Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Police

Police Are Still Stopping Motorists to Spread Compulsory Holiday Cheer

From Bible verses to "Christmas citations," cops continue to use misuse their authority when they act as "kindness squads."

Anthony Fisher | 12.28.2016 1:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Petrdlouhy/Dreamstime.com
(Petrdlouhy/Dreamstime.com)
You have the right to accept my cheer.
Petrdlouhy/Dreamstime.com

Jackson (Miss.) Police Officer Brandon Caston tried to bring some holiday cheer by flagging down motorists and handing them autographed Christmas cards last week.

One delighted citizen recorded her encounter with Officer Caston and posted the video to Facebook. Thinking the officer was stopping drivers at some form of checkpoint, she instead found out Caston was merely handing out Christmas cards adorned with a Bible verse. The Clarion-Ledger quotes Cassandra Welchlin as writing, "Now this is protecting and serving!" after receiving her Christmas greeting.

By all accounts, Caston is a hard-working, dedicated police officer who cares about his community. He was even commended by the department for thwarting two carjackers while off-duty earlier this year. And it appears he didn't use his police cruiser to stage a fake traffic stop to deliver his Christmas greetings, nor did he bring along a camera to help self-promote his holiday cheer for the good of his and his department's image.

But he was in uniform and he was standing in the middle of the street, which makes his attempt at sharing Christmas blessings and biblical verses borderline compulsory.

Reason has covered a series of happy police pranks that were far more egregious than Caston's—who by all accounts wasn't trying to briefly terrify anyone before showing them how great cops are by giving them a gift card to a chain restaurant—but since we last reported on the "kindness squads," even more instances of police pulling people over to give them "Christmas citations" for obeying the law continue to pop up all over the country.

Lest you think we here at Reason are joyless constitutional curmudgeons, other media outlets to both our left and our right concur that these well-meaning attempts at strengthening police and community relations might seem cute on video, but they're both unconstitutional and cruel.

As National Review's Kevin D. Williamson puts it, "Some of these videos are hilarious. But do you know why they are hilarious? Because that unsuspecting citizen who is minding his own business and following the law is terrified."

As far as Officer Caston's Christmas greeting cards, it doesn't appear that he was trying to fool anyone using the force of his uniform. But perhaps next time he wants to spread Christian well-wishes while dressed as an agent of the state, he could do it on the sidewalk where his presence won't be perceived as a compulsory traffic stop.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Should the Government Track Your Movements?

Anthony Fisher
PoliceChristmasFourth AmendmentReligion
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (55)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Citizen X   9 years ago

    "Any unwillingness to reciprocate this Christmas cheer can and will be used against you."

    1. Rat   9 years ago

      Festivus grievances to all.

    2. JW   9 years ago

      "Thank you for not Jewing."

  2. XenoZooValentine   9 years ago

    Happiness is Mandatory

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      How did you know that? That information is above your clearance level, citizen.

      1. ScareCroWoodChippeRepair   9 years ago

        You just confirmed it! Ha ha!!!!

      2. SimonD   9 years ago

        The Computer is our friend.

  3. Kurmudgeonly Kristen   9 years ago

    "Aiyana Jones? Never heard of her. Here's a candy cane!!!"

    1. commodious lies and cheats   9 years ago

      "Be happy it's not the caning your candy-ass deserves."

  4. R C Dean   9 years ago

    she instead found out Caston was merely handing out Christmas cards adorned with a Bible verse

    I think we have a whole 'nuther Constitutional violation here . . . .

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      It's Constitutional violations all the way down.

      1. Heroic Mulatto   9 years ago

        #AllHolidaysMatter

        1. Heroic Mulatto   9 years ago

          Or don't, when it comes to establishment.

          1. Citizen X   9 years ago

            They're a lot like lives in that respect.

          2. GILMORE?   9 years ago

            i dont think the establishment clause necessarily bars police officers from exercising their religious rights. if they start proselytizing, obviously that's different; but i think some people would describe anything as minor as wishing people a merry-christmas (*not in the context of pulling people over, but just as a remark to passer-by) as a perceived violation.

            is a christian officer who wears a cross any different than a sikh who wears a turban on duty?

            Insisting that all employees of the state strip themselves of any association with religion seems more like French 'laicite' than the US 1st amendment. Which is certainly where some people want to take things.

            related = "Cops wearing hijabs*"

            The police departments of New York City and Washington, D.C. both have employed officers who wear hijabs.... In addition...police departments of Baltimore, Memphis, San Francisco, Atlanta and Charlotte said their officers would not be prohibited from wearing a hijab under current policy.

