Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Planned Parenthood Shooter 'Mentally Incompetent,' George Zimmerman Auctions Off His Gun, Next Recession Coming Soon: A.M. Links

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.12.2016 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | carnagenyc/Flickr
(carnagenyc/Flickr )
  • carnagenyc/Flickr

    Donald Trump's One Weird Trick for Getting People to Agree With Him: taking both sides of every issue

  • We're due for another recession soon. 
  • The second trial of six Baltimore police officers charged in the arrest and death of Freddie Gray starts today, after the first trial ended with a hung jury. 
  • George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012. 
  • The man who shot and killed three people at a Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic last November has been declared too mentally incompetent to stand trial. 
  • Italy approves same-sex civil unions. 
  • Meet Love, a Bronx sex worker turned surgical technician who fought back against New York City's Human Trafficking Intervention Courts and won.  

Follow Reason on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: FBI Director Blames 'Viral Videos' for Rising Murder Rates

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (480)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    We're due for another recession soon.

    So we're not in one now?

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      I was about to ask if we ever left the last one.

      1. Restoras   9 years ago

        Technically, yes but in actuality no we never left.

      2. Bill Dalasio   9 years ago

        We left the recession. It's just that we never really had a recovery.

        And yes, things are about to get bumpy. HY default rates have been climbing for about a year and half now and the S&P downgrade-to-upgrade ratio looks pretty ugly.

        1. AlexInCT   9 years ago

          I don't think that fooling around with the mechanisms and numbers that show economic health to make them look better really qualifies as leaving the recession Bill, but maybe I am just not malleable enough to be part of the know-it-alls that have been telling us that recovery is right around the corner for some 7 years now.

          1. SQRLSY One   9 years ago

            "George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012."

            Oh Noes! They's BaaaAAAaaack!!!

            The OTHER part of the truth (Martin threw away the sword and the pistol by his side, before he died, and the cops never found it, bumbling fools that they were), but here is the REAL truth:
            Martin went a fartin',
            And he did ride,
            With a sword and a pistol
            By his side,
            Lookin' for a "creepy ass cracker"
            To help him eat his skittles,
            So when he couldn't find his spittoon,
            He spit instead in his shittooon,
            And shit instead in his spittoon,
            While the cow jumped over the moon,
            And the dish snorted coke with a spoon,
            And we'll all know the truth real soon!

    2. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      I think it's a good idea. The first recession didn't work out so well what with the lack of recovery, so let's reboot and try it again.

      1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

        You know who else promised to hit the reset button...

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   9 years ago

          Me, playing video games in 1999?

    3. Bee Tagger   9 years ago

      Depends on what the definition of the word in is.

    4. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      Recesssion, my ass - I think we're overdue for a whopping yuuge depression, something bordering on economic collapse. I know I'm about as depressed as I've ever been.

      1. Domestic Dissident   9 years ago

        We have in fact been a global Little Depression since the crash.

        Even if you believe what's going on is largely cyclical (and there are good arguments for that), it is being exacerbated by bad government policies pretty much everywhere you look, including but not limited to this administation's regulatory heavy iron fist.

    5. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      Hello.

      Bella, the economy has been a vampire one for quite some time.

    6. Doctor Whom   9 years ago

      The economy is either going swimmingly (if you believe the Obots) or circling the drain (if you believe the Bern victims).

      1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

        So... swimming around the drain?

        1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

          +3rd Degree Bern

  2. sarcasmic   9 years ago

    second

    1. Hamster of Doom   9 years ago

      Hello.

  3. Citizen X   9 years ago

    We're due for another recession soon.

    Damn, we're not even done with the last one yet!

  4. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

    176) I'll say one positive thing about Obama's economic policy (and one thing only): he's been good on anti-trust enforcement. The article engages in typical liberal-bitching that under Obama anti-trust enforcement hasn't increased enough, but it undermines its own argument. The Justice Department has brought 52 anti-trust cases a year under Obama, up from 47 annually under Bush (i.e., up 10%), and has been willing to tackle bigger names (AT&T, Pfizer, Comcast, Halliburton, etc.). I just wish they'd prevented some of the big airline mergers in the past few years?that's been terrible for both ticket prices and reduced route availability.
    In a truly free market, trust-busting wouldn't be necessary. But in an economic environment where big businesses get all sorts of government-provided advantages, anti-trust enforcement is important to preserve competition. I see it as a rare bright spot in Obama's terrible economic policy record.

    1. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      Eh. Blocking Staples/Office Depot was silly. What happens if one of those closes? How is that any better?

      1. Restoras   9 years ago

        It isn't as Amazon just picks up a lot of that share.

        1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

          Amazon is too big and must be busted up. There is your solution.

          1. Restoras   9 years ago

            They'll get around to it eventually.

            1. Pay up, Palin's Buttplug!   9 years ago

              After the campaign donation stop.

    2. Free Society   9 years ago

      Breaking up big companies sounds great when you have a two dimensional understanding of monopolies. Anti-trust law is a cudgel that the state uses in a highly selective way to punish companies it doesn't like and reward ones that it does. Anti-trust law is a political tool, as are the people praising it whether they know it or not.

      1. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

        Sure it's often used as a political tool (Microsoft in the 1990s). But government policy gives big businesses huge advantages--the sheer amount of regulations favors companies with the money for compliance departments, HR departments, legal departments, etc. In these circumstances, there is a tendency for businesses to get bigger and bigger until they dominate their market segment. This would not happen without government interference, or would be far rarer. So it makes sense to have an active policy to reduce the tendency towards monopoly.

        1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

          But government policy gives big businesses huge advantages

          Moral of the Story: If you let the government caress your balls, don't be surprised if it suddenly squeezes them.

        2. kbolino   9 years ago

          So it makes sense to have an active policy to reduce the tendency towards monopoly.

          The reasons why companies consolidate don't go away just because the government forces them to remain separate. If it "made sense", it wouldn't be necessary in the first place. You're basically admitting that consumers' interests should be subsumed for voters' and politicians' interests.

        3. Free Society   9 years ago

          But government policy gives big businesses huge advantages--the sheer amount of regulations favors companies with the money for compliance departments

          This is the exact same logic that progressives use to expand the power of government to solve the problems of the previous expansion of government. "The government rents out it's power to private actors in the marketplace, so we need to give the government more power so it can control the rent seekers in the marketplace."

        4. Jimbo   9 years ago

          The only true monopolies that exist are facilitated by government. That is the only way to really make a monopoly: at the point of a gun.

    3. kbolino   9 years ago

      I just wish they'd prevented some of the big airline mergers in the past few years?that's been terrible for both ticket prices and reduced route availability.

      Yeah, the bankruptcy of the airlines would have been great for ticket prices and route availability.

      1. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

        The government restricts competition in the airline industry in many ways--keeping out foreign airlines from domestic routes, restricting the number of slots airports can use. It would be great if it dropped those restrictions, but as long as it doesn't, reducing the tendency towards monopoly among airlines enhances competition.

        Also, bankruptcy doesn't necessarily mean an airline ceases to exist. Many bankrupt airlines could have just reorganized and re-entered the market.

        1. kbolino   9 years ago

          reducing the tendency towards monopoly among airlines enhances competition.

          Competition only matters if they can actually compete. Companies merge for many reasons, not the least of which being that they can consolidate their operations and reduce duplicated overhead costs. It is in fact better for the consumer for two companies to merge if neither can on its own afford to continue operations at present prices and levels of service.

          Many bankrupt airlines could have just reorganized and re-entered the market.

          With fewer options at higher prices. Restructuring doesn't magically take an unprofitable business and make it profitable. It reduces the burden of past debt, but the company wouldn't have a problem with that burden if it had been pursuing a profitable model in the first place.

        2. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   9 years ago

          reducing the tendency towards monopoly among airlines enhances competition.

          They're not "reducing a tendency." They're blocking economic decisions. That is, decisions which economize operations given the current environment. "Reducing the tendency towards monopoly" means repealing the policies that drive towards consolidation, as you suggest, or at least enacting other policies that shift the current environment away from consolidation.

          "You have sought our permission to combine, and we find you wanting" is not reducing a tendency. It's further ignoring economic reality.

    4. Emmerson Biggins   9 years ago

      I'll respectfully disagree. He's been an arrogant commie fuck stick just like most other areas.

  5. Bee Tagger   9 years ago

    We're due for another recession soon.

    That sounds like a very Stark economic pronouncement.

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      WINTER IS COMING.

    2. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      Summer is coming.

    3. Juvenile Bluster   9 years ago

      This is why we should elect Lannisters to office.

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        Lannisters always pay their debts, which is more than can be said for the current federal government.

        1. Restoras   9 years ago

          Quick fingers CX, I applaud you.

        2. Catatafish & Woodchips   9 years ago

          Alas, both parties seem to be descended from the Baratheons.

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

            We could use a president who spends all his time drinking and hunting.

            Instead we have a combo of Stannis and Renly, a closeted autocrat.

            1. Feminist Killjoy   9 years ago

              I haven't watched the show in a while because no HBO, but in the books at least, Renly is a straight up narcissist who is terrible at any kind of management and whose position would be whatever his close friends tell him it should be, so that fits perfectly with current and potential presidents.

        3. Mickey Rat   9 years ago

          Except the Lannisters are broke (their gold mines are unproductive) and the idiot children are in charge.

      2. Restoras   9 years ago

        Because they always pay their debts?

      3. PBR Streetgang   9 years ago

        At least they always pay their debts.

        1. Hamster of Doom   9 years ago

          We could do with politicians who pay their debts.

          /someone had to say it

    4. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      That sounds like a very Stark economic pronouncement.

      Man, isn't that ironic?

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

        I am Iron-ic Man.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    Donald Trump's One Weird Trick for Getting People to Agree With Him: taking both sides of every issue

    The first ever panderer.

    1. CatoTheChipper   9 years ago

      It didn't work for Hillary with West Virginia's coal miners.

      1. creech   9 years ago

        She still got the votes of nearly 40% of "coal mining households," proving that voting one's economic interests is never a certainty.

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          Coal-mining HRC supporters: "She's just saying that shit to keep the Greenies happy."

          Environmental HRC Supporters: "She's just saying that shit to keep the Unions happy."

          Reality: "She will say or do anything for power."

  7. Grand Moff Serious Man   9 years ago

    George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012.

    Morbidly curious who would pay money for that.

    1. Bee Tagger   9 years ago

      The morbidly curious, probably.

    2. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      What kind of gun was it?

      1. Florida Hipster   9 years ago

        Kel-Tec 9 mm if memory serves.

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          Yes, Kel-Tec PF-9.

    3. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      I think I read an article one time that houses where murders took place have trouble selling unless the murder was really famous when the price actually goes up.

    4. Restoras   9 years ago

      Maybe he's upgrading?

      Maybe he doesn't want to own a gun anymore?

      Maybe he wants a revolver instead of an automatic?

      Maybe he doesn't like the caliber?

      I'm curious why we should care what someone does with their private property.

      1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

        I'm curious why we should care what someone does with their private property.

        A combination of voyeurism and FEELZ for the gun control side?

    5. Held Many Mics   9 years ago

      ENB really screwed the pooch with this drive-by assessment.

      The dude will be unable to live a normal life for the foreseeable future, maybe for the rest of his life. There is an army of internet SJWs who are all willing to do their part to make his life miserable. Do you remember when he was attacked in a road-rage incident? Didn't the dude try to kill him?

      The only bankable asset he has left is his notoriety. I'm not saying the guy is a saint but only that there could be a defensible explanation for this particular action.

      1. Emmerson Biggins   9 years ago

        He needs to grow some facial hair, change his name, and move to another state, or he is going to end up getting charged with Jaywalking, conspiracy to commit Jaywalking, obstruction of justice, and violating the civil rights of the guy whose car he walked int front of (triggering) and sentenced to like 25 years in prison.

        1. Emmerson Biggins   9 years ago

          oh ya tax evasion too.

