

What Kristi Noem Gets Wrong About Habeas Corpus

Billy Binion | 5.20.2025 4:33 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!