Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Olympics

Brazilians Are Allowed to Protest Their Mess of a Government at the Olympics, Judge Rules

Spectators can now freely express their opposition to interim president Michel Temer at the Rio Games.

Anthony Fisher | 8.10.2016 2:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Luis Moreira/Facebook
(Luis Moreira/Facebook)
Free speech scares Olympians
Luis Moreira/Facebook

Brazilians are mad as hell with their government and they'll now be able to express that anger while attending the Rio Olympic Games, following a judge's ruling that only racist or xenophobic speech could be prohibited at the games.

Since the start of the games late last week, spectators bearing signs or shirts protesting Brazil's interim President Michel Temer — frequently using the phrase "Fora Temer," which translates to "Temer Out" — had been finding themselves ejected from arenas for expressing themselves politically.

Last Friday's opening ceremonies notably broke with established protocol by skipping an introduction of the host country's head of state, and when Temer addressed the audience near the end of the ceremony, he was lustily booed by the capacity crowd.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) had argued that "no kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas," the BBC reports. In addition, the Los Angeles Times notes that the official Rio 2016 organizers released a statement offering this half-hearted conciliatory nod to free expression: "Brazil is a democracy and outside of the venues there is no restriction."

Alexandre de Moraes, Brazil's justice minister, was quoted by NPR as saying "Freedom of speech is enshrined in the constitution, but these kinds of political protests cannot disturb the games." de Moraes added that the safety of the athletes was at stake, saying "These events require extreme concentration and to have someone shouting is putting the games at risk."

Free speech, Olympics had bad fit today. These guys+man reported saying "Fora Temer" ejected https://t.co/XZUvFpGnbR pic.twitter.com/lzjd8kvIFR

— Catherine Osborn (@cculbertosborn) August 7, 2016

Judge Joao Augusto Carneiro Araujo wasn't having those arguments, and ruled that spectators still have a right to free expression at sporting events.

Temer has been president since May, when Dilma Rousseff was suspended from office pending an impeachment trial. Given the corruption and abuse which brought the Olympics to Rio, it's hardly surprising that the games themselves are not exactly popular with Brazilians, as demonstrated by Olympic officials giving away hundreds of thousands of seats as both a means of buying good public relations by treating poor kids to the spectacle, as well as keeping seats filled so it looks better on television.

Below you can watch a clip of protesters having their homemade "Fora Temer" signs removed by authorities (which included police, military, and civilian volunteers) even all the way up in the nosebleed seats of a soccer match — a vantage point which makes a mockery of authorities' stated concern that protests would be a dangerous distraction to the athletes.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Judge Critical of Sex-Offender Registry Confirmed to Massachusetts High Court

Anthony Fisher
OlympicsBrazilFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (71)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Brochettaward   9 years ago

    Most of these protesters will be going with the line that their government is awful, and the solution is more government. Brazil's Libertarian Moment.

    1. Hyperion   9 years ago

      Actually, Brazilian libertarians are American style libertarians. There's just fewer of them than there are of us and even more socialists. Meaning they're even more irrelevant than we are.

      1. Zunalter   9 years ago

        On the bright side, they can be even more smug about their political positions than we can.

        1. mad.casual   9 years ago

          So two monocles and *all* Bolivian ass-sex?

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

            Two monocles are called 'spectacles'!

            1. mad.casual   9 years ago

              Quite.

              I say, did I forgot to mention the gallons of orphans?

            2. Hyperion   9 years ago

              No one needs two monocles.

    2. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   9 years ago

      Of course. It's in their genes.

    3. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

      Everything else is illegal at gunpoint. There are 32 looter parties you are forced as gunpoint to subsidize and vote for, and gang of senile judges makes good and sure nothing pro-freedom or pro-choice appears in public for longer than it takes to club it down.

  2. BearOdinson   9 years ago

    Once again, when government runs things, they set the rules.

    Inside a privately owned venue, the owners (or managers acting for the owners) have every right to not allow any political expression. But, since the Olympics is paid for with tax dollars, you get this.

    In a publicly owned venue, the constitution of their country should protect free speech. But in the end, the IOC rules uber alles!

    Oh, and a man with only a plastic helmet and a wooden bat, gets a hardball thrown at him at close to 100 mph from less than 70 feet away. And he has to concentrate with 40000 people cheering, or booing at him. But an Olympic sprinter who merely has to run in a straight line for 100m must have absolute silence to concentrate.

    1. $park? is totally a Swifty   9 years ago

      And fuck golfers too. Any "sport" that requires silence to play isn't a sport.

      1. R C Dean   9 years ago

        Technically, golf is a game, not a sport. If you use a servant, you are playing a game.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          No, no, no. My definition of sport is the correct one.

          The only real sports are bobsledding, speed walking and tennis. Everything else is just a masturbation euphemism.

      2. Gene   9 years ago

        It is the most libertarian game going.

        All you team fanbois are teh lamest.

