A.M. Links: Putin Praises Trump, Friend of San Bernardino Killers to Face Criminal Charges, Ash Carter Used Personal Email for Government Business
-
Vladimir Putin is a Donald Trump fan. "He's a really brilliant and talented person, without any doubt," Putin declared.
- Enrique Marquez, the man who bought the rifles used by Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik in the San Bernardino attack, will face criminal charges.
- Hillary Clinton's tax plan has been endorsed by billionaire Warren Buffett.
- Defense Secretary Ash Carter has admitted to using a private email address for government business during his first months in office.
- "The much-hated pharmaceutical entrepreneur who jacked up the price of a life-saving AIDS pill by more than 5,000% was arrested for securities fraud."
- Got your tickets? Star Wars: The Force Awakens opens tonight.
New at Reason
- Brickbat: Being Disorderly By Charles Oliver
- Top-Secret Material Among Hillary's 'Lost' Emails While we've been fixated on Trump, federal prosecutors continue to examine Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. By Judge Andrew Napolitano
- Carpet-Bombing: Wall-to-Wall Folly "Death from Above" has shown little success as a long-term strategy against terrorists. By Steve Chapman
- Putting the Terrorist Threat in Perspective How likely is an American to be a victim of terrorism? By Sheldon Richman
- Government Should Make Economic Freedom Its New Year's Resolution Free countries are wealthier and healthier. By Veronique de Rugy
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Star Wars: The Force Awakens opens tonight.
More like farce, am I right people?
Are you doing a stand up act?
And what's the deal with Sandpeople? Single file? The way they queue up they might as well be Brits!
So two Jawas walk into a bar...
AAAAAAAUUUUGGRRRH.
/hunh hunh hunh
White guy drive a car like THIS *dorky uptight driving*
Sandperson drive a car like THIS *single file*
Hello.
"The AP Stylebook just changed the meaning of 'global warming' with one amazing edit."
Read. Weep. Reread and cry for mankind.
http://www.upworthy.com/the-ap.....dit?c=ufb1
The shocking ignorance and stupidity is unfathomable. Evil really.
They have so few victories in battle to save Gaia.
I think at this point they just bow to Thulsa Doom.
Next: Chocolate ration to increase.
Yeah, wow. The news media wasn't already biased enough toward the "consensus" view?
Some people do exist who you probably could call "deniers" of the science. But there are plenty of proper skeptics out there with good and reasonable doubts about how climate science is carried out, particularly in regard to temperature records and the value of the current computer models. I probably fall somewhere near Bailey. I buy that people are probably having some significant effect on climate, but don't buy at all that the proposed solutions will do more good than harm.
You'll have to define 'significant effect' for me Zeb. I've read good sources where they argue man's impact, while not dismissed, is negligible preferring to take the prudent approach of gathering more evidence before concluding anything in cement.
Science is not 'settled'.
No, it's certainly not settled. I think the claims that the consensus is definitely true and correct are nuts. We are just barely starting to understand how climate works. It's very arrogant to claim that they have it all figured out.
By significant I mean enough to possibly change some long term weather patterns and melt some glaciers a bit faster. I very much doubt that there will be any kind of disaster. I don't think we need to do anything about it except to accept that things change and that we need to adapt to those changes. Whether or not people are a major driver of climate change, climate changes and people have adapted to climate change before and will do so even more effectively in the future.
This is the extent I'm willing to go as well.
A trending story on the Facebook yesterday was about how scientists are now predicting that some of the Alaskan permafrost might start to thaw sooner than expected - where "sooner than expected" means "maybe in 85 years or so." Of course, that part was buried...
It's easy to make predictions about things that will happen after almost everyone currently alive will be dead.
Of course they did. Because fuck it, they are team members first.
tamales.
Upworthy's take on this is retarded. I hate the AP, but these style changes are just not what they are acting like. "Climate denier" and "climate skeptic" are shitty phrases that are ambiguous-to-meaningless and make for terrible journalism. And the change re: global warming vs. climate science still expresses a preference for the more scientific term.
Not really, climate change has been happening for some 4 billion years and will continue for a few billion more, it's inevitable. Climate change includes the various ice ages which can hardly be referred to as global warming. Global warming as currently used refers to the change since the end of the little ice age.
Hence....CLIMATE CHANGES!
Playing with words is fun.
Mainstream science is what exactly? Consensus?
Given that they ostensibly reject mainstream science, should we not call them science hipsters?
Galileo once rejected mainstream science. Look at where we would be if he had not been suppressed.
Good point. Keep looking at the stars...
"Mainstream science" is the "science" practiced by all those "scientists" receiving those sweet government grants to promote this crap.
Bruh
Well, i'm convinced!
Morons.
"Basically the AP has officially and objectively updated our language..."
Thom, you keep using this word 'objectively'...
You are right.
That boy ain't right...
/Hank Hill
If I had a rubber hose...
Air India employee dies after being sucked into plane engine at airport
Also, how come all the ads today on Reason appear to be busty Down's Syndrome chicks selling t-shirts?
Wow, this showed up in the wrong place.
Either way, I have two words for you: Adblock Plus.
I would like to value Reason's sponsors, I really would, but they've made this site virtually unusable without ad- and social media-blocking add-ons.
^This
I think of it like a libertarian litmus test. I block the ads and donate. Fair is fair.
Until recently, I've found that FlashBlocker is all I need for the site to be useful. No stupid animated video sending my CPU into conniptions but the ads still display.
Unfortunately, Reason just added some stupid in-line ad that autoplays on the main HR page. Over the last week, I've been on video conference calls when all of a sudden the page starts playing some stupid ad and I have to rush to turn it off as everyone on the call stops what they are doing and stare menacingly at me.
Hey Reason- people respond to incentives. Keep this shit up and I will definitely block all your ads.
people respond to incentives
A market opportunity for Super School News!
/Jimmy
I'm not sure that was a complaint... Maybe it was a request?
That's what I get everyday.
I have two words for you: Adblock Plus. I can't imagine how you can use this site without it.
Oh good, the post that timed out showed up too.
Okay, who immediately thought of 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' and 'Die Hard 2'?
'Deep Throat'?
/violently flips loonie subway token at Bobarian.
How do you get sucked into an engine under the wing of you are standing near the nose gear of a plane that is backing up?
There is a video on youtube of a US Navy man being sucked through a jet engine on board an aircraft carrier.
He was unhurt.
I think it's real but I don't see how.
He was hurt but lived.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2v1Pgpzp88
If I recall he was near the intake and jet fighter intakes entrances have a bit of space between them and the turbine blades.
The question I had was this guy should have her nowhere near the engines of he stayed where they describe him.
Rotherham Witness Says Police Covered Up Child Abuse By Muslim Men
...In February, the then Communities Secretary Eric Pickles sent a team of five commissioners to take over the executive functions of Rotherham Borough Council, saying it was suffering from "institutionalised political correctness".
In August last year, the Jay Report found that 1,400 children had been groomed, trafficked and raped by Asian men in the town but police had failed to intervene due to fears of appearing racist....
