Texas Students Arm Themselves With Dildos to Protest Guns on Campus
Make love, not liberty? Students urge the state to protect "cocks not glocks" on campus.


Students at the University of Texas-Austin plan to protest the permission of guns on campus by loading their backpacks with large dildos. The "Cocks Not Glocks: Campus (DILDO) Carry," scheduled for August 24, was organized in opposition to a 2015 state law saying gun-owners over 21-years-old with concealed-carry permits need not ditch their arms when they step into a campus building. It took effect August 1, 2016.
"The State of Texas has decided that it is not at all obnoxious to allow deadly concealed weapons in classrooms," states the Cocks Not Glocks website. But "it does have strict rules about free sexual expression, to protect your innocence. You would receive a citation for taking a dildo to class before you would get in trouble for taking a gun to class."
The group is referring to a Texas obscenity statute that says "no person or organization will distribute or display on the campus any writing or visual image, or engage in any public performance, that is obscene." And, indeed, Texas law specifies that obscene devives include "a dildo or artificial vagina." It's not clear, however, that any student has ever actually been arrested for carrying a dildo; Google turns up no such tale.
In any event, banning dildos on campus is silly. But so is preventing people from exercising other legally-protected freedoms—like carrying a gun—just because they're near some hallowed halls of learning. Whither the calls for cocks and glocks?
For their part, pro-open carry students are planning a counter-protest to next week's Cocks Not Glocks event. A Facebook invite for the counter-protest asks "liberty-minded students" to "bring pro-2A clothing, flags, signs, etc."
On August 4, Students for Concealed Carry sent a letter to the Texas attorney general asking for relief from the University of Texas (UT) Austin and UT-San Antonio's decision to allow individual professors to institute no-gun policies for their own offices.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Compromise proposal: fleshlight with a pistol grip.
Threadwinner.
"Thing that goes up not included"
Yeah, why one or the other? This could be a beautiful moment where a divide is bridged.
Ha ha, you're such a kidder.
It's depressing, really. Obviously cocks AND Glocks should be just fine, if used peacefully.
As an aside, it's interesting they chose the patriarchy's most evil and ancient weaponry to make their flaccid point.
Popehat skewered this perfectly.
Classic!
holy crap that whole thread is priceless
One way or another someone is going to get triggered.
I think you mean friggered.
These kids ARE dildos.
The Rape Culture on Campus Marches On!!!!!!!!
I would be curious to know whether or not the university has issued any opinions or trigger warnings regarding the two open carry policies. If the 2A people were smart (or at least smart asses) they'd be flooding the Dean of Safe Spaces with complaints of being trerrorized by seeing dildos around campus.
"Gun Nuts DESTROYED by Dildo's, Forced to Seek Help From Government"
Uh, disregard that apostrophe.
Freedom for me, but not for thee. Freedom is a zero-sum game; it is known.
And if you are not allowed to exercise your preferred right, no-one should be allowed to exercise any rights.
You know what else is a thing that goes up?
The blood pressure of sane people everywhere?
The minimum wage?
Cheech & Chong (collectively)?
Money supply?
Periscope?
Hitler?
Life expectancy?
This is the most unintentionally funny, and non-sequitur of a protest I think I've ever seen. Ever.
Didn't they make a movie about this called PCu?
"GO AWAY! WE DO NOT WANT YOUR PENIS!"
...
"Wait a minute, if I am nice to them they bring me stuff?"
For their part, pro-open carry students are planning a counter-protest to next week's Cocks Not Glocks event. A Facebook invite for the counter-protest asks "liberty-minded students" to "bring pro-2A clothing, flags, signs, etc."
Why not a "Glocks & Cocks" counter protest.
Perhaps they could even bring in the Mulsim kid and have a "Glocks, Cocks and Clocks" protest.
Why not a "Glocks & Cocks" counter protest.
"Don't be a cock, carry a Glock!"
A "why not both?" counter protest would get zero coverage. Too much liberty to process.
And the logo could be a crossed dildo and AK-47?
no-gun policies for their own offices.
And a no-dildo policy for their own orifices?
