White Slavery: The Movie
Friday A/V Club: A moral panic from the Progressive Era

In my post about PizzaGate earlier today, I mentioned the "white slavery" scare of the Progressive Era, when wild stories circulated of vast conspiracies coercing young women into prostitution. Forced prostitution did exist, of course, but these tales greatly exaggerated both how common and how organized it was. As is often the case, the moral panic manifested itself at the movies.
The white-slavery film cycle began with George Loane Tucker's 1913 hit Traffic in Souls; the second major entry was Frank Beal's The Inside of the White Slave Traffic, released the same year. The latter is embedded below. Unfortunately, some scenes from the movie are lost, so additional intertitles have been inserted to describe what happens in the missing sections.
In brief, the picture tells the story of a girl who is tricked into a fake marriage with a procurer for a sex-trafficking ring, who then ships her off to be a whore in New Orleans. She tries to break free, fleeing to Denver and Houston, but everywhere she goes she is tracked by the enormous sex syndicate. Unable to find any other job, she finally submits.
One of the odder twists comes when she then falls into a conversation with a potential john. A policeman interrupts them, lets the man walk away, and hauls our heroine off to jail. The film disapproves: A placard says, "One law for man—Another for woman." But it just disapproves of the man walking free: The arrest appears to be a good thing, since it leads to the woman's rehabilitation. After her imprisonment, she finally gets a respectable job. (Then she slides back into prostitution and dies. Not a cheery movie!)
Like many other "educational" films over the years, The Inside of the White Slave Traffic opens with an earnest-sounding declaration of serious intent before proceeding to the salacious story. The reaction was similarly bifurcated: Anti-vice activists promoted it, but police shut down some screenings on the grounds that the picture was obscene. Judge for yourself:
The opening includes a list of people who have endorsed the film, ending with a dubious invocation of "every Sociologist of note from Atlantic to Pacific." If you know your Progressive Era history, some of those names may be familiar to you. Charlotte Perkins Gilman, a prominent feminist, was the author of Herland, a utopian science fiction novel in which an all-female society reproduces parthenogenetically. And Frederic Howe had a long career as a reformer, at various stages becoming everything from a Henry Georgist to a New Dealer; his 1906 book Confessions of a Monopolist has a small libertarian fan base. For the purposes of this picture, though, his most relevant credential may be that he was director of the National Board of Censorship.
(For past editions of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I can't imagine that virtually every sociologist could have gotten it so utterly wrong. That doesn't sound anything like sociologists!
Consensus!!
Seems more like "every sociologist of note from Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co."
Not enough jobs for wise-ass inter-title writers these days.
Note the "of note" part, as in "the ones singing our song."
You may be tempted to think that. But take a poll of literally any university sociology department in the country, if you find the leftists to be less than 90% I'll eat my own shoe. And I wear a size 12.
Was the girl from Rotherham?
I like her hat.
Thoroughly Modern Millie
Don't mind me. Just waiting for Ted.
Shouldn't that be "A Moral Panic From the First Progressive Era"?
Did the first Progressive Era ever really end? It seems to me "A Moral Panic From Earlier In The Progressive Era" would work.
I always thought of the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror as the first Progressive Era. Then came Wilson, Hoover, Mussolini, and Roosevelt.
And in today's "Bad Laws Never Go Away" entry: The Mann Act.
Often used against that other threat to traditional marriage: inter-racial marriage.
We should start reminding the left what the progressives of old really believed. Reminding them of the racist origins of things like the minimum wage is like when the robots in Westworld hear about the outside world or are addressed as robots by customers. Their brains are wired to ignore that evidence and push them to continue their daily cycle
Progressives are in complete denial of half of what they believed just 10 years ago.
There was a Peter Lorre movie titled "Stupefiants" in French that made the circuit back when light beer was a 5-year hard-time felony drug in These States. But info on it is really hard to find. Prohibitionist Thanhouser films and lurid DW Griffith flicks were all the rage when the European drug glut was ramping up into World War I. Most of the problems we face today were likely ingrained via flickering image brainwashing between 1909 and 1929. Paranoid superstition is really hard to change...