California

California Voters Defy Trends—By Voting As Expected

Kamala Harris wins in the Senate, and a slew of Propositions were voted on

|

Whereas the national election results shocked and surprised pollsters and many media observers, California's results from Election Day conformed almost exactly to pre-election polls and predictions. Some of the big races were foregone conclusions, such as Attorney General Kamala Harris' 25-percentage-point rout of Rep. Loretta Sanchez for the vacant U.S. Senate seat. But the state ballot initiatives went as expected, too.

Californians voted in ways that would be expected for such a strongly Democratic-leaning electorate, except on the issue of the death penalty. That isn't too surprising, either, given that Californians—despite their left-of-center tilt—have long been supportive of tough-on-crime measures and have consistently supported the death penalty.

Voters rejected, by 54 percent to 46 percent, Proposition 62, which would have repealed the death penalty and replaced it with life in prison without parole for murderers. They approved, with nearly 51 percent of the vote, the alternative Proposition 66. That measure streamlines the appeals process so the state can more quickly execute death row inmates.

Despite such "toughness," voters overwhelmingly approved Gov. Jerry Brown's sentencing-reform measure (Proposition 57) that would allow early release for some felons. There have been some increases in crime rates following the passage in 2014 of Proposition 47 (reducing some drug felonies to misdemeanors), but California voters remain committed to reducing some types of prison sentences.

On Election Day, voters also were strongly supportive of tax and spending measures. They approved, 54 percent to 46 percent, Proposition 51, which authorizes $9 billion in general-obligation bonds to modernize K-12 public schools. State bond measures are not direct tax increases, but they do increase the debt secured by the state's general fund. That means legislators will have to allocate money to pay the service on the debt. They create pressure for tax hikes, or for spending cuts in other areas.

Voters also approved Proposition 55 by a hefty margin (62 percent to 38 percent), which will extend by 12 years the "temporary" personal-income tax increases included in the tax-raising Proposition 30 from 2012. The increases are applied on earnings of more than $250,000 for single filers and more than $500,000 for joint filers. Voters also agreed to boost the cigarette tax by $2 a pack—and other tobacco and nicotine products by equivalent amounts—by approving Proposition 56.

In a fairly close tally (51 percent to 49 percent), voters rejected Proposition 53, which was opposed by the business community and labor unions and would have subjected major infrastructure projects ($2 billion or more) to a statewide vote if they used revenue bonds. Such bonds are funded by revenues from the project (i.e., tolls) rather than general tax revenues. A variety of local tax increases also passed. California voters have moved a long way from the days of the 1970s-era tax revolt.

On social issues, Californians voted Tuesday in a reliably liberal way, as well. They supported, 63 percent to 37 percent, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom's measure (Proposition 63) requiring background checks to purchase ammunition. They rejected an effort, by 8 percentage points, to require actors in adult films to wear condoms. They upheld a controversial new law (Proposition 67) banning grocery stores from handing out those single-use plastic bags and turned back an effort by the plastic-bag industry (Proposition 65) to redirect any bag fees from grocery stores to a state environmental fund. The latter was designed as payback to grocers and grocery unions for their role in the legislative deal that led to the plastic bag ban.

In another victory for liberal activists, voters approved—by an overwhelming 72 percent to 28 percent margin—Proposition 58, which overturns the state's ban on bilingual education in public schools. That's an educational program in which immigrant kids are taught largely in their native language. It was largely banned in 1998 by Proposition 227, whose supporters were concerned that native Spanish speakers were not learning English quickly enough. Prop. 58 did not get much attention this year, and its ballot designation suggested that a vote for 58 was a vote for preserving English proficiency.

Voters did, however, OK a significant political-reform measure by a wide margin (64 percent to 36 percent). Proposition 54 requires that the final version of any bill in the state Legislature be available in print for 72 hours, thus eliminating those controversial gut-and-amend bills in which new language is inserted at the last minute without public or media scrutiny. The measure also gives the public expanded rights to record the Legislature.

California voters also joined voters in Massachusetts, Nevada and (probably, based on close results) Maine in legalizing the recreational use of marijuana. Several other states approved medical marijuana – something that's been legal in California since Proposition 215 passed in 1996. Given California's immense size, this vote (Proposition 64) is viewed as a massive boost to an already-emerging marijuana industry – and to similar votes in other states in coming elections.

Voters approved Proposition 52, which extends a Medi-Cal hospital fee program that allows the state to collect federal reimbursements. It was backed by most of the state's political establishment. Also passed was Proposition 59, which was an advisory vote asking whether state officials should support a constitutional amendment overturning the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, which invalidated certain limits on campaign spending. This was a largely meaningless initiative, but it garnered 52 percent of the vote.

Finally, voters rejected, 54 percent to 46 percent, a measure (Proposition 61) that would have capped the prices state agencies pay for prescription drugs. Opponents ran an aggressive campaign that no doubt contributed to its failure.

