Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Campus Free Speech

UVA Prof 'Agrees' to Leave of Absence After Criticizing Black Lives Matter

Did the university force him?

Robby Soave | 10.10.2016 11:20 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Queer bubbles / Wikimedia Commons
(Queer bubbles / Wikimedia Commons)
UVA
Queerbubbles / Wikimedia Commons

Did the University of Virginia force an engineering and business professor to take a leave of absence because he made a negative comment about Black Lives Matter? It certainly looks like it.

Last week, Doug Muir wrote on Facebook, "Black lives matter is the biggest racist organization since the clan. Are you kidding me? Disgusting!!!"

I don't agree with this comment—Black Lives Matter is bringing much-needed attention to important issues like police brutality, even if I disagree with some of their more extreme tactics and views about wealth redistribution. Obviously, BLM is not a domestic terrorist organization on par with the Klu Klux Klan.

But if Muir thinks so, that's his right. The proper response is to criticize him, not censor him.

Unfortunately, UVA has seemingly opted for the latter approach. In a statement, university administrators explained that Muir has "agreed to take leave":

While free speech and open discussion are fundamental principles of our nation and the University, Mr. Muir's comment was entirely inappropriate. UVA Engineering does not condone actions that undermine our values, dedication to diversity and educational mission. Our faculty and staff are responsible for upholding our values and demonstrating them to students and the community. Mr. Muir has agreed to take leave and is preparing his own statement to the community.

Well, was Muir given a choice? It sounds like the university made him take a leave of absence as punishment for speaking his mind about BLM.

It's important for a university to play host to a wide range of views about important public policy topics. No one should be punished for saying something politically incorrect about BLM.

I reached out to the university for comment. A spokesperson did not immediately respond.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: More Lives Sabotaged by National Faux-Sex-Trafficking Witch-Hunt

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Campus Free SpeechFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (78)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Monroe Feather, Jr.   10 years ago

    BLM is a racist organization.

    1. colorblindkid   10 years ago

      You're a racist for saying their racist. La Raza literally means "The Race" an is inherently a racial supremacy group, yet we're not allowed to criticize it.

      1. colorblindkid   10 years ago

        "for saying **they're** racist."
        damnit

        1. VictoriaGlover   10 years ago

          Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 6-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $98 per hour. Vist this web and go to Tech tab for more info... http://www.Trends88.Com

      2. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Half Spanish and half Amerindian is not a race.

        1. colorblindkid   10 years ago

          Tell them that. The Spanish were far more brutal towards the Amerindians than Americans eventually were.

          1. Zeb   10 years ago

            Is this so? Again, I'm really wondering and don't have an answer in mind.

            If they were worse, why are there so many more people descended from natives in Latin America than there are in Anglo-North America?

            1. Hyperion   10 years ago

              Because it was too cold in most of North America to have a larger population. All of the big cultural centers back in the 1500s were in Central and South America.

              1. Citizen X   10 years ago

                At the time of the Spanish conquest, central Mexico likely had a population roughly the same size as that of Europe.

                1. Zeb   10 years ago

                  I've heard things about Catholics being more open to inter-marriage with the natives as well. Not sure how much to believe them. But it's an interesting idea. Seems like the French in North America were more likely to "go native" than Protestant Brits as well.

        2. Zeb   10 years ago

          Apparently the origin of "La Raza" is "La Raza Cosmica", which refers to the mix of races that make up Hispanic people. Direct literal translation of "la raza" isn't necessarily appropriate.

          1. colorblindkid   10 years ago

            Cesar Chavez himself was deeply opposed to the organization because of its inherent racial connotations that were a step backwards.

            1. Zeb   10 years ago

              I don't know too much about La Raza. Just commenting on the name. I believe it is often used with more of a connotation of "the people".

              1. DenverJ   10 years ago

                It is an inherently racist organization. One of their slogans is "We didn't cross the border, the border crossed us", and they call for the Reconquesta of large parts of the American southwest. Which is ridiculous, because, as pointed out above, most of the American southwest was so sparsely populated as to be nearly empty, and the people who were here were certainly not the ancestors of any of the Mexican peoples.

                1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

                  WEEEELLLLLL, Not exactly true.

                  Large swatch of Texas AZ and NM were treatied several times back and forth with Spain and Mexico. There is even a story of a family that chose Mexico after the War and so they moved all their crap and farm etc. to the other side of the river (families were given a choice and if it was to switch sides the other side would provide land). 4 years later they were back in the US due to another treaty.

