Transparency

California Lawmakers Mobilize to Weaken Transparency Initiative

A transparency bill that would require 72 hours for review of legislation before its voted on is meeting a lot of resistance.

|

Almost everyone has some idea for fixing whatever is wrong in Sacramento, ranging from new campaign spending limits to a requirement that legislators wear NASCAR-style sponsor logos. Such reforms, however interesting they might sound in theory, never change anything.

The problem, of course, is the state government is so big and spends so much money that lobbyists will always try to control and influence it. Real reform would mean reining in the power of government—an idea that's never on the table.

Does that mean we abandon any hope of making state government more accountable? Probably not, but it's important to focus on reforms that work—rather than simply venting our populist anger.

One of the most significant proposed reforms since the passage of property-tax-limiting Proposition 13 in 1978 is headed toward the November ballot. Backed by former Republican state Sen. Sam Blakeslee of San Luis Obispo and funded by moderate GOP donor Charles Munger Jr., "The California Legislature Transparency Act" is far more significant than its title would suggest.

The initiative has such potential to shake up the way legislation is passed that legislative leaders spent the week trying to undermine it. Backers of the Blakeslee/Munger measure have submitted a million-plus signatures. It is likely to pass by overwhelming margins. Opponents' only way to derail it is to confuse voters by placing a similar-sounding, but weaker, measure on the ballot and passing a related reform in the Capitol.

The transparency act's main provision requires that "no bill may be passed or ultimately become a statute unless the bill with any amendments has been printed, distributed to the members, and published on the Internet, in its final form, for at least 72 hours before the vote" can be taken. It includes emergency exceptions.

Legislators often pass "gut-and-amend" measures in which the original bill's language is stripped out and replaced with something completely different. The transformed bill is rammed through in the final moments of the session. Often, legislators haven't even read the details of what they approved. No one—except for the legislative leaders and lobbyists who cobbled together the bill—knows what happened until it's too late to do anything about it.

The initiative also requires all committee hearings to be recorded (audio and video) and made publicly available within 24 hours. It gives the public the right to record hearings and floor sessions with their own phones and recorders. The measure is based on the simple concept that openness leads to better government and less bad behavior.

No wonder the Legislature is scurrying for a softer alternative. Many lawmakers want SCA14 to go on the same ballot. If this constitutional amendment passes with more votes, the Blakeslee-Munger initiative would not go into effect. SCA14, passed in committee, deals with the 72-hour transparency issue but critics say it's so laden with loopholes it renders the reform nearly meaningless—even after some last-minute amendments that bring it a bit closer to the initiative.

For instance, backers of the initiative argue that SCA14 requires a 72-hour notice only in the second legislative house. Instead of expanding transparency, they say, it would allow one house to game the system—and foist gutted and amended bills on the other house. SCA 14 supporters deny that, but the current language is convoluted. This much is clear: the initiative's language is far stronger than the alternative, which is why initiative backers remain committed to taking their measure to the ballot.

Ironically, legislators also used the gut-and-amend process to pass in committee Assembly Bill 884, which deals with the public-recording portion of the Blakeslee-Munger initiative. Because this is a legislative measure and not a constitutional amendment, the legislature can change any of its provisions with a simple majority vote in the future. By contrast, changes in the initiative would have to go back to the people for a vote. That's a key benefit for the initiative.

Current law prohibits the use of any assembly video in any political campaign ad. The initiative eliminates this prohibition and allows videos to be used by the public for "any legitimate purpose." AB 884 also scratches the prohibition, but uses fuzzier language—and because it is a legislative change, legislators can once again make it illegal to use video for campaign ads based on a simple-majority vote.

Opponents say some of the most important legislation would not have passed because the 72-hour rule would have given opponents time to organize to stop it. If that's the case, why don't we just dispense with the entire legislative process and let leadership hammer out all bills in secrecy?

I'm being facetious, of course. In reality, legislators should stop ramming things through at the last minute. They should respect the public and give all groups—pro and con—time to weigh in. That's how democracy is supposed to work. Clearly, the Legislature's latest actions show the transparency act is likely to have a real impact in the Capitol.

Advertisement

NEXT: Judge Upholds Suspension of the Pop-Tart Gun Kid

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. They should respect the public and give all groups?pro and con?time to weigh in. That’s how democracy is supposed to work.

    Something something Republic.

    Anyway, they’ll just ignore it like Congress does.

    1. It’s bad advice to begin with?if the public is allowed to “weigh in,” our distinguished legislators will have more difficulty cracking down on Trolls and other undesirable elements festering in our great society. Although, on the other hand, it’s clear that most of the population couldn’t give a hoot about the “First Amendment” nonsense we occasionally hear about and?as the upcoming election will make clear?strongly supports our necessary, ongoing efforts to criminalize inappropriately deadpan “parody” and other forms of trigger-speech and micro-aggression, forms of “expression” that have no place on a college campus or anywhere else in this country. For a good example of the steps we need to take all across the nation, see the documentation of America’s leading criminal “satire” case at:

      http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

    2. My best friend’s ex-wife makes $94/hr on the laptop. She has been unemployed for 6 months but last month her income with big fat bonus was over $14000 just working on the laptop for a few hours. I work through this Website.. Read more on this site._____________ http://www.earnmore9.com

    3. My co-worker’s step-mother makes $97 hourly on the laptop . She has been out of work for six months but last month her paycheck was $14108 just working on the laptop for a few hours.
      I work through this Website.. See here._______ http://www.earnmore9.com

  2. One of my ideas for reforming legislatures would get rid of committees, leadership, etc, and simplify the hell out of legislation.