...A member of staff gave Mr Hussain permission to take the girls away in his car as long as they were back by 11pm. He took them to a restaurant and then on the drive back pulled over and made her "perform a sex act" on him and his friends....
...She said she first met the men when she was living at a children's home and had informed staff of their behaviour but, as with the first woman, "they just didn't seem to want to know."...
Johnny, you apparently didn't get the memos or the emails, so let me spell it out for you: Reason is not covering this story. Something about something not fitting a narrative something.
Seems to fit the "cops are incompetent, dangerous assholes and retards and you shouldn't count on the state to protect you" narrative just fine.
You aren't supposed to mention the bits we all agree on, Nikki. HATE. RAAAAAAGE. YOU FUCKING COSMO COMMIE FAGGOT.
The most important thing here is division. Never forget our differences, large or trifling.
This is why I like you. Keep the hate alive. #neverforget
Let it flow through you...
Then explain Reason's non-coverage of this story.
If by non-coverage, you actually mean coverage, then I can explain it.
Now, now, Nikki, you know that the "Why won't the Reason Cosmotarians write about my pet subject" crowd doesn't do well with facts.
The cosmotards were silent on it for a long time, and have don't cover it anywhere near as much as whatever Trump most recently said.
They actually did two posts on the story.
Yes, that's coverage alright. Actual no bullshit institutionalized serial rape by "Asian" men against white girls and an active cover-up by cops. Actual crimes were committed by citizens and government agents and no one goes to trial, much less prison.
Two posts. They really got to the bottom of that one.
How many posts will we have on Trump today? Someone who actually hasn't done anything wrong except exercise his rights?
The difference is - one doesn't fit their narrative, and one does. Can you guess which one?
Exactly. It's a huge story which speaks to big issues like institutional corruption, political correctness and Islam. Meanwhile, Reason did approximately 2500 posts on George Zimmerman, an absolute non-issue that only retards were talking about.
@Restoras.
Well, the regards that were talking about that were the rest of the press. The writers here do tend to follow the conventional wisdom unless it contradicts one of their hobbyhorses.
Thank you, Restoras.
NOW TAKE THAT, NIKKI!!
Why is "Asian" in scare quotes?
And, again, the Rotherham story fits the "narrative" perfectly. Did O'Neill seem to have any trouble writing that piece in the magazine? I don't think so.
I think it could get more coverage, but I don't wonder for a second why Trump is more heavily covered. There's a presidential primary contest going on and H&R follows the horse race.
Because "asian" has become the PC term for Pakistani crime. It's not nice to say who's actually doing this even though it's coming from one Islamic place in Asia. So they write it as if it's a bunch of Chinese people or something to leave out the obvious part about the only Asians being a problem the Islamic type.
Most Asian people in the UK are from India or Pakistan. I may be wrong, but it was my understanding that "Asian" has been used for some time in that way in Britain. And people there think of Indians or Pakistanis when "Asian" is used, where in the US most people would think more of East Asians. To an American it sounds like they are being overly vague, but I don't think anyone in the UK is in any doubt who they are talking about.
Most Asian people in the UK are from India or Pakistan.
Which begs some questions:
(1) Why not refer to them as Indians or Pakistanis?
(2) Why refer to them using a term which nobody associates with Indians or Pakistanis, but do associate with Chinese, Japanese, SE Asians, etc.?
There is also a large population of ethnic Chinese from Hong Kong. Not sure what there percentages are, but "asian" is really imprecise here.
Deliberately so.
Exactly right, Suthen.
Yeah, it's imprecise. The typical American usage of "Asian" is similarly imprecise, but people use it.
As I said, I could be wrong, but I think that the usage is common in Britain and probably isn't so much of a deliberate obfuscation since everyone there knows what part of Asia the Asians in question are.
No, jackass, that might be how you interpret it as an American, but no British person would think that.
I'm glad you can read British minds. I think they should use the term earthlings.
Because the term "Asian" is highly vague, especially in UK diction where it means basically any nationality from China to India to Syria to Kazakhstan.
I think it's not as well covered because it's not occurring on this side of the pond. But on the other hand it was a massive cover up of a massive crime, that's only gotten more massive as more evidence was unturned (something like 1400 English children repeatedly raped) and the perpetrators are a protected group that everyone is told "are just like you and me" and they faced no justice due to their status as a protected group.
It certainly fits the incompetent cops narrative. It even fits the PC narrative, but it's the wrong PC narrative for Reason. Reason's schtick is that Muslims (especially immigrants) are not culturally or ideologically different or incompatible with wider western societies in which they live.
Focusing on a story about a PC cover up of crimes committed by Muslim immigrants isn't really their bag.
No no no no. Bailey, Gillespie, and Dalmia recently....
Oh, wait.
"Reason never covered it!"
"Yes, they did."
"Well... well... they ought to have covered it a lot!"
Christ on a cracker, y'all, I was being sarcastic upthread.
I also think it could get more attention, and this is exactly the right crowd for it. To the left, I believe Reason ought to increase their econ and global current events coverage as well. From where I'm sitting, it would not kill them to drop a wee bit of the college baboonery and give the markets that share of the attention.
I do not, hark, decide the problem is that the staff are nationalists who flunked math. Those bastards!
Spot on Restoras.
They wrote like one whole story on it 10 months ago, what do you want! This isn't like the super racissy racist click boy mega scandal that has 50 stories it's just a few hundred minor rapes over 16 years.
How many stories would be sufficient, then? Is there new information that needs to be reported? I'm sure there are many things happening in the world at least as bad as the Rotherham thing that Reason is also not covering. They can't cover everything and their focus is clearly more on American politics and current events with more obvious libertarian tie-ins. The Rotherham is a big deal and should be more of a huge scandal. But I don't see why Reason in particular should feel obliged to cover it heavily. Outside of the "police are useless and corrupt" angle, there isn't much of a libertarian angle to the story. Some people committed some horrible criminal acts and the police and community failed to do much about it.
My understanding is the cover-up of the rapes was done by PC bureaucrats. A perversion of the criminal justice system. Seems to be right up Reason's alley, although admittedly they usually stick to domestic cases.
But if you look at the way Reason covers other things, they seem to have certain focuses that make it seem as if some issues are more important. For example, any minor update on the CA bullet train gets a new blog post. Rotherham doesn't get the same treatment. I suspect it is just because it's in another country. Personally, I find it outrageous enough to warrant being mentioned more frequently. Especially considering Reason's focus on the fake college rape "epidemic".
^This, Zeb. It's just like when I tried to engage the folks who were against the alleged "ground zero victory mosque" people. When asked how far was far enough (blocks, miles) they refused to engage the question.
There's a huge libertarian angle but their version of libertarian is bitching about Trans issues and whining that taxpayers won't pay to ship in refugees. Both get more coverage and both are about as libertarian as handing out welfare checks.
Outside of the "police are useless and corrupt" angle, there isn't much of a libertarian angle to the story.
There's other angles as well.
