Political Correctness

The Armed Wing of Political Correctness

|

Brendan O'Neill is the editor of Spiked and a columnist for reason.com. O'Neill, who calls himself a "Marxist libertarian," writes about free speech, environmentalism, and other issues at the nexus of politics and culture. In December, Reason TV's Nick Gillespie sat down with the 41-year-old Londoner.

Q: What do you think is the biggest enemy or opponent of free speech today?

A: I don't think it's the state. It used to be the state—it would smash its boot down on any ideology it thought was dangerous. That still happens, particularly in Europe. We have hate speech laws which have seen religious people being arrested and critics of Islam being fined. But the real threat, I think, is conformism and cowardice. A reluctance among ordinary people to have the debate out, to take risks intellectually, to express what's in their minds.

Q: But it seems like just as political correctness and tenured radicals took over the university, American politics went very much to the right.

A: I think political correctness is quite right-wing. This is the great myth. I would say this, as a sort of lefty libertarian old-school Marxist, I suppose, but I think political correctness is a very conservative idea in that it's about stamping down on risky ideas, anything that might rattle the apple cart. If you think of the radical left of the '60s and '70s, they spoke entirely in the language of "liberation." National liberation, women's liberation, gay liberation. It's only quite recently the left has adopted the language of being anti-liberal, pro-state, wanting to squash dangerous ideas.

Q: You've critiqued left-wing environmentalism as really puritanical.

A: It's my least favorite ideology. It's an apology for poverty, a justification for unequal development across the world. But you can't come out and say, "I oppose economic development in Africa," because that would be a bit racist. So instead you have to doll it up in these P.C., acceptable-sounding terms like "saving the planet." But it is about preventing people from growing, from progressing, from having the industrial leap forward that we in the West enjoyed 200 years ago.

Q: What do you do to stop Muslims in Europe from being radicalized?

A: I think it's not so much the lure of the Islamic State as it is the push of our own societies. Western Europe has lost any sense of how to make [the next generation] feel part of a liberal, democratic, enlightened Western project….The punishment of Islamophobia, the clamping down on anyone who criticizes Islam, that actually fuels the victim mentality among some young radical Muslims.

Think about the Charlie Hebdo massacre—everyone thought, "This was some foreign attack." But I think it was actually a very French attack. This is a country in which it's potentially against the law to criticize Muslims. Charlie Hebdo itself had been taken to court for "religious hatred." These guys who killed the cartoonists grew up in a country that told them, "It is really bad for people to offend your religious faith." And then we wonder why they acted the way they did.

Q: So do you see terrorism in the West as a problem with the West turning its back on the Enlightenment?

A: Yeah. I think the Charlie Hebdo massacre—that was the armed wing of political correctness. These are products of a society that has abandoned the idea of freedom of speech, abandoned the idea of democracy, abandoned the idea of real robust debate, and tough luck if it hurts your feelings. And in that climate, you give rise to groups who are super-sensitive [and] who think everything that goes against their way of life should be crushed.

NEXT: Critic may not mention planning board member's "name in any 'email, blog, [T]witter or any document'"

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. the Charlie Hebdo massacre?that was the armed wing of political correctness.

    Any politician who said that would jump in the polls, and when the other politicians and all the pundits attacked him for, you guessed it, being politically incorrect, would jump again.

  2. Marxist libertarian. Ha ha ha ha ha 100 million dead ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha…April fools for real.

    1. Yes, I’ve never understood how any Marxist could claim to follow the non-aggression principle, unless they are even more utopianish than libertarians and fantasize of people voluntarily giving up all their worldly goods to the extent necessary to support “to each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities”, which still doesn’t explain how they think individuals, or anyone, can even know such matters. Individualists, on the other hand, believe in the invisible hand sorting things out more or less and don’t expect or want some romanticized equal outcome, only equal legal authority and opportunity.

      1. “to each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities.” We’ll get to find out if genetic engineering and nanotechnology get implemented in a meaningful way. Otherwise, why are we already looking at providing some sort of Basic Income as we identify the permanently unemployed due to robotics alone.

        I’ve been calling myself a Marxist Libertarian for several decades now but it has more to do with applying power-conflict theory than true Marxism. I was raised by a classical Heinlein-libertarian so that’s pretty much game-set-match here. The problem with the application of Marxism to date, if you believe it’s an accurate depiction of a workable political-economy, is that Marx and Engels, expected that it would be applied to an industrial society, not an agrarian one. There wasn’t a snowball’s chance in Hell for a double transformation of the means of production.

    2. He’s also a Christian atheist and a gay heterosexual.

  3. A Slap in the Ass to Political Correctness

    http://bit.ly/2eGuw2f

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.