NSA

How Post-Nixon Reforms Created Today's Spy Agency Monsters

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) unleashed demons that now seem beyond the government's control.

|

Some kind of monster
RICHARD B. LEVINE/Newscom

Those of us who believe that the Constitution means what it says have been arguing since the late 1970s that congressional efforts to strengthen national security by weakening personal liberty are unconstitutional, un-American, and ineffective. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which Congress passed in the aftermath of President Richard Nixon's use of the CIA and the FBI to spy on his political opponents, has unleashed demons that now seem beyond the government's control and are more pervasive than anything Nixon could have dreamed of.

This realization came to a boiling point last weekend when President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of monitoring his telephone calls during the 2016 presidential election campaign. Can a U.S. president legally spy on a political opponent or any other person in America without any suspicion, probable cause or warrant from a judge? In a word, yes.

Here is the back story.

The president can order the National Security Agency (NSA) to spy on anyone at any time for any reason, without a warrant. This is profoundly unconstitutional but absolutely lawful because it is expressly authorized by the FISA statute.

All electronic surveillance today, whether ordered by the president or authorized by a court, is done remotely by accessing the computers of every telephone and computer service provider in the United States. The NSA has 24/7/365 access to all the mainframe computers of all the telephone and computer service providers in America.

The service providers are required by law to permit this access and are prohibited by law from complaining about it publicly, challenging it in court, or revealing any of its details. In passing these prohibitions, Congress violated the First Amendment, which prohibits it from infringing upon the freedom of speech.

The fruits of electronic surveillance cannot be used in criminal prosecutions but can be shared with the president. If they are revealed publicly, the revelation constitutes computer hacking, a federal crime. Nevertheless, some of what was overheard from telephone conversations between the Russian ambassador to the U.S. and former Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, Trump's former national security adviser, was revealed to the public — a revelation that profoundly disturbed the White House and many in the intelligence community and constituted a crime.

The original purpose of FISA was to place the judiciary as an intermediary between the nation's spies and the foreign agents we all know are among us. The theory was that the NSA would first need to demonstrate to a secret court probable cause that the target of the spying is an agent of a foreign power and this would restrain the NSA from spying on ordinary Americans. This probable cause of foreign agency was a dramatic congressional rejection of the constitutional standard — namely, probable cause of crime — for the issuance of warrants. Foreign agency is not a crime.

This congressional rejection of constitutional norms began the slippery slope in which the foreign agency standard has morphed by legislation and by secret interpretations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to probable cause of foreign personhood to probable cause of talking to a foreign person to probable cause of being able to talk to a foreign person to — dropping the probable cause standard altogether — anyone who speaks to anyone else who could speak to a foreign person.

This Orwellian and absurd expansion was developed by spies and approved by judges on the FISA court. The NSA argued that it would be more efficient to spy on everyone in the United States than to isolate bad people, and the court bought that argument.

Hence, FISA warrants do not name particular people or places as their targets as the Constitution requires. Rather, they merely continue in place of the previous warrants, which encompass everyone in the country. FISA warrants are general warrants, allowing intelligence agents to listen to whomever they wish and retain whatever they hear. General warrants are expressly prohibited by the Fourth Amendment, which requires that all warrants for all purposes be based on probable cause of crime and particularly describe the person or thing to be seized — e.g., a conversation — or the place to be searched.

Even though the NSA already has the legal, though unconstitutional, authority to capture any phone conversation or computer keystroke it wishes, its 60,000 agents lack the resources to listen to all conversations or read all electronic communications in real time. But it does capture the digital versions of all computer keystrokes made in or to the U.S. and all conversations had within the U.S. or involving someone in the U.S.; it has been doing so since 2005. And it can download any conversation or text or email at will.

That's why the recent argument that Obama ordered the NSA to obtain a FISA warrant for Trump's telephone calls and a judge issued a warrant for them is nonsense. The NSA already has a digital version of every call Trump has made or received since 2005. Because the NSA — which now works for Trump — is a part of the Defense Department, it is subject to the orders of the president in his capacity as commander in chief. So if the commander in chief wants something that a military custodian already has or can create — such as a transcript of an opponent's conversations with political strategists during a presidential campaign — why would he bother getting a warrant? He wouldn't.

All of this leads to information overload — so much material that the communications of evil people are safely hidden within the mountain of data from the rest of us. The NSA captures the digital equivalent — if printed — of 27 times the contents of the Library of Congress every year.

All of this also leads to the monstrous power of the NSA to manipulate, torment and control the president by selectively concealing and selectively revealing data to him. The Constitution does not entrust such power to anyone in government. But Congress has given it.

All of this also substantially impairs a fundamental personal liberty, the right to be left alone — a right for which we seceded from Great Britain, a right guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment and a right for which we fought wars against tyrants who we feared would take it from us.

Yet after we won those wars, we permitted our elected representatives to crush that right. Those faithless representatives have created a monster that has now turned on us.

COPYRIGHT 2017 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO | DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

NEXT: Conservative and libertarian health care experts pan GOP's "Obamacare lite" plan

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I refuse to conceded defeat by agreeing to the US government spying, which clearly violates the Constitution. I even try and bait our treasonous bureaucrats with words like BOMB…TERRORIST….etc. and pepper them in emails conversation, etc. I would never keep silent if presented with a National Security Letter. If charged with some ridiculous charge, I would demand a speedy and public trial.

