Campus Free Speech

Video: UC-Berkeley Protesters Built a Human Wall to Violently Stop White Students from Crossing Bridge

Activists demand safe spaces for trans and queer students, eviction of campus bookstore.

|

Berkeley
Diego Reyes / Youtube

Student protesters at the University of California-Berkeley gathered in front of a bridge on campus and forcibly prevented white people from crossing it. Students of color were allowed to pass.

The massive human wall was conceived as a pro-safe space demonstration. Activists wanted the university administration to designate additional safe spaces for trans students, gay students, and students of color. They were apparently incensed that one of their official safe spaces had been moved from the fifth floor of a building to the basement.

According to video footage of the protest, demonstrators blocked off the bridge completely. Students who needed to get to class had no choice but to cross the stream by jumping from rock to rock. Dozens of people can be seen doing so.

In the video, the activists appeared to let several students of color pass unmolested, but white students were forced to find other routes. A few who tried to force their way through were violently rebuffed. Protesters shouted "Go around! Go around!" at a white man on a bicycle.

Another student was told, "This is bigger than you," by a protester. "This is about whiteness."

Afterward, the protest moved to the campus bookstore, where activists posted an eviction notice informing the owners that their building was being reclaimed as a safe space for queer and trans students.

"You are hereby notified by the students of the University of California, Berkeley, to vacate the premises immediately," the eviction notice stated. "University administration wrongly allocated this two-story facility to a third-party corporation, keeping in line with its intensifying legacy of prioritizing financial profit over student needs."

The protesters then marched through the student union, reportedly disrupting students who were studying.

I get that they are trying to make a point—they don't think campus is a safe place for marginalized students, etc.—but racism in the service of activism is still racism. These students consider themselves progressives, but what's progressive about punishing people—making it more difficult for them to get to class—because they were born with the wrong skin color?

Indeed, leftist student activism has become increasingly backward on race and identity issues as of late. The Berkeley protesters are demanding formal, university-sanctioned safe spaces for students who belong to particular identity groups. They want what can only be described as a kind of official segregation: separate spaces for students of color, trans students, queer students, etc.

Students have the right to sort themselves into whatever groups they want. But it's baffling—to me, at least—that they would want these groups endorsed and managed by the administration, which creates the impression that identity-based division is some kind of university goal.

Berkeley's public areas—its quads, common rooms, parks, student union, libraries, classrooms, and yes, bridges—should be safe, welcoming spaces for all students. What happened over the weekend didn't look very inclusive to me.

NEXT: 'This Is Your Brain on Drugs' Guy Supports Marijuana Legalization

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Are we still blaming Trump for the rise of white nationalism?

    1. Trump made them block people’s lawful passage, because reasons.

      1. I’m making over $15k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
        Go this web Site and click to Tech tab to start your work… http://www.Trends88.com

      2. I’m making over $15k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
        Go this web Site and click to Tech tab to start your work… http://www.Trends88.com

    2. If Trump wins, I will blame pants shitting SJWs and I will take that to my grave. Funny how Johnson is the “protest vote” but voting Trump to intentionally trigger apoplectic seizuring amongst these fuckwits is a principled stance.

      1. Seriously: I have loathed Trump ever since the 1980s, but the combination of the lameness of the LP candidate and this sort of appeasement of SJW nonsense makes me want to vote for Trump. Of course, I won’t vote for Trump, but I won’t be happy about voting for the LP candidate either.

        1. Well, if you aren’t going to be happy anyway why not vote for Trump and avoid voting for lameness or you can keep supporting lame LP candidates so the party gets the message….that you support lameness. Stand tall on that

          1. I think the obvious answer on why he wouldn’t vote for Trump is he would rather be associated with lameness than criminal stupidity.

            1. Criminal stupidity is vastly preferable to a criminal mastermind, and that’s what we get with Clinton.

          2. The only thing more lame than “appeasement of SJW nonsense” is imitating SJW nonsense and grievance politics. So many people love big government and nonsense protests, so long as it’s directed towards the other side and the current Two Minute Hate target. Fuckwits.

        2. Ah, yes, this is the argument that you don’t really care about policy, much more important is someone who is yelling angrily at the other side. That is true for most people, including most self-described “libertarians,” and explains why Trump won the primary.

          “A plan to decrease spending by 28% and marijuana legalization and fewer wars? No thank you, I can take vowing to increase discretionary spending, military spending, infrastructure spending, entitlement spending, and everything else, because the number one most important issue as a libertarian is angrily yelling at the sort of people I hate and pissing them off!”

          No wonder conservatives believe that libertarians are part of the Republican base and don’t bother to do anything on libertarian issues. Yelling angrily is worth far more votes; not yelling angrily is a dealbreaker unlike increasing spending, the War on Drugs, or anything else.

          1. Except this isn’t at all what he said. He never said he doesn’t care about policy and he explicitly said he wouldn’t vote for Trump so obviously in this case he is not someone who will just vote for a candidate who yells at people he doesn’t like.

        3. At this point I am voting LP strictly so they can hit the 5% – then I’ll push for a real LP candidate in 2020.

          1. Fuck the Libertarian Party. They need to be destroyed.

      2. Here is what I don’t understand.

        If the University is not a ‘safe space’ how are these retards allowed to parade all over the place and hang up fake ‘eviction’ noticies without being beaten, shot, and physically harmed? I mean, they are actually getting physical themselves and no one is actually pushing back or hurting them.

        Thus, how could they possibly be considered to be inside a ‘not safe’ space? In the real world, or in those neighborhoods full of non-collegiate ‘people of color’, these people would be either dead or running for their lives. Yet here they are, flaunting their ‘privilege’ and abject foolishness without consequence, safely.

        Yeah, my sympathy level is zero. If I were the ‘white guy on a bike’ I’d have hit them at maximum velocity, personal well being be damned. Blocking public bridges to vehicle traffic is retarded, even if it’s only a bicycle. I have a feeling that when confronted by being struck by a bicycle going 10-15 MPH they would suddenly find that their desire to block traffic would be reduced significantly.

      3. Sign this petition here to defund U.C. Berkeley.

        https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/
        petition/remove-federal-funding-uc-
        berkley-and-use-it-fix-flints-water-pipes

    3. We just need to find the one Republican on Berkeley to blame.

      1. RethugliKKKan obstructionisms!!!!!!!!

      2. He graduated thirty years ago.

    4. What’s this “we” shit, Kemosabe?

  2. Did none of the guys think to get a bunch of their friends together and crash the “blockade” with a flying fucking wedge? Because that’s what my buddies and I would have done, just for shits and giggles.