First and foremost, of course, would be a more honest discussion of the risks of mass immigration and the ways in which assimilation does or does not happen.
Second, would be a look at how the PC protection of these rapists was driven in some part by the way that these "Asian" communities are concentrated to capture voting districts via ethnic bloc voting.
One might also find a libertarian angle or two in the way a disarmed British community apparently felt powerless to defend its children more directly from these predators.
But it conflicts with the "we made them do it" shtick.
And that you should count on the state to import criminals to use their acts as basis for more govt control of non criminals.
The only non-criminals in this country are the ones in charge. Its a very small demographic.
I hope this will lead to a major national examination of conscience over there. Of course, given the way they've been going they will probably conclude these incidents were the result of structural racism and they need to redouble their efforts to "welcome" those people.
"...1,400 children had been groomed, trafficked and raped by Asian men in the town but police had failed to intervene due to fears of appearing racist..."
How many of the people involved in this are still breathing?
Someone needs to smoke some of these motherfuckers, and I am not talking about the goddamn Pakis.
Well, not only about the goddamn Pakis, anyway.
All of them.
They've already started on procuring new girls.
And 'grooming' has entered the wider lexicon.
No one is going to do anything--for the same reason Reason barely touched the story. It is vindication for badthink writ large.
Paki and PC bureaucrat alike will have a good Christmas this year.
Hillary Clinton's tax plan has been endorsed by billionaire Warren Buffett.
But what about his poor secretary?
If a Republican president or presidential candidate were taking economic advice from a Wall Street billionaire not on the government payroll as openly as Barry and Hillbot do, the leftwing media and progtards on derpbook would be in hysterics.
Do you overlook the fact that Republican party politicians are progtards?
Your comment is a bit of a non-sequitur, but I usually go with "fascist" or "statist slaver."
It's fascists and statist slavers all the way down.
But Buffett is on the government payroll, at least indirectly.
*mumbles some epithets about estate taxes and life insurance*
Buffet thy name is rent seeker.
see: KOCHTOPUS!
125) The other day at the Marginal Revolution site there was a post on how the FDA should recognize medical trial results from other countries, getting medicines approved faster. The comments section was full of the site's resident liberals saying "thalidomide, thalidomide" over and over again. There weren't even any real arguments, just "Oh, yeah, what about thalidomide?" or about 20 close variations.
I noticed something similar on a Washington Post article last week, I don't even remember what it was about, but the answer was "Sandy Hook," again and again, no real arguments, just a reference.
It reminded me of the "Darmok" episode of Next Generation. No real attempt at original thought, just repeated references to an important past event that somehow vaguely resembles the current situation. It has the same effect too: it's impossible for anybody outside the community to communicate with them.
That's how progtards operate. They all get their talking points from one or two sources and just repeat them over and over again without any critical thought. You see it in news articles, as well. It's especially embarrassing when they even use the exact same adjectives to describe something.
Dude. Vaccines cause autism. THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED. ALWAYS.
Do they thnk the FDA has never approved any drug that later turned out to be dangerous?
It's also a bit funny since left liberals so often think we should be more international and stop all the American exceptionalism stuff.
^This. Never miss the opportunity to call them out on their hypocrisy.
When the walls came down...
Darmok and Jalad on. the. OCEAN.
/argumentwon
Dude that is a total "Shaka, when the walls fell"...
Pfizer and Gilead at Tangara?
I'm very well versed on the idiotic rules regarding pharma drugs already approved elsewhere. Years. Tens of millions of dollars, if not hundreds of millions, for a drug already approved in the EU. And then people wonder why the drug (especially an orphan drug) ends up being so damn expensive.
Because... corporations? And profits? And, uh, greed? Wait, I said profits already. Um, lobbyists?
GERRYMANDERING!!!
CITIZENS UNITED!!!!!!!
It's the Little Blue Book in action.
Reinventing Newspeak ? The Fatal Error at the Heart of The Little Blue Book
The two best classes from my public school career (such that it was) were Forensics (i.e. Public Speech) and Theory of Knowledge. ToK forced me to examine various philosophies on how facts are established as truths, while the debates in Forensics forced me to argue both sides of a point, seek out compelling facts on either side, and be able to recognize fallacious reasoning. It is noteworthy that these classes forced me to dialogue with teachers and classmates to strengthen my style, whereas every other class was just "Read the book and complete the test"- which could have been done online.
Forensics is also the greatest asset as I have transitioned into the working world, where I have formulated "Overt's Theory of Corporate Success" - "A person's advancement in a large corporation has little to do with results they produce and most to do with how they conduct themselves in meetings."
The seen and the unseen.
Bastiat should be fucking required reading.
For every Thalidomide there is a beta blocker.
Check and mate. Seen vs Unseen, unseen wins hands down.
In 1984, its referred to as 'duckspeak'
Just in time for your Force Awakens premiere parties
Star Wars kama sutra books shows droids and bounty hunters in sexual positions
These aren't the roids you're looking for.
Speak for yourself, sailor.
I can feel your anger. Or is that your finger?
Your Schwartz is bigger than mine!
Is that a light saber in your pocket?
Han shot first, which was really inconsiderate of him.
"It was because you are so damned sexy."
"He's a really brilliant and talented person, without any doubt," Putin declared.
In Russia, hard blows you.
Yeah, I can see these two being real buddies if Trump is elected.
I'm trying to figure out what it's be like. Tango & Cash? Bill & Ted?
Marley & Me?
Iggy and Squiggy.
The Lone Ranger & Tonto?
Pinky and the Brain.
Turner and Hooch?
Karnak: "What's the rudest thing you can do to a girl in church?"
(opens envelope for the answer)
"Turner and Hooch"
Hiyo !
Ren and Stimpy?
Good thing Putin never said he likes libertarians. Reason would put his epiglottis under a Hitler mustache on the front page.
Irate bank customer pours pot of poop on counters, floor
Yellin is Chinese?
Nice.
You know, you could have gotten the same message across with DARK chocolate.
/looks at Fist.
Just as vile.
An ample opportunity to post a link to my favorite porn site, http://itsjustchocolate.com.
It's a porn site, but it's just chocolate (and naked ladies).
But was it in the shape of an Aryan mystical symbol?
Obama meets with Michael Bloomberg about gun violence
Two progs discussing guns. Yeh, that will end well.
Specifically, they discussed ways to keep guns out of the hands of those who should not have access to them non-government actors and how to help state and local officials address gun violence seize guns from law-abiding citizens.
Did their bodyguards discuss which guns they thought were best?
"...keep guns out of the hands of those who should not have access to them..."
I have a strong feeling that Obumbles and Bloomturd have a very different idea about who those people are than I do.
Michigan repeals several outdated unenforceable laws
Libertarian moment?
Snyder is an awkward nerd.But I respect him, if only for the fact that liberals hate him.
"Awkward nerd" describes the vast majority of hit and run commenters, so you better quickly apologize to them. I am just awkward, so I was not insulted.
I have to apologize to myself then, too? Ok, apology accepted.
