Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Brickbats

Brickbat: Pink?

Charles Oliver | 2.24.2017 4:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Casther / Dreamstime.com
(Casther / Dreamstime.com)
pink hair
Casther / Dreamstime.com

Timothy Jenkins, a freshman at Mississippi's Gulfport High School was suspended after he dyed his hair pink. The school dress code says a student's hair must be a natural-looking color.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Pot-Shop Cop Reinstatement Gives Police Black Eye

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

BrickbatsPublic schoolsMississippiFashionEducation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (22)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Trigger Hippie   8 years ago

    Meh. I got kicked off my freshman basketball team for first getting, then refusing to cut off my blue mohawk.

    1. Radioactive   8 years ago

      commie pinko...no wait, commie blueo?

  2. UnCivilServant   8 years ago

    As long as they apply the same rule throughout, I'm not seeing anything to get worked up about. Is there any sign of a double standard? It's not exactly an absurd component of a dress code.

    1. Radioactive   8 years ago

      it's all dependent on the shading and if he clashed with what the cool girls were wearing that day...

    2. SomeGuy   8 years ago

      yea its a standard dress code rile since at least the 80s/90s.

      as long as it applies to guys and girls i dont see the issue. Still a stupid fucking rule but not unjust perse.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    Well, when I was a freshman I showed up to class having let my buzzcut grow out an inch and a half and I was mocked mercilessly. And that was by the teacher. And I was home schooled!

    1. UnCivilServant   8 years ago

      Serves you right.

      Why didn't you learn the lesson about proper self-care?

      1. pan fried wylie   8 years ago

        his Health teacher was also the Gym teacher, so, yeah.

    2. Radioactive   8 years ago

      did she dress you funny too?

  4. Will4Freedom   8 years ago

    I guess I had it good. My hair was past my shoulders, had a beard and would wear my colors to school every day.

    colors = MC club patches.

    1. UnCivilServant   8 years ago

      How much were you held back if you had anything that could be called a beard?

      1. Will4Freedom   8 years ago

        I was held back because of my stupidity, anti-authoritarian attitude, laziness, etc.

        I don't think my beard had anything to do with it. There were kids with better beards and they were not held back at all.

        1. Will4Freedom   8 years ago

          Or was that some kind of euphemism I'm not familiar with?

          1. Radioactive   8 years ago

            yeah it rhymes with dumb fuck...

      2. SomeGuy   8 years ago

        I knew a black/Puerto rican who had a beard at 15. Was also a racist hypocritical little shit.

  5. Longtobefree   8 years ago

    Will this be part of the DeVos choice policy?

  6. Rich   8 years ago

    Jenkins said he got multiple warnings before his suspension, with school officials saying it distracted other students.

    I'm sure there are plenty of other "distractions" that officials at least tolerate.

    1. Wizard4169   8 years ago

      Yeah, it's always a "distraction", but I often found administrators' petty tyranny far more distracting that the behavior they were cracking down on.

  7. Bra Ket   8 years ago

    Going for some kind of LGBT-discrimination angle here?

    1. Radioactive   8 years ago

      colorist!!!

  8. Real American   8 years ago

    "His mother, Sheryl Jenkins, said the policy infringes on his rights and her right as a parent to decide what's best for her child."

    Mom's a damn fool, too. No word from "Dad" which is not surprising at all.

  9. phenryinohio   8 years ago

    Grown up now. But even then studied this a lot. Basically, if you are in school you have pretty much less freedom than than those peeps who were 2/3 of a person persons until 1865. And that was before the parents came and got you.

  10. #NotMyReason (Krabappel)   8 years ago

    This seems like an awfully local story to be published in cosmopolitan Reason magazine.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!