    1. By flying wedge you mean ax handle to the face, right?

      1. Only if they physically tried to detain or restrain me, then yeah, fucking self-defense.

        1. A free pass to throw pussies (literally and figuratively) off a bridge. And no one cashed in? Only at Berkeley.

          1. Were I there, I would be bringing the fucking PAIN!

            1. They don’t allow things like pain, reality or consequences on California campuses.

              1. I would like to test those things on the resident progtards there. For fun.

    2. OH NOES MACROAGGRESSION!!1!

    3. Jesus Christ, I just watched the video, and the fucking cops were present, and not only allowed these idiots to block people’s lawful passage, but told white students to go around. Fucking insanity.

        1. exactly what would have happened if one of the students forced to jump from rock to rock missed and broke an ankle? The University would Be on the Hook for a potential lawsuit. The police were derelict in their duties no doubt because the administration said play nice to appease the little SJW snowflakes.

      1. Just wait until the students start demanding separate water fountains for white people.

        1. History isn’t cyclical; that implies motion were just staying in the same dumb place doing the same dumb things.

    4. Alternatively, have a bunch of guys show up with paintball guns and make the protesters people of many colors.

      1. I was thinking guns other than paintball guns.

        ATTN: Preet Bahara

        That was a joke indicating my level of outrage at these morons. I would never shoot anybody unless my life was in danger.

        1. I’ve seen your recent videos. They make your disclaimer seem somewhat… questionable.

        2. It’s Mr. Bharara if you’re nasty.

      2. Please! The PC term is paintball markers.

      3. SJW crowd dispersal starter kit:

        Payload
        Delivery System

        Just get a few people to chip in and have a grand time for an evening. Better than paintballing them, I’d wager.

      4. I dunno. The protesters looked pretty white to me. I saw one black dude among the protesters. If this group took the protest to nearby Oakland I doubt they’d be welcomed with open arms.

    5. Did none of the guys think to get a bunch of their friends together and crash the “blockade” with a flying fucking wedge?

      Sooner or later something like that is going to happen, and all the blame for the violence will be placed on the white students who crashed their idiotic fascistic spectacle “peaceful protest.”

    6. Did none of the guys think to get a bunch of their friends together and crash the “blockade”

      Pfff… Berkeley Nazi… pfff.

      I hate Berkeley Nazis.

    7. This would be a good time to deploy the XL sized can of SJW spray:

      http://tinyurl.com/z2f52nq

      1. I was hoping your link would be to a refillable, reusable flamethrower. Oh well, I guess this will do.

    8. That would be a beautiful thing to behold. Nice long build up before climaxing with the initial charge so one could enjoy their money shot reaction as they are being bowled over and trampled or more likely scattering like the scared POS that they are.

    9. Putting my college antics hat on from 15 years ago, I would have some brave, white soul blackface himself and his clothes with horse shit then attempt to cross. Hilarity ensues.

    10. Obviously we need to bring Red Rover back to elementary recess, those human chains always have weak links that are easily identified with a little practice.

  3. My wife wants to move back to Cali. I tell her to write me if she does.

    1. Why would she want to do that? Sure, Florida has its problems, but California has the same problems, a bunch of new ones, and a state income tax. Plus at least we get a few days warning before apocalyptic disasters occur.

      1. Her brothers are out there.

        1. That’s the best reason not to move back there. You still get the benefits of visiting, without the headaches of living there. I appreciate the fact my grandfather lives in Cali, since I get to go to California and enjoy it as a tourist, and not put up with all of the ridiculous headaches living there would entail.

      2. The weather is infinitely better in CA.

        1. That is true. Still not worth it.

          1. It will become even less worth it when the inevitable unfunded liabilities (public pensions) crisis occurs, necessitating a giant increase in taxes and cuts in public services (i.e. pay even more to get even less).

    2. Tell her to write me, too!

    3. She can buy my place. I am getting thexcited fuck out, soon.

      1. Fucking autocorrect. Ok, I AM a little excited about getting the fuck out.

    4. My wife wants to move back to Cali.

      Heard from a recent college graduate: “Taking a job in California is like booking a stateroom you can’t afford, on the Titanic.”

  4. This is microcosmic example of what Koestler talks about in ‘Scum of the Earth’, that sometimes the means make the ends meaningless.

  5. “I get that they are trying to make a point” Why, Robby, why?!?! Why do you always need to say this? Why the disclaimer? They are fucking retarded and there is absolutely nothing at all good about this or the point they are making. It is all horseshit.

    1. Robby is trolling us with this shit. Stop reacting and he’ll stop doing it.

      1. That may be true in many instances, but in this case I don’t think he’s trolling.

        1. Could be, Froot Sooshi does actually have some SJW tendencies.

      2. No. He won’t. The Robby Horses, ridden, they must be.

        I am convinced he really believes this shit, and buys the whole SJW religion, lock, stock, and barrel. Amazingly, what Robbo has very recently discovered, is that “white” Caucasian people are actually a colour and a race. (According to the Gospel of The Totem Pole of SJW Grievance, whites, cis-heteros in particular, are neither a race, nor included as a colour in the People of Colour Wheel).

        It may actually pierce his tiny amygdala that yes, all that SJW nonsense he futzes with can actually be used against him. Personally, if he were on that campus. And like the waffling, socially equivocating, flaccid ramen noodle that he is, would accept non-white people screaming at him, “Go ’round to the back, whitey,” he would do so reflexively without so much as a peep.

          1. It’s kinda funny to see that people whom otherwise seem intelligent and rational will turn into the same shit-eating morons one regularly encounters in the world under the right circumstances.

            1. I think it’s absolutely a gas that the minute poor, weakly, downtrodden Robbo gets anything remotely construed as a (valid, legitimate) criticism from a bunch of Blue Meanies, you immediately slip into your hero outfit and deflect away, not even addressing many of the points put forth.

              1. I guess that’s what I get for not being a libertarian. I’m sure if I were a libertarian I’d know who are the right people to be trod upon.

                1. Indeed. I notice you didn’t refute any of the points that have been made this thread, or this one. (Make sure and read my last comment – you may haven’t have read it).

                  And for the record, I still like you, Sparky; your purposefully obtuseness is frustrating, however. What’s it going to take for you, a reverse South Africa-esque, SJW Apartheid Society, where a few are dictating to society-at-large all proper GoodRightthinknik Speech and nebulous, undefined, subjective, Orwellian, “Social Improvement”?

