Donald Trump

Trump White House Vows to End 'Dangerous Anti-Police Atmosphere'

What he really means is stopping the feds from exposing police misconduct and lies.

|

Phil McAuliffe/Polaris/Newscom

While Donald Trump was delivering an inauguration speech filled with grim references to "American carnage" and out-of-control crime on Friday, his White House was already launching its rhetorical war against police critics.

"The dangerous anti-police atmosphere in America is wrong," the White House says in its new page on law enforcement, launched almost simultaneously with Trump's inauguration. "The Trump Administration will end it."

Like so much of Trump's rhetoric, the page is long on bigly statements and short on details about how his administration will accomplish the fraught task of repairing relations between the men and women in blue and the communities they serve. Much of the plan has to do with Trump's preoccupation with ending illegal immigration.

So, what Trump really means when he talks about ending the "anti-police" atmosphere is stopping the federal government from exposing civil rights violations that give credence to police reform groups and Black Lives Matter activists.

Under the Obama administration, the Justice Department Civil Rights Division dramatically escalated the number of pattern and practice investigations into police departments for civil rights violations. The division's scathing reports on the Ferguson, Baltimore, and Chicago police departments, launched in the wake of controversial deaths at the hands of officers, revealed systemic civil rights violations and unconstitutional practices that fueled much of the national conversation on policing.

Those days are over.

One of the concrete plans the Trump administration does have for restoring "law and order" is slashing the budget of the Civil Rights Division by $58 million, roughly a third of its requested budget for the current year. Trump's pick for Attorney General, Sen. Jeff Sessions, has long been a staunch supporter of police and critic of the Justice Department's civil rights investigations.

If the Trump administration thinks, though, that giving lip service to "blue lives matter" rhetoric and shielding police from scrutiny will end antipathy toward police, it's in for a rough discovery. It's hard to overstate the current trust gap between police and minority communities in large cities, the morale problems among those departments, and even the difference in perception between white and black police officers.

As my colleague Ed Krayewski wrote, a recent wide-ranging Pew survey on police attitudes found that:

More than 85 percent of all cops surveyed said high-profile incidents of police brutality have made their jobs harder—nearly 75 percent of respondents say highly publicized incidents of police brutality have increased tensions between police officers and black community, while 72 percent say cops in their department are "less willing to stop and question suspicious persons" (with the number as high as 86 percent of cops in departments with at least 2,600 police officers). Few cops (just 14 percent) said they thought the general public understood their risks at least somewhat well. By comparison, 83 percent of American adults insist they understood risks police faced. 87 percent of big city cops said interactions with black residents had become tenser, while 61 percent of cops in smaller departments agreed […]

Only 27 percent of white officers said they believed protesters were driven at least in part by a desire for police accountability, while nearly 70 percent of black police officers acknowledged as much. Older officers were also more likely to believe protesters were genuinely concerned than younger officers were. 63 percent of white cops said they would tell a colleague to break department protocol to do what is morally right—just 43 percent of black cops responded the same way. More than 90 percent of white officers said the U.S. has done what was needed to secure equal rights for black citizens—just 29 percent of black cops agree.

The attitudes and disparities this poll reveals, and the enormous problems they create within departments, weren't created in a vacuum. Neither was the antipathy toward police in minority communitiws. It grew out of long-standing grievances, supported by advances in technology that subjected police to unprecedented scrutiny. That scrutiny has shown—over and over, as an investigation by BuzzFeed news revealed this week—that police lie, and those lies are tacitly endorsed by departments that don't have the will or institutional momentum to do anything about it until public embarrassment forces them to.

Unchecked, this atmosphere of lies and obfuscation becomes corrosive and pervades entire departments. Take, for instance, what the the Justice Department Civil Rights Division found regarding the Chicago Police Department's infamous "code of silence":

This code is apparently strong enough to incite officers to lie even when they have little to lose by telling the truth. In one such instance, an officer opted to lie and risk his career when he accidentally discharged his pepper spray while dining in a restaurant—a violation that otherwise merits minor discipline. Even more telling are the many examples where officers who simply witness misconduct and face no discipline by telling the truth choose instead to risk their careers to lie for another officer. We similarly found instances of supervisors lying to prevent IPRA from even investigating misconduct, such as the case discussed elsewhere in this Report in which a lieutenant provided a video to IPRA but recommended that the case be handled with nondisciplinary intervention rather than investigated, describing the video as only depicting the use of "foul language" and affirmatively denying that it contained any inflammatory language or that the victim made any complaints — both patently false statements as demonstrated by the video.

But instead of doing something constructive, Trump is blithely endorsing a counter-narrative that will do nothing but try and say the underlying problem doesn't exist. And now he has the imprimatur of the White House.

Advertisement

NEXT: Slenderman Documentary Unpacks Disturbing Teen Murder Attempt

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. OMG TRUMP DIDN’T FIX IT IN HOUR 4 OF HIS PRESIDENCY.

    ILLEGITIMATE!

  2. So are we against cutting the $58 million?

  3. Thank God someone’s finally looking out for the police.

    1. Other than the FOP, city councils, mayors, courts, State’s Attorneys….

      1. Don’t forget Grand Juries, local prosecutors, other cops, local media, etc

    2. I’ll be interested to see what he actually does. I’m going with status quo with some pro-police rhetoric.

      1. Ah the safe bet. I’m going to roll the dice and says, police run internment camps for the undesirables.

        1. So, Jails then? Or would that be Prison…

  4. What he really means is stopping the feds from exposing police misconduct and lies

    +1 Voxsplainer?