              2. R C Dean   10 years ago

                Even so, how is that not racist?

    2. Dan S.   10 years ago

      Is it actually an organization at all? My impression is that it is simply a slogan that has become popular with certain people and local groups, but that there is no central leadership or structure forming an organized group called Black Lives Matter. Am I right or wrong?

      1. BoTardESQue   10 years ago

        It's kind of like the "Tea Party". Started as de-centralized groups, then the "professional activists" took the name over.

  2. colorblindkid   10 years ago

    Yet it is Trump and conservatives (which Trump is not) we're supposed to be fearing.

  3. Sevens   10 years ago

    Has anyone ever been made to "leave" for excessively accusing non-protected/non-"historically disavantaged" groups of racism/sexism/etc.?

    1. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      It's not uncommon for professors to say genocidal things about 'non-protected' groups and not be sanctioned.

      Remember what Mao said: anything done to a member of an oppressor class is by definition self defense.

  4. Hyperion   10 years ago

    "Black Lives Matter is bringing much-needed attention to important issues like police brutality"

    No, it isn't. It's taking the focus off of police brutality and making it all about race.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      Y'all let Robby's trolling get you every damn time.

    2. colorblindkid   10 years ago

      Yep. The day Keith Lamont Scott was killed, 5 white men were killed by police.

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Didn't the cops initially approach him because they thought they saw him rolling a joint in his car?

        Someone let me know when BLM are out protesting against the drug war. I won't hold my breath.

        1. MarkLastname   10 years ago

          A lot of affirmative action jobs are tied up in the drug war, so don't count on it.

  5. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

    Obviously, BLM is not a domestic terrorist organization on par with the Klu Klux Klan.

    Unless there was more to his comment, he doesn't seem to have made that claim.

    1. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Well caught. He said they were the most racist organization since the Klan, not the biggest domestic terrorist group since the Klan.

      Robby must be mad ripped, what with constantly hauling those goalposts around.

  6. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

    "Black lives matter is the biggest racist organization since the clan. Are you kidding me? Disgusting!!!"

    Which class teaches you STEM nerds about extra exclamation points?

    1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      This is the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics applied to printed outrage.

    2. Lee Genes   10 years ago

      He learned that at Trump University.

      1. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

        Hey don't knock it. His degree has way more exclamation points than yours ever will.

        1. Lee Genes   10 years ago

          It's true. I'm so embarrassed.

          1. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

            Sad!

            1. Lee Genes   10 years ago

              You forgot a couple of exclamation points.

              Loser!!!

  7. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

    Black Lives Matter is bringing much-needed attention to important issues like police brutality,

    Ends do not justify the means.

    Obviously, BLM is not a domestic terrorist organization on par with the Klu Klux Klan.

    Not stipulated.

    Quite the opposite seems obvious to me. BLM is an organization which judges people, their characters and their value as humans based on their race. Their rhetoric is not merely racist; it celebrates and wallows in their racism. Their actions are meant to other and diminish anyone not of the "good" race, and if they have not yet become as violent as a decades-long historical group in their heyday, well, it's a bit much to trust it to their good behavior. They don't appear to have any.

    The difference appears to be merely one of scale, rather than benevolent intent.

    1. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      I entirely agree.

      Or I guess, this being the internet, I should say "^^^THISSS"

    2. BoTardESQue   10 years ago

      Yup.

      How 500,000 Black people in the US are undocumented immigrants and relegated to the shadows.

      From here.

      Notice they don't mention the other 11 million or so "undocumented immigrants"...

  8. american socialist   10 years ago

    I've been instructed by SJWs in the Reason commentariat that to criticize any civil rights organization or rape advocacy agency is wrong so obviously this article is written by a fascist insect. No means no, Mr. Clinton.

    1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      Yes, you're a victim.

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        So now someone who is mentally handicapped is considered a victim?

        1. Zero Sum Game   10 years ago

          A case could be made, Hyperion.

          If you take a useful idiot and train him to accept many things without critically thinking about them and all of those things are both destructive to himself and others, have you not done him harm? When the church controlled much of the (known) world in Europe, taught its adherents to hate themselves and their motivations as sins, and encouraged them in the practice of self-flagellation, who was the most in the wrong: the fools, or those taking advantage of them?

        2. Zeb   10 years ago

          Maybe he was dropped on his head as a baby.

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Hey, AmSoc, did you hear that there's a socialist paradise down in South America? It's called Venezuela. Why aren't you there yet supporting your comrades?

