Trump Is Recycling Old Real Estate Marketing Gimmicks in Hopes of Reviving the Obamacare Repeal Bill

As a developer, Trump tried to generate interest in projects through false momentum.


Gage Skidmore / Foter

Early yesterday, The Washington Post's Robert Costa reported that a senior White House official said that a vote on the House bill to partially repeal and replace Obamacare was just days away. New legislative language based on a tentative deal struck between conservative moderate factions would circulate over the weekend, and a vote would be held on Wednesday of next week.

But Republican leaders in Congress immediately cast doubt on the notion. "There is no legislative text and therefore no agreement to do a whip count on," a GOP aide told Politico. The White House's claim that a vote was in the works was bunk—misinformation spread to the media in hopes of generating momentum on a bill that remains stalled.

This is how the Trump administration tends to work. It substitutes empty hype for real achievement, hoping that no one will be able to tell the difference. It's a marketing gimmick, not governance—and it's an old tactic from Trump, who employed it as a real estate developer.

This isn't the first time something like this has happened with the health care bill. In January, Trump said that an Obamacare replacement was "very much formulated down to the final strokes" and that the plan would provide "insurance for everybody," and would have "lower numbers, lower deductibles." House Republicans didn't release a bill for almost a month and a half. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that under the GOP plan, 14 million fewer people would have coverage the following year alone, a figure that would rise to 24 million after a decade. (A leaked document indicated the White House's own internal estimates put the total loss even higher.) Trump's January description of the plan was all empty bluster.

Something similar, meanwhile, appears to have happened again today. A senior White House official—again unnamed—told CNBC that the Senate Budget Committee was working on health care legislation in hopes that it could be sent out today or tomorrow. That's an odd claim, because the Senate Budget Committee wouldn't be the ones to draw up legislation. In fact, according to Jonathan Swan of Axios, it appears that the Senate committee was just reviewing language for technical reasons.

The Trump administration is trying to build momentum where little or none exists by manufacturing the appearance of energy and activity.

Trump used this same sort of deception before he became involved in politics. As Carlos Lozada wrote in a 2015 Washington Post review of Trump's books, Trump has long believed that the way to create interest in a project is to trick people into believing that it is already in the works:

In [The Art of the Deal], Trump, then 41, explains the power of psychology and deception — he calls it "bravado" or "truthful hyperbole" — in his early real estate acquisitions. Before he was a brand name, he had to convince people that he was worth their time. It was small things here and there. Like asking his architect to gussy up the sketches for a hotel so it seemed like they spent huge sums on the plans, boosting interest in his proposal. Or having a construction crew drive machinery back and forth on a site in Atlantic City so that the visiting board of directors would be duped into thinking the work was far along. "If necessary," he instructed a supervisor, "have the bulldozers dig up dirt on one side of the site and dump it on the other."

"I play to people's fantasies," Trump explains. ".?.?.­­ It's an innocent form of exaggeration — and a very effective form of promotion." Perception is reality, he writes, and achieving an "aura" (a recurring word in his writings) around his projects, his ideas and himself is essential.

And with some Trump projects, there really wasn't anything more than the illusion of activity. The Trump Ocean Resort, a Southern California condo project that Trump pitched personally, collected $32 million from prospective buyers, but was never completed.

It remains to be seen whether the Obamacare replace project will turn out to be a complete illusion or not. But the constant trial balloons and whispers of momentum where there is none shouldn't instill much confidence, because they suggest that Trump doesn't really understand what the problem is.

The problem for the GOP health care bill isn't lack of momentum. It's that the underlying bill is incoherent and widely disliked, and House Republicans don't agree on what the policy should be. And Trump, who dismissed the policy details driving disagreement as "little shit," does not appear to have any interest in grappling with those policy differences. Deceptive marketing gimmicks might sell real estate, but they don't solve policy problems.

NEXT: Justice Dept.'s Threatening Letter to Sanctuary Cities Is Less Than It Seems, and That's Good

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The administration should show in front of throngs of forced admirers a video of a missile attack destroying Obamacare.

  2. As a developer, Trump tried to generate interest in projects through false momentum.

    Which makes him different from basically all of his predecessors how?

    1. He sucks so much worse at it that it’s embarrassing?

      He’s making it known that he will consider himself a failure if he doesn’t get a healthcare bill. He’s not going to get one. Forget Trump–we’re about to do away with the entire notion that “businesspeople” in general ought to be in charge of government stuff at all.

      1. Today we learn that Tony got roofied on January 20th and lost all memory of the preceding eight years.

        1. I seem to recall a one-term black senator being the best president of my lifetime despite unprecedented and uncalled-for obstruction while the two “businessmen” who flanked him were the worst presidents of all time, a fact known about the current one fewer than 100 days in.

      2. Forget Trump–we’re about to do away with the entire notion that “businesspeople” in general ought to be in charge of government stuff at all.

        Ok Tony, so can we remind you of that should Michael Bloomberg or Tom Steyer ever run for office?

        1. I didn’t say it would be a good thing.

      3. we’re about to do away with the entire notion that “businesspeople” in general ought to be in charge of government stuff at all.

        In other words, only lifetime government apparatchniks — untainted by time in the private sector — are suitable for controlling all aspects of Proletariat lives.

        Lick those boots Tony.

        1. Merely suggesting that Trump is not doing the image of capitalism many favors.

          1. Trump is no more a capitalist as Hillary is a feminist. If you don’t understand that you’ve wasted your time hanging out here.

  3. The botching of Ocare repeal was entirely predictable. I would bet money that most Republitards aren’t really interested in repealing it; it was designed, like any entitlement wealth-transfer program, to be impossible to dismantle without genuinely fucking somebody over- preferably someone vulnerable and photogenic.

    Throw a party of cowards, statists, and big-government flunkies at that mess, and they will bounce right off. They are too collectively afraid and stupid to not fail.

  4. Black market insulin is going to be awesome. I can’t wait to die from variable purity suspensions leading to hypoglycemia. Suck it, opioid-overdose-epidemic!

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.