                  1. Why would you think I like or approve of SJWs? Because I think you guys are going overboard being dicks to Robby? I think they’re the most useless group of people currently occupying the Earth. But I have some perspective. Being a douchebag to a blogger that doesn’t hate SJWs hard enough on a website that doesn’t hate Hillary hard enough is just not that high on my list. If you could see through your Robby hate, you might notice that he calls out the morons more often than not. I get that you hate the way he goes about it sometimes, I just don’t understand the necessity of being such a complete douchebag about it.

                    It’s really your own little in-group virtue signaling, though I doubt you’ll see it that way.

                    I still like you too, doc. I have plenty of friends who I think become irrational morons over silly things. Because it’s my opinion and I don’t expect others around me to just blindly accept everything I say.

                    1. 1) I don’t “hate” Robby. I detest his half-hearted, at best, deflections of shit that five years ago would have been unthinkable as both public and collegiate policy, such as the out and out advocacy of racial segregation.

                      2) Stop calling me a douchebag. I am not being one, irrational or otherwise. I haven’t called you any names, and I would appreciate the same in return.

                      3) I don’t “virtue signal”. Being here in Commie-topia and starting a family has changed both my perspective and priorities in life. Greatly. My tolerance for “FEELZ GOOD!” social idiocy is even less than it was five years ago. I don’t want to come to the USA, if we have to, to run into racial segregation, legally condoned and encouraged, “FUCK WHITEY! FUCK BadWrongthinkniks! PRONOUNS!” And a shitload of legal and financial boots and on my neck just to appease a bunch idiots delusions about biology and remarkably Fascistic intolerance to anything but their SJW religion.

                    2. 1) Honestly, that just means you’re getting old. Robby is young and this is how young people in America are now. Getting mad about it ain’t gonna change anything.

                      2) We’re all douchebags to some degree. I am a douchebag about other things, just not this. Would it be better if I called you a crotchety old man?

                      3) As I said, I didn’t expect you’d think you were virtue signaling. Let me ask you this, would you rather the government were involved in telling people the right things to think and believe? Would it be better for anyone if the dumb shit that these young kids are screaming about were codified in law? Social pressure should be the ideal way to change culture. If the “wrong” people are winning, then either the “right” people aren’t numerous enough or just don’t care enough. I don’t really like the direction things are going right now either. Unfortunately, I am vastly outnumbered. Bitching about it on a website isn’t going to change that.

                    3. Social pressure backed by the masses, with police on looking on not caring about liberties being trampled is not a way to solve these problems.

                      It will lead to laws.

                    4. It’s almost time to remove their kind from our country.

                2. you don’t have to be a libertarian to notice that these students are shitheads and any disclaimer of their actions is nonsense, but apparently it helps.

                  1. I just don’t happen to read “disclaimers” into everything Robby writes. So that might be the problem you’re missing.

            2. Indeed, Groovus’s ultra SJW-for-white-people nonsense and grievance-mongering is utterly ridiculous. I don’t hate that shit any less just because it comes from some moron race hustler yelling “they started it!” any more than I forgive the Leftist race hustlers who equally yell “they started it!”

              Nothing to do with Robby, it has to do with all these damn socialists for white people calling themselves libertarians.

        1. “I am convinced he really believes this shit, and buys the whole SJW religion, lock, stock, and barrel.”

          Robby writes most of his articles bashing SJW antics on college campuses and elsewhere (honestly, I’d like to see him expand his area of commentary. Or at least diversify his selection of links when he posts them), but because he’s not as harsh as some here would like then he clearly must actually be a SJW true believer. This is like the flip side of the leftists who accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being either a “liberal” or a “fascist.” Even when the person is a full-blown socialist, anarchist, or communist.

          1. Let me echo and amplify the call for diversity in links when Soave is on link duty. If nothing else, run over to Balko’s blog and pilfer a few nut-punch links to sprinkle in.

          2. Robby writes most of his articles bashing SJW antics on college campuses and elsewhere

            Bashing, kinda, yeah. Its his unconscious/reflexive acceptance of their toxic premises that frustrates. His main beef seems to be more tactical (“they have a point, but this isn’t the way to make it” in a nutshell).

            I get that they are trying to make a point?they don’t think campus is a safe place for marginalized students, etc.?but racism in the service of activism is still racism.

            Nowhere do I see him challenge the ludicrous “point” about campus being unsafe for “marginalized students”.

            1. Nowhere do I see him challenge the ludicrous “point” about campus being unsafe for “marginalized students”.

              So fucking what? Do you honestly believe that that means he’s giving them a shining endorsement?

              1. No, but he’s always just giving them a mild rebuke.

                And as stated, there will come a day when the SJW’s spill some blood, and it’ll be clear all the mild rebukes did not work.

            2. As Sparky said, so what? The article isn’t about whether or not the campus is unsafe for “marginalized students,” it’s about the reprehensible tactics of activists. And if you make it about whether or not the campus is “unsafe” (a term that they won’t even define the same as him) then that opens the door to the argument of “you’re wrong about it being safe, therefore we are right in what we’re doing.” Why not simply make the point that their actions are wrong regardless? And it’s not as if Robby has never argued against narratives like that about safety (off the top of my head, how many articles has he written about the exaggerations about the prevalence of rape on college campuses)? Again, it’s equivalent to leftists accusing someone who is making arguments for speech codes, safe spaces, etc. of being a conservative because they don’t attack them as much or as harshly as they (the leftists) wish they did. Which I’m sure you would find ridiculous. If you took a neutral observer who didn’t know much about the whole campus speech debate, gave them an overview of the sides, and then had them read a bunch of Robby articles, I seriously doubt any such observer would conclude that Robby is on the SJW side of the argument.

              1. As Sparky said, so what? The article isn’t about whether or not the campus is unsafe for “marginalized students,” it’s about the reprehensible tactics of activists. And if you make it about whether or not the campus is “unsafe” (a term that they won’t even define the same as him) then that opens the door to the argument of “you’re wrong about it being safe, therefore we are right in what we’re doing.” Why not simply make the point that their actions are wrong regardless?

                Because protest is a valid way to express dissent–if what you’re protesting is, itself, actually valid.

                Thus, the problem ISN’T their actions–it’s the underlying assumptions they’re acting on. Those assumptions are moronic and dangerous.

                YOU don’t seem to see that. Robbie doesn’t seem to see that. Sparky doesn’t seem to see that.