        *cept for the Blue Jays, they rock*

      3. Zeb   9 years ago

        Who said it was a sport? It's an athletic competition.

        The only real sports are the ones that involve killing things.

      4. Paloma   9 years ago

        What I find amusing is the announcers on television talk in whispers.

    2. Zeb   9 years ago

      I wish people would shut the fuck up at baseball games too. No one gives a shit how loud you can yell.

    3. Zeb   9 years ago

      Do they make people quiet down for the track and field stuff? I thought it was mostly just tennis and swimming.

      1. Paloma   9 years ago

        And when a player is trying to make a freethrow in basketball, the fans are not only yelling but trying to distract with wavy thingys.

    4. Paloma   9 years ago

      Plus the catcher yelling at him too!

  3. Pay up, Palin's Buttplug!   9 years ago

    TURMP WUD GET US OUT OF THE OLIMPIX AND MAKE THE MESSICANZ PAY FER IT! TURMP!TURMP!TURMP!

    What's with all these pro-Trump sentiments in the promoted comments?

  4. Krapulent Kristen   9 years ago

    OT: Balkooooooooo!

    Money quote:

    But your constitutional rights aren't determined by the behavior of people who look like you, or by the behavior of the people who live in your neighborhood.

    1. Hyperion   9 years ago

      or by the behavior of the people who live in your neighborhood

      Unfortunately, Balko is so wrong on that count. My Constitutional rights (I'm gonna pretend like that's still a thing) are absolutely being determined by the progtards in my neighborhood voting for commie democrats.

      1. Krapulent Kristen   9 years ago

        If you read the article, he's saying your constitutional rights don't end because you live in a high-crime area.

        1. Hyperion   9 years ago

          Not until the cops arrive and shoot me for filming them, anyway.

          1. Krapulent Kristen   9 years ago

            OMG, that's the point of almost the entire article. That BPD institutionalized the notion that the Constitution doesn't apply in certain neighborhoods.

            1. Hyperion   9 years ago

              Wait, I thought the point of all articles is that Trump is Hitler?

        2. R C Dean   9 years ago

          he's saying your constitutional rights don't end because you live in a high-crime area

          He's right about that. Your Constitutional rights ended some time ago, because you live in the US.

          1. Hyperion   9 years ago

            ^this^

    2. Dennis, Constitutional Peasant   9 years ago

      I just finished re-watching "The Wire" over the past few weeks.

      I really think it needs to be required-viewing for people to at least get a grasp of "how bureaucratic institutions affect everyone's lives". like, high-school civics or something.

      I suspect many would *still* get the wrong ideas from it, thinking that the moral of the story is that better TOP MEN are needed to make the machinery function the way it was intended. But it would at least provide a starting point for people grasping the concepts of 'incentives' and 'conflict of interest' and 'the bureaucratic priority to protect the system above all, to the point of undermining their own mandate'...etc.

      ... at least people would get a glimpse of "how shit really works".

      1. Dennis, Constitutional Peasant   9 years ago

        to wit -

        1. Brochettaward   9 years ago

          But if we got rid of those things, there would be nothing for the smug white progressive ruling class to preen about.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

        I suspect many would *still* get the wrong ideas from it

        Well, the guy who wrote it blamed everything on capitalism in an interview. So there's that.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          It's amazing how he managed to make a show that pretty much demonstrates the exact opposite of what he believes.

          He apparently thought that Marlo was the representation of capitalism in the story. I would have thought that was Bubbles, the hard working entrepreneur constantly shit on by the system.

      3. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   9 years ago

        The creator didn't even get the right ideas from it. But I agree, required viewing.

      4. Agammamon   9 years ago

        You want it to be one way . . . but its the other way.

      5. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

        From watching teevee? Doesn't that shit scramble your chromosomes and cause brain damage leading to suicide by defenestration?

        1. Migrant Log Chipper   9 years ago

          Only in your case, Henry.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

      "Our review of incident reports and interviews with officers and community members found that officers regularly approach individuals standing or walking on City sidewalks to detain and question them and check for outstanding warrants, despite lacking reasonable suspicion to do so.

      Didn't New York have the same policy?

    4. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

      "BPD violates the First Amendment by retaliating against individuals engaged in constitutionally protected activities. Officers frequently detain and arrest members of the public for engaging in speech the officers perceive to be critical or disrespectful.

      Doesn't this describe nearly every police department everywhere?

  5. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

    I've dropped the last three bananas I've had in my hand.

    1. Dennis, Constitutional Peasant   9 years ago

      I think that's far too literal and graphic to qualify as a euphemism.

    2. IndyEleven   9 years ago

      Euphemism?

    3. Hugh Akston   9 years ago

      "Why would a banana grab another banana? Those are the kinds of questions I don't want to answer."

      1. SugarFree   9 years ago

        + International animation rights

        1. Chipper Morning Wood   9 years ago

          You are gonna have to explain that one.