Nice
Just to make it weirder, the President of Texas A&M has told faculty they will be fired if they don't allow students packing guns into their offices. Coverage available at the Chronicle of Higher Ed, incidentally, for those who need data. I think liberal's hysterical fear is silly, but I think the counter-counter reaction is kinda silly too.
Is their office on State property? End of discussion.
why have a policy if there's no enforcement?
You think exercising one's rights is silly?
"counter-counter reaction" would be three levels of countering the initial action.
When a guy starts shooting from the tower, throw your dildo at him.
That would be a sexual assault. In Germany they would charge you with sexually assaulting the dead.
Most don't know that Chapman killed almost all of his targets in the first 20 minutes. After that, so many people were shooting back at him that he lost all accuracy because he could take aim over the wall.
*couldn't
You mean Whitman?
Muslim refugees approve of this message.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/857.....l-assaults
Seems like Corsica is the only place in Europe that still knows how to form a proper mob of angry villagers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrkCk_eIP-s
Transylvania isn't in the angry-mob business any more?
I would like to see them fighting off an attacker armed with dildos, though.
"For their part, pro-open carry students are planning a counter-protest to next week's Cocks Not Glocks event. A Facebook invite for the counter-protest asks "liberty-minded students" to "bring pro-2A clothing, flags, signs, etc.""
Why? Seems like an event called "Cocks Not Glocks" works as it's own counter-protest.
Not that I mind, but I do wonder why someone would want to carry a dildo around.
They sure should be able to have them on campus.
Unlike you, most people don't have the resources to buy self-propelled hovering dildoes, nor to retain the services of oiled Nubian Adonises as full time dildo-bearers.
I blame Obamacare. That's quite an oversight.
I'll go adjust my privilege score.
"The State of Texas has decided that it is not at all obnoxious to allow deadly concealed weapons in classrooms," states the Cocks Not Glocks website. But "it does have strict rules about free sexual expression, to protect your innocence. You would receive a citation for taking a dildo to class before you would get in trouble for taking a gun to class."
What do you expect in a country where it is easier for a kid to get their hands on a Glock than on a book?
I get my Glocks out of the Vending Machine.
I just love that their response to a restriction on expression is not to demand the restriction be removed, but that a different, unrelated restriction be implemented on something they don't like.
The best sense I can make of that is that they believe that people who like guns must necessarily be social conservatives who want obscenity banned.
They need to come check out H&R.
2 sides. Must be
It is a double sided issue, yes.
Well for that, we need ________!
This is my rifle, this is my gun.
The State of Texas has decided that it is not at all obnoxious to allow deadly concealed weapons in classrooms
Should be: "The State of Texas correctly decided . . . "
But "it does have strict rules about free sexual expression, to protect your innocence. You would receive a citation for taking a dildo to class before you would get in trouble for taking a gun to class."
If you keep your dildo concealed (as you must keep your gun concealed), I don't see how they can give you a citation for taking a dildo to class. Now, if you wave it around and hoot like a monkey, yeah, you'll probably get in trouble.
One of these things is an enumerated right of the individual in the Constitution...
SLD, I don't care whether you carry one and or both, so long as you do so in responsible manner.
If you wave anything and yell things in class you'll get in trouble. I'd hope.
This is a protest. Of course that's what they will do.
Prediction: nobody will get in (much) trouble.
If I were a prof, I'd get the biggest, skankiest, knobbiest, most absurdly colored dildo I could.
Oh, and if anyone pulled a Cocks not Glocks protest in my classroom, I'd whip it (the dildo, that is) out and say in my best Paul Hogan impersonation "That's not a dildo. THIS! is a dildo."
What class are you teaching? Sign me up.
Advanced Lawn Eviction: Cane-Shaking Techniques From Around the World
Oh, you're supposed to use a cane? I thought you were supposed to use an M1 Garand.
That's the graduate seminar "Modalities of Lawn Eviction Apparatus: An Integrative Approach"
Something like this then.
Will not click.
But will bang.
I would make every kid in class have one of those suction cup dildos stuck to their desk, pointed generally towards their faces.
"One of those". As if you don't own several. You're not fooling anybody.
Yes, "one of those", I'm not giving up any of mine for this thought experiment.