                Equivocating–accepting those premises as even a tiny bit valid–helps the SJWs. It helps their pervasive stupidity spread. And Robby equivocates as a matter of course–as if he thinks that yes, these people are absolutely right, but they’re going about raising awareness all wrong.

            3. So fucking what? It doesn’t help anyone to validate falsehoods and faux social problems. Robby can’t bring himself to describe evil stupidity in terms any stronger than “inadvisable” and “counter-productive”. There’s a reason Robby’s anti-SJW articles are completely off-putting to so many anti-SJWs. His brand of journalism is dickless.

              1. There’s a reason Robby’s anti-SJW articles are completely off-putting to so many anti-SJWs. His brand of journalism is dickless.

                Well, it’s a good thing you’re here with your big swinging dick to let us know how much of a badass you are.

                1. Right I’m swinging my dick around and claiming to be a badass because… I accuse Robby of practicing dickless journalism. Thanks for your complete lack of an argument. It tells me exactly how worthwhile it is to engage with you.

                  1. Whew, glad we got that cleared up.

            4. Progressives have no point, other than it isn’t ok to be a progressives.

          3. Then they whine about being called douchebags, the douchebags…

        2. Do you actually know how big an amygdala is supposed to be, or what it’s even for (memory, decision-making, and emotional reactions), or is that the only part of the brain you can name?

      3. Or…..we can send Sinbad and Matchbox 20’s Rob Thomas over to his place. To beat Robby’s testicles with his own shoes.

    2. It’s baffling – to me at least – that he brings out the kid gloves for violent racists, so long as they call themselves progressive. This article didn’t look very balanced in tone to me.

      1. I may not agree with Dylan Roof, but…

        *Something You Won’t Ever Hear*

        1. “I get that Dylan Roof was trying to make a point, but…”

        2. These kids are assholes, but good lord they didn’t shoot up a church full of people. When Robby writes that about (for example) a black nationalist killing cops or white people, then you can make that analogy.

          1. Specifically targeting government officials, regardless of the perpetrator’s race, would be rebellion/revolution.

            Specifically targeting someone because of race, regardless of the perpetrator’s race, would be racism and depending on the tactics, terrorism.

    3. Maybe because they are trying to make a point?

      It’s a stupid point, but a point.

      1. ^This^

        I think Robby is trolling the commentariat. He never said he agreed with the point they were trying to make, just that they were trying to make one. A retarded, infantile point, but a point nonetheless. In fact, right after that, he explicity said “racism in the service of activism is still racism.”

        And yet, many members of the commentariat have been trained like Pavlov’s dogs to automatically assume Fruit Sushi is agreeing with the prog-tard idiots whenever they see phrases like that and they Just. Can’t. Help. Themselves. Must… RESPOND…

        I’m sure it provides Robby and probably everyone else in the reason offices hours of entertainment watching the usual suspects lose their shit like the trained dogs they are.

        1. No shit. The best part, in my opinion, is that he got a doctor, a lawyer, and a bunch of nerdy engineers to become the jock squad picking on the scrawny kid with the nice hair because he’s too faggy for them.

          Nice work, Rico.

          1. Engineer, and I giggled.

            I think he enjoys it a little bit too. Knowing he can get a rise out of us with some slight masochistic tendencies in regards to being put on blast.

          2. You forgot the college professor, hospital manger, and the professional liguist/professor as well, since you’re keeping a running tally, there, Sparky. And I’m sure there are other professions represented as well, who really don’t want to see any more of this sick SJW religious infection proliferate.

            1. Thanks for updating the list for me. It really makes it that much clearer that people, regardless of their education, background, or intelligence, will still manage to be useless douchebags when given the opportunity.

              1. Indeed, it does.

                And encapsulates and accurate describes the SJW bowel movement quite succinctly.

              2. C’mon that the whole damned point of Reason’s comment section!

        2. You’re probably right, but personally I’d rather be on record as unequivocally against racists brownshirts for posterity than have fun with the commentariat. To each their own.

          1. If you read the entire post and ended up thinking Robby is not against these people, then I suspect you have a bias that you are unwilling to let go of. To each their own, except those shitty SJWs though, amirite?

            1. “Unequivocally”. I have to type each word from a smartphone while on break so please read all of them.

              And yes, to each their own is invalidated by breaking the NAP. You’re getting far more worked up about Robbie bitching than the actual Robbie bitchers.

              1. Worked up? Frankly I lump this behavior in with the people who spend all of their time here bitching about how much the site sucks now compared to how it used to be. That used to be a running gag among the commenters that are now doing it. It’s bizarre behavior as far as I’m concerned. I just find it a little fascinating in its bizzareness. Of all the things there are in life to spend one’s time doing, bitching about the way others act seems odd.

                1. This is getting too meta. I’m fascinated by bizarre equivocation and you’re fascinated by my bizarre fascination.

                  Also, bitching about how others act (and spell, and HTML tag, and prefer their pizza) is the bedrock of HnR. So much so that you’re bitching about people bitching without irony.

          2. Maybe they don’t a TV in the break room at Reason HQ so this is the only form of entertainment they get while at work?

            1. I truly pity them if “we” are their entertainment. Plus, they have an old broken radio stuck on NPR, so there’s that.

              1. *horn/chimes* Today, on Capitol Hill….

        3. On the other hand Barry Goldwater said, “I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice!” It’s entirely possible the students believe their actions are increasing liberty for non-whites. I strongly disagree with the students, and I think their actions are inflammatory, self-defeating, and antithetical to their stated goals. And before someone says it, I know stated goals and actual goals may not necessarily be the same.

          I feel bad for these students, they are living in a perverse and pervasive culture which keeps them infantile, ignorant and helpless.

          1. I don’t get the “Of course” clauses Bobby puts in his posts. The posts would read better without them; they aren’t very professional.

            I do not, however, take them as evidence that Bobby endorses SJW causes. He’s young. He’s new. College wasn’t too long ago for him. He can be forgiven for saying stupid, but ultimately harmless, shit.

            1. I don’t think ceding moral high ground and validating the pet peeves opponents that are so thoroughly and completely wrong about basically everything could be described as “harmless”. Counter productive at a minimum, facilitating the rise of something darker at most.

            2. Too much Young Turks, maybe?

          2. You may feel bad for these students. I want make them feel bad. Perhaps they will learn a valuable lesson. Either way, it’s time to bring the MOTHERFUCKIN’ PAIN!

      2. Stalin made a few points too during the Reign of Terror, when he cleansed those villages. I know how I would have dealt with Stalin.

