Free Markets Linked to Less Human Trafficking
Score one for capitalism and economic liberalization: countries with freer markets handle human trafficking better, say researchers.


A new paper published in the journal Defence and Peace Economics shows no evidence suggesting "that economic freedom is associated with human trafficking." In fact, countries with freer markets are "more likely to enact and enforce policies to fight human trafficking."
For the paper, titled "Is Human Trafficking the Dark Side of Economic Freedom?", U.S. researchers looked at data on human trafficking severity by country as compiled by the U.S. State Department, the United Nations (UN), and the Freedom Fund's "Global Slavery Index," as well as what policies these countries had enacted with regard to human trafficking. "We, along with our co-authors, Claudia Williamson of Mississippi State University and Lauren Heller of Berry College, set out to investigate whether economic freedom is actually making human trafficking worse," write researchers Robert A. Lawson and Ryan H. Murphy in a Dallas Morning News article about their work.
Their findings?
In our sample of 112 nations, we found no evidence that economically freer nations exported out, imported in, or transported more people through forceful means. On the contrary, there is strong evidence that countries with more economic freedom are more likely to enact and enforce anti-human trafficking policies and some evidence that the actual incidence of human trafficking is lower in freer economies.
Lawson and Murphy point out that "many millions of people would like to migrate to countries to better their quality of life but are denied the freedom to do so, either by their current government … or by the governments of host nations like the United States that restrict immigration. Sadly some are turning to unscrupulous human traffickers in a desperate attempt to migrate."
"The good news," they say, "is that the process of economic liberalization and the globalization that it has unleashed do not appear to be culprits in encouraging human trafficking. If anything our research shows that people concerned about human trafficking should favor more economic liberalization across national borders."
A recent report from conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation also found that economic freedom was linked to lower levels of sex and labor trafficking. Using the rankings from the State Department's Trafficking in Persons report, Heritage researchers found that all but two of the 18 countries ranked as worst for human trafficking also recieved ratings of "repressed" or "mostly unfree" in Heritage's 2016 Index of Economic Freedom.
"In contrast, countries designated Tier 1 in the TIP report predominantly rank as 'Free' or 'Mostly Free' in the Index," explain authors Olivia Enos and James M. Roberts. "The implication is clear: Countries that promote economic freedom are more likely to be effective in combating trafficking in persons."
A 2013 paper published in the International Journal of Management and Marketing Research found that "press freedom is found to significantly affect a country's ability to adhere to international anti-human trafficking laws."
"In our analysis using data from 119 countries, the empirical results suggest that countries that are more economically free and developed and have greater income equality, tend to be more successful in complying with the anti-human trafficking laws outlined in the [UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons] which supports previous research. Further … countries that enjoy greater press freedom also tend to have a greater degree of compliance with the anti-trafficking laws."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So are these countries more likely to reduce human trafficking, or are they just more likely to enact and enforce policies designed to do that? Because one of those helps victims of kidnapping and rape, while the other results in busting up gay escort services because FYTW.
ENB -- Next time search for "traffic cop".
Is that cop telling all Raptors to go?
Are we talking about actual human trafficking, or consensual prostitution? I see the two used interchangeably so often it's hard to tell what people are actually talking about.
ENB's been pretty consistent in untangling the two in what she writes.
Women are incapable of deciding to sell sexual services because of "Patriarchy".
Probably both, based on the sources they're using, which tend to conflate the two. But when we're talking global data, it does at least to tend toward more a realistic focus on labor trafficking and actual sexual exploitation.
Bernie's gonna get labor trafficking dealt with. Dealt with!
My personal favorite is when they define human trafficking as 'any woman who moves to another country to work as a hooker.'
That way you get millions of human trafficking 'victims,' even though most of them did this consensually, just like any other immigrant worker.
The only power SJWs have is the power to define who is a victim. Well, when there aren't enough victims, one makes them. One declares so many people to be victims that it becomes impossible for people to live without offending someone.
Rand, paraphrased.
Capitalism is too busy oppressing us daily with 23 different brands of deodorant to bother with the trifle of trafficking us to a master who's kinder than the unceasing cruelty of Zionist banking and industry.
Those 5 words shot any credibility the theory held.
For those curious about this AM's Not, it was #3: A means can be justified only by its end. But the end in its turn needs to be justified.
Trotsky, not Kissinger said that.
Dammit. I was going for 2. I thought it was just a little too witty for Kissinger.
I'm not even sure what human trafficking means anymore.
"Sadly some are turning to unscrupulous human traffickers in a desperate attempt to migrate."
So the guy who helps you across the border is a human trafficker. What about a taxi driver?
Taxi drivers no, Uber drivers OTOH...
I have a new business idea.
UberUnderground
So the guy who helps you across the border is a human trafficker.
By any definition of human trafficking which isn't a synonym for "slave prositution", I would expect prostitutes to be a minority of people who are human trafficked.
Leaving aside the coyotes who just get you across the border for a fee, many immigrants are also forced into bad jobs for little to no pay, as their "wages" go back to whatever cartel got them across the border. To me, this sounds like human trafficking, but somehow its not part of the conversation since the usual suspects decided to hide their hatred of prostitution under a new label.
So ENB DOES like gladiator movies. Huh.
I thought that picture was from a Justin Bieber concert.
That dude stole my tinfoil kilt!