  8. Bee Tagger   9 years ago

    Donald Trump's One Weird Trick for Getting People to Agree With Him: taking both sides of every issue

    Does he have one weird trick for getting people to disagree with him, too? Seems like he does.

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      Sure he does: taking both sides of every issue.

    2. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      My guess is Donald Trump has quite a few weird tricks.

      1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

        More positions than what you have in the Kamasutra.

        1. Brett L   9 years ago

          Please, it would be appropriation if it were in My Kamasutra. I mostly just stick to getting my wife drunk when I'm bored with the usual positions. I don't need no book larnin for that.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012.

    Suddenly Reason is against private commerce??? IS THIS AN UNLICENSED GUN TRANSFER CONCERN? He probably needs money. Being publicly crazy ain't cheap.

    1. Restoras   9 years ago

      ENB was triggered so she had to fire from the hip.

  10. Grand Moff Serious Man   9 years ago

    That awkward moment when you almost say the G-word at a Hillary rally...

    1. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      Gunt?

    2. Citizen X   9 years ago

      Grandma?

    3. Rich   9 years ago

      She's cute when she's awkward.

    4. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      Gorgon?

    5. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      "Grand jury" is two words.

    6. Zeb   9 years ago

      Wait, are they not doing the pretend to be Christian thing anymore? I thought that was required of all national level politicians.

      1. Eternal Blue Sky   9 years ago

        I think the rules are that the Red Tribe has to pretend to be devout Christians and the Blue Tribe has to pretend to be casual, Easter-and-Christmas style Christians.

        1. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

          Like Bernie?

    7. Lee G   9 years ago

      gastrophilanthropist?

      guillotine?

      1. CatoTheChipper   9 years ago

        Geriatric?

    8. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

      Genitalia?

    9. egould310   9 years ago

      Wow. They really packed one of every flavor of human being into that audience. Hipsters, bull dykes, asians, blacks, alady in a turbin, etc. It's just so natural and realistic. I'm really impressed with Hillary.

      1. egould310   9 years ago

        I also see a messican, some union thugs, and at least one pederast.

        I especially like how Hillary bobs her head to the rhythm of the speaker. It shows maturity and intelligence.

      2. Haha, charade you are   9 years ago

        "The sportos, the motorheads, geeks, sluts, bloods, wasteoids, dweebies, dickheads. They all adore her. They think she's a righteous dude".

    10. lap83   9 years ago

      Goiter?

    11. You Sound Like a Prog (MJG)   9 years ago

      @CleveBryan @BillSFrank God forbid we should repeat the words of our fore fathers

      Yeah, umm...

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        Yeah, wasn't "under God" added to the pledge in like 1955?

  11. Hamster of Doom   9 years ago

    George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012.

    Someone send him the number for Click's PR team. Stat.

  12. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Chelsea Handler: When You Meet a Single Woman, Congratulate Her

    "They"?the amorphous community of married couples and the often patriarchal and/or religious masses of the world?"just want us to be happy" by forcing us to pair off. They're apparently uncomfortable with the solitary splendor of people like me who are single and pretty goddamned comfortable about it. "They"?the married people?want me to join their happy kingdom where about 50% of first marriages and even more second marriages end up in the divorce incinerator.

    And of course, as is the tradition in what is still mostly a man's world, single females still bear the disproportionate brunt of single-shaming and single-bewilderment-syndrome, while men tend to receive an understanding wink and a nod regarding their bachelor achievements, bedroom conquests and beer breakfasts.

    Simone de Beauvoir wrote in her 1949 book The Second Sex?and it's still true today?that gender is a device men use to stereotype women and that they use it as an excuse to organize society into a patriarchy conveniently owned and operated by an oligarchy of men.

    1. Bee Tagger   9 years ago

      Ugh, the 50% divorce rate myth again
      http://qz.com/306166/the-divor.....eating-50/

      1. Rich   9 years ago

        *And* -- women get just 73% of the alimony they deserve.

    2. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      "where about 50% of first marriages...end up in the divorce incinerator."

      This has not been true for decades.

      "while men tend to receive an understanding wink and a nod regarding their... beer breakfasts."

      Who says you can't do this while married?

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        My wife and i have shared a beer breakfast on more than one occasion. Turns out it's one of those things that's fun in your 20s but just sort of emotionally and existentially exhausting in your 30s.

        1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

          Kegs and eggs never gets old, you just got old, old man.

          1. Citizen X   9 years ago

            Wisdom of experience, broski. Now i power through the morning after the night before with a ton of coffee, eggs (with salsa), bacon, and fried potatoes, a walk around the neighborhood, and a massive dump, the way God intended.

            1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

              No one wants to hear about your foreplay routine. Goodness.

              1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

                Bloody Mary or Tomato Beer for the health benefits with a raw egg for the pure manliness.

                1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

                  You have bulemia and that's your recipie for purging, right?

                  1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

                    Failed bulimic. I have the binge part locked in, but not so much on the purge side.

        2. Zeb   9 years ago

          It always seems like a good idea. But then you just want to take a nap.

          My morning drinking is limited to a Bloody Mary on special occasions these days.

          1. Citizen X   9 years ago

            I'll do a mimosa maybe twice a year.

        3. Catatafish & Woodchips   9 years ago

          I'm getting really upset about all this breakfast stout micro-aggression.

          1. Krabappel   9 years ago

            Founder's breakfast stout is a good one.

            1. Catatafish & Woodchips   9 years ago

              My favorite beer for early morning footy matches.

        4. Elspeth Flashman   9 years ago

          The husband and I spent a morning once drinking when he had a conference right near my office. I went back to work at 10:30 buzzed as hell, and then sleepy. Fun but exhausting. I'd do it again though.

          1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

            There's a brewpub stupidly/ingeniously located in the middle of several blocks of industrial parks near where I work. They make terrific chili and decent beer. Sometimes I stop by for lunch and go back to work happily buzzed.

        5. Krabappel   9 years ago

          I just split a bottle of dry cider for breakfast on Sunday. You then just have to offset it with an extra cup of coffee afterwards. I made salade lyonnaise and it was fucking delicious.

      2. lap83   9 years ago

        I couldn't even do that in my 20s

        1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

          Weak!

          1. lap83   9 years ago

            I weighed less than 120 for most of those years!

      3. Mickey Rat   9 years ago

        She has just enough knowledge of things to get them utterly wrong.

    3. Hamster of Doom   9 years ago

      Simone de Beauvoir wrote in her 1949 book The Second Sex?and it's still true today?that gender is a device men use to stereotype women and that they use it as an excuse to organize society into a patriarchy conveniently owned and operated by an oligarchy of men.

      True. On the other hand, women will do the exact same thing.

      1. lap83   9 years ago

        This. I've worked at a few female dominated businesses. Women are usually more subtle about their sexism, but that doesn't make it better.

        1. Krabappel   9 years ago

          Not always. I worked for one who was an absolute tyrant to all the women in the office but would back down when a man challenged her/disagreed with her on something.

          1. lap83   9 years ago

            Women tend to find strength in numbers

          2. Hamster of Doom   9 years ago

            You'll get all kinds. I worked under a chef once who only promoted women. Called them his Angels. Swore it was mere coincidence that he only took his employees seriously if they were women.

            Worked for another guy, who hired me and a man at the same time. A year later, I'm running the Big Money shift by myself and the other guy was sharing the Nothing Ever Happens Slacker shift with a third. I'm handling the safe and the bank deposits. I'm doing the training. I'm the Regional Employee of the Quarter - twice. I'm being paid a dollar less an hour and stuck in the title of "Management Trainee" while the other guy's already been given the collared shirt.

            Using accumulated power to sort the world according to personal bias seems to be more of a species stereotype than a demographic one. It's a great deal more difficult to spot your own biases than it is to see everyone else's.

    4. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      Existentialists are over rated.

      1. Zeb   9 years ago

        I hear a lot of people say that. How many people have to say that before it becomes untrue?

    5. Irish is a Millennial, Poll Me   9 years ago

      "Simone de Beauvoir wrote in her 1949 book The Second Sex?and it's still true today?that gender is a device men use to stereotype women and that they use it as an excuse to organize society into a patriarchy conveniently owned and operated by an oligarchy of men."

      I like when feminists say bad things about men because they always make us sound like total geniuses.

      1. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

        Yeah, I thought I was sitting around scratching my butt, but all this time I was concocting a clever plan for world domination.

    6. Catatafish & Woodchips   9 years ago

      "...single females still bear the disproportionate brunt of single-shaming and single-bewilderment-syndrome..."

      Chelsea Handler has obvious not witnessed the degree of shaming my mother is capable of inflicting on me.

    7. Free Society   9 years ago

      When You Meet a Single Woman, Congratulate Her

      Congratulations, your children are more likely than other children to get abused and neglected by you and even more likely molested by the revolving door of men in your life. Congratulations, your lifestyle choices produce the single greatest predictor of your child's future incarceration, poverty and untimely death. Here's a fucking medal.

      1. Free Society   9 years ago

        oops. I read "Single Mom". My apologies single ladies everywhere, except Nicole.

    8. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

      Chelsea Handler: When You Meet a Single Woman, Congratulate Her

      Congratulate her?

      I'd rather seduce her.

    9. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

      Chelsea Handler is a person? I thought it was a job title at the Clinton Foundation.

      1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

        Boo this man!

    10. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

      To be fair, Chelsea should be commended for being single... Can you imagine how miserable the poor bastard married to her would be?

    11. Bill Dalasio   9 years ago

      I'd consider Chelsea Handler, but I'm allergic to penicillin.

    12. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

      What a shame she isn't married, she could make some man very happy. If he's a masochist.

  13. Rich   9 years ago

    The man who shot and killed three people at a Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic last November has been declared too mentally incompetent to stand trial.

    "Too" mentally incompetent? WTF?

    1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

      Does this look like the face of a crazy man?

    2. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

      I seem to recall an argument in a logic textbook to the effect that soon the outrageousness of crimes would, ipso facto, let the perps off as insane. Sure seems to be working for murdering cops and antichoice christianofascists. SO why not let Bin Ladin, the Airliners for Allah crew and snuff film islamofascisti off the hook by the same argument?

  14. Tonio   9 years ago

    Italy approves same-sex civil unions.

    Wow, right in the Pope's backyard. That's got to be embarrassing.

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      Eddie hardest hit.

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        I don't think Eddie even recognizes this pope as legitimate.

        1. Citizen X   9 years ago

          Oh, he backs the pretender in Avignon? HERESY!

        2. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

          No, but I suspect history will know Pope Francis as a Bad Pope.

          As a Burke/Ratzinger reactionary, it's not surprising that I would say this.

          But we've had bad popes before, and so I won't faint and exclaim, "OMG this never happened before!"

    2. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      This is the social justice pope, who aids jihadis over christian refugees.

      Benedict, however, is probably livid.

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        ^This.

      2. Free Society   9 years ago

        Benedict, however, is probably livid.

        It's what he gets for abdicating. Throwing the Catholic Church to the mercy of the Social Justice predators.

        1. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

          It's really too bad.

          1. Free Society   9 years ago

            Abdications being so rare and the advent of this current type of Pope being even more rare if not unique, makes you wonder if Benedict wasn't pushed out.

            1. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

              I wish I knew.

    3. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

      Oh, the Italian state has done a lot of embarrassing things in the Pope's backyard, like steal it from the Pope. Italians have been flipping off the Popes for centuries.

  15. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Iron Maiden saved my life: Adelaide man Steve Radeski now wants to repay his heavy metal saviour

    "I only had about six minutes to live and he came up after about four minutes and he was wearing a 1985 Iron Maiden tour shirt which he'd had since he was a kid. He was a tragic fan but looked at me and realised that he would have to use it as a tourniquet which stemmed the blood flow until the helicopter arrived.

    "Iron Maiden saved my life."

    With the help of The Advertiser, Mr Radeski is now able to repay his saviour.

    Iron Maiden's management learnt he had purchased one of the legendary heavy metal band's shirts to replace the one Mr Gaythwaite used to staunch the bleeding.