  6. Key phrase: “they would want these groups endorsed and managed by the administration”

    Look to who bonos. Grievance functionaries in the university admin and (x)-studies students who’s only hope of a job is either EOO slots in government or grievance jobs in the academy.

    Someone’s got to manage the oppressed and downtrodden.

    1. Someone’s got to manage the oppressed and downtrodden.

      That’s why a rather large number of these SJW types are going into the one area of the private sector where they will exert the most direct influence and shape corporate policy:

      Human. Resources.

      Ponder that on the Tree of Woe.

      1. This is why they need to be taught how weak and worthless they are now. Not embolden them by allowing them to believe they have a valid position, or can make a difference. Beat them down hard now. Make them cower like a viciously abused animal. Which is still better than these little commie shitbags deserve. Anything less is an indulgence, and a mistake.

  7. I get that they are trying to make a point?they don’t think campus is a safe place for marginalized students.”

    We could probably dispense with the marginalized students moniker since it’s become ckear that’s an inversion of the truth.

    1. Can you imagine the university’s reaction if a large group of white fratbros did the same thing, and let only white people use the bridge? I bet the reaction would be just slightly different.

      1. Well, that different. THEY have ALL the Power.

      2. +1 Duke Lacrosse team

      3. The Berkeley MRAP and full SWAT team would go take them down. They might get the “White Privilege” of only having rubber bullets fired at them.

        1. The Bias Response Teams are salivating.

    2. Agreed. Reason and its writers are way too apt to cede ground to Leftists (and only Leftists) on issues that seem pretty black and white. The most offensive part about this spectacle is that it was allowed to occur at a public university, which is funded not only by residents of California, but also the whole country (indirectly through student loans and federal grants to universities).

    3. And, from an actual watching of the video, apparently anyone of Asian origin is classified as “white people” for the purposes of this demonstration: made to go around the bridge, and their study time disrupted. I guess my white-inflected reasoning cannot comprehend the true meaning of “People of Color”? Would some kind SJW please sanitize my mind?

      1. Asians are on the same level as white people on the hierarchy of victimhood because they often tend to be high achievers without having to rely on special treatment or handouts. That makes them doubleplusungood because they’re living proof that “People of Color” can get ahead and achieve if they’re willing to do the work instead of groveling for scraps from their limousine liberal “betters.”

      2. There is no right to block a public thoroughfare. To do so forcibly is an act of violence. A possible solution to this problem:

        Photograph those who blockaded the bridge. Take statements and record them. Get the names of several students and employees who were denied passage.

        File civil class action suit against the SJW perpetrators of this violence. Damages could be based upon time wasted and risk of injury in crossing the stream, etc.

        It would be nice if the feds would enforce civil rights laws against the SJWs who conspired in this crime, but that’s a pipe dream.

        1. You forgot to ask for a pony. Always ask for a pony when you put your wish list together….

        2. Beating the holy shit out of them is much quicker. And possibly a source of significant catharsis.

          1. Keep in mind that the cops there are Californians too and, being campus cops, probably have had a few mandatory diversity sessions ‘taught’ by some of these turds, so even if you hit back in self defense, I wouldn’t be surprised if the cops arrested yo instead.

            Seeing those cops standing there essentially aiding and abetting the new brownshirts, and thinking about what Maya Angelou said about wanting to see white kids killed makes me think that scuttling police reform as an issue by making it all about race wasn’t, in the eyes of hardcore leftists, a bad thing. They don’t object to police behaving badly; they want them to behave badly against different groups of people, that’s all.

            1. They don’t object to police behaving badly; they want them to behave badly against different groups of people, that’s all.

              Indeed; they expressly say “Black Lives Matter”, and treat “All Lives Matter” as an anathema.

  8. It’s Berkeley, ground zero for stupid.

  9. Wouldn’t would would would would would would would would would wouldn’t.

    That hat macro-aggresses me.

  10. Berkeley’s public areas?its quads, common rooms, parks, student union, libraries, classrooms, and yes, bridges?should be safe, welcoming spaces for all students

    All students aren’t welcome in restrooms, gyms, or parking lots? Hm. Interesting.

    1. welcoming spaces for all students

      Robby really likes to speak their language. Next article will delve into issues of “black bodies”.

  11. Should have gotten a bigger group of people and run these snowflakes’ asses over. If you start off by knocking out the fat fuck in the cargo shorts, the rest of them will probably disperse pretty quickly anyway.

    1. I would go for the girl in the blue shirt on the right side of the fellow (peacefully trying to cross the bridge safely). Look at those legs. That girl is sturdy.

      1. Sturdy is good. Don’t want a girl that feels like i’m hugging a bag of antlers.

  12. Okay, but come on. It’s Berkeley.

    1. It’s Berkeley.

      I keep thinking about that. I never agreed with their politics, but at least the Berkeley protesters of the 1960s and 70s were trying to change the world, not hide from it.

      I’d love to see some of the radicals I grew up with show these snowflakes what’s what.

      1. These idiots are such pussies they’ve managed to make Weatherman look like badasses…. What a time to be alive.

  13. Personally, I would have kept walking right through them with the disclaimer “If any one of you touches me or threatens me I will use my right to self defense.” I’m sure that would have lead to me breaking some faces, and it would have been not only justified but well deserved.

    1. And you would have been beaten to pulp, charged with assault and expelled from the university because someone claimed to hear you say “nigger”, at which point the judge, the prosecutor, the jury and the university will all agree that all of it’s your fault because a white person saying nigger is a free pass for anyone to anything to you.

      1. I would follow that up with the mother of all lawsuits. I would love nothing more than to take that University, those shitbag traitor snowflakes, and that commie city for millions of dollars.

        1. Ha. Forget it Suicidy, it’s Californiatown.

  14. “you know… morons”

  15. “Students who needed to get to class had no choice but to cross the stream by jumping from rock to rock.”

    Oh, the dull symbolism of today’s prudish youth. Blocking Sather Gate is a photo op more than an inconvenience. There are other plenty of other bridges over Strawberry creek.

    (And to reveal my dissipated youth, I’ll ask, who else here has jumped “from rock to rock” over the creek, without even anybody blocking the gate bridge?)

    1. There were several older men who were very clearly violently confronted and told to walk across the creek.

  16. Fucking fascists. Sooner or later you’re going to see this shit escalate. Eventually you’re going to have a violent confrontation between these shitheels and some group of white students. Of course, the media will put all the blame on the white people and it will be further “proof” that all white people are evil racists, sexists, and homophobes, etc. This isn’t going to end well for anyone.