    1. Any legislator can put up any bill for consideration.

    2. All bills must have a one month public review period.

    3. During that one month period, other legislators can put themselves down as approving the bill.

    4. At the end of the one month period, if a majority of legislators in each chamber have approved the bill, it passes.

    5. There are no “nay” votes, since not approving is the same thing.

    6. Authors can revise their bills at any time, restarting the one month review period.

    Political party control over their members would be limited to kicking them out of the party, which would probably entail losing funding, staffing, etc. But no committees controlled by seniority and controlling what bills can be offered or when they can be voted on.

    1. Your proposal is very good and filed with common sense so it won’t happen.

    2. This is an interesting proposal. Why not send it to state representatives and see if anyone raises it as an issue?
      Particularly California.

    3. That’s a great idea. I think we should make it viral.

    4. Nonsense. Our political masters already created the best system ever !!!!

  3. Commence your Home Business right now. Hang out with your Family and Earn. Start bringing $75/hr just over a computer. Very easy way to choose your Life Happy and Earning continuously. Begin here..

    Copy This Link…

    ??? http://www.BuzzMom90.Com

  4. “Opponents say some of the most important legislation would not have passed because the 72-hour rule would have given opponents time to organize to stop it.”

    Someone offered that as an argument without laughing?

    1. It is also easier to win an election if you prohibit any opposition.

    2. Finding something humorous requires thinking about it.

  5. I’ve made $76,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student.I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money.It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it.

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..

    ??????? http://www.Reportmax20.com

  6. I’m making over $9k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do…. Go to tech tab for work detail..

    CLICK THIS LINK=====>> http://www.earnmax6.com/

  7. I’m making over $9k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do…. Go to tech tab for work detail..

    CLICK THIS LINK=====>> http://www.earnmax6.com/

  8. My proposal was a one day waiting period per page. There needs to be some kind of resistance to large complicated laws.

    Another good approach would be a zero sum legislation rule. For every page of new law proposed a page of old law must be removed.

    1. Fantastic ideas.

      I propose an “automatic sunset” whereby EVERY law has an automatic sunset not to exceed 10 years from the time the law takes effect. The law may only be renewed IF it is resubmitted, it is shown to have done what it set out to do (by an impartial, famously non-partisan body something like the CBO, etc.), and goes through the same process to pass as any brand-new bill.

      The renewal of old laws would take up so much of the legislature’s time that it would be difficult for any frivolous new bills or bad old laws to become law.

      1. Forgot to mention–the laws that don’t automatically sunset are those enshrined in the constitution. Of course, this puts pressure on legislators to pack the constitution with frivolity, so the rule must be that a law must have been renewed 5 times (= 50 years) before it can become part of the constitution (still following a very rigorous process to do so, i.e. constitutional convention, etc.)

        Laws like the ban on murder are obviously important enough that the legislature would have to keep renewing it so they could then insert it into the constitution. What constituency is going to let their legislator allow the ban on murder to sunset? Again, this would keep them so busy they would not be able to write frivolous bills.

  9. $89 an hour! Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening?And i get surly a chek of $1260……0 whats awesome is Im working from home so I get more time with my kids.
    Here is what i did
    ?????? http://Youtube.Nypost55.com

  10. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.

    ??? http://www.NetNote70.com

  11. California, home of Nancy Pelosi’s view of transparency:

    We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It

  12. Evan . if you, thought Gladys `s story is impossible… on saturday I got a new Alfa Romeo since getting a check for $5834 recently and-in excess of, ten thousand this past-munth . it’s definitly the best work Ive ever done . I began this 4 months ago and almost immediately started bringing in at least $80.. p/h . you could look here …

    ………………. http://www.MaxPost30.com

  13. It’s California, a single party state. What difference does it make?

  14. my roomate’s step-mother makes 60 each hour on the internet and she has been out of work for seven months but last month her check was 14489 just working on the internet for 5 hours a day, look at ..
    Read more on this web site..

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.maxincome20.com

  15. I’m making over $9k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do…. Go to tech tab for work detail..

    CLICK THIS LINK=====>> http://www.earnmax6.com/

  16. before I saw the bank draft which had said $9426 , I didnt believe that…my… brother woz like actualy earning money part-time at there labtop. . there uncles cousin has done this 4 less than fifteen months and by now repaid the dept on there place and got a great new Mini Cooper . read the full info here …

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??

    ? ? ? ? http://www.selfcash10.com

  17. before I saw the bank draft which had said $9426 , I didnt believe that…my… brother woz like actualy earning money part-time at there labtop. . there uncles cousin has done this 4 less than fifteen months and by now repaid the dept on there place and got a great new Mini Cooper . read the full info here …

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??

    ? ? ? ? http://www.selfcash10.com

  18. uptil I saw the bank draft four $8760 , I be certain …that…my sister woz actually bringing in money part time from there labtop. . there neighbour had bean doing this 4 only about eighteen months and resently cleard the depts on there home and bourt a top of the range Chrysler ….

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Reportmax20.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.