You better apologize.
well, this is awkward.
You will be receiving the Vulcan Death Grip next time you are in public.
Sounds good.
"trespassing in a huckleberry marsh"
But why can't this be enforced? Sounds like property rights to me.
How does one differentiate a huckleberry marsh from, say, a regular bog that has a single huckleberry bush?
Well, my friend, that's why you need gov't regulation! Now it's going to be anarchy!
How does one differentiate a huckleberry marsh from, say, a regular bog that has a single huckleberry bush?
a huckleberry hound nose the difference
You're a daisy if you do.
"organizing "endurance contests" such as walk-a-thons"
Are walk-a-thons endurance contests? All the ones I've ever hear of are like three miles.
Marathons are right out!
You know who else organized an endurance contest?
The IOC?
Phidippides?
General Masaharu Homma?
Lisa Sparxxx?
Jim Fixx?
Heh, some of my family members are big on running. They run marathons every couple of months. So about halfway through a fun run one of my nephews just called bullshit on fun runs. They're not fun.
There is a property north of Midland on the way to Sanford Lake that has billboards and signs on them that read DNR=Damn Near Russia. From what I understand the state wouldn't let the property owner develop the property because they thought it was a wetland or something. So he ended up erecting those signs and clear cutting every tree... Now it's a dumpy swamp with tree stumps.
So, I guess he used a woodchipper for the trees, huh ...
Michiganders will be your huckleberry.
-1 They Shoot Horses, Don't They?
Castaway Who Survived 14 Months At Sea Sued For Cannibalism Of Shipmate
Wasting meat is a larger crime amongst my people.
I wouldn't cared if he killed the guy. That is a legitimate my life or yours situation, and I believe it's moral to try and survive.
Of course it is. But the family wants a payout.
That is an interesting take on the NAP...
They should have drawn straws first.
Is the prospect of starvation a mitigating circumstance?
$1 million for a 150 lb man, that's $6,667 per pound, bone-in. It better have tested better than Kobe beef!
If he died of starvation, he probably weighed half of that. That's caviar prices.
Hunger is the best sauce?
Jose: 'No, he tasted more like pork.'
Lawyer: BUSTED!
I had thought this was allowed under the law of the sea in extreme situations back in the age of sail. The incident "In the Heart of the Sea" is based on had a similar circumstance as I recall from documentaries about it. I wonder if it still the same way.
Then again, how quickly the surviving man resorted to cannibalism might be an issue.
His body was going to be eaten by one thing or another. It may as well have been his human friend struggling to survive.
Even with a gamy leg ?
A Siberian Town Wants To Elect A Cat As Mayor
That would have been a better debate than ours.
I'd feel much better about US voters if they wanted a cat over Hillary or Trump.
O. Long Johnson 2016
A Siberian Town Wants To Elect A Cat As Mayor
Campaign rally chant: "We want Pussy, We want Pussy"
sorry. Narrrows own gaze
Campaign theme song
hah! nice
Thank you
*relaxes gaze*
How bad were the human candidates if a cat was the lesser evil?
Leadership allies reject effort to move funding bill to the right
helluva job there, Ryan
related: Conservatives give Ryan a pass on budget deal they despise
http://www.politico.com/story/.....cus-216876
wut?
That crude oil export thing has my employer doing the happy dance. God I hope it passes. The oil and gas biz could use some good news right now.
Tiny kitten rescued from conveyor belt at recycling plant
Awwwwww. A sack and a river works better.
When you die, kittens will poop in your cremated remains and there will be nothing you can do about it because you are in hell.
or as Fist calls it, "Monday".
I think this was episode of Tom & Jerry.
Itchy & Scratchy. But it had a different ending.
*Yeardley Smith and Nancy Cartwright shriek with laughter*
I hear kittens make great cardboard.
While true, the training costs and relatively shorter lifespans of felines make it uneconomical to use kitten labor.
Cook declined to say whether it was a violation of Pentagon email policies.
"WAS IT A VIOLATION?!" *** snap! ***
/Jack Bauer
Catholic Diocese finds Utah 'bleeding host' wasn't a miracle
Combining the Body and Blood of Christ all in one? For the busy faithful on the go!
the church sets a high bar for proving a miracle
"We answer to a Higher Bar!"
Uh, maybe God sometimes works in fairly quotidian ways.
Penicillin is a miracle! Fuck you deniers!
The 'Isolationist' Smear
I'm sorry, but weren't the 30's and 40's characterized by intensive meddling in East Asia and eventually a brutal world spanning total war? The fabled "age of isolationism" is never in the history books where they say it is.
No, Comrade, we have always been at war with Eastasia
This Day in History
All I remember about the signing was Reagan-Mulroney's bromance.
"I was constructed in a garage in Palo Alto a very long time ago. ? A man whose name shall remain nameless created me in his garage."
Well, that explains a fair amount.
I was born in a factory, far away from the milky teat
What's the use?
You know what else was consructed in a garage in Palo Alto...?
(I know it was shot in Dallas, but it always made more sense taking place in silicon valley.)
Defense Secretary Ash Carter has admitted to using a private email address for government business during his first months in office.
HE LEARNED IT FROM WATCHING HILLARY, OKAY?
Ivy leaguers sign 'petition' to repeal First Amendment
Fuck, and these guys are going to be in congress and all levels of government in fifteen years. We are screwed.
I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.
I'm not shocked, but I am terrified that we have, at most, two decades left of even nominally free speech in this country before these idiot fascists are populating the federal court system
Your winnings sir.
That sounds like a micro-aggression to me. Can we get some muscle over here to clear this guy out.
I blame SoCons on lead.
What the hell? I mean, really... what the hell?
I would like to see how it was worded to see exactly on what basis they went for it.
The anti Citizen's United people seem to favor repeal because they think somebody richer than they are having the freedom to use their resources as they see fit means a person with lesser resources has no voice. Valuing equality higher than liberty is the death of liberty.
Mark Bittman on GMOs, farms, raising healthier kids, and establishing a minimum drinking age for soda.
Just get it over with and say kids aren't allowed to buy anything until they are 18.
Except beer or slot machine credits - 21 for those.
But they should totally be allowed to buy organic vegetables!
That's such an incredibly stupid article.
I especially love how he searches for solutions as to why Iowa farmers only grow corn and soy, and manages to reach conclusions as to why that happens (it's industry's fault!) without even mentioning how it happens because government subsidizes it.
Almost the entire article is horrible.
I was about to point that out, as well. The logic (here and elsewhere) seems to go:
1) Government has a bad, expensive idea to distribute money to a favored constituency
2) Resulting distorted market creates problematic side effect that all critics predicted
3) Ignore the problem until it gets the attention of someone at NYT or WaPo
4) Declare it a "crisis" and, rather than address the source of the problem, use it as a justification to erode liberty and civil rights.
See, also, health insurance
Without subsidies, Iowa farmers would still grow pretty much corn and soy. That's because of a combination of soil and climate make Iowa highly suitable for corn and soy. Not to mention that a couple of thousand acres can be managed by one guy or gal with a big tractor and associated equipment.
The climate and soil in the "Corn Belt" are ideal for corn and soybeans and, just as important, not very good for other big acreage crops like small grains.
However, ND would grow more barley and less corn sans subsidies.
You're right about that.
"So what kinds of things can we do to make it harder for kids to drink Coca-Cola?"
As a parent, I find saying the word "No" to be sufficient.
I don't think he's a parent, and his goal is to make it harder for other people's kids to drink coca-cola.
Some parents find it difficult to do so, and the #1 most important purpose of the government is to make sure no one* ever has to suffer any discomfort to their feelings for any reason ever ever.
*Unless you are a heterosexual white male, in which case you are part of the oppressive patriarchy and aren't entitled to any rights.
I drank a ton of coke as a kid. But I was active and never fat. The problem isn't that your kid is drinking coke. The problem if there is one is that your kid is not active enough or eating too much in general.
So what kinds of things can we do to make it harder for kids to drink Coca-Cola?
Put it in the freezer overnight?
Oh, OK then. I guess that's settled.
British man performed as stripper while claiming thousands of dollars in disability benefits
Nice pasties, Mark. Are they Cornish?
*narrows gaze*
*salivates*
A 51-year-old British man ... stripper
Rule 34 in action.
"The much-hated pharmaceutical entrepreneur who jacked up the price of a life-saving AIDS pill by more than 5,000% was arrested for securities fraud."
Luckily you can get Schadenfreude over the counter.
Goddamn you, Fist...
*sighs as lower lip quivers*
Endless summer! Olivia Wilde flaunts flawless bikini body while paddle boarding in Hawaii only 20 months after welcoming son Otis
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....-Otis.html
I lust her so bad...
I hated her character on House, but at the same time I was always rooting for her to get more screen time.
Jennifer Morrison, the woman she replaced on House, is more attractive. Also, she doesn't have an alien face.
A 5head and high cheekbones does not an alien face make, and anyway fuck you, I like it.
But Jennifer Morrison is also top notch. I also hated her character on the show.
So, you hate female television doctors?
You probably have a strong dislike for Dr. Temperance "Bones" Brennan too, don't you?
IMO, the writers for House did a horrible job with all the female characters. They were pretty much all caricatures.
Of course they were. Every character was a caricature, and every plot was the same (mystery illness, wrong diagnosis, a little illegal investigation, then at the very end... ah ha!). The show was as formulaic as they come.
House's character had a lot more depth (largely thanks to the strength of Hugh Laurie's acting), but then that's why the rest of the cast were all caricatures, because they only served to flesh out the intricacies of the main character. Nevertheless, the male characters were nearly all better written and more fully fleshed out. Chase's character arc I particularly enjoyed after they turned him into an asshole. Ultimately though, it's the House and Wilson show, mirroring the Holmes/Watson dynamic that they were riffing from the get-go.
and anyway fuck you, I like it.
seconded
Hey, to each their own. You prefer alien heads. It's all good.
Miranda Kerr has an alien face. Wilde, not so much.
FWIW, I like Miranda Kerr as well. Maybe xenophilia is my thing.
Dichen Lachman is clearly alien. And hot.
You prefer alien heads. It's all good
I hated her in Cowboys & Aliens.
Alien? More some fae creature type, I think.
sarc, I am surprised at you.
Why?
Looks like she has cankles and the thighs look a little thick.
All the better for riding with...
"The much-hated pharmaceutical entrepreneur who jacked up the price of a life-saving AIDS pill by more than 5,000% was arrested for securities fraud."
I'm getting the feeling that if anybody without political connections gets investigated some crime can be found to toss them in jail for several years.
His latest venture involved manipulating the stock of a small biotech - KBIO I believe. Not that "manipulation" is a crime but Forbes magazine was calling for his arrest a couple of weeks ago.
I'm getting the feeling that if anybody without political connections gets investigated some crime can be found to toss them in jail for several years.
That's the beauty of criminalizing everything. You can always nail your political enemies with something.
Plus prosecutorial discretion FTW.
Well, when you put banana republic, tin-pot dictator material in the white house...
Vladimir Putin is a Donald Trump fan.
There's a dream ticket for conservatives.
Hmmmm. Putin or President Pantywaist...
Warty rides to the rescue!
The Earth Has Less Nutrients Due to a Shortage of Animal Poop
what we need is a vegan revolution, meaning fewer animals, and less poop for our fruits and vegetables! Hooray!
what we need is a vegan revolution, meaning fewer animals, and less poop for our fruits and vegetables! Hooray!
"global nutrient pump"
More like a global nutrient dump.
Space poop from asteroid mining will eventually replace it, I reckon.
"'Gas music from Jupiter', indeed!"
But the global warming crowd tells us that all the world's livestock are warming up the planet because they're pooping and farting more than all of the undomesticated fauna that ever lived.
That is obviously GMO poop, and is not to be trusted.
So, the economy is a zero sum game, but biology is not.
Got it.
Light the Bo signal!
New Orleans considers removing Confederate monuments
They did such a bang up job on the levees.
And we all know New Orleans as a city has no other more pressing problems to deal with than statues of people that most of its citizens likely don't even know who they are. I mean it is not like there is a crime, poverty terrible schools and economic development problem in New Orleans. Nope, those things have long since been solved and New Orleans is free to move onto important things like this.
Pray for another Katrina.
The day you show me a Confederate statue get off its plinth, walk around, and lynch someone is the day I will agree that it should be removed.
Dutch town riots over asylum centre plan
Whelp, this could very well be the turning point. This is an actual violent reaction to attempt to take in more refugees, and that could be all it takes to spark a full tide change of behavior in Europe.
"About 2,000 people joined the protests from the municipality of 27,000, 27 km (17 miles) from Utrecht, Dutch national broadcaster NOS reports."
Holy shit, you have to take into account that Europeans are more likely to riot than Americans, but that is a huge chunk of the populace turning out on the street. How the hell do the politicians think they are going to keep their jobs with that kind of resistance.
How the hell do the politicians think they are going to keep their jobs with that kind of resistance.
They have all the guns?
I think there is a limit to what sort of policies you can reasonably shove down people's throat. The government thinks they can just impose members of the backwards societies on Earth on the inhabitants of the most advanced and k selected societies on Earth and think there won't be a problem. Those rioters are taxed to feed, house, clothe and provide for all the needs of these asylum seekers and third world immigrants in general. Free people, k selected people, don't breed well in captivity and in the west the k selected are taxed to pay for the lifestyles and offspring of the r selected. Thereby diminishing the amount of k selection taking place in society, making the world a worse place.
So Europeans, please do riot, burn every one of those tax funded refugee centers to the ground. It would do far more good to send money to the afflicted region to help people rather than import them to the west where the cost to help them is an order of magnitude higher and less effective.
What is going to happen is people will just start taking matters into their own hands and that will be very ugly. Long term, I think Muslims are less of a threat to Europe than many think. The European welfare states are going to collapse and the Europeans are not going sit idly by and let these people terrorize them into submission. Cut off the welfare and get the natives to start taking matters into their own hands, Muslims will decide going back home is a good option. They are still a relatively small minority and have virtually no economic prospects in Europe outside of welfare once the natives really turn on them. Cut off the welfare and what do they have? Long cold winters of hoping the natives don't show up and burn their homes down?
That is both sad and reason for optimism. But also correct I believe. The longer the welfare gravy train flows into their insular little colonies in Europe, the more unpleasant the end game will be. There's just something I don't like about k-selected people being forced to forgo their own reproduction in order to subsidize the reproduction of r-selected good-for-nothings and I don't think I'm alone on this. The welfare state is just downright evil.
It is very sad. Things are going to get ugly in Europe for everyone and most of all for Muslims. But the Muslims have no one but themselves to blame. You can't just show up in an alien country and squat and demand the locals cater to you. And that is what Muslims have largely done in Europe.
Yeah I'm not exactly impressed with how Muslims ("westernized" or not) generally behave in Europe. There are exceptions, my next door neighbor in Arnhem was a Turkish grocer and lived above his store. He was a great guy, always gave me free baklava. That said, my first day in the Netherlands a Morrocan tried to mug me with a shard of broken glass. Not long after, a Levantine of some type actually did rob me on an empty train. I could go on and on with my anecdotes, but the lesson I learned while living there was to assume they mean me harm and to keep my distance. Albeit, I never had a negative interaction with a Turk. The ones causing trouble were almost always Morrocans and Lebanese.
Alleged car thief just wanted 'out of R.I.' before he rammed Rehoboth police cruiser
another economic refugee
Then one night in desperation
A young man breaks away
He buys a gun, he steals a car,
He tries to run, but he don't get far
And his mama cries
As a crowd gathers 'round an angry young man
Face down on the street with a gun in his hand
In the ghetto
(In the ghetto)
Confessions of an orgy addict
I'd just broken up with my boyfriend ? a complete jerk ? so it was my way of giving him the finger.
Yeah, that'lll show him!
so it was my way of giving him the finger.
... if you know what she means...
The gives him the finger by getting everyone else's fingers.
Has there ever been an article that started "Confessions of a..." where the writer didn't turn out to be a self-centered asshole?
That one didn't seem so bad.
Her twitter bio:
All-round curious person, always on the lookout for new, buzz-worthy stories. Journalist and frazzled mother of two. Senior Features Writer for New York Post
Well, she'd be fun to take camping.
Sex fiends always seem to have kids, it's almost as though there's a connection
Where were all the three-way bang apps when I was unmarried? This is bullshit.
The reality.
Many moons ago, back when the universe seemed slightly more sane, a (quite pretty) friend of my wife-to-be apparently asked the two of us if we were interested in a three-way. I say apparently because she asked in a very non-transparent way to the point where I didn't understand what she was getting at.
She only brought it up again 2-3 years later saying - to paraphrase - "It's too bad you turned down sex with me when you had the chance."
Me: *jaw drops* What? When was this?
I had a very similar experience. A friend of my wife-to-be asked us both if we wanted to do a threeway. I immediately signaled my approval, though I was not as subtle as I should have been, my fiance wasn't keen on it and did take just a wee bit of offense that I was all about it.
Maybe if you hadn't answered: "I'd love a threesome with you! Who else should we invite?" it might have gone better.
ha ha that's actually not too far off. The enthusiasm was definitely there.
What was that you said about men always needing more than one partner, and it's only the veneer of human morality that places such importance on fidelity?
Creepy compared to investment bankers and New York lawyers? That's pretty harsh.
That is harsh. And if those guys were into going to an orgy where the "women were few and far between" my guess is they were not very interested in the ones who were there. NTTAWWT
I only clicked that to see if she is hot.
No pic, dammit.
In late breaking news, Super-asshole Martin Shkreli is investigated by the SEC:
http://hotair.com/archives/201.....for-fraud/
Karma is a bitch, but I would like reason to point out that this asshole is trying to game government rules to jack up prices on certain drugs rather than actually innovating. This guy is the OPPOSITE of a free market entrepeneur...
A rent seeking entrepreneur.
A rent seeking entrepreneur.
It's like this guy is trying to be a caricature of a capitalist.
selling a 62 year old drug that costs you a dollar to make for $750 with no fear of a competitor sounds like a government controlled centrally planned timeserving bureaucrat regulation failure.
Yeah, what he describes is pretty much the opposite of "a capitalist society, capitalist system and capitalist rules"
And no one mentions that it is government in the equation making this "capitalism" possible. Certainly not Bernie or Liddy...
Well, personally, I think it's obvious that what we need is MOAR REGULAYSHUNZ
Yeah. He sounds more like a prog on a mission to show that 'capitalism' is awful.
Open Relationships
The Cardinal Rule of sexual strategies:
For one gender's sexual strategy to succeed the other gender must compromise or abandon their own.
...For a female of any species to facilitate a methodology for breeding with the best genetic partner she's able to attract AND to ensure her own and her offspring's survival with the best provisioning partner; this is an evolutionary jackpot....
The bottom line is that men are more receptive to casual sex than women as a general rule. This means that it will usually be easier for women to enjoy the benefits of an open relationship than men. So if a couple is in an "open relationship" and they both are equally receptive to casual sex, the woman is going to get a lot more of it than the guy. Open relationships can favor the guy but only when the woman is not interested in looking elsewhere.
Yeah, that's got to be the major reason why open relationships aren't more popular. It's fun to fantasize, but I imagine most men aren't going to be too happy if their woman is getting laid and they aren't. It takes a very rare and special kind of person to make that work. Most people are either too insecure or too jealous.
I think it all comes down to not wanting to raise a kid that isn't yours.
Bingo. I could sorta see how people past child bearing age could get into such things. I mean whatever works for you. But how anyone who is young enough to have kids would is beyond me. Kids are enough of a pain in the ass as it is. To be willing raise someone else' kid because of you wanted to indulge some kink is just completely beyond my comprehension.
That is logical, but it's not like the guys who would want a relationship open on their end are swayed by the thought of someone else raising their kid. In practice I think it's more jealousy. Emotion, not logic is usually behind a double standard.
Yeah lap, people in general are naturally jealous. I would think it would be very hard to suspend that forever. Some people are more jealous than others and being too jealous and possessive can be very self destructive. But, to not be jealous at all is I would think very rare.
I think the internet exaggerates the actual frequency that these sorts of relationships exist. They are out there no doubt but they are overall pretty rare.
I always felt like jealousy is borne out of an evolutionary reaction to not wanting to raise a kid that isn't yours or part of your tribe.
You are probably right Idle Hands.
I could see the kid being a constant trigger of jealousy. But I don't think a guy who sees his wife with another man would be thinking "gosh what if they have a kid together!" In that moment it's probably baser emotions.
sure but in that instance it seems to mostly serve as a driver to leave a relationship, not for everyone but most. Most jealousy seems to stem from suspicion anyway and maybe that results in paying more attention to the relationship?