    1. When cynical assholes are accurately predicting the future, we should all be very worried.

      1. It’s getting really easy to predict the future I just think of the worst possible way things could get worse and extrapolate from that. This world fucking sucks. Come on, SMOD, hurry the fuck up!

    2. Scott Adams has a poignant assessment of this today relative to the Election on his Dilbert Blog.
      Progs are bullies. It is the single common linkage between all Dems…..they all have someone they want to bully.

      We see it in these students. It’s not what they want that’s the problem. But rather, they want to take it out on others. They want to exert power and control on their peers. They are bullies.

      Scott points out that on election day, Trump supporters shouldn’t be advertising, because it will result in bullying activities. And Trump supporters are more likely to unholster if push comes to shove.

      Not sure I agree. Not sure why anyone should hide who they are or what they want to do because of a bully. At some point it will come to a head.

      1. Better to just spay/neuter/euthanize all props.

    3. I recently watched the youtube video of Ben Shapiro on some CNN SJW panel. I big (male to female) tranny next to him threatened to assault him (‘put him in an ambulance’) while grabbing him by the back of the neck after Ben called it ‘sir.’ It later said something to the effect of “I’ll see you in the parking lot.” Shapiro, it’s worth noting, didn’t respond to the threats and stayed calm throughout.

      How did left wing media report the event? “Transexual activist threatens to assault conservative on air?” Nope. They said “On air Confrontation between Transexual Activist and Conservative Almost comes to Blows.” “Comes to blows.”

      And just like that, the victim has been equated morally to the aggressor.

      So yeah, it doesn’t matter. A bunch of lefty brownshirts could pull honkies from their cars and beat them to a pulp and CNN would report it as “confrontation gets violent.” Not “leftist lunatics assault strangers.”

      Oh, I should explain, thanks to leftists informing me of the grave insult of using the wrong pronoun, I’ve decided from now on I’m just going to call transexuals ‘it.’ Because fuck these people. Deirder Mcloskey I’ll ‘her’. McCloskey is alright.

  17. Well, there are several clear faces in the picture. Conspiracy to violate constitutional rights is still a felony. One of those rights is to travel in public spaces. Not to mention that kidnapping charges have been brought in similar circumstances. Not to mention racial discrimination. (but in the real world, not berkeley.)

  18. Shouldn’t these kids be, you know, studying or something?

    1. Perhaps if they were majoring in real degrees, but I suspect these fuckwits are all Victimhood Studies majors or some such bullshit.

    2. I’m guessing they get credit towards their ridiculous majors for participating.

    3. It’s how you can tell they didn’t put a dime of their own money into their “college experience”.

    4. They should be getting repeatedly punched in the face until their speech impediment is too sever for me to ever hear them bitching about white people again.

      1. Don’t sweat it. People who get this way will find that karma is a real bitch.

  19. Activists wanted the university administration to designate additional safe spaces for trans students, gay students, and students of color.

    And drinking fountains. Don’t forget the drinking fountains.

    We don’t want the whiteys spreading their whitey cooties.

  20. I don’t know if the pendulum will ever swing back in the direction reason, but I suspect that if it does, it will do so with a vengeance.

    1. I’m not counting on it. The people who run the media sympathize with these asshats. The alt media has largely gone full trumptard. What’s left but a few blogs? Zines like Reason which essentially play the role of being dragged along by lefties repeatedly saying ‘come on guys, doncha think this is a little too far? Come on guys, we all want the same thing, right? Come on gang…”

  21. If I were a Berkeley student, “Colored Only” and “Queer Only” signs might could possibly mysteriously appear on drinking fountains.

    1. That is a fantastic idea that would work on university campuses across the nation as well.

    2. It might be better to make the signs look official, something like:

      …….. This fountain is a ………..
      . RESERVED SAFE SPACE ..
      ………………. for ………………….
      PERSONS OF COLOR ONLY

    3. ‘Negroes Only’ and ‘Faggots Only’?

  22. I have a hard time feeling sorry for anyone who is attending Berkeley, or for anyone who hires someone from there.

  23. Forgive me, I’m not up to speed on the current oppressed minority hierarchy…are people of Asian decent “of color”? It looked like they were going around the bridge too.

  24. God if i were there i would turn this whole thing around. Like ? of the people in that line were white, id be all like “once again white people tell gay students they are not welcome” or “handicapped students are forced to cross dangerous creek”

    These people need to be forced to live by their own contradictory rule set. How do you know you werent turning away trans students? Do you presume you can tell just by looking? How dare a bunch of white people presume to speak for the black community. Once again white people steal POC’s voice and pain. Gays are forced to come out of the closet if they dont want to suffer violence at the hands of white liberals. etc etc.

    Any women turned away? How is that not a title IX violation? How can women feel safe on campus if students can physically prevent them access to campus with the police’s apparent blessing?

    1. Kind of like how Jimmy dealt with PC Principal on South Park.

  25. “They were apparently incensed that one of their official safe spaces had been moved from the fifth floor of a building to the basement.”

    And stole their stapler?

    1. They’re having a bit of a roach problem down there. So if they could just get a can of pesticide and start spraying around that’d be great.

      1. Raid for SJW’s?

    2. It was a symbolic demotion of their group. And the view was better from the fifth floor.

      1. Fuck the view. moving them to the basement saves them from having to walk up five floors worth of stairs. I call that a good thing.

  26. These students consider themselves progressives, but what’s progressive about punishing people…

    That’s pretty much the only reason people like being progressive. You get to swing various clubs at your enemies without personal repercussion.

    1. Leave it to Robby to regard progressivism as nothing more than a misguided theory about the wonders of rainbows and unicorns. It’s far more serious than whining about human rights.

      1. Everyone of those little faggoty fucks wishes they were ole’ Joe Stalin, and could kill all their perceived enemies.

  27. Ha! They tried to do this crap when I went there in early 2000’s. Then they were making a human wall stopping people to protest IsraelI treatment of Palestinians. Because it was only 1 or 2 people thick across it was easy enough if you were determined to break through, which is what I did. I wasn’t going to let those shit heels make me late for class.

  28. Serious question. How in the hell do progressives get away with the wife-beater excuse ?

    They use intimidation, but if there is push back they get violent and say “see what you made me do”.

    1. It’s okay when they do it. That’s all you need to know.

  29. Progressivism is a kissing cousin to fascism, so Soave’s shock that progressives would resort to this grotesque form of protest is naive denial about what they actually are.