      1. american socialist   10 years ago

        Why would I move from one disfunctional state to another disfunctional state? If I'm going to move anywhere, I'd go to where things actually work-- like in Denmark.

        1. Citizen X   10 years ago

          You're a fan of low corporate income taxes, huh? That's surprising.

          1. Citizen X   10 years ago

            Although it's not surprising at all that you'd be into Janteloven. Heaven forbid anybody should do better than anybody else at anything.

        2. pan fried wylie   10 years ago

          my insulin is made in Denmark. please, stay the fuck out of Denmark.

    3. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      Um, is there a point in there somewhere?

      1. DenverJ   10 years ago

        On top of his head.

        1. Citizen X   10 years ago

          Yes, but it's inverted.Birds try to bathe on him when it rains.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    But does the author agree with the comment the professor made?

  10. DJF   10 years ago

    While he has time off the Professor can find out who were the terrorists who attacked the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity during the University of Virginia fake rape story. As far as I have seen none of the attackers have been charged

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      I think this tenured professorship thing is the way to go. Cops have to actually kill someone to get a paid vacation like that, and all this guy had to do was tweet something. What a gig.

  11. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   10 years ago

    What's #BLM's beef with the comment... that they're actually bigger than the Klan?

    1. waffles   10 years ago

      Perhaps it's a John Lennon moment and BLM just has that much reverence for the KKK.

    2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      He said *CLAN*

      As in "Wu Tang"

  12. joe.m   10 years ago

    He was an adjunct with a successful career outside UVa, so this is mostly a loss to the university. And his adjunct status does not in any case make the university's actions less deplorable, and Reason is right to shame UVa in response. But let this be a teachable moment for all those hardcore libertarians who are against tenure in universities. A tenured professor making a similar remark (or perhaps a more civilized argument against the prevailing orthodoxy) might be publicly ostracized or lose some endowed junket, but they would never lose their academic position. Remember Larry Summers? If we want people in academia to be able to speak their mind, we *must* have tenure. The conversation is not too exciting even as it stands, but this incident tells us how many dissenting voices would be allowed to remain without that protection.

    1. Zeb   10 years ago

      Do a lot of libertarians oppose tenure for professors?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Having seen the tenure process up close, I certainly do. Private institutions may, of course, do as they please.

  13. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.

    I do not agree with this comment

    1. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      Nietzsche say that?

  14. Free Society   10 years ago

    ?Black Lives Matter is bringing much-needed attention to important issues like police brutality white people being racist meanies,

  15. waffles   10 years ago

    SAD!

  16. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    No one should be punished for saying something politically incorrect about BLM.

    ""Donald Trump has rendered "political correctness" a meaningless term for describing anything""

    Make up your mind, dude.

  17. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Does Black Lives Matter (not to be confused with the Bureau of Land Management) have a tactician to rival the wizardry of Nathan Bedford Forrest?

    I think not.

    1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      (whips out racist-calculator, plugs in "Wizard".... gets "probably racist"..... plugs in "Nathan Bedford..." and it explodes)

  18. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    While free speech and open discussion are fundamental principles of our nation and the University, Mr. Muir's comment was entirely inappropriate.

    "Freedom be damned."

  19. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Having seen the tenure process up close

    Thankfully, you refrain from fully exposing those depravities in your fanciful vignettes.

  20. IceTrey   10 years ago

    The professor didn't say BLM were terrorists. Strange turn there.

  21. The Fusionist   10 years ago

    "Black Lives Matter is bringing much-needed attention to important issues like police brutality, even if I disagree with some of their more extreme tactics and views about wealth redistribution."

    And the Ku Klux Klan brought much-needed attention to the separation of Church and State.

  22. DenverJ   10 years ago

    Terrorists are, like, all explody and junk. BLM are more like Brown Shirts.

  23. Smells Like Reason   10 years ago

    What does "take leave" mean, as opposed "take a leave of absence"?

  24. jonnysage   10 years ago

    While free speech is fundamental to our freedom, we just allow it. Sorry.

    1. jonnysage   10 years ago

      Can't grrrrrr

  25. Lawman45   10 years ago

    Obviously this engineering professor is not Glenn Reynolds (UTenn law prof who would not yield).

  26. denatureindonesia   10 years ago

    Nice Post

  27. lukashik   9 years ago

    While coming to education, the technology has brought many advantages to students and as well as teachers. showbox For example, students can do their homework or assignment with ease and can complete it faster by using the Internet.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks