Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Public schools

Wisconsin High School Suspends Student for Criticizing New Speech Policy on Twitter

Thin-skinned bureaucrats strike again.

Robby Soave | 1.19.2016 2:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Dreamstime
(Dreamstime)
Basketball
Dreamstime

Star student-athlete April Gehl isn't a fan of the Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association's new sportsmanship guidelines, which prohibit teens from cheering inoffensive things like "air ball," and "we can't hear you" at games. Gehl tweeted, "EAT SHIT WIAA" along with a screenshot of the stipulations.

The thin-skinned bureaucrats at the WIAA didn't like being called out by a teen girl, so they instructed the athletic director at Gehl's high school to "please take care of it." Gehl was eventually suspended from her basketball team for five games. According to postcrescent.com:

"I couldn't believe it," Gehl said. "I was like, 'Really? For tweeting my opinion?' I thought it was ridiculous."

Gehl's tweet, which contained profanity directed toward the WIAA, was her off-the-cuff response to a WIAA email that took students to task for an increasing number of student-section chants at sporting events that mock the opposing team or school. …

According to Jill Gehl, that school policy includes a section on inappropriate language, which her daughter was ultimately punished for.

Being part of the basketball team is ostensibly a privilege, rather than a right, and the school has wide latitude to deprive certain privileges to students who act out. Even so, punishing Gehl for expressing a colorful opinion about a government policy on social media smacks of censorship. Certainly, it's wrong to teach students that they have no right to complain about state-imposed restrictions on their speech rights.

Hat tip: The College Fix

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Fighting Global Censorship, ProPublica Joins the Dark Web

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Public schoolsFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (58)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. colorblindkid   9 years ago

    Thankfully they caught her before she hurt anybody's feelings. I can only imagine the horror that would have ensued otherwise.

  2. Catatafish & Woodchips   9 years ago

    "Certainly, it's wrong to teach students that they have no right to complain about state-imposed restrictions on their speech rights."

    Stop - stop it, my sides - oh, God, stop the laughter.

    1. Jerryskids   9 years ago

      "Certainly, it's wrong to teach students that they have no right to complain about state-imposed restrictions on their speech rights."

      I'll bet they think it's okay to teach students that they have a right to complain about the lack of state-imposed restrictions on their speech rights, though, so toe-may-toe, toe-mah-toe.

  3. Citizen X   9 years ago

    I'm sorry, miss, but did you think you were living in a place where you could just say whatever you want, whenever you want?

    Teenagers are so foolish.

    1. phenryinohio   9 years ago

      Americans are so foolish.

  4. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

    To be fair, does anyone like being called out by a teen girl?

    1. commodious spittoon   9 years ago

      Ew. Seriously? So gross.

      1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

        i love that commercial.

  5. esteve7   9 years ago

    EAT SHIT, indeed. How is that different than when we say "FUCK OFF, SLAVER"

  6. Roger the Shrubber   9 years ago

    punishing Gehl for expressing a colorful opinion about a government policy on social media smacks of censorship.

    Robby - do you always have molten sugar on the stovetop for sugarcoating? You do know that you have to keep a close eye on the temperature and continuously stir it else you'll ruin your cookware or worse, start a fire?

    1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

      Hot break, watch for it or lose a pan.

    2. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

      Ohh and don't listen to Roger, if you stir that shit you will fuck up a pan and a spoon.

  7. Lee G   9 years ago

    She should have said "EAT VERMONT CHEESE"

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      +Cabot Cheddar

    2. Shirley Knott   9 years ago

      Eat Velveeta!

    3. Zeb   9 years ago

      Check out Grafton Village cheddar before you bash Vermont cheese.

  8. sarcasmic   9 years ago

    Certainly, it's wrong to teach students that they have no right to complain about state-imposed restrictions on their speech rights.

    How are they going to learn to accept state-imposed restrictions on the speech rights if they are allowed to complain about it?

  9. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   9 years ago

    This vile young woman and her supporters must think these athletic games are meant to be fun. Blech!

  10. kinnath   9 years ago

    It is never too soon for children to learn that government is violence -- "Fuck You That's Why".

    1. QuadGunner   9 years ago

      This ^

  11. Sevo   9 years ago

    Do we have a new standard in "Double Down"?
    Not only does the Gestapo outlaw normal speech, but then suspends someone for laughing at them.

  12. Francisco d'Anconia   9 years ago

    Penn State asks students to report microaggressions to administrators

    The public university is in the midst of a massive campaign that encourages students not only to watch what they say, lest they offend someone, but also to report any and all biased statements to campus officials.

    "There is no place for hate, overt or subtle, at Penn State ? such actions do not represent our mutually held values," Eric Barron, president of Penn State, stated in a recent message to the campus community.

    And here is the kicker...they are going to try to use the first amendment to justify it:

    Powers said the bias reporting acts as a catharsis of sorts for students, acknowledging the public university has no right to hinder students' First Amendment rights.

    "Penn State stands firmly behind free speech and free expression, even in those instances when the views being expressed are disturbing or insulting, or the actions hurtful," Powers told The College Fix. "The First Amendment doesn't just apply to those who express ideas with which we agree. It also applies to those whose ideas we may find challenging, repugnant or even appalling. By providing an outlet for individuals to report bias they have seen or experienced, we are giving them an equal right to express their thoughts and feelings on the matter."

    What happens to those reported, I wonder?

    1. Illocust   9 years ago

      I'd say people should abuse the system until they are forced to shut it down, but these guys have no principles. Anyone using it for anything but bitching about white male privilege would end up fucked over somehow.

      1. R C Dean   9 years ago

        That would be my plan. Fucking bury these people in micro-complaints.