  30. Can one of the students affected take a picture and take it to the dean and formally xharge them with racial discrimination?

  31. Students who needed to get to class had no choice but to cross the stream by jumping from rock to rock. Dozens of people can be seen doing so.

    Fucking Berkley and their fellating power.

    *Real* anarchists would have self-organized a self-defense militia and declared war – don’t jump on rocks, pick them up and throw them.

  32. $35k/yr in-state tuition.
    That’s roughly$200/day when in-class. Assuming 8/yrs a day of actual active educational activities, that’s $25/hour. Disrupting someone else’s paid-for activity is a crime. Multiple that by the number of students disrupted and we’re talking a good bit of change for even 30 minutes disruption. Extend that over a school-year and one has to imagine this kind of disruptive crap occurs a fair amount. how many student-hours per year?

    Where are the lawyers with a nice class-action lawsuit?

  33. Idiots. If you’re in a position to demand safe spaces, you don’t need them. By definition a safe space is one that you try not to let the normals know about so that they don’t crash it and turn it into a bachelorette party venue.

    1. ……can’t believe I’m agreeing with Tony

      1. It’s a fucked up day when that happens.

      2. Singularity has been reached!

  34. Disney name tags require that a person have their place of origin or current residence listed and any college program students will instead have their alma matter. It’s been a godsend in helping me quickly size up any new idiots we get in my department! Thankfully, most of the special snowflakes have a short life expectancy in the Disney Transportation.

  35. If you choose to go to UC Berkeley, shouldn’t you kind of expect this sorta thing? Like, maybe even deserve it? I mean, Jesus Hell, it’s Berkeley.

    1. Believe it or not, UC Berkeley is a real university. Its science and engineering students don’t have time for this nonsense, and don’t deserve it.

      1. I’m not saying it’s a joke uni, not in the least, but shouldn’t those science and engineering students be aware that this is far more likely to happen here, than other places? Or maybe that’s just my perception?

      2. STEM minorities do not count in SJW Land.

      3. The engineering students should get together and build their own damn bridge just for them.

        1. I’d rather they built a trebuchet to clear the bridge.

        2. With blackjack, and hookers!

    2. Sign this petition here to defund U.C. Berkeley.

      https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/
      petition/remove-federal-funding-uc-
      berkley-and-use-it-fix-flints-water-pipes

  36. What do these knobs define a safe space as, anyway?

  37. So, separate but equal is a good thing now? I’m really trying to keep up.

  38. The first goal, before all the others, is a demonstration of power. The message is, “Look what we can do.” If you can intimidate people, you can control them.

  39. Chemical warfare response would have been appropriate, homeless style: walk out to the barricade, drop trousers, lay a huge deuce at their feet. Walk off smiling.

    1. This would’ve been an excellent opportunity for supersoakers full of urine and cayenne pepper.

  40. So you have racism against white students —- crickets. One person gets a text message somewhere at some school (usually found out to be a hoax), and it’s a national uproar.

  41. I’d be breaking some non-white noses.

    1. I bet 40-50% were white.

  42. Fucking racist scum.

  43. Don’t forget, we’ll shortly be paying “free” tuition to public universities so the snowflakes can enjoy their indoctrination in SJW tactics at no cost to themselves.

  44. This reminds me of a conversation I had with a guy I met in Zagreb many years ago. He was a Croat returning home to the formerly Serb majority area of Croatia after the war. He made a comment that when your neighbor comes home wearing the uniform of the Serb militia, you have to make a choice. You can do nothing and probably get killed. You can leave, which he did. Or you can go join the Croat militia. It seems to me that a lot of these students are putting on militia uniforms. They shouldn’t be surprised when a lot of whites decide to do the same.

    1. Yeah, those are my thoughts. It’s like going to prison and joining your race’s gang; it’s not because you’re racist, it’s because you’re being attacked based on your race, so you join up with others of the same shade. If you persecute a group of people based on some shared characteristic you’re forcing them to join together and identify as a group, regardless of whether they really have that much in common.

  45. Thankfully the cops were on scene to protect the students of color from all that toxic whiteness.

  46. I Quit my office-job and now I am getting paid 99 USD hourly. How? I work over internet! My old work was making me miserable, so I was forced to try something different, 2 years after…I can say my life is changed-completely!

    Check it out what i do:===> http://www.works76.COM

  47. It sad to see all the sheeple that are willing to walk through the creek.

  48. I can think of a place to designate for these whiners: Prison.

    Also, I cannot imagine that this action doesn’t violate a host of Code of Conduct rules at the University. Any person prevented from walking over the bridge should immediately file numerous complaints with the University. Expressly mention the racial discrimination and violent intimidation. These criminals should be expelled.

  49. So let me get this straight. The Liberal Arts majors were preventing the STEM majors from getting to class?

    1. Via a bridge. Three guesses to who builds bridges…

      To everyone who said “man, fuck these guys, me an my buddies woulda pushed through!”, no. You build another bridge. I know, I know, it’s a lot of work. But eventually, there’s gonna be too many bridges for them to obstruct.

      Of course, then the engineering students would all be in prison for unpermitted building, but thems the breaks.

      1. We’re Americans, we fight tyranny and fascism. We don’t tolerate or ignore it.

  50. My plan? Cross at the creek, slip, fall, hit my head, and then sue the fuck out of Cal.

  51. That’s why a rather large number of these SJW types are going into the one area of the private sector where they will exert the most direct influence and shape corporate policy:

    Human. Resources.

    Ponder that on the Tree of Woe.

    I wouldn’t worry too much. Eventually a manager is going to wonder why no positions ever get filled and why subsequently no work is getting done, and like magic the human resource profession will go the way of the dinosaur.

    1. Soon the only job seekers that get hired will be handicapped, black lesbians with Spanish surnames. I wonder, Could I claim that I’m a handicapped black lesbian trapped in a white male body?

  52. I am puzzled why none of the white student did not collect a few friends and then *force* their way through. Force only respects force.

  53. Racism and bigotry.

    Lots of Asians had to cross the creek.

    How do they know someone isn’t gay?

    They must’ve gotten their way as babies throwing tantrums in stores.

    1. I’d like to know how they felt.

  54. So what’s the problem? I don’t see anything here a flamethrower wouldn’t fix in about 30 seconds.

    That line has me recalling the old school yard game – “Red Rover, Red Rover…”

    Would have been pretty cool if about a dozen 200-pound white guys had just walked through the middle of that gaggle of morons.