Oh, and if anyone pulled a Cocks not Glocks protest in my classroom, I'd whip it (the dildo, that is) out and say in my best Paul Hogan impersonation "That's not a dildo. THIS! is a dildo."
Reference that would not be understood by a single student in the class.
Yeah, if a gun is concealed properly then no one knows it's there. So it really can't be obnoxious.
In other words; please take your dildo and cram it where the sun shineth not.
We already know you're a dildo!
"The State of Texas has decided that it is not at all obnoxious to allow deadly concealed weapons in classrooms," states the Cocks Not Glocks website. But "it does have strict rules about free sexual expression, to protect your innocence. You would receive a citation for taking a dildo to class before you would get in trouble for taking a gun to class."
I suspect if you displayed that gun openly, you'd get into a lot more trouble that Cocks Not Glocks would get into for displaying dildoes.
With tuition costs where they are, they should be holding an "not in hock" protest. Or, better yet, get to fucking class, do your goddamn schoolwork and graduate, dipshits.
In any event, banning dildos on campus is silly.
Good thing Texas doesn't ban dildos on campus, then.
They'd have to start paying those loans back then.
Can't do that yet.
But this is their schoolwork. The real schoolwork anyway.
Oh, how precious.
Yet many of those students are probably supportive of affirmative consent laws and Title IX Inquisitions for anyone accused of sexual assault. So not very protective of cocks on campus either. Fuck them all to death.
Y'all kin f*ck 'em. In the first place, I 've scant desire to get accused of rape. In the second, I'm picky about where I put that.
Well, I wish them all the luck in overturning the ridiculous obscenity law.
Not sure how they figure it has anything to do with guns. The best I can come up with is that they think that all gun owners are social conservatives who would be upset by the public display of dildos.
Well, let's look at the bright side: we've finally found something that "progressives" feel the government can't do! Concealed carry permits are issued by the government, after the applicant has been vetted by the government. You'd think that would be all the assurance that a good proggie would need!
These kids today, so hip and transgressive.
A GUN IS JUST A SUBSTITUTE FOR A PENIS! GET IT? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Is that why my wife insists on carrying mine in her purse?
Careful if the purse has a zipper..
It's amazing how unhinged these leftists get. Whenever gun rights are expanded, crime goes down despite their predictions of a "shootout at the O.K. Corral"
Just remember that each dildo must come with a trigger warning.
Too bad triggers don't come with dildo warnings.
The evolution of liberty:
"Give me liberty, or give me death!" 1775-Patrick Henry
"Four score and seven years ago...." 1863-Abraham Lincoln
"We will never surrender!"-1940-Winston Churchill
"Cocks AND Glocks!"-2016 H&R commentariat
The evolution of threats to liberty:
The British Empire 1775
State-endorsed slavery 1863
National Socialism 1940
Bunch of college kids with dildos 2016
Don't get me wrong, I am totally FOR Cocks and Glocks!
It just seems that somewhere along the way, we lost a certain eloquence in our defense of liberty.
Does make for a good bumper sticker though! 🙂
It is unclear how they feel about H & K, Taurus, Springfield, or are weapons that don't rhyme with anything right out?
S & M not H & K
Tart puss not Taurus
High Yield not Springfield
Pussy power not Sig Sauer
Roger not Ruger
(all of these are half-ass at best)
Lessons, not Smith & Wessons.
Boogers not Rugers.
Xthese "protesters" can go fuck themselves. Does that make everyone nappy or what?!?!?!?!!!
Maybe someone will bring an assault dildo to school!
Or a dildo with detachable magazine, a collapsable stock, a pistol grip, a bayonet mount, a barrel shroud, and accessories mount?
Oh, a dildo bayonet on AD-15 would be funny!
"Our rights are being infringed, so we want yours to keep being infringed!" is ... well, it's not effective.
Fight for liberty if you want liberty.
Fighting against someone else's won't help increase yours.
You'd think the sort of people who push "intersectionality" would understand this, but ... well, the "wrong" rights aren't "rights" at all, natch.
but they don't believe in liberty. They believe in things they like being legal (or forced!) and things they dislike being illegal.