Danish Deregulators
How Denmark revamped its telecom regulations


If you're interested in the shift from Scandinavian social democracy to Nordic neoliberalism (*), you should check out Roslyn Layton and Joseph Kane's new paper on Denmark's deregulation of the telecommunications industry. The Danes, they inform us, have not just shed the state's telephone monopoly but disbanded its telecom regulatory agency, refused to let the government fix telecom prices or push particular telecom technologies, and mostly avoided telecom subsidies.
As is often the case with reforms described as deregulatory, some of these changes did more to rearrange the state's role than to reduce it. (That regulatory agency, for example, had its duties distributed to other arms of the government.) And some weren't really changes at all. ("In Denmark's history there are only three instances of telecom subsidies," Layton and Kane write, "and they are for extremely small amounts targeted to remote areas.") But the net effect was less intervention in the marketplace, not just compared to the past but compared to nearby nations. Despite all the recent liberalization in Sweden, for example, the government there still owns a piece of the country's dominant telephone company.
In any event, it's an interesting case study. It used to be a cliché to suggest that socialism works better in Scandinavia than elsewhere. The best argument that that's true may be the ease with which Scandinavian socialists have moved toward markets.
(* I hate the word "neoliberalism," but alliteration must prevail.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It is not a big deal to be first now a days..My condolence to Fist.
Are cinnamon buns legal yet?
Pah! What is 200 years of individualized anarchic chaotic experience against thousands and millions of bureaucrat years? get a real job and stop poisoning The People you evil capitalists!
As screwed as the site is, has anyone bothered to apologize the commentariat? Maybe suggested that they (the management) are embarrassed by the fuck up? Maybe even admitted they don't know what the fuck they are doing?
Has anyone been fired? If not, why not?
Matt, what a great job you and Nick are doing! I'm sure I'm not alone; the donation in 2017 is $0.00, and you deserve every penny.
Has anyone been fired yet? If not, why not?
They are gonna blame it on that robot that KMW hired when she took over. The robot has been working nonstop trying to solve the problem of why attempts to submit comments keep halting.
They keep yelling "You're fired!" but those fucking squirrels just keep on going.
Hey, it's cheaper than child labor.