  55. Well, “”You are hereby notified by the students of the University of California, Berkeley, to vacate the premises immediately,” the eviction notice stated. “University administration wrongly allocated this two-story facility to a third-party corporation, keeping in line with its intensifying legacy of prioritizing financial profit over student needs.””

    …certainly tells me that Berkeley’s reputation for lack of Critical Thinking and Real World Economics hasn’t changed in the forty or more years since I first drew that conclusion.

    Sad.

  56. Of course they find the most minority and LGBT friendly place in the entire universe to complain about the atmosphere of repression and racism. It is pretty clear that their protest is not about making any sort of actual constructive change, but about the act of protest itself.
    That is probably why they have shifted the focus from acts perpetrated by White people or males or whatever, and instead protest Whiteness or maleness or heterosexuality itself. Because those are not things a person can change, so there is no real danger of people spoiling the protest by unexpectedly giving in to the demands.

  57. Where is Rational Thought’s safe space on campus?

  58. I’ve made $64,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I do,

    ???????? http://YoutubeJobs.Nypost55.com

  59. “Bias Response” admins are…nowhere to be found.

    Think if I had a reason to be there, I’d be carrying my metal briefcase, and lay about with against anyone who laid a hand on.

    Then I’d go home and shower with a bucket of bleach to get the Berkeley off me.

  60. UCB desperately needs administrators with the backbone to expel these snotty little racist asswipes before they have to learn the same painful and expensive lesson that Mizzou did.

    -jcr

  61. So, anybody know where I can hire a half dozen sumotori in the Bay Area?

    -jcr

  62. This is what happens when we give special rights to people. They just might want to look up the term “equal”. As in equal rights.

  63. Ah – Chairman Mao would be pleased!

  64. I’m using it now and it’s awesome! I’ve signed up for my account and have been bringing in fat paychecks. For real, my first week I made $1305 and the second week I doubled it and theen it kind a snowballed to $120 a day! juet follow the course…… they will help you out……………

    visit More This Site———->>> http://www.jobnet70.com

  65. I’m using it now and it’s awesome! I’ve signed up for my account and have been bringing in fat paychecks. For real, my first week I made $1305 and the second week I doubled it and theen it kind a snowballed to $120 a day! juet follow the course…… they will help you out……………

    visit More This Site———->>> http://www.jobnet70.com

  66. This is not only an example of the ignorance of the current generation, but a lack of education and a prime example of History Repeating Itself. $10 says these college students don’t even know who Martin Luther King was, mainly they are doing the exact opposite of everything he stood for and was trying to teach.
    Some would argue that he only represented the African Americans and slavery in his crusade of equality, but that is untrue. As stated in his speech;

    “I still have a dream, a dream deeply rooted in the American dream ? one day this nation will rise up and live up to its creed, “We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men are created equal.”

    1. If Dr. King were alive to see this today, I am certain he would have shamed these students. What they should have protested against was the School Administration, not white people. The students claimed this was a pro-safe space demonstration, and that they wanted safe spaces for trans students, gay students, and students of color. Are they indicating that there are no trans or gay white people? And on top of that, they forcibly prevented fellow students from crossing a bridge? Using violence and threats, is that really the way to get your point across? To push your protest upon the parties and people that had no hand in deciding the fate of your “Safe Space”? To disrupt studies, and force students to risk their safety to traverse a river to get to class? Did these fellow students really deserve this? Did these students actually wrong these protesters in some way? All of them?

      1. Again, to quote Dr. King;
        “But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.

        The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. And they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.
        We cannot walk alone.
        And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.
        We cannot turn back.”

        “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

        1. These students have not only disgraced their “cause”, but have failed to realize that their actions will resolve nothing because they themselves have done a wrong. Their actions have shown that they are not really trying to demonstrate a “Safe Place” for people in need, but their demonstration has shown that they are aggressively looking to segregate and exclude. Hatred begets more hatred. Prejudice is still prejudice. It matters not what your color, religion, culture, or background is. We are all human beings.
          It is 2016, soon to be 2017. It’s not the 1900’s anymore. Its hasn’t even been 50-years since the death of Martin Luther King, and yet the message of his cause and dream has already been forgotten by the modern generation and society. We came so far since 1968, made many great strides forward for social acceptance for any and all people, and yet we only ended up falling down and going back full circle where segregation, prejudice, and hate drive us to turn against our fellow man for self satisfaction and superiority. It seems the ideal of “Equality” is truly only just a “Dream” that no one wants to achieve.

  67. You know, I named my 2 million volt stun gun Reason. I bet those leftie students would listen to Reason.

    1. Snow Crash was a cool book.

  68. it will be a fun year watching all the spoiled brats tell us how bad they have it

    1. Or, you know, ridicule them until they retreat to their safe spaces in mommy’s basement. That seems like a better idea.

      Not that I don’t fantasize about running over people like this. But maybe don’t actually do it.

  69. I’m using it now and it’s awesome! I’ve signed up for my account and have been bringing in fat paychecks. For real, my first week I made $1305 and the second week I doubled it and theen it kind a snowballed to $120 a day! juet follow the course…… they will help you out……………

    visit More This Site———->>> http://www.jobnet70.com

  70. RE: Video: UC-Berkeley Protesters Built a Human Wall to Violently Stop White Students from Crossing Bridge
    Activists demand safe spaces for trans and queer students, eviction of campus bookstore.

    This is what progressives, socialists, etc call toleration.
    One can expect more toleration once Heil Hitlary or Trump the Grump is elected.
    Won’t life be wonderful?

  71. This is LEFTWORLD where idiocy is the norm.

  72. Just throwin’ this out there as an observation.

    In the video, I see a lot of ‘people of color’ making their way through the creek bed on their way towards something perhaps (gasp) productive.

    Notice something else? The difference in size/girth between ‘protesters’ and ‘producers’. The front row of bridge blockers is about 60% clinical obesity.

    Those taking the harrowing 50 meter trek are uniformly fitter.

    Now could be that only these campus dumbf*ks are so clever in their guile, that they put the fatties up front as an impenetrable phalanx against whiteness and common sense. (Chances zero.)

    In fact this video appears to reveal more about individual effort and personal discipline ? than injustice and colors.

  73. Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail,,,,,,,
    ——————>>> http://www.careerstoday100.com

  74. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.

    ===> http://www.works76.com

  75. Sign this petition here to defund U.C. Berkeley.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/
    petition/remove-federal-funding-uc-
    berkley-and-use-it-fix-flints-water-pipes

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.