Fake News

Chinese State Media Condemn Torture Story as 'Fake News'

Lingo first deployed by U.S. media and politicians now being used by authoritarian regimes abroad

|

chinachange.org

People's Daily, the largest official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party, tweeted out to its nearly 3 million followers a story yesterday decrying reports of a lawyer being tortured as "FAKE NEWS."

Xie Yang, a human rights lawyer, was detained by the Chinese government in July 2015 on charges of subversion and other crimes against the state during a round-up of activists and other dissidents, and earlier this year his attorneys released transcripts of their conversations with him, where he detailed the torture he was subject to. As The Guardian noted in its article, Xie's claims were "impossible to verify" but also "consistent with previously documented forms of abuse in China." There's little reason for readers to doubt Xie's claims. His only right, he said his jailers told him, was to "obey the law."

For the Chinese Communist party, it's not enough that their grip on the country prevents many claims of human rights violations from being independently verified. Via People's Daily they've floated an unsubstantiated claim that an "independent investigation team" set up by the government has "concluded that the allegations are fake." Undoubtedly, readers of People's Daily amenable to their propaganda may believe them.

The Chinese Communist Party's use of the term "FAKE NEWS," in the same all-caps style preferred by the president of the United States in his own tweets, provides some useful clarity on the primary purpose of the phrase. "Fake news" was first used in the mainstream media to describe stories those journalists felt were inaccurate or wholly made up that, some journalists and Democrats argued, swung the election to Trump. Fake news included stories of Clinton's health (which was not an issue until it was).

From the beginning the charge of "fake news" was a distraction, a complaint not about the fakeness of the news but the unfettered freedom involved in reporting it. The U.S. never required a license to practice journalism—after all, that was how the British were able to control much of the flow of information in the 13 colonies—while new media technologies have lowered the value of or even made obsolete many of the media gatekeepers of old. In October, President Obama complained about the "wild west" media landscape, as if that were a bad thing, as if the relatively free flow of information was not part and parcel of American culture. The use of the term "fake news" assumed that this free flow was a problem. It was never precisely defined. Did fake news mean a story like the one about President Obama wanting to use weaponized AI to stay in office, or did fake news refer to stories not framed the way some people preferred, like, say, calling the Obama administration's secret cash payment to Iran a ransom or a "tribute"?

In retrospect, it should have come as no surprise that President Trump, against whose supporters "fake news" was first deployed, would be able to use the term to great effect himself. After all, most people don't consider themselves to be fake news consumers (except insofar as you consume stories like the one about weaponized AI ironically and with full awareness of their fake nature). Instead, they tend to believe that stories that don't fit their worldview are the fake news. For politicians, the term is an effective catch-all for stories that are critical of them, something Fox CEO James Murdoch pointed out recently. Such a use is not so much a "co-option" of the term as a natural evolution. It's use now by the Chinese state media should be the least surprising development in the fake news saga, as well as a warning of the authoritarian direction our leaders have been going, particularly vis a vis free speech, for some time now.

Advertisement

NEXT: Of Artificial Mice and Men Embryos

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. So…Trump is a success?

    1. Fake president.

  2. I have a friend who lives in China. ‘Cause of the Great Firewall, we have to communicate through Chinese chat client. The chat client also displays news articles when it first opens up. It’s always ~interesting~ to see how China spins things. The protests in Hong Kong had no coverage whatsoever.

  3. “Lingo first deployed by U.S. media and politicians now being used by authoritarian regimes abroad’

    What you mean is ‘lingo employed by the US media to secure their monopoly over information that later was later deployed by a boorish president to demonstrate how often the US media actually prints false stories to further a narrative”

  4. OMG Reason, why are u trying to start a war with China?

  5. In other news, the sky is blue and people use words to communicate.

  6. Never before has a meme started by the left gotten so out of control, so fast.

  7. I wonder if “fakiness” will ever enter the language as a counterpart to “truthiness”? Interesting ….. firefox spellcheck says “truthiness” is spelled correctly, but not “fakiness”.

  8. George Orwell pointed out way back in the 40s that “fascism” was so overused by people labeling each other, as to be completely meaningless. And yet it’s still going strong today (and getting stronger).

    Political language is just stupid. There’s no point in making a statement of facts, besides being boring and nuanced, people probably already know it. The point of communication in politics is to spread lies.

  9. We need like/unlike for articles.

    After reading Ed’s articles, I feel no rage I must express.

  10. President Donald J. Trump delivered an optimistic, forward-looking message of unity and strength
    The American people saw the President I serve with every day?broad shoulders and a big heart. He laid out an agenda to repeal and replace Obamacare, rebuild our military and infrastructure, make better and smarter trade deals that put American workers first, and enact the kind of tax relief and regulatory reform that will unleash the full potential of the American economy.
    campaign trail. Together, we will Make America Grea tAgain. more at http://www.lawsonjamesblog.com…..vered.html

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.