Friday A/V Club: Bureaucratic Comedy
In Memoriam: Antony Jay, co-creator of Yes, Minister


The real divide in politics pits the people who think government looks like The West Wing against the people who think it looks like Yes, Minister. The soaring principles of The West Wing did sometimes turn up in Yes, Minister (and its sequel, Yes, Prime Minister), but by the end of each half-hour they had usually been buried in a committee or snuffed out in a seedy bargain. The result may not have been an inspiring vision of good government, but it was one of the wittiest TV shows of the 1980s; this week, sadly, saw the death of Antony Jay, the British broadcaster who co-created and co-wrote it.
Jay was a man of the right; his writing partner, Jonathan Lynn, hailed from the left. They nonetheless worked well together, perhaps because the specific policies that popped up on their two shows barely mattered. Yes, Minister and Yes, Prime Minister aired their share of topical jokes, and sometimes they expressed explicit political preferences (usually but not always libertarian-leaning). But the heart of both programs wasn't any particular policy agenda. It was the underlying mechanics of government: the ways a bureaucracy perpetuates itself and the places a reform can go to die.
The setup was simple: A somewhat well-meaning but basically spineless politician takes command of the Department of Administrative Affairs, and the department does everything it can to keep him from changing anything. (Yes, Prime Minister kept the basic formula in place, but now he had the entire British government to deal with.) Early in the first show's run, the viewer is primed to sympathize with the minister and to cheer his occasional reformist victories, but with time he comes to represent a different sort of social malady—a man willing to do virtually anything for votes and publicity, just as the bureaucrats he locks horns with are willing to do virtually anything to maintain the status quo. The two shows' 38 episodes, which ran from 1980 to 1988, sometimes feel like a public-choice textbook in sitcom form, with characters happy to spell out the venal rationales for everything they do.
That may sound didactic, and I suppose it was; with another cast the shows might not have worked at all. (A recent attempt to revive the franchise with new actors was a bust.) Fortunately, Jay and Lynn had a terrific cast, particularly Paul Eddington as the bumbling minister and Nigel Hawthorne as his Machiavellian sparring partner from the civil service. Hawthorne could make the most didactic dialogue into something musical, and Eddington's facial expressions alone could be as funny as the shows' sharpest lines. The two actors had perfect chemistry, even if their characters didn't.
Below you'll find "The Challenge," a Yes, Minister episode that originally aired in November 1982. It's solid throughout, but I picked it because it includes one of my favorite scenes in the series, in which Hawthorne explains to Eddington the real reason Britain has nuclear weapons. You should watch the whole thing, but if you just want to see that exchange, it runs from the 11:35 mark to about 12:30. It's not just a funny moment in itself, but a setup for the funniest moment of all, which comes shortly after 15:30:
(For past installments of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't know what it is about the British but they seem to be able to parody politics better than any culture on the planet. If I try to connect that to the British body politic, I sometimes find myself asking, "Are they aware of what they're creating, or are these shows a representation of the voices that are against it?"
It's my understanding that Veep is an adaptation of a British show, which again would make sense. Veep of course being the much more realistic portrayal of American politics than West Wing.
If anything, Veep is far less outlandish than actual American politics right now.
And with better looking people!
"Hey, good lookin', whatcha got cookin'?... Dickwad pie?"
My absolute favourite line has still gotta be "Hey slick, what's blondie's situation? Does she choke for coke?"
God there are some great lines in that show.
Jay and Lynn had the advantage of having an informant inside the UK government who fed them information that they used to write episodes. The episode where there's a hospital with staff but no patients was fed to them by the informant ? there were 6 (IIRC) hospitals in the NHS like that.
The informant may have been a pre-PM Margaret Thatcher ? she is known to have sent them a letter with a story on the UK government inadequately supplying soldiers in Northern Ireland.
It seems clear that Veep has an informant inside the Obama administration. Deep inside.
On the Yes Minister DVD they claimed they had several. Supposedly, get a civil servant or a politician in front of a hearty lunch (with some wine) and they will tell you all kinds of stuff.
I need that.
Please, I have it on good authority that the White House is full of witty people constantly walking and talking while solving the world's problems.
I recall an interview with the creator (director?) of In The Loop (which I can't recommend enough for Libertarians-- it's also a bit useful as a kind of Cliff's notes to British politics) in which he shows the film to one of the people supposedly portrayed in the film. If I recall the politician's biggest complaint, "We don't use that much foul language". My takeaway was yeah, everything else? Spot on.
I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you into an assisted suicide.
"I'm not going to read you the riot act, but I will read some extracts from the riot act..."
SHUT IT, LOVE ACTUALLY!
In the Loop, Veep, and The Thick of It are all the work of Armando Iannucci.
James Hacker: Bernard. Humphrey should have seen this coming and warned me.
Bernard Woolley: I don't think Sir Humphrey understands economics, Prime Minister. He did read classics, you know?
James Hacker: How about Sir Frank? He is head of the Treasury.
Bernard Woolley: Well, I'm afraid he's in even greater disadvantage in understanding economics. He's an economist.
$89 an hour! Seriously I don't know why more people haven't tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening?And i get surly a chek of $1260......0 whats awesome is Im working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Here is what i did
?????? http://YoutubeJobs.Nypost55.com
Thank you for a lovely tribute to the creator of my favorite TV show, Jesse.
Yes, and well deserved. I'm a little miffed that Jay's passing seems to have gone unnoticed by a lot of pop culture sites.
I guess I have to check this show out.
I know it's on Amazon Prime. It used to be included with the sub, but apparently not anymore.
One of my favorite scenes is the explanation of Politicians' Logic.
There's also an episode about push-polling (I don't think they called it that back then) that's very good.
I came here to mention Politicians' Logic.
Antony Jay's output is mostly limited to TV; the co-creator of Yes Minister, Jonathan Lynn, would go on to direct Nuns on the Run and My Cousin Vinny.
Best show ever.