    1. I really object to that statement because the feds are very much about do as we say, not as we do. And you could easily/definitely argue that their interventions are harmful as they create the illusion of progress where none actually exists. I mean, we see examples of departments that have had multiple settlements with the DoJ and nothing actually ever seems to change.

      The feds come in and create a dog and pony show.

      1. The feds also don’t investigate jack fucking shit unless it involves some perceived racial injustice. 58 million bucks for the justice department to look into half a dozen major metro police departments and find that the only meaningful misconduct is the persecution of urban blacks by whitey. Thanks for the insight.

  5. Score one for Trump:
    “Trump administration overturns Obama’s mortgage-fee cut for first-time buyers”
    http://www.sfgate.com/news/art…..872216.php

  6. Like so much of Trump’s rhetoric, the page is long on bigly statements and short on details about how his administration will accomplish the fraught task of repairing relations between the men and women in blue inbred low-IQ pig fucking thugs and the communities they serve terrorize.

  7. I wish I could play cops and robbers my whole life. Ah well, at least I can help provide the opportunity for others.

  8. In all honesty, police and criminal justice reform is waaaay more important than our oversea engagements.

  9. “over and over, as an investigation by BuzzFeed news revealed this week”

    Wow, really? You’re citing BuzzFeed as a news source after they just got publicly busted for publishing a fake story? I’m no fan of the police, and believe they lie their asses off to protect themselves and each other, but you should seriously consider how your sources will reflect on the professional reputation of this publication.

    1. Did you click through the link, Flanders?

      1. I try not to give the site any traffic. So nope. I’ll gladly look at cached pages of the site though.

        1. So rather than check out the article and judge for yourself whether or not what it contained was fake news you chose to remain in ignorance.

  10. So, I guess the toxic cop culture isn’t the swamp he told us he was going to drain.

    1. I’m pretty sure “swamp” refers to DC specifically, what with it literally being in a swamp.

      1. It used to be a swamp. So he should really be pushing an ecological restoration project for DC, to return it to being an unlivable, bug-infested mudhole.

        Oh, and in the name of saving the planet, he should order all AC turned off in federal office buildings.

  11. “Even more telling are the many examples where officers who simply witness misconduct and face no discipline by telling the truth choose instead to risk their careers to lie for another officer.”

    I don’t find that very telling at all. I actually consider it a “job requisite” for many professions. Police, lawyers, doctors, etc. In these profession, it is more than common to lie to protect your comrade, because if you do not, who will lie for you when you find yourself in hot water? That is why malpractice lawsuits are notoriously difficult to win. Professions with unions/licensing boards form a camaraderie of protectionism naturally.

    1. where officers who simply witness misconduct and face no discipline by telling the truth

      Really? Its lying for a fellow officer that has no consequences. Ratting out one of the Boys in Blue, that will have consequences.

      Hell, there was a cop fired for not gunning down a civilian, but talking him down instead. By not gunning him down, he put his fellow officers at risk, so he was fired. You think there won’t be consequences for telling the truth?

  12. Police should be held accountable but this conclusion is quite the leap. Please stop the hysterics and present the who, what when where and why. Let me form the conclusion

  13. Since when is buzzfeed a credible new source? that is a joke right?

    they are at best people magazine for people obsessed with politics

  14. Anti-police rhetoric and action runs a gamut from denouncing actual abuses and suggesting reforms…to rioting in the streets, burning down shops, etc.

    As a cynic, I presume the new administration will try and lump all these things together. But who knows, I can’t prove it yet.

    Anyway, thanks, rioters, for creating a nice backlash which gives an excuse for ignoring the abuses.

  15. RE: Trump White House Vows to End “Dangerous Anti-Police Atmosphere”
    What he really means is stopping the feds from exposing police misconduct and lies.

    What it really means is that Trump the Grump wants to ensure the police are there to protect him and his ilk.
    He will institute more oppressive police procedures to further erode the US Constitution as has the past two presidents so we can slowly but surly evolve into a police state. All he really needs is another major attack on the USA to accelerate this nefarious process of incorporating a police state.
    I had a friend of mine tell be back in 1990 the USA will become more like the USSR and vice versa. I told him he needed an enema.
    But I was wrong, and, sadly, he was right.

  16. Rhetoric is one thing, but bailing out police pensions will ultimately Make America Five Countries Again.

  17. There’s a pretty good case to be made that the federal government doesn’t have any business investigating or interfering with local policing unless an officer has committed a federal crime. Most police reform efforts should be focused locally rather than federally, unless it’s the US Marshals Service that’s throwing flash bang grenades into baby cribs and I missed it. In any case, the justice department spending shit loads of money investigating a handful of major metro PDs not for their abusive policing practices, but for their impact on racial minorities, has done exactly fuck all to restrain police abuse, or even to help racial minorities. So, rather than lamenting the loss of funding for a monstrous, tenuously constitutional clusterfuck of a federal bureaucracy that does absolutely nothing, you could always, you know, work on actual police reform.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.