            "We're in the business of defending peoples' freedom and liberty," said Lt. David Robinson, a spokesperson for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg PD. "We would not infringe on officers' beliefs."

            Meanwhile, officers in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Houston, Las Vegas, San Antonio and Columbus, Ohio are not allowed to wear hijabs on duty

            i smell inevitable SC case

            1. Pro Libertate   9 years ago

              The Court is weak on Free Exercise law. That's why we have the RFRA, sorta. But a statute shouldn't be necessary. Of course, there's always going to be a tension between the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses when government actors are involved.

            2. JW   9 years ago

              i dont think the establishment clause necessarily bars police officers from exercising their religious rights. if they start proselytizing, obviously that's different

              [Looks at cop, in cop uniform, standing in street acting as a cop, explicitly proselytizing.]

              Um....

      2. Brochettaward = (((pants)))   9 years ago

        Well, it's Christmas, you Scrooges. why should they be stingy with the Constitutional violations?

  5. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    All they want for Christmas is to visually sweep the interior of your vehicle without cause.

    1. Ceci n'est pas un woodchipper   9 years ago

      ^This. Everybody who thinks that a cop stopping you to wish you a Merry Christmas would ignore an open container or a smoldering butt that might possibly be a joint since he had no cause for the stop raise your hands.

      1. Rat   9 years ago

        Driving without a wreath on your grill is probable cause.

  6. GILMORE?   9 years ago

    Christmas cards adorned with a Bible verse

    The misuse of authority was tolerable until he brought jesus into it?

    these well-meaning attempts at strengthening police and community relations might seem cute on video, but they're both unconstitutional and cruel.

    Pick one. Either intention matters or it doesn't.

    Christian well-wishes

    Again - would the issue be any different if he were dispensing with 'Secular' enforcement of Well-wishes?

    I have a buddy who gets upset when i say, "bless you" after he sneezes, and retorts with a snippy "no thank you".

    He knows damn well i'm as atheist as he is, and he knows damn well i do it reflexively, but he still acts as though any reference to supernatural forces is an unconstitutional imposition on him.

    Its not a good look.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   9 years ago

      I have a buddy who gets upset when i say, "bless you" after he sneezes, and retorts with a snippy "no thank you".

      Christ, what an asshole!

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   9 years ago

        Christ, what an asshole.

        1. Trshmnstr, Grump Apprentice   9 years ago

          Things I'd rather have done to me than watching that video

    2. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      these well-meaning attempts at strengthening police and community relations might seem cute on video, but they're both unconstitutional and cruel.

      Pick one. Either intention matters or it doesn't.

      It is possible to be unintentionally cruel, GILMORE.

      1. GILMORE?   9 years ago

        ""It is possible to be unintentionally cruel""

        yeah, i know. i think maybe i still have robby's insistence on the "accidental" offensiveness of the Oregon-Blackface-teacher on my mind... where intention was repeatedly cited as justification to excuse her speech.

        (*which in my mind needed no such qualification)

        similarly - if the cop's being a dickhead by pulling people over sans any cause, why bother giving him the benefit of good-intentions? just call him a cruel douchebag and don't try and split hairs, as though his goodwill provides some intangible mitigating-factor.

        1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

          I've been dealing with Oracle all day, so the earlier debate slipped from my mind.

          Given the number of reflective reactions, I've been making a conscious effort to give people the benefit of the doubt and not assume.

          Of the major "inappropriately qualified statement" debates of late, I regard the 'white genocide professor' one the most eggregious because it outright claims a different level of rights regarding speech reserved for academia over the general public. The "Meant well but was doing harm" cop not quite as bad a qualification from Robby. The blackface professor was unclear if the qualifying statement was with regards to employment or speech rights.

          1. GILMORE?   9 years ago

            pretty much agreed

    3. commodious lies and cheats   9 years ago

      Nothing spells "well-meaning" like issuing a driving citation, or worse, after an unconstitutional traffic stop.

    4. R C Dean   9 years ago

      I have a buddy who gets upset when i say, "bless you" after he sneezes, and retorts with a snippy "no thank you".

      Try "fuck you, keep your germs to yourself" and see what he says.

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        "Science benefit you!"

        1. Swiss Servator   9 years ago

          *sets down coffee mug and begins thunderous applause*

        2. R C Dean   9 years ago

          X's is better.

    5. lap83   9 years ago

      It sounds like you haven't given into the snippiness and you continue to say it. Good. Though I'd be tempted to annoy him even more..inserting a different deity each time "Buddha bless you" ...reciting a Catholic prayer..."may the Lord bless you and keep you.."

      1. GILMORE?   9 years ago

        Though I'd be tempted to annoy him even more..inserting a different deity each time "Buddha bless you"

        dude, now whenever he sneezes I raise one hand like the pope and start offering a benediction in latin, make the sign of the cross, etc. Its our own little private joke.

  7. R C Dean   9 years ago

    There's this thing called "under color of authority". When a cop in uniform pulls you over, he is acting under color of authority. If he pulls you over without any legal cause, he is abusing his authority and violating your civil rights, "intentions" and cute videos be damned.

    This cop committed civil rights violations that may amount to crimes.

  8. Lurk Diggler   9 years ago

    Scraping the bottom of the outrage barrel here.

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      These masturbation euphemisms are getting pretty abstract.

      1. AddictionMyth   9 years ago

        LOL haha - I know right??? L00K at YOOOUUUUU!!!

  9. chemjeff   9 years ago

    "Lest you think we here at Reason are joyless constitutional curmudgeons,"

    Wait, you're NOT joyless constitutional curmudgeons?

    I've been tricked!

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      Well, they realized they were appropriating my culture and had to stop.

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        Fortunately, you don't really like culture.

        1. AddictionMyth   9 years ago

          LOL haha - Look at you!!!

    2. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

      A few Cosmos and the Constitution goes out the window... along with lunch.

  10. AddictionMyth   9 years ago

    It's terrorism! Worse than ISIS!!!

  11. AddictionMyth   9 years ago

    Speaking of Holiday cheer...

    Anyone get any good prezzies from Santa this year?

    1. AddictionMyth   9 years ago

      I got a shiny new UN 2334 - more fun than a laser pointer cat-hat!

    2. Ornithorhynchus   9 years ago

      One that sort of kind of fits in with the topic here, although it doesn't involve cops.

      I was walking along the sidewalk on Christmas Eve, when a car pulled into the parking lot beside me, and the driver yelled at me to stop. Then a kid jumped out and handed me a Christmas card in an envelope. Then he got back in and they drove off.

      My first assumption was that they were one of those groups that hand out Christmas cards to attract people to their church. But while the card did have a couple of Bible verses, it didn't mention any church by name.

      What the card did have was three signatures-- presumably kids, judging by the penmanship-- and a twenty dollar bill.

      That's how you spread Christmas cheer.

  12. Lachowsky   9 years ago

    Federal Court Rules Police Can Shoot A Dog If It Moves Or Barks When Officers Enter A Home

    I don't know how to post links, but this just popped up in on my local news site. I guess a police dog murderer won a case in federal court affirming their right to shoot dogs indiscrimately.

    1. R C Dean   9 years ago

      Yeah, that was posted here. Basically, the cop chased a dog into the basement, cornered it, and when it barked at him, he killed it.

      1. Lachowsky   9 years ago

        Ok. I missed the a.m. links. I was actually having to do work at work thus morning. awful

  13. Hyperion   9 years ago

    "The Clarion-Ledger quotes Cassandra Welchlin as writing, "Now this is protecting and serving!" after receiving her Christmas greeting."

    This here, folks, this is an example of your average citizen sheeple and is why we are truly fucked.

    1. Eman   9 years ago

      She likes getting governed good and hard I guess, but cops spending time doing this shit makes me think they might not need a bigger budget next year.

      1. Trevor Saliba   9 years ago

        I couldn't agree more.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Superman Is About the Anti-War Vibe Shift

Matthew Petti | 7.18.2025 5:23 PM

Why Are Students Using AI To Cheat? Maybe Because They Shouldn't Be In College At All

Emma Camp | 7.18.2025 4:00 PM

Although Meth Is Irresistible, The New York Times Says, Addicts Often Prefer Small Cash Rewards

Jacob Sullum | 7.18.2025 1:45 PM

ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up

Autumn Billings | 7.18.2025 1:24 PM

Federal Judge to Trump on FTC Commissioner Firing: No, You Can't Fire Whomever You Want

Jack Nicastro | 7.18.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!