Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Government Spending

Congress Reaches Spending Deal; 'Skinny Budget' Goes Out the Window

You didn't think they were really going to defund public broadcasting and slash the EPA by 31 percent, did you?

Jesse Walker | 5.1.2017 10:48 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Sesame Street

Take Big Bird off the altar; they're not going to sacrifice him after all. (*) Congress has reached a deal to keep the government funded til September and, as usual, the GOP's talk about defunding public radio and TV has turned out to be an empty threat. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting isn't being zeroed out. In fact, the bill will fund it at the same level as last year.

The National Endowment for the Arts? It'll get more this year than last. The National Endowment for the Humanities? Same. The Environmental Protection Agency is getting less money, but not the 31 percent cut proposed in the administration's so-called "skinny budget"; instead it's losing just 1 percent. And no, Planned Parenthood isn't getting defunded.

I highlighted those five items not because they're big parts of the budget—only the EPA really spends that much—but because they're the sorts of red-meat issues that get Republicans and Democrats worked up. If they're basically unchanged, you can be sure that there won't be major reductions in the areas where there's a lot of bipartisan agreement. Sure enough, there will be more money for medical research, for national parks, for NASA, for the DEA, for Homeland Security, and—of course—for the Pentagon. The military won't be getting the $54 billion hike that Trump proposed, but the $25 billion boost that it's getting instead isn't so shabby.

There are a few small victories here and there for limited government. The plan won't fund Trump's border wall (though border security in general is getting a spending spike), and Jeff Sessions may be unhappy to hear that the Department of Justice won't be allowed to use its funds to keep states "from implementing their own laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana." And yes, some offices will be seeing some cuts under Trump, just as some offices saw some cuts under Obama.

Overall, though, Bloomberg's Sahil Kapur summed it up pretty well:

 

Twitter

 

If that sounds familiar, it's because it's pretty much what we've been telling you to expect here at Reason. We may live in weird times, but some things are still predictable.

(* Yes, I know: These days Big Bird airs on HBO. He is nonetheless fated to forever be a synecdoche for the CPB.)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Pentagon Claims 352 Civilians Killed in Strikes on ISIS Since Start of Campaign, Trump Invites Duterte to White House, Congress Agrees to Fund Government: A.M. Links

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Government SpendingPBSNPRNational Endowment for the ArtsPlanned ParenthoodEnvironmental Protection AgencyPentagon
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (17)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

    *burns MAGA hat*

  2. Crusty Juggler aka "Chad"   8 years ago

    Fun fact: "The National Endowment for the Humanities" was my nickname in college.

    1. Trigger Warning   8 years ago

      Mine was "Naturally Endowed Humanity."

  3. Don't look at me.   8 years ago

    Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.
    We elected the wildest of wildcards and we still can't cut spending. LOL

    1. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

      Pres don't make budget. Simple as that.

      Maybe, if he was super popular, he could get some of his cuts through. And even then... probably not.

      1. rudehost   8 years ago

        Nonsense presidents propose and sign off on spending. He has every ability to control the levels of spending and in fact more control than any other person in the country. The reason you got spending increases rather than cuts is that the talking yam has no interest in spending cuts. Makes sense we know that our bloated federal agencies would be reduced to paupers if we couldn't get them another 50 billion a year.

        1. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

          He has a few abilities, certainly not all of them. He can't amend legislation or control what happens to a bill in either chamber. He can veto what gets passed, and even then, he can be overridden by 2/3 of Congress (not impossible to get if there is a shutdown).

        2. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

          Talking Yam. I like that.

  4. creech   8 years ago

    There's no turning back. The TEA Party is in ruins, along with enumerated Constitutional powers and the GOP.
    Pelosi et al win again - making four yard gains instead of ten yards but still running up the score. You cannot fight Santa Claus and his sob stories.

  5. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

    You didn't think they were really going to defund public broadcasting and slash the EPA by 31 percent, did you?

    No. Only morons ever believed that shit.

    1. ernieyeball   8 years ago

      "morons" aka President Pud and Planet Pud.

  6. BYODB   8 years ago


    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting isn't being zeroed out. In fact, the bill will fund it at the same level as last year.

    And this will be called a cut.

  7. Glide   8 years ago

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

    You can't cut spending when even the right will vote out anyone who cuts their spending.

    1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   8 years ago

      Won't get fooled again, right?

  8. Garth Bigelow   8 years ago

    Doesn't the big P still have to approve the final version? If so I wouldn't put it past him to kick the thing back to the House even if it meant going into shutdown.

    1. Diane Merriam   8 years ago

      Do you really think that's going to happen? Not a chance.

  9. Jo Rae Perkins   8 years ago

    Is it possible this was a continuation of Obama's budget? Considering President Trump's 'budget' is not taken into account until October. The POTUS budget merely lays out his agenda and how it will be paid for.
    And it is the House that has control of the purse strings. However, they should have gone with the so called shutdown! Kicking the can down the road is wrong.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!