Lionel Shriver Praises Cultural Appropriation, Attacks 'Super-Sensitivity'—While Wearing a Sombrero
We Need to Talk About Kevin author hopes current trend of political correctness is a 'passing fad'


Lionel Shriver—author of We Need to Talk About Kevin—hailed cultural appropriation as an important and necessary tool for fiction writers during a speech at the Brisbane Writers Festival last week. She even did so while wearing a sombrero—an ode to the Bowdoin College incident.
"The moral of the sombrero scandals is clear: you're not supposed to try on other people's hats," she said, according to The Guardian. "Yet that's what we're paid to do, isn't it? Step into other people's shoes, and try on their hats."
Shriver points out that if no one were allowed to borrow from other cultural traditions, she would be obligated to set every single one of her novels in North Carolina—and all of her characters would have to be based upon her own experiences.
The result would be narrow-minded and dreadfully boring, Shriver noted:
I am hopeful that the concept of "cultural appropriation" is a passing fad: people with different backgrounds rubbing up against each other and exchanging ideas and practices is self-evidently one of the most productive, fascinating aspects of modern urban life.
But this latest and little absurd no-no is part of a larger climate of super-sensitivity, giving rise to proliferating prohibitions supposedly in the interest of social justice that constrain fiction writers and prospectively makes our work impossible.
Read her full remarks here.
It's great to see such a prolific and well-respected author defending the process of writing from the purveyors of political correctness. Shaming writers who borrow from other cultural traditions is in no one's best interests: this kind of thought-policing would actually lead to less diversity, as Sonny Bunch points out.
I hope Shriver is invited to give this talk at an American university campus. This is a message that students need to hear—though they are likely to organize a dis-invitation campaign against her, I suppose.
Read more about Shriver, who describes herself as not unfriendly to libertarianism, here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Shriver is a good German name.
No German should ever corrupt culture with the filthy with the habits of the beasts of Jewry. Cultural appropriation? It is not possible because they do not have culture!
I'm digging Neo-Hitler.
Danger 5 gonna kick your ass!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z09bNgSeMI
Her recent "The Mandibles," on a dystopian future caused by debt and Fed debasement, is excellent.
As a rule I don't read books written by females, but she does call herself Lionel and looks like she might be able to kick my ass, so maybe I'll give it a go. Any comparable books/authors you could list.
Don't read books written by females? Why on earth? Why miss the books of Lois McMaster Bujold? Or Elizabeth Moon? Or Wen Spencer? I can understand not reading books by the terminally politically correct. That often (though not inevitably) spoils their ability to tell a story. But to just skip the books written by half the human race?
*shudder*
There are more books written than I could possibly read, and even though one particular female written book may be better than most male written books the chance of me selecting that book is negligible, thus I spend my book reading time on the time proven better male authored books. Its simple probability really, like splitting 10's or doubling down against a dealers'4.
Someone wrote a book about me?
No, the book is about the other Kevin.
(brain explodes)
Just look at how Japan appropriates America, it's sick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Wc7Ms0aYY
You guys remember Yuigioh right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Qe4AZRkFYE
Pfft.
You call that dumb Japanese depictions of America? Mad Bull 34 is undefeated.
What about sexual appropriation?
not unfriendly to libertarianism
As opposed to ... what? "Fuck freedom"?
Did you guys know that Rastafari culturally appropriated dreadlocks and marijuana from Hinduism by way of Shiva devotees in the West Indies?
Well, it's true!
http://tinyurl.com/gmmf8ny
http://tinyurl.com/z8lzkk2
"Ganja" is a Sanskrit word.
I don't think there's a single aspect of Rastafarianism that is not culturely appropriated.
Also, Tejano music culturally appropriated polka rhythms and instrumentation from Czech and German immigrants.
Jesus, is that why it all sounds the same?
Tuba and accordion!
They love them some polka music.
And jazz was played by black artists on instruments invented by white people and recorded on technology created by white people, then sent out into the world by record labels owned by Jews.
But it's the devil's music anyway.
You should never judge a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
Ban wearing other people's shoes as cultural appropriation and you've just gotten out of ever being judged.
I think that's really what they're after.
Reminds me of the "It's a black thing, you wouldn't understand" T-shirts I've seen. If I can't understand then there's no point in me listening to your dumb ass I guess is what you're saying?
The Progressive Left does have a way of saying "I am above your judgement, peasant". The funny thing is, they love to point out how the dominant Culture of the late Victorian era did the same thing, and how wrong they were.
I feel culturally appropriated everyday.
No one cares about you Guinea bastards.
And at least you have a culture people recognize, I'm mostly Dutch, all I've got is windmills, being cheap, stealing land from natives and hating the Spanish.
WOODEN SHOES!
The Dutch did all that?
And here us English, German, hokey-ass, white bread, crackers have been taking the rap for it all this time?!
"There are two things I cannot abide. Those who are intolerant of other people's cultures, and the Dutch.
Uh, as a Canadian, it's you doing the appropriating, sir.
You people are aggressive tonight.