An Omaha Woman Took Her Business to Iowa Because of Nebraska's Licensing Laws
Unwilling to spend the money for a massage therapist license in Nebraska, Ilona Holland took her business across the bridge to Iowa.

Nebraska's licensing rules literally are driving businesses out of the state.
Take the example of Ilona Holland. She and her husband, Eric, moved to Omaha in 2013. Holland had been a licensed message therapist in Maryland before the move, and after getting settled in Nebraska, she was eager to get back to work, only to discover that she would need an additional 400 hours of classes before she could qualify for a massage therapist license (after taking 600 hours of them to get her Maryland license years earlier).
With a child on the way, Holland knew she couldn't afford to spend thousands of dollars on the additional schooling. Instead, she decided to use her knowledge of Reiki, a traditional Japanese physiotherapy involving the transfer of energy from one part of the body to another, to start a business. Though Reiki requires touching, it doesn't resemble massage therapy in any other way—customers remain fully clothed throughout the treatment and there's no intense rubbing or pressure applied.
Just months after opening her small business, Holland got a visit from the government. Without a massage therapy license, she was told, she would have to shut her doors.
She did. Then she reopened them, on the opposite bank of the Missouri River.
Today, Holland still lives in Omaha, but she runs her business in Council Bluffs, Iowa, where the licensing requirement were less strict. Still, she worries about what could happen if her husband has to relocate for another job.
"If my husband got another job somewhere else, I would have to check and see whether I'd have to go back to school again. I can't do that, now that I have a second child on the way," Holland told Reason in a phone interview this week.
Holland and other Nebraska-based entrepreneurs made the case for licensing reform on Tuesday at the state capitol. An effort backed by the Platte Institute, a free market think tank, is encouraging state lawmakers to cut red tape and ease occupational licensing laws, like the one that caused Holland to move her business out-of-state. The group says that one in four workers in Nebraska are subject to mandatory government permission slips.
Licensing is supposed to protect the public's health and safety, but lawmakers should ask themselves why Holland's business is apparently not a threat to those things in Iowa--or, before that, in Maryland--but apparently is a danger to Nebraskans.
Unlike some critics of licensing, Holland says she believes the government should be involved in setting minimum requirements for people working in her field, but she thinks states could do more to respect and honor licenses issued elsewhere.
"I just find that its too excessive if we want to aim for consumer protection," she said. "I think that we should move forward and Nebraska should start making the change to open the borders to other states. Let's open it up."
Indeed, licensing laws can prevent workers from being able to move from place to place in search of better opportunities. A Brookings Institution study released earlier this year found that states with high occupational licensing burdens see fewer workers moving out-of-state when compared to states with lighter licensing requirements. That's not necessarily because people are happy in those places. Instead, researchers say workers feel locked in place because most state-issued professional licenses are not transferable, so moving out-of-state means you'd be out of business unless you can obtain a new license in your new state.
"There is a widespread belief that Americans' economic mobility has declined and that Americans are also less likely to 'move to opportunity' than in the past," wrote Scott Winship, a senior fellow with the Manhattan Institute, in a paper released in September that found a similar pattern. "These two assertions have been linked to argue that falling residential mobility is an important factor behind diminished economic opportunity in America."
More than one-third of all jobs in the United States are now subject to some form of licensing (up from just one in 10 jobs in 1970, according to research by Morris Kleiner at the University of Minnesota), so more workers than ever before are forced to take their licenses into consideration when thinking about a move. Reforming licensing laws in Nebraska would be good for workers, but it would probably be good for consumers too. According to the Heritage Foundation, licensing laws in the Cornhusker State cost families an average of $900 in inflated prices for goods and services last year.
Nebraska has already shown a willingness to act. Last year, the state legislature rewrote licensing rules for hairbraiders to remove a nonsensical requirement that hairbraiders spend 400 days in school to obtain a cosmetology license. The bill to exempt hairbraiders from the cosmetology licensing scheme passed the state's unicameral legislature without a single opposition vote.
Holland says she knows people working as servers and in retail because they are unable to spend the time and money it takes to get a massage therapy license in Nebraska. Loosening the rules would make it easier for people to find a job they enjoy, she said.
"Things change, we have to evolve," she said. "Lift people up, let them answer their calling and find their passion."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Florida man hardest hit?
GO IOWA!
Actually surprising.. I usually have to hit my head on my desk when iowa laws and regulation make national news.. though I will always lord it over southern states and ABC stores
+ Happy Ending:)
For a "message therapist" that would be a period, right?
Holland is a fool. Invest in that license, because you know very few others will. You'll have limited competition. Which, of course, is the point.
This is why i give to the Institute for Justice, and have them as the beneficiary of my Amazon Smile purchases.
Sounds like sex trafficking to me.
This raises a number of important questions =
- lash or cane?
- a dozen per instance, or do they scale up on multiple offenses?
- is the editor included?
Lash. You drive with a lash.
You thrash with a cane, yes?
You've got a warped mind. My first thought was Uber.
I think both of you misunderstand me.
I was actually asking what form of punishment should be deemed mandatory for over-use of the term "Literally".
two-stroke bastinado, maybe?
a traditional Japanese physiotherapy involving the transfer of energy from one part of the body to another
smh
also popular with Iraqi interrogators
FFS Reason - stop giving this woo bullshit even the slightest bit of respectability. I know Reiki is irrelevant to the article, which is why at the very least the specifics of what proponents *claim* (with no evidence, complete ignorance of what the terms they use mean, and in violation of what we understand about physics).
Unless she's lighting one part of their body on fire or freezing it, she's not moving 'energy' from one part of the body to another.
Church it up any way you may, its just a massage - nothing more.
Isn't one of the key components of massage you know, touch?
There was a time not long ago that opening just about any business in Council-tuckey (aka - the armpit of Omaha)was a really bad move, but not anymore. Iowa's liberalized casino laws put three (maybe more?) casinos on Omaha's doorstep, and the conservative nanny state Nebraskans flood over there to leave millions of their dollars there every year. Every few years Nebraskans try to legalize full fledged casino gambling in the State, and every few years the people in the Western 2/3rds of the state vote it down. Meanwhile, Council-tuckey, which used to be a dump (as I noted), now has had a construction boom, every fire house has a shiny new fire truck parked out front, and all of the schools have brand new computer labs due to the casino cash the Nebraskans leave. And with Colorado on their western frontier and legalized weed, there is very little reason for anyone to live in Nebraska anymore (just kidding - kind of).
My favorite best massage therapist was in Oregon, and stopped because they have outrageous licensing requirements. It's a fucking crime.
Look into what's behind all this and you'll find corporate money banking it all. The Platte Institute for Economic Research identified almost 200 occupations that Nebraska's licensing and regulation policies placed significant burdens on small business owners, but who were the loudmouths who objected the most strenuously to the study's recommendations? That's right: the moneyed elites. The Nebraska Restaurant Association, for example, is pouring money into the state legislature to ban food trucks. The medical lobby is paying for continuing regulations on message therapists. Even Big Makeup is getting into the act, bribing regulators to create a license for hair braiding.
If all this were simply up to legislators, they would let these people alone and collect the tax revenue from the businesses, but since corporate lobbying money is plentiful, the fascists seize the political opportunity to tighten the screws on our liberties in the name of the "common good."
Try waving into the NC bar from NY. Nearly impossible. Just the bar exam again.