Brickbat: Situational Awareness


A District of Columbia police officer and sergeant are under investigation after the officer "dry fired" an unloaded weapon at another officer during a roll call meeting. The sergeant reportedly ordered the officer to unload his weapon and fire it at another officer as part of a training exercise on situational awareness.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Threaten one of the serfs, and it's a joke.
Threaten another cop, and it's suddenly a serious matter.
Of course that's how it is. If 4 members of the Clinton family had died in Benghazi, Hillary would've been all over it. But since it was 4 serfs, she said, "What difference, now, does it make?"
Sounds like instead of situation awareness, those officers needed a refresher course on getting their stories straight.
One would think they would have plenty of practice at that.
Oh, come now. We learned after that incident of the detective who fatally shot his estranged wife through her windshield in full view of several officers with guns drawn on him (and of the man's fleeing child) that police don't fire on their own even to save a life.
But to save the life of another officer? I'm surprised their panic fire didn't snuff out the entire room.
+1 circular firing squad.
I sincerely doubt this was a training exercise. It's more likely the "victim" was being taught some other lesson.
It this the cop version of 'dry humping'?
as part of a training exercise on situational awareness.
They hate wearing the dog suit. Sarge always calls them his little bitch.
Most revealing comment: "You shouldn't be doing that kind of training. This is police academy 101. You do not pull your weapon out of your holster and display it, especially in a roomful of cops."
But this sounds like exactly the sort of thing that would happen on Police Academy.
Nice.
are you allowed to pull anything else out?
Your papers and/or cash.
Only cops are trained to a standard high enough to be allowed to carry and use guns.
rule #1: don't put your booger hook on the boom latch!
Lol
My roommates girl makes $65 an hour on the internet of hiss laptop . She has been without work for 6 months but last month her pay was $6852 just working on the internet for a few hours. linked here.....checked here?
===== http://www.Buzzmax7.com
Remember folks, only these highly trained specimens get 50-state concealed carry..for life. Due to their 'proficiency', er something
know who else was "proficient"?
Mark Twain?
Barney Fife?
The sergeant reportedly ordered the officer to unload his weapon and fire it at another officer as part of a training exercise on situational awareness.
To be fair, this awareness exercise was probably cheaper than that bullshit where a "gorilla" bursts into the meeting.
Well, modulo the paid administrative leave, I mean.
I dunno dude that makes a lot of sene to me dude.
http://www.Complete-Privacy.tk
Pointing a weapon, much less pulling the trigger, at another person [whom you do not wish to kill in justifiable self defense] violates the very essence of safe and responsible firearms handling. The directive to do so was the fundamental mistake in this scenario; not surprisingly it all goes downhill from there.
I don't know about DC, but in New York, pointing a firearm at another person qualifies as assault. Regardless of whether it was loaded or not. (Usual caveats about use of force justification in such circumstances apply, but this was an unprovoked situation).
Did a cop give the order,
and
did a cop perform the action?
The answer to both is yes, so it was doubly justified.
I used to work for a PD. Twice I was given direct orders to do things that would put others or myself at risk. Both times, without hesitation, I said "Hell. No". Once I was told "Do it or you are fired". I handed over my keys and badge and said goodbye. They chased me down in the parking lot and asked me to stay.
I was never police material and they knew it, I was never one of them. They respected me for that.
I finally resigned. I guess I am one of those "I won't be in a club that would have me" types.
That is the way my dad taught gun safety. First rule: there is no such thing as an unloaded gun. Your rules follow from the first rule. Second rule: there is no such thing as a foolproof safety.
All cops involved in this incident should be subject to summary dismissal.
DA RULES:
1. Treat all guns as though they are loaded, at all times; the vast majority of accidental shootings occur with what was believed to be an unloaded gun.
2. Never point a gun at anything, and especially ANYONE, you do not wish to kill or destroy.
3. Never touch a trigger until you are aiming and ready to fire at what you wish to destroy ["safeties" being a secondary line of prevention, the mass of grey matter between your ears, and the finger it commands, being the first].
4. Always consider what is beyond your target [includes roads, houses, and any potential unknowns] as well as the target itself.
Situational awareness: "Oh shit, i'm in a room full of cops!"
and they have gubs!!!
Want to meet a girl? Welcome to http://goo.gl/mxiosK
the Best adult Dating site!