    Mr Radeski said the band's management contacted him after reading his story on Advertiser.com.au and vowed to get his shirt signed so he could later present it to his saviour, who received an award and commendations from both the police and army for his efforts.

    1. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      Tiipper Gore screams as she fondles her...

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        Fondles her what, Rufus? FONDLES HER WHAT?

        1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

          Parental advisory label?

        2. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

          I WILL NOT BE SUCKERED INTO A VULGAR BATTLE OF WITS WITH CRUSTY.

          1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

            Rufus wants to gently peel back Tipper Gore's parental advisory sticker, and that is okay.

        3. Rhywun   9 years ago

          Her whatever.

    2. Aloysious   9 years ago

      That's a nice, happy story.

      1. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

        Or happy ending anyway, according to the joined at the groin massage parlor girls filing blotter reports. Is the whole thing an Al Gore econazi recruiting gambit?

  16. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    something something broken windows fallacy...

    Fort McMurray's rebuild to have positive economic impact: analyst

    he Fort McMurray wildfire has hit right at the foot of Canada's oilsands.

    ...

    "When you take that kind of supply out, it's bound to have a little bit of an effect on price because a shortened supply means higher prices," Martin speculated.

    But Martin contends that there are some positives on the horizon when Fort McMurray starts to rebuild.

    "Anytime you spend that kind of investment money, it is going to have an impact and it will be positive and it will go a long way to mitigating Alberta's downturn."

    1. Juvenile Bluster   9 years ago

      "Breaking news, Paul Krugman has been arrested for arson..."

      1. Grand Moff Serious Man   9 years ago

        Paul Krugman is tired of trying to reason with you people

    2. Rich   9 years ago

      Drill, baby, drill! Burn, baby, burn!

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        +1 Disco Inferno

      2. Elspeth Flashman   9 years ago

        Let's burn lots of things! Burn all the things!

        1. Citizen X   9 years ago

          DIG HOLES AND FILL THEM

          1. Krabappel   9 years ago

            IT'S PATRIOTIC TO SHOVE MONEY INTO THE MONEY FIRES!

    3. Tonio   9 years ago

      he Fort McMurray wildfire

      Shouldn't that be "xe"?

    4. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      Thanks for the link! I posted here several weeks ago looking for help putting together my proposal for the city council regarding my economic stimulus program of burning the city to the ground and now I have some hard cites as to how beneficial the proposal might be.

    5. Free Society   9 years ago

      Funny how the broken window crowd is always a bit hesitant to burn their own house down as an investment in the future.

      1. Catatafish & Woodchips   9 years ago

        It's a bit like when discussing global overpopulation with an enviro and you get to the point where you ask "so, will you be sacrificing your own children on Gaia's altar?"

        1. kbolino   9 years ago

          A good many of them don't have children. But they won't be sacrificing themselves on that altar...

  17. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

    This guy? Mentally incompetent? You don't say...

    1. Zeb   9 years ago

      Those are some serious crazy eyes.

  18. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Bill Nye Is A Huckster

    More severe weather. More suffering. More expense. Let's all take climate change seriously. pic.twitter.com/HGHQJLgqRr

    ? Bill Nye (@BillNye) May 11, 2016

    If people trusted global warming alarmists, they might function under the premise that severe weather events are something unique to this particular age. It was only the discovery of fossil fuels that forced man to wrestle with the terrifying hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and rain showers. Before the discovery of oil, or the Fall of Man, it was San Diego for everyone all the time.

    Is there really more severe weather? More tornadoes, for instance?

    Since I'm not an engineer like Nye, I turn to the people at National Centers for Environmental Information and learn that not only has tornado activity seemed to be pretty steady the past few decades (in every single region of the United States, for that matter), but that the frequency of violent tornadoes has decreased.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   9 years ago

      Sometimes I wonder what the reaction would be if some historical storms were to happen today. Sometime in the 12th Century, according to some evidence, there was a Category 4 or 5 hurricane that hit New Jersey. The Great Colonial Hurricane of 1635 hit Long Island as a Category 4 and then near Providence as a Category 3. Multiple intense hurricanes (Category 3+) hit New England in pre-Columbian times: between 1100?1150, 1300?1400 (1295?1407), and 1400?1450 (1404?1446), respectively (last sentence c+p'd from wiki). Not to mention things like the Blizzard of 1899 (below zero in Tallahassee, Gulf of Mexico-effect snow in Tampa).

      1. Zeb   9 years ago

        Yeah, people have a terrible sense of perspective when it comes to things like that. Whatever has happened in my lifetime so far has to be normal. But there are plenty of things that happen pretty regularly on a slightly longer time scale than what we experience that no one has really seen. It's ridiculous to assume that whatever has happened since people started keeping good weather records should be considered normal and the way things ought to be.

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          But back in the day, people didn't have engineers (like Bill Nye?) that allowed them to live in places that would naturally be underwater or in danger of falling into the ocean, or big government backed insurance that paid for their stupid asses to rebuild in those shitty places.

          Anybody who did live in those places was a likely weirdo loner, but now we have whole communities crowded into disasters waiting to happen.

      2. John   9 years ago

        IN the 19th Century they had a blizzard in NYC in July. Freakish weather happens.

      3. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

        WEATHER ISN'T CLIMATE until it's convenient.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          And it's even more ridiculous because all weather is influenced by whatever is going on with the climate. It's just nonsense to try to say that storm A is because of global warming and storm B isn't. To the extent that there is climate change (and there always is), climate change affects all weather. There aren't discrete causes and effects in a hugely complicated dynamic system like climate. Everything causes everything else.

          1. Citizen X   9 years ago

            +1 Butterfly Effect (starring Ashton Kutcher)

    2. Tonio   9 years ago

      Last three paragraphs are you (LH), not Nye - right?

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        Oops, Harsanyi. Never mind. Derp.

    3. Feminist Killjoy   9 years ago

      I've seen a lot of fluff news about the fires being caused by global warming and stuff like "there is oil there, oil burns. therefore oil caused the fire" with no mention of how wildfires are naturally occurring and are worse when they haven't happened in recent memory. Maybe they did have hotter weather than normal, but I really hope it wasn't hotter than it was last summer.

      My favorite is always the immediate complaints of price gouging for everything, despite the amount of free aid coming in. Insurance prices are going to rise, huh? So surprised!

      1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

        Maybe they did have hotter weather than normal, but I really hope it wasn't hotter than it was last summer.

        It was colder than last year, and close to unseasonably cold.

        1. Rhywun   9 years ago

          It was in the upper 80s while it was going on. I thought, huh is that normal for northern Alberta?

          1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

            It was in the upper 80s in southern Alberta.

            (I am reporting secondhand from an Albertan who I believe has evacuated the region in question, so yeah, it's hearsay.)

            1. Rhywun   9 years ago

              I am reporting the reading at weather.com that I checked because I couldn't believe what a reporter was saying on the TV. Maybe that's normal, I dunno but I found it kind of shocking.

        2. Feminist Killjoy   9 years ago

          I get most of my Canadian news from CBC radio, so I only heard stuff like this - 'Of course' Fort McMurray fire linked to climate change, Elizabeth May says.

    4. Chip Woodier   9 years ago

      I trust Bill Nye on this as much as I trusted him with his anti-GMO bluster. Unfortunately, the consensus is in (for now).

    5. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

      Climate alarmists keep crying wolf, and the people stop believing the alarmism.

      They have to look at their own hysterics to understand why climate change consistently ranks among the lowest policy priorities for the citizenry.

      1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

        Rare climatic event responsible for solar halo and shootout between suspects and police in Venezuela.

        Seriously, I have no idea why the author reports both events in the same article.

        1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

          Here's a copy-paste warrior from the comments thread. He posted the same thing several times.

          Chad Furman

          Government ownership of the means of production is different than taxing corporations and using the income to provide social benefits. Think public education, affordable healthcare for the disabled, libraries, roads, energy and food subsidies...

          Summary, as written by Frederic Bastiat over 150 years ago:

          Government is that great fiction through which everyone endeavors to live at the expense of everyone else.

          1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

            Which is true, I suppose. Less Stalinesque communism and more Hitler-esque corporatism. Yeah, that's an improvement, I guess.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    The second trial of six Baltimore police officers charged in the arrest and death of Freddie Gray starts today, after the first trial ended with a hung jury.

    I don't care for this concept. The state, with unlimited resources, trying defendants over and over again? Smacks of double jeopardy.

    1. Rich   9 years ago

      Legal *experts* say it's OK, so who cares what you care for?

    2. Zeb   9 years ago

      It does seem like if you can't get a jury to agree on guilt, then it indicates that some reasonable doubt exists. On the other hand, fuck the police.

    3. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

      Why don't they conscript women for jury duty in Baltimore?

  20. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    You know who else had an underground missile site...

    Iran Shows Off Third Underground Missile Site

    Iran's military recently publicized a third underground missile facility and showed the launch of a new ballistic missile through the top of a mountain.

    U.S. intelligence agencies said in a recent internal report on the launch that the new underground missile facility was disclosed by Iran in March.

    It was the third time since October that Tehran showed off an extensive network of underground missile facilities. The new video, however, for the first time shows a missile launch from one of the country's underground launch facilities.

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      < href="https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00LD8IRG2/reasonmagazinea-20/"Travis Colfax?

      1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

        ARRRRRGGG!!!!!!

        Travis Colfax?

    2. OneOut   9 years ago

      Thanks for showing us where to aim our nuke tipped bunker busters Iran.

      Just had to show of

  21. Grand Moff Serious Man   9 years ago

    Mark Ruffalo: Why is LA a toxic wasteland?

    With 840 miles of beautiful coastline and palm trees swaying in the breeze, "toxic" is not the first word that comes to mind when one thinks of California. Yet, in spite of its reputation as a progressive environmental state, California's toxic affair with oil and gas has been hiding in plain sight.

    Nowhere is this more apparent than in Los Angeles, the nation's largest urban oil field. Though it is the second most populous city in the country, L.A. is still the wild, wild west when it comes to oil development. Active oil wells dot the cityscape, connected by a spider web of pipelines carrying oil, explosive fumes, and corrosive acids directly under homes. Worst of all, these oil wells have a devastating impact on Angelenos' long-term health.

    I went on a "toxic tour" of L.A. and witnessed what it looks like when extreme fossil fuel extraction collides with the places where people live, work, and play. Our reliance on fossil fuels puts real communities at risk across the city. Extreme oil extraction injects a toxic mixture of chemicals into the ground to stimulate oil wells in a manner similar to fracking, and the emissions can cause headaches, nosebleeds, respiratory ailments, inter-generational reproductive harm, and even cancer for surrounding neighbors.

    Smug alert!

    1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      He does that in one of the most economically depressed areas in New York (where he apparently has a home) as well. He helped defeat fracking in New York. He is a grisly twat.

      1. Rhywun   9 years ago

        Everything outside the orbit of the NYC-to-Albany axis and maybe Ithaca is about equally depressed.

        1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

          Everything outside the orbit of the NYC-to-Albany axis and maybe Ithaca is about equally depressed.

          That is not true. Sullivan County and Southern Tier are really depressed, and the contrast between those counties and the neighboring counties across the state line in Pennsylvania is incredible.

          1. Rhywun   9 years ago

            across the state line

            I.e. not New York. I'm talking about New York State.

    2. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

      "connected by a spider web of pipelines carrying oil, explosive fumes, and corrosive acids directly under homes"

      Isn't the whole point of these pipelines to reduce the amount that comes in contact with the environment? I mean, if they transported the oil in tankers or railcars it seems like there's a lot more risk of spillage and waste.

      Though I suppose Ruffalo means we should not extract the oil at all, and everybody in LA should get around on horseback or on foot or something.

      1. CatoTheChipper   9 years ago

        Self-driving vehicles powered by mouse milk, mummy dust, and unicorn farts.

    3. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      Fossil fuels technology has never been more efficient and cleaner and advancing evermore.