That there is a rational reason why sexual jealously exists does not mean that any particular instance of jealously that an individual feels is for rational reasons.
That could be the evolutionary reason for it. And probably enters some people conscious calculations. But for the most part I'd think it is more of a raw emotional reaction, particularly with the availability of birth control.
A women would feel jealous because you aren't paying enough attention/providing for her kid, so it's out protecting her offspring. And kind of the opposite for a man. Of course this is 100% pulled out of my ass but it could be plausible. More than likely their are many reasons for why the emotion has been developed and preserved over the years.
It is all fun and gams until it is totally one sided. Most swinging couples seem to be either men who are into their wives being with other men and their wives either like it or are indulging them or couples where the wife is just going through the motions to keep her husband happy by getting him laid.
That is all fine and good if it works for the people involved. it does not however work for most people.
Please tell me that this was intentional!!!
Sadly no.
Forget it, tarran, it's Johntown.
A few years ago I had a guy crash on my couch because his wife (and mother of his four children), was "swinging" without him. I felt it was I was obligated to inform him that they weren't really swingers if he isn't usually invited to their meet-ups.
I want to feel sorry for that guy but my God no one is that stupid. He must have either gotten off on her doing it without him or had such pathetic self esteem he thought he deserved it. Either way, I can't see how I can feel much sympathy for him. If he got off on it, good for him. If not, it is his own fault for being so pathetic. That is just sad.
Don't feel sorry for him.
I think it's pathetic in either case really. I get the whole fetish thing, that it's a sort of emotional masochism. But when it comes to actually having your wife, and mother of your children, plowed by other dudes and not even in the context of quid pro quo, that is just pathetic.
I don't get the fetish either Free Society. I think guys into that mostly just like to be humiliated, which I really don't get, or they love the idea of their wife being a whore, which I don't get either but not as much as I don't get the humiliation thing.
If you can empathize with a masochist then you can get it. Granted I'm not one, but I always try my best to empathize, to understand someone's train of thought. Sometimes physical, sometimes it's emotional. This is sometimes manifested as having a flare for drama and conflict, or in this case, experiencing pain in terms of humiliation or betrayal.
If they're happy, I don't see how it's pathetic necessarily. It probably is pathetic in most actual cases, but unusual relationship arrangements work for some people.
Unless you're gay!
That said, open relationships have always sounded like a lot of trouble.
Most people I've talked to about it say that swinging, open relationships, or anything of the sort should never be attempted unless you don't really care about that relationship anymore. Some others have said that it works great, but there seem to be a lot more people who advise against it.
For no particular reason.
Thinking a metaphor for China asserting territorial rights in the South China Sea.
The Cautionary Tale of Mickey Kaus, Contrarian Liberal Blogger Turned Trump Fan
Yes, in a parliament. Not so much in a two party first-past-the-post system.
Kaus is a good example of the type of person who is attracted to Trump. He is not a conservative. He is a Democrat. He is an old school FDR kind of Democrat who is patriotic, believes in government and thinks the government needs to act to protect the economic interests of the middle and lower middle class. His number one issue is immigration.
Exactly who can a guy like Klaus, and there are a lot of people like him, support other than Trump?
Exactly who can a guy like Klaus, and there are a lot of people like him, support other than Trump?
Sanders seems like an obvious choice as well, except for the patriotism I guess.
Kaus is an old school Democrat. He is not a socialist. He is pretty down the middle on economic issues. So Sanders is not an option.
I'd say FDR was as much a socialist as Bernie is, regardless of either man's willingness to embrace the term. They're very close on policy. Although you're probably right that a guy like Kaus sees them as different enough to make the distinction.
FDR really made all the same assumptions about human nature and society that the socialists and fascists were making. It's not surprising that his policies fit those molds.
Listening to journalists preen about their favored political candidates is like listening to pretentious teenagers call each other stupid for liking the wrong bands.
Donald Trump may in fact be the most credible candidate for presidency.
A cautionary tale? What the living fuck? These assholes really do believe not being a part of the hive is the most disastrous thing that can befall someone, don't they?
I was just scratching my head over that use of words.
I dont understand the majority of what they say because our assumptions about the world are all nearly polar opposites.
Yes. This
pretty much translates to "don't make waves".
Most Asylum Applicants Are Interviewed by Telephone
Press "one" for Arabic. *Blaaam*
exploding sheep?
Or alarm clocks.
Revenu Quebec pulled a good one on a contractor I know. Years ago he built a house to sell. They ran into some tiny problems regarding the buyer but he had a solution. So he called Rev Que to make sure it was legit to do so. They cleared it and said it was okay. Seven years later they reviewed his file and decided - because the law had changed in the interim - he owed them $12 000.
This is what tax collectors/agencies do to people. They literally have the power to act with impunity and potentially ruin lives.
Anyway. I lent him the money. He's good for it but what a story. Like he told me, 'I made a profit. I had the money then. But to come after me now when I don't is ruthless.' It would have cost him about $12 000 to fight it in court and get a reason (fuck you that's why is the reason) so it wasn't worth it.
All phone calls with tax collector should be recorded and given a number. If they come back and say something different later the tax payer should get to choose which interpretation is acceptable. That would be a non-FYTW system though.
He knows now.
Mourinho out:
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/34670192
Wow.
Yeah, all the BBC talk yesterday was that they had decided to keep him at least through this weekend but obviously something changed. Guardiola is supposed to be leaving Bayern at the end of the season so, current rumor is someone like Hiddink for the rest of the season, then Chelsea & Man City will compete for Pep.
And, Beneitez is apparently on a short leash at RM.
There are so few points scored in international football that the newsworthy topics are scandals, firings and trades.
Yeah, wow.
I'm sure they're beating down the door to take charge of a bunch of slackers.
Whoa. Seriously.
I think, unfortunately, that a court would still hold you responsible for the bad advice you receive from the IRS in the States.
Quebec sounds a lot like the State of Illinois.
Chicago and Montreal are art-deco, corrupted sister cities!
"He's a really brilliant and talented person, without any doubt," Putin declared.
Can anyone really argue against this? Trump is definitely talented at promoting Trump. His campaign is so retarded it's brilliant. This endorsement from one bully to another is just going to keep the Trump Train Trucking along.
That is true. Yes Trump was born with a lot of money but he has managed to be one hell of a self promoter. Love him or hate him, I don't think you can say he is stupid or talentless.
Hell of a self-promoter. Then again, so is Kim Kardashian. As a businessman, not so much
http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/.....dex-funds/
Milli Vanilli made millions and won a grammy award off of (pretending to sing) songs like this
No, I think its entirely fair to say Trump is stupid and talentless, and that the voting public WANTS a stupid and talentless candidate.
I think Putin could probably win both the GOP and DNC primaries.
That is an interesting question. I would like to say you are wrong. You might be but I honestly can't say for sure you are wrong. Our political class is just that pathetic.
I think Putin could probably win both either the GOP and DNC primaries.