None of this was particular surprising, which is a surprise in and of itself. As the rest of the country defied the predictions, California went along with flow.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

21 responses to “California Voters Defy Trends—By Voting As Expected

  1. I see ABC has released a new poll today. They have Hillary only up by 6 points now.

    1. That right there is funny!

  2. Californians are such an elitist liberal block that they rejected by almost a 2-to-1 margin having a sexual predator as President. This proves that the state has been taken over by SJWs who worry about offensive Halloween costumes and other such calumnities. Poor, poor them. They are to be pitied, really.

    1. Yeah, Californians voted overwhelmingly for the homophobic liar. But, then, socialists are historically homophobic liars too, so it shouldn’t surprise us that you like her.

    2. Instead, we voted 2-1 for a woman who attacked and demeaned victims of sexual assault by her husband. Oh, what a proud day for my state!

    3. Wait, which one was the sexual predator? The one who was impeached for leveraging an intern to service him in the White House? I mean, I know Hillary didn’t molest any of those women, she just enabled it and covered it up. I guess that’s better than theoretical sexual assault on the part of the other candidate, but the margin of difference is thin enough that it’s hard to be outraged over it.

      The difference between Bill Clinton and Donald Trump? One of them was stupid enough to leave behind physical evidence.

      1. Hard to judge. We tend to forget Huma was Hillary’s intern at the same time as Monica was Bill’s.

    4. “Poor, poor them”

      Poor, poor asswipe.
      Fuck off.

  3. In another victory for liberal activists, voters approved?by an overwhelming 72 percent to 28 percent margin?Proposition 58, which overturns the state’s ban on bilingual education in public schools.

    Interesting thing was that this ban was overwhelmingly supported by… Hispanics. This infuriated Anglo liberals. I wonder how the vote broke down this time around?

    1. It got rephrased to trick Hispanic voters into voting what Anglo liberals know is good for them.

    2. Immigrants, especially less educated immigrants, tend to be wary of bilingual education because they think it will impede assimilation. My own mother, very solidly left-of-center across the board, is extremely opposed. I (also technically a Latino immigrant, but one who obviously came here much younger) support it because empirical studies (against all prior intuition) are very clear that it is actually effective and helpful.

    3. They should have just called it the Hire More Teachers Act, since that’s what it really is.

  4. “Also passed was Proposition 59, which was an advisory vote asking whether state officials should support a constitutional amendment overturning the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision…”

    Good luck with that, California. Somewhat ironically, that would have hurt Hillary’s bid for President. (Not that it ended up mattering for her.) They always want to slam the door closed behind their chosen candidates.

    1. “Also passed was Proposition 59, which was an advisory vote asking whether state officials should support a constitutional amendment overturning the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision…”

      The local rag was whining yesterday about how long it was gonna take Trump to issue rules about what can be printed, without a hint of irony for supporting that and someone who is on record as wanting to gut A-1.

      1. Indeed. They worry about the First Amendment while begging the government to curtail the First Amendment. They never seem to notice that they are never actually imprisoned for all their political speech, but I don’t expect rational behavior from these types in the first place.

  5. As a liberal who initially came on board (from standard leftist “progressivism”) over consumer nannyism, this is a very sad day for me. Initiatives usually do much worse than polling suggests, due to a lot of reflexive “no”ing–rule of thumb they say is that an initiative needs to poll over 60 to be confident.
    .
    The plastic bag ban actually broke even more for “no” than that–it was polling well over 70 and squeaked by as the closest on the ballot. Bummer. I was really disappointed that the “revenge” initiative, which sounded so “environmental” (proceeds must go to environmental causes) failed by more than the main one passed–especially since there wasn’t much of a media campaign against it.
    .
    I was so confident on the cigarette tax! One failed four years ago that was half the size, did not involve a special-interest cash grab, and did not include vaping. This one was doing worse in the polling run-up; one poll showed support at 60 and all the others much less. It passed with 65, one of the biggest landslides on the ballot.
    .
    Anyone have any explanation for the wonky results?

    1. (Also defying conventional wisdom by outperforming polling were both death penalty initiatives. Thought to both be going down to spectacular defeat, the abolition one was relatively close and the “reform” one actually squeaked by to pass! I am pro-death penalty so I liked this. But it looks like if trends–and the “ideologizing” of this issue along left-right lines, which looks to accelerate under an obnoxiously law-and-order President Trump–continue, abolition may happen sooner than later. Governor Brown will probably commute everyone on Death Row, which will definitely change the political “facts on the ground.”)

  6. California: Venezuela on the San Andreas

  7. Was the condom thing Proposition 69? No number was given in the article.

  8. until I looked at the paycheck saying $4730 , I did not believe that…my… brother woz like actualy bringing in money part time from there computar. . there friend brother started doing this for less than 7 months and resently paid for the morgage on there home and bought a new Cadillac …….

    …….. http://www.jobprofit9.com

  9. They upheld a controversial new law (Proposition 67) banning grocery stores from handing out those single-use plastic bags…

    Not where I live they didn’t. 60% against. Assholes on the coast who already had the law anyway voted to impose it on us.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.