      But twat-twits like this guy want to regress progress.

      I despise the left. Despise them for their anti-human thinking.

      They would have died a proper death during the Renaissance.

    4. Feminist Killjoy   9 years ago

      Extreme oil extraction injects

      This is great writing though. I love every part of it.

    5. Zeb   9 years ago

      If it does cause helath problems or other harm, the oil companies should do something to mitigate that. Seems like it could be a particular problem there for the same geographical reasons that smog was such a big problem there.

    6. DJF   9 years ago

      I thought that oil in LA was natural?

      1. Suell   9 years ago

        The oil is organic and fair trade.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          With all the small, independent producers, it probably does meet fair trade requirements. And it's definitely organic.

    7. lap83   9 years ago

      Mark Ruffalo: Why...

      That's where I stopped reading. He makes Taylor Swift look like an intellectual

      1. Suell   9 years ago

        There was no need for that Swift bashing.

        1. lap83   9 years ago

          There's no need for her to be an intellectual.

    8. Mickey Rat   9 years ago

      Is one reason LA is a big city is because if the oil industry? We did not choose to do fuel extraction under where people live, people decided to live where we were doing mineral extraction.

  22. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Nowthen Man Threatened Boys With Gun Over Bounce House

    Robert Joseph Baron was charged with second-degree assault and threats of violence in connection with the incident, which happened last Friday in Nowthen.

    According to the charges, two juvenile males were delivering a bounce house for their business last Friday night when their GPS led them to the wrong driveway. A woman told them they had delivered the bounce house to the wrong address, so the two boys began packing it up so they could take it away.

    The complaint states while they were packing up, Baron pointed a shotgun at both boys. When officers found Baron, he was intoxicated with a blood alcohol content in excess of .20.

    1. SusanM   9 years ago

      That's life in a Nowthen town, I guess.

      1. PBR Streetgang   9 years ago

        Ah hey ma ma ma hey...

      2. Private Chipperbot   9 years ago

        It's right next to Comenow. Nice area.

        1. Homple   9 years ago

          Minnesota has towns named Climax and Fertile about a half hour's drive apart.

    2. Rich   9 years ago

      "Nowthen" was coined by the town's first postmaster, James Hare, who had the habit of saying "Now, then" in conversation.

      1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

        "NowWhat had been named after the opening words of the first settlers to arrive there after struggling across light years of space to reach the furthest unexplored outreaches of the Galaxy. The main town was called OhWell. There aren't any other towns to speak of. Settlement on NowWhat has not been a success and the sort of people who actually want to live on NowWhat were not the sort of people you would want to spend time with."

    3. Brett L   9 years ago

      Huh. I would have guessed Florida or New Jersey.

  23. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Chinese police uncover huge fake jellyfish 'scam'

    Police in eastern China have raided two fake jellyfish workshops, saying more than 10 tonnes is thought to have made its way into local food markets.

    Police said the fake jellyfish had been made by mixing chemicals, adding that checks showed high levels of aluminium.

    The syndicates made more than 170,000 yuan (?18,100; $26,100) in profits in a year of production, they added.

    Jellyfish is very popular sliced and served as salad, particularly along China's southern and eastern coasts.

    1. Rich   9 years ago

      fake jellyfish workshop

      Nice band name.

      1. SugarFree   9 years ago

        They do nothing but reggae covers of Flaming Lips' songs.

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          Which is worse than selling fake aluminum jellyfish salad.

          But they sound like perfect free market libertarians.

          1. Citizen X   9 years ago

            Isn't "Fake Aluminum Jellyfish Salad" the name of the next Radiohead album?

  24. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

    'We could have been there': Squadron member speaks out on stalled Benghazi response

    The special forces based in Italy were ready to go and were ordered not to go. The article ends with this gem:

    The two men who spoke with Fox News have not spoken with the committee.

    TW: autoplay

    1. AlexInCT   9 years ago

      Your assumptions that the committee investigating this was interested in anything but quickly rubber stamping the version put forth by State and the WH seems to be the issue here....

    2. AlexInCT   9 years ago

      Your assumptions that the committee investigating this was interested in anything but quickly rubber stamping the version put forth by State and the WH seems to be the issue here....

  25. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Doctors used to literally 'blow smoke up your ass' with 18th Century medical treatment

    While it's unclear whether there is a direct link with the phrase, doctors did actually used to blow smoke into people's rectums in the late 1700s as the predominant medical therapy to try and resuscitate people who were believed to be dead, narrator Simon Whistler said. Mostly it was used on near-drowning victims.

    The treatment was so commonplace that equipment for it was stored near waterways, much like defibrillators are often stored for use in public areas today.

    To help people remember how to properly use it, one doctor even wrote a rhyme that went, "Tobacco glyster (enema)/Breathe and bleed. Keep warm and rub till you succeed. And spare no pains for what you do; may one day be repaid to you."

    1. Tonio   9 years ago

      That is truly bizarre. Of course we didn't figure out the Heimlich until the 20th century, and CPR didn't get useful until the sixties (I think).

      1. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

        Ignaz Semmelweis didn't figure out doctors should wash their hands before surgery until the 1840s, and this was considered a crackpot theory for decades afterwards.

        We think we're advanced, but humanity is still in its childhood.

        1. Tonio   9 years ago

          And don't forget re-using surgical instruments!

          The germ theory was proposed by Girolamo Fracastoro in 1546, but scientific evidence in support of this accumulated slowly and Galen's miasma theory remained dominant among scientists and doctors. A transitional period began in the late 1850s as the work of Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch provided convincing evidence; by 1880, miasma theory was still competing with the germ theory of disease. Eventually, a "golden era" of bacteriology ensued, in which the theory quickly led to the identification of the actual organisms that cause many diseases.[2][3] Viruses were discovered in the 1890s.

          1. Free Society   9 years ago

            Robert Koch provided convincing evidence

            So Germ Theory is just another Kochspiracy? *puts on tin foil hat*

      2. Just a thought not a sermon   9 years ago

        From Wikipedia:

        Heimlich first published his views about the maneuver in a June 1974 informal article in Emergency Medicine

    2. Rich   9 years ago

      I suppose it's better than cramming leeches up there.

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

        That's for shrinking swollen hemorrhoids.

    3. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

      "Rectum? Durn near killed 'im!"

  26. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Virginia woman pole dances for her 100th birthday

    "Some asked her what she wanted to do for her 100th birthday, and she said 'a pole dance.' And she no sooner said, 'I don't know why I said that.' And the rest of us said we don't know why you said that either, we didn't even know you knew about pole dancing, mom," Lensch told WWBT.

    Throughout the 100 day celebration, Ingerling received numerous gifts from strangers and family members alike and was even treated to a celebration at His or Hers Salon.

    The celebration culminated in a small gathering at Ingerling's home where she was surrounded by family and friends and fulfilled her wish of dancing on a pole.

    "We have worked it out that we are going to set up a pole for her. And she is going to do a pole dance," Lensch said. "Very tasteful dressed. Not in the leopard print leotard that she once suggested, but she will stand up by the pole because that was her dream."

    paging CJ

    1. Tonio   9 years ago

      Suck it, Florida!

      1. Florida Hipster   9 years ago

        Oh hell naw!

        *cranks DMX work it out on the floor*

        *twerks aggressively*

        1. Hamster of Doom   9 years ago

          *rains dollar bills*

    2. PBR Streetgang   9 years ago

      Freakin' southside of RVA. Buncha wierdos

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        I miss Plaza Bowl.

        1. PBR Streetgang   9 years ago

          Hull Street and Belt Boulevard. CLASSY!!

          1. Citizen X   9 years ago

            Classy as shit, dude.

          2. Tonio   9 years ago

            Ghettotastic!

            But seriously, folks, can we do an RVA meetup?

            1. PBR Streetgang   9 years ago

              I don't live there anymore, but I'm around RVA 6-8 times a year. If I'm in town a meetup would be cool

            2. Citizen X   9 years ago

              I don't make it up to RVA very often, but any H'n'R meetup will obviously have to take place at GWARBar.

          3. PBR Streetgang   9 years ago

            I grew up in Petersburg, so I KNOW me some classy

  27. Mazakon   9 years ago

    Muslim Family Considers Suit after Daughter Barred From Wearing Headscarf at Citadel College

    The Citadel military college, known for its buttoned-up uniforms and strict discipline, decided Tuesday that a newly accepted female student cannot wear a traditional Muslim headscarf if she enrolls in the fall.

    The decision disappointed the student, according to a family spokesman who said they are considering legal options because they believe "it's the same issue faced by African-Americans and women in this situation." The school didn't immediately embrace the first African-American cadets during the 1960s and fought the enrollment of women in the 1990s before relenting.

    Commandant of Cadets Geno Paluso said allowing the student to wear the head covering known as a hijab wouldn't be consistent with the school's policy of having cadets look similar.

    1. Rich   9 years ago

      Muslim Family Considers Suit after Daughter Barred From Wearing Headscarf at Citadel College

      Well, if the Citadel won't let her wear a headscarf I doubt they'll let her wear a suit.

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        Yeah, surprised the family will let her wear pants if they're that

        And AFAIK, african americans didn't ask for changes to uniform or grooming standards.

        1. Free Society   9 years ago

          And AFAIK, african americans didn't ask for changes to uniform or grooming standards.

          Not for the Citadel but that's apparently so for the TSA. I saw a TSA supervisor in Philly with his pants below his ass, his shirt not tucked in and his officer's hat turned sideways as he searched my bag. I've never felt so safe.

        2. Cdr Lytton   9 years ago

          And AFAIK, african americans didn't ask for changes to uniform or grooming standards.

          Shaving profile, anyone?

      2. Tonio   9 years ago

        Dammit, Rich, I missed the funny part. Need. Moar. Coffee.

    2. Irish is a Millennial, Poll Me   9 years ago

      "The decision disappointed the student, according to a family spokesman who said they are considering legal options because they believe "it's the same issue faced by African-Americans and women in this situation." The school didn't immediately embrace the first African-American cadets during the 1960s and fought the enrollment of women in the 1990s before relenting."

      It shouldn't really have to be said, but saying that headscarves are against the dress code is not the same thing as refusing to allow black people to go to the school at all.

      Per the Citadel's dress code:

      "Students may not wear any other jewelry, including earrings or other body-piercings, while on
      campus. Exceptions to this policy may be granted on a case-by-case basis for students requesting to wear jewelry for religious purposes, provided that the item is worn underneath the clothing."

      So they won't even let you wear small religious jewelry unless it's not visible. It's not discrimination if it applies to all religions.

      1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

        The thing about uniforms is, well, they're supposed to be uniform.

        1. SusanM   9 years ago

          Not even a pledge pin?

        2. Irish is a Millennial, Poll Me   9 years ago

          They don't have uniforms at the Citadel, they have a dress code. You can wear what you want, I think they just don't allow visible religious dress

      2. John   9 years ago

        Yes. And going to the Citadel, even though it is a state school, is not some basic right. People who are fat or out of shape can't go there. The school discriminates on all sorts of basis.

        If you want to be a strict Muslim, good for you. You should have that right. But if being so means you can't meet the dress code at a military academy, boo fucking hoo. You have a right to practice your religion not force everyone to accommodate your beliefs.

        You know who else can't go to the Citadel because of their religous beliefs? Quakers. They are pacifists and would never be able to square training to kill people and break things with their religion. Should we make an exception for them? No. This is no different.

        1. Jerryskids   9 years ago

          The whole uncompromisable religious obligation stuff is undoubtably BS - the Citadel could simply declare all female cadets honorary men, they could get some Imam to wave his hands over her head and say a few words and - poof - she's wearing a magic invisible head covering, she could get a haircut and sweep up the hair and wrap it up in a scarf and thereby claim the hair on her head is covered - lots of ways to weasel around "The Laws", just like the Catholics and the Jews have been doing for centuries and I'm sure the Mohammedans have been doing, too, when they want to do something they're not supposed to be doing and still be able to fool God on a technicality. (And if this devout Mohammedan took out a student loan to pay for college, well, you know there's a rule about that, too.)