    If you let them scare you into abdicating your constitutional rights, they just take more and more. Freedom is not free nor blood-free.

    1. Same here we should be friends lol. I have no problem dying to defend my house or my rights and i will never accept a plea deal because i will gladly enjoy wasting as much of tax payers dollars possible and wasting their time. Hell if i go to jail/prison i will gladly waste 30-80K a year sitting there in a cell. Prison is nothing like the big green weenie and they can’t ever force me back to that shit hole so i will gladly rot in due to principles.

      Just like if i ever get pulled over again. I will waste at least 3 hours of a cops time finding ways to troll him and gather evidence for the ticket to be thrown out and just try to piss him off with in legal limits for good measure.

  2. I even try and bait our treasonous bureaucrats with words like BOMB…TERRORIST

    Whatever you do, don’t bait them with ARTHUR ALAN WOLK.
    https://tinyurl.com/h4hdran

  3. The NSA already has a digital version of every call Trump has made or received since 2005. Because the NSA ? which now works for Trump ? is a part of the Defense Department, it is subject to the orders of the president in his capacity as commander in chief. So if the commander in chief wants something that a military custodian already has or can create ? such as a transcript of an opponent’s conversations with political strategists during a presidential campaign ? why would he bother getting a warrant? He wouldn’t.

    By the same token then, Trump should be able to just order the NSA to provide him copies of calls he made from Trump Tower in October of 2016. Right?

  4. Teams of reality fabricators hollow-eyed and flitting from your screens turn screw after screw into the collapsing cracking cranium that is the magnificent opposition to the dismal gestalt of scanners.

  5. Has there ever been a direct facial challenge to the constitutionality of the FISA act?

    1. I assume they would just ignore it. We tried to throw out gun control by using history and they just don;t care that citizens used to buy fucking artillery rockets.

  6. +1 parallel construction

  7. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which Congress passed in the aftermath of President Richard Nixon’s use of the CIA and the FBI to spy on his political opponents, has unleashed demons that now seem beyond the government’s control and are more pervasive than anything Nixon could have dreamed of.

    Shit, Stalin’s rotting corpse would get a hard on, if it could, just imagining what it would be like to have that kind of power.

    This congressional rejection of constitutional norms began the slippery slope in which the foreign agency standard has morphed by legislation and by secret interpretations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to … anyone who speaks to anyone else who could speak to a foreign person.

    IOW, everyone. Snowden was right to describe the NSA’s spying program as “turnkey totalitarianism.”

    1. binney said it first.

  8. My hope is that Trump will fight to dismantle this as he is getting bit in his ass by these fucks. My brain is telling me that he will capitulate because of the broader War on Terror and how he staked his presidency on fighting/winning that war using all the weapons the USA has at its disposal. His call to boycott apple and his comments on Snowden being a traitor, come to mind.

    1. Has this program actually found any terrorist?

      1. I don’t think so but I don’t have security clearance but any good bureaucrat will tell him that it has and have the charts and data proving it has.

        1. pretty much Clapper lied repeatedly with fake stats to congress.

  9. “This is profoundly unconstitutional but absolutely lawful because it is expressly authorized by the FISA statute.”

    How can something be lawful and unconstitutional. Has anyone tried to sue to overturn this law? seriously asking

    1. Bird law it’s not governed by reason

    2. Christ thats so retarded. If its unconstitutional or against natural law it is the definition of unlawful.

  10. I am using it now & it’s awesome! I’ve signed up for my account and have been bringing in fat paychecks. For real, my first week I made ?350 and the 2nd week I doubled it & then it kinda snowballed to ?150 a day! just folllow the course.. they will help you out

    ================> http://MaxNet80.com

  11. as Joel said I’m alarmed that some people can get paid $8414 in a few weeks on the internet . visit this site right here…………. {{{{{ http://www.cash-review.com }}}}}

  12. This is profoundly unconstitutional but absolutely lawful

    Aren’t constitutions law?

  13. What a load of nonsense.

  14. This surprises no one ever to run into it.

    The spying adds little to security — genuine threats can be attacked with many other tools, and general warrants are nearly useless since they can’t be used in court.

    General warrants do allow butt-covering bureaucrats to get ahead of exposure — if they know up front what a known critic knows, they can get out front and create evidence needed to “neutralize” the threat.

    How? One way is to invade a reporter’s computer so that, e.g., confidential sources can be discovered and intercepted.

    Or, one simply can use associated investigatory powers to smear the reporter.

    How?

    Well, I’m doing research on the terrorist Symbionese Liberation Army and an associated group that once plotted to assassinate the Secretary of Defense.

    All an intelligence agency has to do to discredit such a person is tell people that Reporter X is under investigation “in connection with the plot to kill the Secretary of Defense!” “Establishment” media then won’t even return the reporter’s calls.

    Don’t say it never happens (because I caught the FBI changing its ballistics reports in the Hearst case, there are files on me for a “plot” to kill Jimmy Carter (I’ve had people I know approach me and ask me about stuff like this)!

    It’s no secret these kinds of abuses occur, and far more often than the agencies are willing to admit.

    Reason readers again should view the movie, “Enemy of the State,” then realize that even this movie is WELL behind the curve!

  15. Most of us want to have good income but dont know how to do that on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn huge sum, but whenever Buddies try that they get trapped in a scam/fraud so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the page. I am more than sure that you will get best result. Best Of Luck for new Initiative!

    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, http://www.moneytime10.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.