        Vast swathes, I am sure, of the curriculum and activities are micro-aggressions against white males, by design, so I wouldn't even have to break a sweat.

        1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

          Write a script to pick out words in course and administration emails...i could have fun with this.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

      It's teaching students the circlejerkedness of the bureaucracy. The only thing of use students could take away from it.

    3. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

      This is secretly a contest to see who can come up with the best Paterno/Sandusky joke.

      An older woman who goes after young men is a cougar. An older man who goes after young boys is a Nittany Lion.

      On a scale of 1 to 10, how old is Sandusky's boyfriend?

    4. wareagle   9 years ago

      What happens to those reported, I wonder?

      George Orwell had a book on that. The only difference is that the reporting began with children much younger than those of college age.

    5. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

      What happens to those reported, I wonder?

      Maybe they get first amendment'd.

  13. Illocust   9 years ago

    Grievance study adjunct has a class full of special snowflakes campaign to put her on tenure track. She was completely taken by surprise when they decided to do this all on their own, for realzys guys.

    Seriously, I'd drop her ass so fast if I was running this school. No way in hell keeping someone around that organizes the freshman into sending you letters will end well.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/.....burger_bar

    1. RBS   9 years ago

      Those poor adjuncts, unknowingly entering into short term contracts.

  14. B.P.   9 years ago

    Hopefully the "Eat shit WIAA" chant will sweep through high school gyms all over Wisconsin.

    1. WTF   9 years ago

      "Hey, WIAA
      How many kids did you fuck today?"

  15. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    Soave poaching from Oliver without credit. If fellow contributors can't get a tip of the hat, how can you idiot commenters who care enough to post links hope to get one?

    As for the "take care of it" marching orders, the WIAA claims it didn't say any such thing to the school district.

    1. Illocust   9 years ago

      I'm not posting links for a hat tip. I'm posting links to hear what ya'll have to say about it.

      1. Swiss Servator   9 years ago

        VIRTUE SIGNALLING!!!!!!

    2. Citizen X   9 years ago

      If lower-status contributing males don't want their statuses poached by Robby, they'll need to step up their mane game.

  16. Anomalous   9 years ago

    Hey, you suck!

  17. DK   9 years ago

    "EAT SHIT WIAA" is clearly an acronym.

    End Aggression Talk. Support His/Her Intramural Teams. Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association.

  18. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   9 years ago

    Apropos of nothing, I notice our economic recover seems to be in a "pause".

    1. Je suis Woodchipper   9 years ago

      you need to adjust your ground sensor data.

    2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   9 years ago

      As it approaches the 8 yr mark, I believe 'hiatus' or possibly 'ice age' might be more appropriate?

    3. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

      All the other economies have already crashed from asset-forfeiture and prohibition laws exported to them from These States. There's no one else to sell short. Equality is a lot like entropy that way...

  19. Granny Weatherwax   9 years ago

    What's this playing sports is a privilege shit? It's a Ninth amendment right!

    1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

      AU is in DC.

  20. R C Dean   9 years ago

    According to Jill Gehl, that school policy includes a section on inappropriate language, which her daughter was ultimately punished for.

    I can see a policy on inappropriate language spoken (or, I suppose, publicly displayed) within the 4 walls of the school.

    But a tweeter isn't that. I'd sue the fuckers if I were her family, for violating her civil rights. Damages? Why, she's a teenage girl. Her emotional suffering from public humiliation, etc. is incalculable, but we'll settle for $10mm in small unmarked bills.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   9 years ago

      Not going to happen. Precedent set in Doninger v. Niehoff states that social media posts that lead to "disruption" of school activities aren't protected by the 1st Amendment. The disruption in Doninger v. Niehoff? The principal had to miss a scheduled meeting to deal with the blog post.

      Yeah....

      1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

        * cocks hammer

        So, what you're sayin' is we are already fucked?

        * gently places barrel into mouth....

        1. Ron   9 years ago

          be carefull what you say on line you may be denied the next time you go to buy a gun because of that statement. See they already have us in their grip.

          1. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

            Whaddaya mean "us," paleface?

            * moves away from him on the Group W bench...

        2. ant1sthenes   9 years ago

          You're pointing it away from the direction of the problem.

      2. coloraDOOM   9 years ago

        This is hell. I'm in hell

        1. Heroic Mulatto   9 years ago

          It's even worse than you think:

          The Second Circuit noted that a showing of actual disruption is not required by Tinker; rather the question is whether school officials "might reasonably portend disruption from the student expression at issue."

          1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

            Some wiggle room?

            though the Court hastened to add that "[n]one of this is to say that school officials have completely unfettered discretion to disqualify students from participating in extracurricular activities. [However,] [t]his Court is not faced with a case where a student was denied the right to run for student office because of the color of her skin, or her religion or even her politics." Id. at 215.

            1. Clich? Bandit   9 years ago

              politics?

              1. Heroic Mulatto   9 years ago

                Welp, *spits in spittoon* that's a loophole in need a'closin'.

  21. Ron   9 years ago

    the school should have no control over what a person says outside of school. i hope someone helps her and sues that school.

  22. Hank Phillips   9 years ago

    Background checks for reporters: "That aside, this kind of law would be completely unworkable." Reminds me of the Bard's comment that "Communism, like any other revealed religion, is largely made up of prophecies."
    Hillary prophesied that hemp re-legalization "would never work." This amounted to daring youngsters to vote Libertarian, and look what it did to her campaign.
    Friends, it's a movement! The Profits, not Prophets movement is the Libertarian Party and all you gotta do to join is vote--with feeling! Gimme a "V," gimme an "O," gimme a "T," gimme an "E..."

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!