          1. John   9 years ago

            It is total BS. I bet if some rich guy offered her a few million dollars not to wear her headscarf for four years, she would do it. How bad do you want to go to the Citadal and how important is your devotion to a headscarf?

            And that doesn't even consider the fact that Islam does not require it. Islamic women have gone without them for centuries. It is nothing but a way for her to shove her identity in people's faces. That is it.

            1. Free Society   9 years ago

              It is nothing but a way for her to shove her identity in people's faces. That is it.

              Haven't you heard? That's so hot right now.

    3. Zeb   9 years ago

      So, if the point of the headscarf is to hide the hair, I have a solution for Muslim women: get a crew cut and wear a hat. Military cadets wear hats, don't they?

      You have to give up other rights in the military. Why can't they make you give up religious rights too?

      1. Chip Woodier   9 years ago

        Could cut it all off and hide it in a closet. There...fixed.

    4. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      You know who else discriminated against people based on whether or not they had head coverings?

      1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

        J Edgar Hoover? (The fedora was part of the dress code.)

      2. Tonio   9 years ago

        Mid-Twentieth Century Americans who excluded Jews from many country clubs?

      3. Notorious UGCC   9 years ago

        Men Without Hats?

    5. Warty   9 years ago

      Why the fuck would anyone want to go to the Citadel? That's what always confuses me when it's in the news. Were they that desperate to get yelled at even though they didn't get into West Point?

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        The Citadel, Virginia Military Institute and Texas A&M are kind of a second-tier alternative to West Point. The military apparently likes degrees from those places and there are old-boy networks in place within the services (mostly Army and Marines) for those grads.

        1. DrZaius   9 years ago

          Virginia Tech and North Georgia College and State University along with some school in Vermont have programs that are called senior military academies and are designated by congress. I think the big difference is that upon graduation from one of these programs you are guaranteed a commission, whereas you might not be if completing a regular ROTC program at State U or wherever.

        2. AlexInCT   9 years ago

          VMI serves all 4 military branches, not just the Army, and stands apart from the academies specifically on that credential. The other 2 are crap schools however. 🙂

      2. John   9 years ago

        You go to the Citadel if you want to live in South Carolina the rest of your life. I know a couple of Citadel grads. They all went back to South Carolina and walked into high paying jobs and easy lives. Citadel grads basically run the entire state and they take care of each other.

        I always wondered why the hell anyone would go there until I met someone who had. You go there because once you graduate you are taken care of for life in the state of South Carolina and a few other places.

        1. Warty   9 years ago

          Interesting. Makes sense.

        2. GILMORE?   9 years ago

          I can attest to this.

          Only a fraction of citadel grads actually go on to military service. Most just see it as a private 'finishing school' for local gentry.

        3. GILMORE?   9 years ago

          That said - there are ALSO people who don't get into the academies who want ROTC military-prep and VMI/Citadel is seen as more-prestigeous than just any uni-program, though the reality is that there's little advantage in practice.

  28. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    Newspaper IT employees 'angry as hell' over foreign workers

    "The are basically firing me and hiring a foreign worker to do my job at less than half the rate they were paying me," said one IT employee. "They really couldn't find American workers to do this job? Seriously? I am angry as hell."

    "I feel the same way the Disney employees must have felt last year when this exact same thing happened to them," said this IT employee.

    On the form an employer must indicate whether they are H-1B dependent. If H-1B workers comprise 15% or more of an employer's workforce, the employer is classified as "H-1B dependent" by the U.S. government and subject to additional requirements.

    H-1B dependent firms are required take "good-faith steps to recruit U.S. workers" and not displace workers. But there's a loophole. If these employers pay more than $60,000 to a visa holder, or that person has a master's degree, the nondisplacement provisions do not apply.

    1. kbolino   9 years ago

      "The are basically firing me and hiring a foreign worker to do my job at less than half the rate they were paying me," said one IT employee. "They really couldn't find American workers to do this job? Seriously? I am angry as hell."

      Methinks the first statement has something to do with the answer to the second.

      1. Brett L   9 years ago

        Yes, but that's not how the H1-B program is supposed to work legally. It is for an absolute shortage, not price-point shortage.

    2. Rhywun   9 years ago

      "We will be having much rain..."

      /next's weeks forecast

      1. Brett L   9 years ago

        "Please do the necesaary..."

        First time I read that I thought they were advising a bowel movement.

        1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

          I thought it was "Please do the needful"

          1. Rhywun   9 years ago

            ^Yup.

          2. AlexInCT   9 years ago

            ^^ THIS

  29. Mazakon   9 years ago

    Caitlyn Jenner Allegedly May 'De-Transition'

    Warning: Video, autoplay

    1. Grand Moff Serious Man   9 years ago

      Well why not? She already beat the manslaughter rap.

      1. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

        Hey.

        Why isn't there a 'womanslaughter'?

        /raises eyebrow.

        1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

          You should send this to the SJW Gender Studies professors at universities across the country.

    2. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

      So he won't be a Republican anymore?

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        [golf clap]

    3. Rich   9 years ago

      And .... the start-up ad begins "I was once a man like you ....".

      You can't make this shit up.

      1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

        A MANNNNN....

    4. Citizen X   9 years ago

      "I've been going through a really weird time in my life."

    5. AlmightyJB   9 years ago

      Wants to go for Man of tbe Year?

    6. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      Hero!

    7. Rhywun   9 years ago

      De-transition from what? From what I have heard she hasn't started transitioning beyond clothes and make-up.

      1. Suell   9 years ago

        Fake tits, Adam's apple removal, facial feminization surgery.

        1. Rhywun   9 years ago

          Gotcha.

      2. Jerryskids   9 years ago

        Jenner transitioned from celebrity to attention-whore and now wants to go back to just being a celebrity. You can be just as famous for having once done something as you can be for continuing to do it, so why bother putting in the effort? It's like OJ Simpson - you only gotta kill your ex-wife the one time to become famous, you don't have to keep killing ex-wives on a regular basis to stay famous.

        1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

          +1 If I Did It

        2. Juice   9 years ago

          OJ was already famous?

          1. gimmeasammich   9 years ago

            Ever see any of the Naked Gun movies?

    8. Eternal Blue Sky   9 years ago

      Doubletrans??

    9. Red Rocks Rockin   9 years ago

      If this is true (and with that family, who the hell really knows), it wouldn't be a huge surprise.

      It's telling that when Jenner got the facial feminization surgery, the first reaction wasn't "Wow, I look gorgeous," it was "Oh god, what have I done?"

  30. Domestic Dissident   9 years ago

    George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012.

    You should be happy that his life is ruined because he defended his own life and now he has to auction off his possessions just to survive, you worthless fake libertarian left-wing scumbagetta you.

    After all, that's exactly what you and the rest of your fellow media turds were hoping for.

    1. Flemur   9 years ago

      Thanks, you beat me to it. The SJW author is "clinging to jerkwad relevancy".

      I thought Holder had stolen the gun, but:

      "The firearm is fully functional as the attempts by the Department of Justice on behalf of B. Hussein Obama to render the firearm inoperable were thwarted by my phenomenal Defense Attorney," the item description says.

  31. Rich   9 years ago

    High school lacrosse team accused of killing guinea pig, using blood like face paint

    an individual approached the Grosse Ile School District with "information that one or more members of the District's lacrosse team engaged in cruelty to an animal"

    WHAT?! *NOT* CULTURAL MISAPPROPRIATION?!

    1. spqr2008   9 years ago

      Pure Michigan

    2. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      "Lacrosse" is a term stolen from the French to identify a sport stolen from the Native Americans. They should just say the face-painting is a rebuke to the French cultural appropriation, a "taking back" of the game, and denounce the critics of the face-painting as privileged racists and natalophobics and oppressive members of the Franciarchy.

  32. Elspeth Flashman   9 years ago

    101 comments in 19 minutes?

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      Slow comment day.

    2. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

      dalmatians?

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        That is othering to Croats, Lord.

    3. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      Listen you, the majority of my morning is going to be spent listening to conference calls that have nothing to do with me, so I have the time. You people...

      1. John   9 years ago

        Are we on the same call?

  33. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

    Cribbed from a LH link: Thieving eagle steals fisherman's catch off his line

    Wynans said the eagle is well-known to locals as a menace to fishermen.

    OMG millennials don't move there.

    1. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

      Because they don't have fisherpeople?

      A lake I used to fish on as a kid had an eagle that would wait for the local osprey to catch a fish. It would then swoop down and pester the osprey until it dropped the fish. Eagle would then eat that fish and the osprey would have to go catch another fish. Young me didn't realize I was watching a great metaphor of govt in action.

      1. Citizen X   9 years ago

        Birds of prey are almost universally dicks, to each other and to anyone else, whenever they can get away with it.

        Owls, though. Owls are alright.

    2. John   9 years ago

      I saw that this morning. That is fucking awesome. Birds of prey really do know they are cool.

      1. Warty   9 years ago

        I once had a bald eagle land on a tree branch 20 feet above me. It was easily one of the cooler things that's ever happened in my life.

        1. John   9 years ago

          I saw one on the Potomac last year. He was in a tree about 30 feet up. He had to be the most regal looking animal I have ever seen. He just oozed superiority and grace. It was amazing.

        2. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

          When I was a kid, you knew about every pair of nesting eagles in the region because they were rare. Now they are getting to near pest levels.

          A lake I fished on in Wisconsin had an eagle that would swoop down and eat the perch and sucker minnows that fishermen threw out on the ice to die. Often would be within a few yards of the fish house. Big enough that you never fucked with it.

          1. John   9 years ago

            They have them in the winter at the lake out in Kansas where my parents used to live. The lake freezes over leaving a small area of clear water for the ducks to swim. That becomes like a buffet for the eagles. You will see a couple of eagles dining on a duck and the other ducks on the other side of the clear water seemingly chatting about what a shame it is what just happened to Bob.

          2. Private Chipperbot   9 years ago

            We have Ospreys that nest every summer in a cell tower near our house. We use the telescope to watch them more than looking at the night sky. They are huge and it's really cool watching them pluck big ass fish from the river.

            I also literally ran across a bald eagle on a trail run. As I approached, I was pissed because I thought someone let their dog loose. As I got closer it hopped up on a fence and then took off. Those things are huge.

      2. Enough About Palin   9 years ago

        I worked on the 30th floor of an office tower very close to the Mississippi River. Saw lots of bald eagles, but the coolest was one that had caught a large bird. It would take the bird up about 50-60 feet above my window, release it, watch it drop for a second or two and then dive down and re-catch it. It did this for at least 20 minutes.

  34. Irish is a Millennial, Poll Me   9 years ago

    "The man who shot and killed three people at a Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic last November has been declared too mentally incompetent to stand trial. "

    By the end of the day we will have multiple essays by leftists claiming that this is proof of anti-Muslim discrimination because the courts are trying to paint the shooter as 'just crazy' so Christianity doesn't have to bear the blame for the attack.

    1. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      You have to be mentally incompetent to be Christian and anti-Planned Parenthood.

      /progthink.

    2. Tonio   9 years ago

      Damn, Irish. You are the hateyist hater since hate came to hatetown. I'm jealous.

    3. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

      So we can agree that Muslim terrorists are lunatics who deserve to be locked up for the safety of others. Super.

      1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

        And besides, he isn't being excused for his actions by reason of insanity, he's going to be treated so that he understands the charges brought against him. (I'm addressing the inevitable prog hysteria, not you.)

  35. Jordan   9 years ago

    We're due for another recession soon.

    We never left the last one. A "jobless recovery" is a recession papered over with stock market bubbles.

  36. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

    Domino's employees help rescue regular customer after 11 day absence

    Kirk Alexander, 48, is well known for his daily orders among employees at the Domino's Pizza shop on Silverton Road in Salem, but employees became concerned after noticing he hadn't placed an order in several days.

