Protests in Brazil After Prez Names Ex-Prez Lula Chief of Staff to Protect Him From Corruption Charges, Sparking Protests
A federal investigation could still yield him and others in government.

The appointment of former Brazilian president Luis Inacio Lula da Silva by President Dilma Rousseff, shielding the recently charged ex-president from prosecution, sparked a new round of protests in Rio de Janeiro, So Paolo and other cities in Brazil after three million people demonstrated around the country on Sunday.
Lula was sworn in earlier today, immediately followed by a judge issuing an injunction to suspend the appointment because it thwarted "the free exercise of justice."
Money laundering charges against Lula were announced by state prosecutors in Sao Paolo last week, related to beachfront property in Guaruja. The former president insists the property is not his—it belongs to a construction company, OAS, that is one of the main targets of a separate, federal corruption probe.
The charges required approval from a judge, and Lula claimed that the prosecutors were "not unbiased." Brazilian law prevents cabinet members (which a chief of staff is considered as) from being prosecuted by anyone but the Supreme Court, protecting Lula from the state charges.
The federal investigation, "Operation Car Wash," has not netted Lula yet. That probe is targeting a decades-long, billions of dollars kickback scheme between federal politicians and other members of the ruling Workers Party and the state-run oil company Petrobras, the largest publicly-traded company in Brazil, illustrating that the danger of money in politics comes from the government powers that are up for grab in politics, not on free people exercising speech with the help of it.
Rousseff, president of Brazil since 2011, served as the chair of the board of directors of Petrobras from 2003 to 2010—at the same time as she served in the cabinet of Lula da Silva, first as minister of mines and then as his chief-of staff.
Rousseff has faced on-again off-again anti-government protests for several years, including in the run-up to the World Cup. There have also been protests in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro over the bulldozing of poor neighborhoods and forced relocation of residents by the left-wing government ahead of the Rio Olympics, which should also see an increase in measures to prevent protesting at the events.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS! TRUMPLINKS!
Would somebody please find a big mute Indian to smother Restoras with a pillow?
+1 Flying Over
My Brazilian friends all keep predicting Rousseff is going to be impeached any day.
But she keeps pushing the envelope.
Lady Parts FTW!
The Brazilian girl I'm being catfished by was talking with me about this earlier. "Cansei do Brasil" is probably the best way to sum up her thoughts.
*resumes K-1 visa research*
Why is it that South America and Africa are such a mess. Yes ,outside [western and USSR] meddling didn't help .But come on,lots of natural resources and hard working people.What's the deal in the tropics?
Which answer do you want? Currently the popular choices include the Social Justice answer, the Stormfront answer and the aging favorite, the classical marxist answer. We can also provide a selection of artisinal guessing by various economists.
Corruption is easy when you have power?
A fuckton of crony capitalism and state-owned monopolies, to start. That were, of course, started in the name of "the people." They're paying for it now, though. With gas as low as it is, Pemex (Mexican state-owned gas monopoly) is hemorrhaging money, and the peso is almost 18 to $1.
Thank god we don't have political shenanigans to shield corrupt politicians.
*glares at ford and nixon*
Nixon's crimes were nothing compared to the last three presidents. Electing Hillary will be like electing Nixon after the whole country knew about everything bad he did, but somehow even worse.
Chile isn't a mess as far as I know.
Didn't they also recently have a bloody purge of leftist thinkers?
Recent?
Within living memory (of people who weren't leftists)
Great headline, Ed. Not redundant at all. Great headline.
It's very important to know that the spark for the protests was the action, and they were not just adjacent chronologically.
That picture of Hillary reminds me:
Man, has she ever porked up. Could be a side effect of whatever treatments she is on for whatever health problems she has, I guess.
I think, maybe, out of all the problems with Hillary Clinton, the cankles and weight gain are of no importance whatsoever.
I mean, she's not a model or porn star and, unlike The Donald's Hair, this is not a 'look' she's chosen. Fat or thin she's not going to win here - if she gains weight its 'related to her health', if she loses weight its because 'she has health problems'.
You are undoubtedly correct, sir. Still, man, has she porked up, and pretty quickly, too.