All he would have to do is put the proper letter after his name, then spew blustery platitudes in support of the notions of the base.
Putin would win both primaries, then win an Oscar, then win the Stanley cup single handed.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/1.....book_nymag
Saudi millionaire cleared of rape after claiming he tripped and his penis accidentally penetrated the victim.
Insert Steve Smith joke here.
Did he trip on his penis?
Good question. If I were that girl's father, he wouldn't have to have to worry about tripping on his penis very much longer. I am a great believer in the legal system. At some point, however, you have an obligation to ensure justice where the legal system will not.
I have to wonder what happened here? Was this a case of blame the victim by the jury? Yeah, I agree, if someone harmed a loved one of mine they would be begging to go to prison for life after I get ahold of them.
John, did you read the first comment after the story (why didn't Bill Cosby think of this)? LOL.
No. But that is funny.
There is an old british legal argument about that. But you do have to give the legal system the chance first.
And in this case, that was done.
If my daughter got raped and the guy who did it was walking around free, I pretty much would never have a happy day again anyway. So, what would I have to lose by cutting his dick and nuts off? If I am miserable anyway, I might as well be in prison. And I would likely do okay in prison if I was there for cutting off the dick of the guy who raped my daughter. That is a respectable crime that would likely keep people from fucking with me.
"It was a million to one shot, doc. A million to one!"
+1 Fusilli Jerry.
+1 ASSMAN
I am guessing the jury was a sympathetic crowd.
My father was in London last year and said he didn't see any Englishmen.
I'm beginning to think you fuckers don't have the answer.
Duncan Sheik's Barely Breathing?
Beer
Cheers! I'm 5 in already.
Nice. I'm at work recovering from last nights beers.
"To alcohol! The cause of - and solution to - all of life's problems!"
-Homer S.
It's always Hitler. Or 42.
Or sometimes Steve Smith
Also, woodchippers
Don't forget Rule 34
I don't have any answers but I certainly have a lot of questions.
Like how many Wartys (Warties?) exist in this universe at a given moment? Is there some type of higher level equation to figure this out?
How many STEVE SMITH victims are there on a yearly basis?
How many memes does H&R generate in a month?
If you're walking through the forest with a canoe in your purse and the wheels fall off, how many red flags does it take to cover a dog house?
Fish.
He said RED flags.
So the answer is 'The Sphinx'.
If he'd sung it, then the answer would be 'fish'.
Like how many Wartys (Warties?) exist in this universe at a given moment? Is there some type of higher level equation to figure this out?
There is only one Warty, but He contains multitudes.
How many STEVE SMITH victims are there on a yearly basis?
All of them.
How many memes does H&R generate in a month?
What difference, at this point, does it make?
*golf clap*
Never change communism.
something tells me there would be plenty of people who would support this here.
If you are one of these guys why in gods name would you stay in China. The second it looks like someone might think you're guilty of something I'd be on a first class flight to somewhere warm for retirement.
Many did.
It's not exactly trivial to find permanent residence for yourself, your money, and your family (if you have one) in a foreign country when you're a high profile person in a place like China where your wealth and status is largely a result of your relationship with the ruling party.
I'd be discretely transferring an inconspicuous portion of my wealth into bitcoins and small diamonds and taking the family on a vacation to Hawaii. Here's a group of people that the US actually should be giving asylum to.
"Here's a group of people that the US actually should be giving asylum to."
I'd keep that brush a bit more narrow.
If you read much about the Russian 'businessmen', you'd prefer they stay at more than arms' length.
There's reason to believe that quite a few of the Chinese 'businessmen' also made their fortunes by gaming the 'privatization' process; Elon Musk ^n.
Fair point, though I'm inclined to think that small number of wealthy refugees are less problematic and less welfare dependent than a large number of poor ones that are pulling in $250k per year per household in welfare.
Hypocrites for Hillary!
"Clinton backs the Buffett rule; Buffett backs Clinton"
http://www.kcra.com/politics/c.....a/36995712
It doesn't matter to Buffet what the tax structure is - he'll still be a billionaire. Fuck him.
Yeah, it's like Obama wanting his kids to grow up without global warming. Heck, his grandkids will be multi-millionaires, as will Al Gore's. Do you really think any of them will be forced to cut back on unnecessary limo rides, private flights to the Caribbean, or trips to Paris or St. Mortiz?
Private jets for me, bikes for thee
Buffet is a regulatory capture whore. Folksy Buffet pretends not to understand the tax code and bemoans the unfairness to the little guy, and slick Buffet lobbies for rules which lead to gross over regulation and ultimately line the coffers of his insurance (among other) holdings.
Buffett takes a salary of $100K. He then takes free rides on the fractional-jets he owns, paying hotel and dining bills from his gap-gains (not mentioned in the 'tax 'em; they're rich' Buffett Plan).
The man is without shame.
I'd go a step further. He refuses to give portions of his wealth to his own family; his own blood on some work ethic garbage.
Bro, you leveraged the system in your favor. I don't think you can pick and choose where you're gonna be moralistic and daddy of the year.
He's so annoying.
Choose to be strong, you weak fucks.
Seems like an impressive story so far, but I cannot see his taut abs, so I have already dismissed this workout.
I wouldn't turn him down.
I'm wondering if Reason will be posting an article on the Repub's hideous shitshow of an omnibus spending bill, one that gave the Dems everything they wanted, and gave the Repub base nothing it wanted.
And the Repub establishment wonders why their own base hates them, and is looking for any alternative, even one as odious as Trump.
The Republican Party's entire purpose seems to be to give Democrats everything they want.
My God is Paul Ryan worse than anyone ever imagined? What a fucking shitbag. He just shows that you cannot ever trust anyone who is considered a "Washington Wonk". I don't care what they say. Ryan is in bed with the beltway culture and sold the country out in the name of "bi partisanship" the first chance he got.
Don't tell me that is the best they can do. Bullshit. We have a lame duck President and big majorities in both houses. Ryan is happy with that shit.
It's indeed a terrible bill, but I suspect Ryan knows that the media scrutiny is going to be most intense this cycle, accepting the short-term loss as part of a bigger long-term strategy.
I have no fucking idea why I'm giving that shitbag slaver the benefit of the doubt here, as I have never had any faith in his being anything but an asshole.
accepting the short-term loss as part of a bigger long-term strategy
What long-term strategy? And how does giving the Dems everything they want advance it, exactly?
"Once every terrorist is dead, and the GOP controls the White House and has overwhelming majorities in both houses, and every media outlet can be counted on to stop attacking our motives, then and only then will we start 'reducing government' by demanding government spending only increase by 3% every year when the Democrats call for 5% increases." Typical GOP establishment figure who scares you into voting Republican "because you wouldn't want those big spending Democrats to win would you?"
Yeah, I keep hearing that too. The dems keep getting what they want over and over again and the Rs sell it as a short term loss as part of a bigger long term strategy.
It probably is true, it's just not a long term strategy for the people we think they are talking about.
Putin respects strength above all else. Let that sink in for a moment.