    Managers Sarah Fuller and Jenny Seiber found that he hadn't ordered from the location in 11 days and decided to send driver Tracey Hamblen to his home after a call to his phone went straight to voicemail.

    ISIS is going to win...

    1. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   9 years ago

      Michelle Obama: Aw, so cute. WAIT! He was eating pizza everyday?! I will not stand for this! Expert Team assemble! We must put a stop to this!

    2. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      "Medical issues requiring immediate attention" - perhaps brought on by say, eating dominos boxed grease on a daily basis? Seriously, it's been eight years since I last made the mistake of buying anything from that company.

      1. SugarFree   9 years ago

        It's been eight years since you ordered me
        Cocked your head to the side and said, "You're greasy."
        Eight years since you laughed at me saying,
        "Get back together come back and order me."
        Eight years since the last slice
        I realized it's all my fault, but couldn't tell you
        Tomorrow you'll order me
        but it'll still be two days 'til you shit yourself

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          Seriously, fuck you for making me sing that to myself.

  37. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

    Great PR move here in Minnesoda.

    Delta has offered to give the TSA some of its workers to help the TSA because the TSA is so fucking incompetent.

    Someone should give the guy who came up with this idea a bonus. The TSA is about the only organization around that could possibly make Delta workers seem energetic and efficient.

    1. SusanM   9 years ago

      Not just PR

      Delta is also purchasing a 5 percent stake in Clear, a biometric identification technology company that allows users to jump to the front of the TSA PreCheck line. Delta will soon be able to offer a discount to the airline's loyalty program members and its diamond-level customers will get the service for free, Bastian said.

      The program is expected to roll out at all Delta's major hubs, including MSP, by the summer.

      1. John   9 years ago

        Most business travelers fly the same airline because the perks that come with doing so. If it wasn't for TSA, the airlines could do all kinds of things to expedite security for known travelers and both reduce the wait for the rest of us and allow security to concentrate on people who are an actual threat.

        1. Rich   9 years ago

          concentrate on people who are an actual threat.

          The TSA does *better* than that, John.

          They concentrate on people who are a *potential* threat.

          1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

            But they don't concentrate too hard, judging by their extreme failure rate.

        2. SusanM   9 years ago

          I'm just saying, is all.

          1. John   9 years ago

            And you are right. Airlines know their customers and could do a much better job at running security than the government.

            1. spqr2008   9 years ago

              They just don't want the liability. I'm sure the insurance companies are the main reason we have the TSA, since airlines don't want to have to insure against the incredibly unlikely event of someone crashing an airliner into a building, or deal with the lawsuits arising from it.

              1. John   9 years ago

                That is a very good point and probably it.

      2. Rich   9 years ago

        a ... company that allows users to jump to the front of the TSA PreCheck line.

        The *company* allows this? I don't think so.

      3. The Last American Hero   9 years ago

        This Clear thing sounds a little like Scientology.

      4. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

        That seems like a silly program. The only thing it gets you out of is the check of your ID. The hold up in the PreCheck line isn't the ID check, it is the physical screening.

        I don't see any advantage to Clear that makes $180/yr that much better than $85/5yrs.

        1. Cdr Lytton   9 years ago

          Depends on the airport. In some with high Pre numbers where even those lines can be long, I believe the Clear customers get escorted right to the front of that Pre line (if you have Pre on your boarding pass). It's not so much competition as Clear+Pre. Clear has also branched out to other venues such as sporting events.

          Besides, don't pay $85, get Nexus for $50/5 years & Global Entry to boot.

    2. John   9 years ago

      It is almost like the evil corporations who run the airlines have an interest in the safety of their customers or something. That can't be true!!

      1. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

        You know those evil capitalists would love to install whirling blades in the jetway to puree all their passengers in order to be able to pack more people in. The only reason they don't is because the carry on luggage tends to jam up the blades.

        1. John   9 years ago

          There is no better business model than killing your customers. Everyone knows that.

          1. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

            Say what you want about the idea of killing your customers, you have to admit it cuts down on the number of refunds you have to issue.

    3. Zeb   9 years ago

      I still like my solution to air security and efficiency. Just heavily sedate the passengers and put them in a box and ship them like cargo. I would totally go for that on any flight over 9 hours.

      1. Pope Jimbo   9 years ago

        I was just proposing this to a coworker. Just like the shipping containers revolutionized cargo shipping, air capsules would do the same for flights.

        No more watching the 100 lb, 5 ft woman try to heave a 200 lb "carry on" bag into the overhead while everyone is backed up. You can take whatever you want in your air capsule. If it fits, great.

        My other idea is allowing people to drive their car on a train flatcar. Then when you get to your destination, you can drive off and you are ready to go. My trips to Chicago, Memphis and out west would be awesome if I could do this.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          There are car trains. I think they are closed cars, and I don't know if you can stay in the car. The Eurostar "chunnel" trains have that service and I think there was an Amtrak one on the east coast for a while.

          1. Tonio   9 years ago

            AmTrak's AutoTrain (DC to Florida with a few stops in between) your automobile is transported with other autos in a car car, humans ride in a passenger car.

  38. John   9 years ago

    Single sex clubs are okay when we do it. Suck it ladies.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer......le/2591056

    1. The Last American Hero   9 years ago

      If gender is a social construct, then there's no problem, right?

      1. John   9 years ago

        If I went to Harvard, I would dress up in drag and show up at one of their meetings asking to join. What are they going to say?

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          What are they going to say?

          You're not butch enough, Sweetie?

    2. Irish is a Millennial, Poll Me   9 years ago

      I'm still convinced that Harvard report they used as justification to shut down single sex clubs was fraudulent because such clubs went against Harvard's political ideology. Even their own report says something ridiculously retarded:

      "Other than in dormitories, Final Clubs are the single most likely location for a student to experience a sexual assault (as identified from the list of locations given in the survey)"

      and

      "Nearly one out of every two (47 percent) female College seniors participating in the Final Clubs reported experiencing nonconsensual sexual contact since entering college ? the highest rate for any of the organizations identified in the survey"

      Non-consensual sexual contact is a term so nebulous as to be meaningless. It could mean anything and most of the things it means are so minor that no one should really care.

      Secondly, there is more sexual assault in the dorms than in the Final Clubs, per Harvard's own claims. Why not segregate all the dorms then and not allow women and men to be in dorms together after a certain time? I mean, if it's okay to completely police your students in order to prevent phantom rapes, why not go whole hog and turn the school into a giant chaperon?

      1. SugarFree   9 years ago

        If the Final Clubs don't allow women in them, then how are women being "assaulted" in them?

        1. DJF   9 years ago

          Your just a trouble maker aren't you, with your facts and your logic?

        2. Irish is a Millennial, Poll Me   9 years ago

          Women are allowed to go, they just can't be members. You can bring women to the Finals Club for parties, is my understanding.

          1. SugarFree   9 years ago

            Ah. I guess that makes more sense.

            But still, why would a woman want to live in a rape dorm or be a member of a rape club? Do they want to get in on the rape?

            1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

              Here I was hoping for some 'Woman in Prison/College' Sugarfree abomination to put me off of my lunch (my new diet plan).

      2. John   9 years ago

        Someone bumping into you in the hallway is non consensual contact. And you know it is bullshit because they used such a nebulous term. If it were the case that even 10% of Harvard women said they had been groped sexually over their objection, the report would have said so and made a big deal about it. The fact that they use such a meaningless term shows they had no better alternatives.

        And I love the "other than the dorms' qualifier. If these clubs are so bad that we have to shut them down, why aren't they shutting down the dorms or going back to a 1950s style sex segregated in loco parantis model? These same people no doubt are all about gender neutral bathrooms and letting people have a "sex positive lifestyle" and so forth. And they admit the dorms, that they made coed and whose environment they created, are the most likely place for a woman to be assaulted. But, they are closing down the single sex clubs. Yeah, that makes sense.

        it is all about politics.

      3. paranoid android   9 years ago

        Why not segregate all the dorms then and not allow women and men to be in dorms together after a certain time? I mean, if it's okay to completely police your students in order to prevent phantom rapes, why not go whole hog and turn the school into a giant chaperon?

        Stop it, that kind of talk will get Eddie all hot and bothered.

  39. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

    I've got a job headhunter after to me to work as a programmer at a local medical manufacturing place.

    Pros: 30% bump in pay

    Cons: less vacation days, more travel required, and less free time (eg - I often work from home or leave the office early to take care of family stuff).

    Apparently the first two workers already in this position were from India and there were some "communication" issues. So I would be third man in.

    I've been at my current place for over 14 years, know everyone in my department like a cousin, and have very little management looking over my shoulder. Hard to jump ship, but things haven't exactly been swimming here as we're short-staffed and the IT projects continue to pule on.

    I don't need-need the money, but it would certainly help my house redo and hobbies.

    1. Tonio   9 years ago

      Tough choice, LH. Really comes down to which you value more highly at this point - income or time. But also consider how well you interface with South Asians, how stable you think the recruiting company would be, etc.

    2. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

      The travel could be a downer, especially if you have a wife and kids.

      As for "communication" issues, was it the Indian head bobbing that confused them?

    3. DOOMco   9 years ago

      Not an easy choice.

    4. lap83   9 years ago

      If you've been with the same company for 14 years, you could easily get a bump in pay by moving on,not just with this new company, and you don't necessarily have to sacrifice time off. Or do some research and ask your current employer for a raise based on that

    5. Rhywun   9 years ago

      we're short-staffed and the IT projects continue to pule on

      Job security. Seriously, having "too much" to do is not a problem.

      1. Loki   9 years ago

        having "too much" to do is not a problem.

        It is if you loathe what you do for a living (that's the boat I'm in).

        1. Rhywun   9 years ago

          Heh yeah that would be different.

          I'm in the opposite boat - too little work and fearing layoff.

    6. Loki   9 years ago

      Pros: 30% bump in pay

      Cons: less vacation days, more travel required, and less free time
      ...
      I don't need-need the money, but it would certainly help my house redo and hobbies.

      The extra money won't do much good if you don't have time for your house redo and hobbies.

      Apparently the first two workers already in this position were from India and there were some "communication" issues.

      I don't know, that sounds like a bit of red flag to me. Sure, they claim that the first two people were from India and had "communication issues" but who knows if that's true? Maybe the company treats their people like shit and that's why the first two quit. I suppose one could spin that as a "communication issue" E.g.: "We didn't effectively communicate the fact that we're a horrible company who treats our people like shit and they quit once they figured that out."

      I'd suggest doing a lot of research into the company - read employee reviews on indeed.com or glassdoor.com or something - before jumping ship.

      1. Rhywun   9 years ago

        red flag ... the first two people were from India and had "communication issues" but who knows if that's true?

        Good point. The only "communication issues" I have with Indians are those who are still offshore. The many I work with in person in the US I have no issues with at all.

      2. Lord Humungus   9 years ago

        makes sense -thanks

      3. Good Chipper   9 years ago

        When I first started working for my current company, I checked out the ratings websites, and found a ton of employees and former employees shitting all over the company. I was worried, but it was a great opportunity, so I had to take it.

        Best decision I ever made. This company kicks ass. I have this feeling all of those reviews were written by assholes who didn't want to work or follow orders.

        Internet reviews are worthless. We also have customer complaints against my company all over the internet - we're basically a 1-star on every review site out there. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find that the complaints against my company are basically 100% due to "customer didn't read his contract, is pissed that he's expected to fulfill the terms".

    7. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      "A local medical manufacturing place". If I had a "head-hunter" calling me, I'd be a little suspicious about what exactly they're looking for in a candidate. Did the caller smack his lips a lot and mention anybody named Kang or Kodos?

  40. Loki   9 years ago

    George Zimmerman, clinging to jerkwad relevancy, is auctioning off the gun he used to kill teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012.

    That's uhm... a little tacky.

  41. Bra Ket   9 years ago

    I don't think auctions are about trying to stay relevant. More like trying to raise cash.

    1. Warty   9 years ago

      Yeah, Zim Zam has to be broke by now. His only asset is the fact that he can sell himself being a dick to 4chan.