          1. SugarFree   9 years ago

            It's a video.

          2. Sir Digby Chicken Caesar   9 years ago

            CMW, Mr. Banana Grabber. Mr. Banana Grabber, CMW.

    4. See Double You   9 years ago

      The last three? How many did you have before?

    5. Chipper Morning Wood   9 years ago

      There is no other way to interpret that except that Crusty has been fumbling handjobs.

    6. $park? is totally a Swifty   9 years ago

      What you need, sir, is a gen-u-wine banana hammock to carry your bananas in.

      1. mad.casual   9 years ago

        Or a bunker.

  6. Hyperion   9 years ago

    Apparently, even CNN is getting in on this fake scandal thing:

    MAORZ FAKE SCANDALZ!

    1. Pay up, Palin's Buttplug!   9 years ago

      Press release from Judicial Watch.

      1. Pay up, Palin's Buttplug!   9 years ago

        The JW press release notes that Huma Abedin left classified material in her bed in hotel room with the door open while she was downstairs.

        The CNN article doesn't mention it.

        1. Hyperion   9 years ago

          Also, nothing to see here, Trump is Hitler.

        2. R C Dean   9 years ago

          Let's back up a step:

          What level of classified material was Huma allowed to actually see and handle?

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

            What level of classified material was Huma allowed to actually see and handle?

            That's classified.

          2. Hyperion   9 years ago

            What level of classified material was Huma allowed to actually see and handle?

            All of it was on Hillary. Ewww!!!

          3. Pay up, Palin's Buttplug!   9 years ago

            Ahh, not classified but "presumably sensitive":

            The emails also reveal that Abedin left then-Secretary Clinton's daily schedule, a presumably sensitive document, on a bed in an unlocked hotel room. An email on April 18, 2009, during a conference in Trinidad and Tobago, from aide Melissa J. Lan to Huma Abedin asks for the Secretary's "day book binders." Abedin replies: "Yes. It's on the bed in my room. U can take it. My door is open. I'm in the lobby.Thx." Moreover, the emails show the annoyance of another Clinton aide that the schedule was sent to an authorized State Department email address and not to an unsecured non-state.gov account.

          4. mad.casual   9 years ago

            What level of classified material was Huma allowed to actually see and handle?

            Far more importantly; the message implies that she left it on the bed with the door open *intentionally*. dunt-dunt-duuuh.

        3. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   9 years ago

          Reminds me of the 60 Minutes piece on Snowden, when they try to portray him as a weirdo for reviewing classified material from under a sheet.

          But he's the one endangering Americans.

  7. Rufus The Monocled   9 years ago

    Obama and progressives everywhere are pleased somewhere a country has the sense to make such decisions on its citizens' behalf.

    God bless government.

    1. Zunalter   9 years ago

      As long as those decisions are the correct ones. /Assad

  8. Juice   9 years ago

    I'm translating Fora Temer as "Without Fear." This is worthy of expulsion?

    1. Hyperion   9 years ago

      Out of fear.

      Without fear would be 'sem temer'

      1. Hyperion   9 years ago

        Oh wait, that has a comma in it. So it would be 'Out, Temer!'. Temer is the interim president of Brazil.

      2. Paloma   9 years ago

        It's a great cognate, but Temer is a guy. Fora, which I'd thought was plural of Forum, really means "out", like "Fuera" in Spanish.

  9. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

    This is the second overthrow of a government supposedly elected by secret ballot I have witnessed in Brazil. The first is objectively reported in the Oliver documentary--communist, yes, but that part is accurate. This female prez had the temerity to sign a bill offering rape victims DNA forensics and a morning-after pill, and was surrounded by Pope Per?n's lynch mobs orchestrated by former US Ambassador Ayalde "The Terminator" of gringa Drug Warriors. More http://tinyurl.com/zvk2wue
    Every Brazilian party more than a year old is communist, fascist or prohibitionist--just like US parties--except that all alternatives are banned by senile judges ordering men with guns to make sure no libertarians get on the ballot and no doctors pander to uppity rape victims.

    1. Paloma   9 years ago

      If you read Dilma's history, she was a former left wing almost terrorist in the style of Angela Davis. She supposedly renounced all those ideals because she was in love, and we've all been there. From my point of view, she supported Chavez, and refused to even acknowledge his opposition, and now Venezuela is fucked. So fuck her.

  10. hguhf fkhj   9 years ago

    Thank you very much for your efforts and the wonderful efforts benefited greatly
    hguf
    friv1

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Tariff Downturn

Liz Wolfe | 6.3.2025 9:30 AM

Did Bill Buckley Really Lead a Successful Revolution?

Brian Doherty | 6.3.2025 7:00 AM

These 4 Industries Successfully Lobbied Trump for Tariff Exemptions

Jack Nicastro | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Quick Work

Charles Oliver | 6.3.2025 4:00 AM

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!