      1. John   9 years ago

        He didn't break the law. And that case should have never been a story outside of where it happened. The media assholes ruined the guy's life and made it impossible for him to have any kind of a normal life.

        Whatever you think of that case, that is a terrible precedent.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          It's another one of those cases where everyone sucks. When it comes to Trayvon Martin, I hate everyone.

          1. John   9 years ago

            It is a tragedy. Martin was an idiot who thought that manhood meant confronting anyone who disrespected him. Zimmerman was a cop wannabe who didn't understand the dangers associated with confronting strangers or the consequences of carrying a gun and potentially having to use it.

            Zimmerman had the unlucky break of running into someone who was violent and stupid. Martin was violent and stupid and had the unlucky break of running into someone with a gun who was terrified enough to use it. The incident ended Martin's life and ruined Zimmerman's life. And all because two morons got into a pissing match. That is really all there is to it. If Zimmerman had waited for the cops, it doesn't happen. If Martin had just gone to his uncles house and not assaulted Zimmerman, it doesn't happen. What a fucking waste.

            1. Warty   9 years ago

              Yeah, I agree 100% with you here.

            2. Domestic Dissident   9 years ago

              Also, Martin was a known juvenile delinquent well on his way to a life of crime. If Zimmerman hadn't killed him, eventually someone else would have, or he would have ended up in prison, guaranteed.

              He was already caught once in possession of burglary tools and stolen jewelry, and certainly should have arrested and charged, but wasn't because Miami-Dade school officials quietly passed an edict to treat criminal delinquents like Martin with kid gloves.

              1. John   9 years ago

                If Zimmerman hadn't had a gun. Martin would have gone down for a serious assault and battery charge. Eventually, Martin would have either killed someone and spent the rest of his life in prison or run into the wrong guy and been killed himself.

    2. Domestic Dissident   9 years ago

      Not only is Brown a dishonest cunt, she's a stupid dishonest cunt.

      Please hire her already Washington Post so we can get her the fuck out of here.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   9 years ago

        this is why VP... you know the rest

  42. Free Society   9 years ago

    On that whole zoning thing I blathered about yesterday. Well yesterday afternoon my wife went to the Mayor's office to inquire about the qualifications to be a on the local zoning board. Apparently they are appointees from the community who volunteer and typically it's an extremely shortlist of people who get their rocks off fucking with other people's property rights. She told the Mayor that she wanted to be on that list. He agreed because they have a hard time finding people for that position. It's been the same crusty old bags of shit for the last few years. So she will be seated at the next term in about 6 months and she plans to approve of every single permit and variance that comes before the committee, provided that it doesn't fuck with anyone's property rights.

    I would not describe my wife as a libertarian, but I have been cultivating her hatred of government for about 8 years now. Her hatred of government has grown so much that she's functionally a libertarian by default. This must be what Emperor Palpatine felt like. "Yes, good....let the hate flow through you...yes, now show me your titties my young apprentice.....good..."

    1. Tonio   9 years ago

      Bore from within!

    2. Zeb   9 years ago

      Good for her. I have a friend who recently got on the zoning board. He is not what you'd call a libertarian, but he has the right attitude and enjoys approving everyone's projects over the objections of the busy-bodies on the board.

      1. Free Society   9 years ago

        All it takes is a hatred of busy-bodies, not even necessarily a hatred of government. The two things are usually synonymous though.

    3. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

      I have been cultivating her hatred of government for about 8 years now

      Me too! I send her all the articles that don't get covered on your average leftist site and shared on your Derpbook feed.

      Yes, good....let the hate flow through you...yes, now show me your titties my young apprentice.....good..."

      LOL. I need to work on the titties-on-demand thing.

      1. Loki   9 years ago

        What, you mean you can't get FS's wife to show you her tits on command?

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

          I didn't think anyone would ever be able to get her to stop... Nice work.

    4. Krapulent Kristen   9 years ago

      I'm doing this with my neighbor...it's fun when someone is open-minded enough to see what you're telling them.

  43. Ken Shultz   9 years ago

    "The 83-month-old expansion is already the fourth-longest in more than 150 years and starting to show some signs of aging as corporate profits peak and wage pressures build. It also remains vulnerable to a shock because growth has been so feeble, averaging just about 2 percent since the last downturn ended in June 2009."

    Yeah, um, any economist who says something like this obviously doesn't know what they're talking about.

    We can't have recessions anymore for a number of reasons. For one, the banking industry is much more heavily regulated now than it was before Obama became President. Now that the banks are heavily regulated, there can't be any more recessions. That's what regulating them was all about--preventing future recessions.

    In addition to that, we have ObamaCare now--which makes our economy more competitive.

    Meanwhile, when we move to a $15 minimum wage nationally, economic growth is expected to really take off.

    I know all this because I've heard it all on NPR, repeatedly, over the last eight years, and, obviously, if what economists say conflicts with what we've heard on NPR, then they're basically rednecks and they shouldn't be trusted.

    1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

      That's what regulating them was all about--preventing future recessions

      By the narrow and very specific technical definition used in the government record keeping.

      Meanwhile in real life, we're still recessed.

      1. Ken Shultz   9 years ago

        You must not be listening to NPR.

  44. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

    Are we ready for a gay Disney princess? We may be closer than you think.

    I thought we were pretty damn close, though.

    1. SugarFree   9 years ago

      What was Mulan?

      1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

        a straight transvestite.

        1. SugarFree   9 years ago

          "I don't get a period. I'm a cartoon!"

    2. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

      I don't how I feel about this.

      Legal support for homosexuality is one thing. Cultural immersion is another.

      1. Tonio   9 years ago

        But gay people do exist in our society, and were ignored or marginalized for decades. That doesn't obligate society to tell our stories. But it's funny how every time someone wants to include a gay character that the accusations of forced association (or cultural immersion, or whatever) come out.

        1. paranoid android   9 years ago

          The preferred term is "ramming it down our throats", and how dare you snicker at that phrasing!

          1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

            The preferred term is "ramming it down our throats

            It could become the next "culture war of the year of the week" which would be unfortunate.

        2. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

          I'm totally okay with it in the media. The good news is that I can tune out if I don't like it (which I do), especially with the fragmentation of the media market.

          I don't understand what the long-term cultural implications will be. There is no way of predicting it. We'll find out 40-50 years from now.

        3. Free Society   9 years ago

          But gay people do exist in our society,

          In MUCH smaller numbers and frequencies than is portrayed and believed.

          1. paranoid android   9 years ago

            In MUCH smaller numbers and frequencies than is portrayed and believed.

            What do you mean "portrayed"? By whom? Do you have any kind of numbers to back that assertion?

            1. Free Society   9 years ago

              What do you mean "portrayed"? By whom?

              Media outlets, films, politicians, jackoffs on your facebook feed and activists. Who do you think I meant?

              Do you have any kind of numbers to back that assertion?

              It's not news that people grossly overestimate the population of gays and trans. It's funny that you're so incredulous about this. Here is one study out of many.

              http://www.gallup.com/poll/147.....sbian.aspx

              1. paranoid android   9 years ago

                No, I mean, I get that people are bad at estimates, I'm just confused as to why you think they're overrepresented in media portrayals (why it would matter if they were is another story).

                On any channel, with the possible exception of Bravo (and even then I'm not sure), heterosexual representation will outnumber gay ones at least 99 to 1.

                1. Free Society   9 years ago

                  I'm just confused as to why you think they're overrepresented in media portrayals

                  Because I have eye balls. Never heard of the North Carolina Bathroomocaust? Totally worth all the fuss because a small fraction of that .05ish% subset of the population has difficulty choosing which shitter to use. How could anyone get the idea that the actual size of that population is bigger than it actually is? That's just crazy talk.

              2. Zeb   9 years ago

                That's surprising. I would have guessed maybe 5-10% on the high end and I'd believe it was even a little lower for people who are exclusively gay.

            2. Rhywun   9 years ago

              He means it's getting too gay around here.

          2. Zeb   9 years ago

            I think it depends a lot on how you measure it. It appears that a significant minority of people are somewhat "curious" or have some kind of homosexual experience at some time in their lives. Many fewer identify as gay and are only interested in partners of the same sex.

            1. Free Society   9 years ago

              It's nowhere near 1 in 4 people. And that seems to be what people believe given their exposure to the culture war, media portrayals and identity politics.

              1. Rhywun   9 years ago

                LOL I have never heard anyone seriously propose that number.

                Since when do we put any stock in polls, anyway?

                1. Zeb   9 years ago

                  Yeah, the highest I've ever really heard is 10%.

                  I suppose a lot of TV shows like to put gay characters in. But even there, I don't think many have 1/4 of their characters gay.

                  Like most polls, that one seems to mostly show that people don't think things through very well.

                  1. Free Society   9 years ago

                    Like most polls, that one seems to mostly show that people don't think things through very well.

                    People believe what they're told. Do you think people in 1920 thought the gay or trans population was as big as people in 2016 think it is? If not, why not?

                    1. Zeb   9 years ago

                      But no one has ever been told that 1/4 of the population is gay.

                      In 1920, of course people thought that gayness was much less common than it is because being openly gay was socially unacceptable and often illegal. People think it is bigger now because they have more information. I'm sure there is also some element of it being pushed in popular culture too. But even in popular culture, representations of gay people isn't close to 25% of who is portrayed.

                    2. Free Society   9 years ago

                      But no one has ever been told that 1/4 of the population is gay.

                      I didn't say they were explicitly told that. My argument is that the (nearly) 1/4 perception is a result of mass cultural influences from the media and the media's amplification of activism.

                      People think it is bigger now because they have more information.

                      And not all of it valid. One might argue that there is too much information in that way.

                      But even in popular culture, representations of gay people isn't close to 25% of who is portrayed.

                      Again, I didn't say that. The 23-25% is people's perception, it's their takeaway from popular cultural influences. It's the conclusion that people have arrived at, given their outsized exposure.

                    3. Zeb   9 years ago

                      I didn't say they were explicitly told that.

                      You did say "people believe what they are told", implying that people are being told that the gay population is much higher than it is.

                    4. Free Society   9 years ago

                      You did say "people believe what they are told", implying that people are being told that the gay population is much higher than it is.

                      You got me on semantics. Sort of. The difference between implicit and explicit. And yes, people are being implicitly told that the gay population is higher than it is, not specifically the 1/4 figure but they certainly are led down that path however inadvertently. They didn't arrive at that 1/4th conclusion by pure happenstance. If people were fully aware than trans folks make up a mere fraction of a fraction of the population, do you think they'd be shitting the bed over bathrooms in North Carolina? They're being taught that this is the defining struggle of our era.

                2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

                  I think I remember some gay activist claiming it was actually 1 in 3 and that is just seemed lower because people deny it, even to themselves.

                  1. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

                    The source makes me suspect the claim is bogus. Kind of like feminists climing a 1 in 4 rape rate. It doesn't even come close to sounding credible.

                    1. Free Society   9 years ago

                      Kind of like feminists climing a 1 in 4 rape rate

                      And yet the 1 in 4 rape rate on college campuses has become conventional wisdom that is accepted at face value by a huge proportion of people exposed to that propaganda.

                    2. UnCivilServant   9 years ago

                      That doesn't make it any less of a lie.

                    3. Free Society   9 years ago

                      That doesn't make it any less of a lie.

                      I'm not sure what you're arguing. Did I say that the popular perceptions are true and valid?

                    4. Zeb   9 years ago

                      Which claim? In the survey, they only claims are about people's perceptions. No actual research has ever suggested any number nearly that high.

        4. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

          What do you mean, marginalized? What about all those musicals?

      2. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

        Tonio - sorry if I offended you man.

      3. Enough About Palin   9 years ago

        Cultural immersion is another.

        Queer fatigue.

    3. Tonio   9 years ago

      I would think a gay prince would be more likely. And there were broad hints that one of the male suitors in Brave was totally not into girls and was just going through the motions because his family expected it of him.

      1. Idle Hands   9 years ago

        and you can't tell me there wasn't a vibe emitting from a couple of those 7 dwarfs.

        1. Loki   9 years ago

          A couple? I think Grumpy was the only one who was straight. Why else do you think he was so grumpy? You'd be pretty grumpy too if you had live with 6 homosexual midgets constantly trying to have their way with you. /sarc

    4. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      Some Disney fans argued on Twitter that it would have been a huge help for them to see gay characters in movies when they were young ? that they might have become more sensitive and accepting towards gay peers, or better able to grapple with their own sexuality. Studies have suggested that seeing gay characters in popular entertainment can decrease prejudice towards those groups.

      "There is no doubt that kids seeing positively portrayed gay characters could have a significant effect that would contribute to such children's learning about the world and who is in it," said Edward Schiappa, a professor of comparative media studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

      Agreed. I grew up with Bert and Ernie, and I love the gays.

      1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

        Gay folks here - what's the difference in homosexuality in men and women?

        It is my understanding that with men, it's basically hard-wired. But with women, it's more of a choice, especially with an emotional instead of a physical element? Is that right?

        1. Suell   9 years ago

          Let me posit that query to the burly woman with a crew cut and extensive arm tats including a pink triangle that I see at the local coffee shop scowling from behind her laptop.

        2. Rhywun   9 years ago

          with women, it's more of a choice

          I think what you're really perceiving is that society is somewhat more accepting of it from women, and therefore you see more women "experimenting".

          BTW it is no less an emotional component with gay men than it is with straight men. There's this persistent idea out there that gays are just guys who haven't "found the right woman" yet.

          1. Zeb   9 years ago

            Purely anecdotal, but among people I personally know, gay women seem more likely to switch back and forth.

            1. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

              See Trump-supporting gay guy Nero's tweet. He pissed off a lot of people with this one tweet:

              I don't believe in lesbianism. Not really. It's not a sexuality, just something to do between bad relationships.

              1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

                Who could possibly take offense with that? Women can do anything they put their mind to.

              2. Zeb   9 years ago

                In my experience, that's not it either. They seem to have equally bad relationships with both men and women.

          2. Injun, as in from India   9 years ago

            It's shows like "Orange is the new black" I was insinuating to, where the woman tells her boyfriend that she was once a lesbian, but not anymore. Or Bill de Blasio's wife. One of my acquaintances was that way too - she was a dyke, and then she met a guy and is now a married mom. Hence the question.

            As for guys, the gay men I know are simply not attracted to women. So there is no question of finding the right woman.

        3. Krapulent Kristen   9 years ago

          Who cares?

    5. lap83   9 years ago

      Why does entertainment have to be socially responsible?

    6. Zeb   9 years ago

      I'm ready for Disney to stop ding princesses. How about teaching children that monarchy is weird, anachronistic and wrong? If you want to challenge traditional gender roles, why do it in a context that is all about archaic tradition?

      1. Free Society   9 years ago

        Monarchy is wrong, just less wrong than democracy. What it does have going for it is it's ostensible rooting in property rights, except in this case it's the private ownership of a protection racket. Better than public ownership for more than a few reasons.

        1. Zeb   9 years ago

          I suppose it depends on the monarchy. The British style of limited monarchy had a lot of property rights built in. Some others, not so much.

        2. Zeb   9 years ago

          And when you say "democracy" do you mean a democratic republic or more pure democracy?

          I certainly don't think democracy is a virtue in itself.

          1. Free Society   9 years ago

            And when you say "democracy" do you mean a democratic republic or more pure democracy?

            I mean suffrage, the more broad and universal the suffrage, and the larger the electorate, the worse it is. Three people on a desert island voting on how to use scarce resources is one thing, that's basic conflict avoidance. Millions of people on a continent voting how to use everyone else's resources is another thing, that's a basis for conflict.

            I certainly don't think democracy is a virtue in itself.

            Correct. It's just a decision making mechanism for groups, that says nothing about the legitimacy of said group existing as a single group or making decisions by such means in the first place.

          2. Free Society   9 years ago

            I suppose it depends on the monarchy.

            The smaller the better, the less suffrage the better. If your property were a sovereign territory, you would functionally be a prince. It wouldn't be justice that some people move into your backyard and take a vote on who gets to sleep in the master bedroom. Those people who move into your backyard, were they to elect a temporary caretaker (president), that person will be less interested in preserving the capital value of the property unlike a yourself who has an incentive to maintain the value so you can sell it or pass it on to your family, things which a temporary caretaker cannot do. The caretaker then, has every reason to consume as much capital value as possible before it gets turned over to the next temporary caretaker or at the very least no reason not to neglect the capital value altogether.

            1. Zeb   9 years ago

              OK, I see what you mean. I don't think that describes any monarchies that have existed in recent history or what Disney presents in princess movies. But I do agree that what you describe there would be good. I'm not sure that's what most people are thinking of when they hear "monarchy" though.

              1. Free Society   9 years ago

                Monarchies, like all states, have a tendency towards centralization of power. They undergo the same sort of institutional entropy that all states experience, but at a slower rate with lesser severity. And even the monarchies that have existed in recent history (think pre-WWI), tax rates were remarkably lower, central banks had much less ability to manipulate currency, legislation was less frequent, legislation was less far reaching in it's scope and warfare was more limited in it's totality. Recent democracies have a much worse track record on all of those counts. The age of democracy does not represent the advancement of civilization, the age of democracy constitutes a regression of civilizing influences.

                1. Zeb   9 years ago

                  The US had all of those things as a constitutional republic pre-WWI as well. I'm not so sure it has so much to do with the form of government as it does with the fact that before the 20th century, things were just a lot more decentralized largely for practical reasons. I'm not so sure that a monarchy with modern communication and surveillance capabilities and a modern police force would be any better than any of the alternatives.

                  Whatever it is, here we are. You can't put the toothpaste back into the tube.

                  1. Free Society   9 years ago

                    The US had all of those things as a constitutional republic pre-WWI as well.

                    The US was slipping down a slope after the Alien and Sedition Act and even faster during the Civil War. The US also had a distinct culture of limited government and respect for constitutionalism that they directly inherited from English common law that their ancestors had lived under many generations prior.

                    I'm not so sure that a monarchy with modern communication and surveillance capabilities and a modern police force would be any better than any of the alternatives.

                    I don't want to debate non-factuals, anything could conceivably happen or not happen in an alternate universe. What remains unchallenged, the preservation and promotion of capital value and diminished capital consumption under private property is unquestionably better than under public property, even when the property in question is an unethical protection racket. I'm not saying monarchy=good, I'm saying monarchy=less bad than the present alternative.

    7. Free Society   9 years ago

      I have no problem with homosexuality, but if they dike up Frozen, I will not be telling my daughter about that movie's existence. I refuse to let this latest culture battle be waged on her little psyche.

      1. Suell   9 years ago

        They won't stop until we are at Ancient Greek levels of homo.

        1. Loki   9 years ago

          Ancient Greek levels of homo

          Athens, or Sparta?

    8. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      A gay Disney princess is supposed to be some big deal? What about the pedophile guy flying around in tights snatching kids out of their beds, luring them off to some magical "adventure land", hanging out with a group of "lost boys", a boatload of seamen and a fairy? That doesn't seem a little "out there" to you?

  45. DEG   9 years ago

    Hassan claims cops involved in beating will be "full investigated"

    Warning: auto-play video

    While a handful of people on the ground saw what unfolded, thousands more watched it on television, as news helicopters hovered overhead.

    "They all stepped out of their cars, and he just surrendered, and all of the sudden, you just saw all the cops start beating up on him and stuff," a witness said.

    New Hampshire Gov. Maggie Hassan said the arrest will be fully investigated.

    "The footage from yesterday raises serious concerns," Hassan said in a statement Thursday. She added that an investigation is "important and appropriate."

    The Attorney General's office is working to determine which officers were involved and what departments they are from.

    Sure. I won't hold my breath.

    Best video I've seen of the beating so far

    1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      That is really bad. He must have been a huge threat while laying on his stomach.

      1. Idle Hands   9 years ago

        I'm kind of shocked they didn't let the dog loose on him while he was on his stomach.

    2. Zeb   9 years ago

      On that evidence alone, they should all be in jail now awaiting trial. How hard is it to determine who was in the video?

    3. Free Society   9 years ago

      "The footage from yesterday raises serious concerns"

      She says it like it's not a clear cut, text book, iron clad and inarguable example of excessive force. Of course.

      1. Zeb   9 years ago

        Hassan is absolutely terrible.

        1. Loki   9 years ago

          You mean the Free State Project hasn't managed to turn NH into Libertopia yet? /sarc

          1. Zeb   9 years ago

            All the masshole transplants ruin it for everyone. A decent number of FSP related people have been elected to the legislature.

            1. DEG   9 years ago

              All the masshole transplants ruin it for everyone.

              That's part of the reason I didn't vote for NH when it was time to vote.

              1. Zeb   9 years ago

                I was glad they chose NH because this is where I want to live and it can't hurt. But I don't expect libertopia anytime soon. The character of the more populous areas of the state has changed too much over the past few decades.

                1. DEG   9 years ago

                  I haven't liked snow for a long time, since before I moved to NH. I decided to put up with it because I thought "Live Free or Die" meant something. I found out pretty quickly it doesn't. So, I will leave. The question is, when are the jobs not lucrative enough to put up with snow.

                  1. DEG   9 years ago

                    There's another reason beyond the influx of MA refugees that the Free State Project will have an uphill battle. The Puritan culture that dominates much of New England is not conducive to freedom. New Hampshire has less of the Puritan culture than Massachusetts, but it exists in New Hampshire and existed before any influx from MA.

      2. Jerryskids   9 years ago

        "The footage from yesterday raises serious concerns," Hassan said in a statement Thursday. She added that an investigation is "important and appropriate."

        They're even now investigating the seriously disconcerting violation of the professional courtesy rules regarding the TV news crews not airing these sorts of videos. Why was this sort of thing allowed to be filmed and who allowed the film to be broadcast? They're going to get to the bottom of this outrage, I'm sure.

  46. Leslie Wilson   9 years ago

    Most of us want to have good income but don't know how to do thaat on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn money at home, so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the site. More than sure that you will get best result.OI3..

    ====== http://www.CashPost7.com

  47. Leslie Wilson   9 years ago

    Most of us want to have good income but don't know how to do thaat on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn money at home, so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the site. More than sure that you will get best result.OI3..

    ====== http://www.CashPost7.com

  48. Karinka   9 years ago

    Are you single tonight? A lot of beautiful girls waiting for you to http://goo.gl/pI9ucn
    The best adult dating site!

  49. LauraStephens   9 years ago

    I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website...
    ------------------------------------ http://www.earnmore9.com

  50. ammythomas11456   9 years ago

    Start making more money weekly. This is a valuable part time work for everyone. The best part work from comfort of your house and get paid from $100-$2k each week.Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week. For more details Check this link??

    Clik This Link inYour Browser
    ? ? ? ? http://www.MaxPost30.com

  51. KieraArcher   9 years ago

    Started working at home! It is by far the best job I have ever had. I just recently purchased a Brand new BMW since getting a check for $25470 this 8-week past. I began this 6 months ago and I am now bringing home at least $120 per hour.

    I work through this link. Go here--------------------- http://www.earnmore9.com

  52. NatashaJames   9 years ago

    My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out.

    This is what I do----------------- http://www.earnmore9.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Fourth of July Is a Celebration of Freedom—From Government

John Stossel | 7.4.2025 12:01 AM

A Broad Ruling Against Trump's Immigration Policies Illustrates Alternatives to Universal Injunctions

Jacob Sullum | 7.3.2025 4:40 PM

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Federal Prison Guards Allegedly Beat an Inmate to a Pulp. The Supreme Court Says He Can't Sue.

Billy Binion | 7.3.2025 2:48 PM

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia

Peter Suderman | 7.3.2025 1:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!